Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The second amendment encourages the registration of firearms
That is a correct interpretation of the 2nd Amendment. Because state militias are necessary, the Fed Gov will not infringe on the right of the people. That is all it means. It's a limit on Fedaral power.The second amendment encourages the registration of firearms
You could probably only make a case for that at the state level. Not the federal level. The second exists for the sole purpose of defending the states against federal usurpers. It'd be contradictory to say that the feds have that power. That's 10th amendment territory. Technically a federal registration would be usurpment in and of itself
Please explain.The second amendment encourages the registration of firearms
The facts that are completely against firearm registration are immeasurable. In all cases it was implemented it was used by some governing entity to CONFISCATE FIREARMS from the CITIZENS.
The facts that are completely against firearm registration are immeasurable. In all cases it was implemented it was used by some governing entity to CONFISCATE FIREARMS from the CITIZENS.
Immeasurable he says!!
The facts that are completely against firearm registration are immeasurable. In all cases it was implemented it was used by some governing entity to CONFISCATE FIREARMS from the CITIZENS.
Immeasurable he says!!
Immeasurable-too large, extensive, or extreme to measure. (you're welcome)
The second doesn’t mention personal protection...Personal protection is the basis for the second amendment when it was penned just as it is now. Funny it takes longer now than it did then for a lawman to come to the rescue and he has to think whether saving your life is worth being charged with a crime by some liberal pile of shit, or being tried or sued for shooting some thug.
The second amendment has nothing that even hints at registration. Only a idiot that surely doesn’t merit the right to own a firearm would support their registration.
It does say well regulated.The second amendment has nothing that even hints at registration. Only a idiot that surely doesn’t merit the right to own a firearm would support their registration.
Well, they're probably using that 'well regulated' line as the premise.
A well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free stateThe second amendment encourages the registration of firearms
No, it doesn't. It's not even worth the time to elaborate as your statement is wrong on its face.
You are correct, but it does declare that individuals have a pre-constitutional inalienable right to keep and bear arms, and that the power to regulate arms was to be strictly reserved to the States and kept from Federal authority.The second doesn’t mention personal protection...
A well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free stateThe second amendment encourages the registration of firearms
No, it doesn't. It's not even worth the time to elaborate as your statement is wrong on its face.
You cannot regulate your militias without registering the weapons and knowing what you have available to you to keep your state secure