Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For example, a woman who wanted to prevent pregnancy would not be allowed health insurance coverage for oral contraceptives or a tubal ligation, a surgical procedure in which a woman's fallopian tubes are blocked, tied, or cut to permanently prevent pregnancy.
However, the bill does provide that a woman with endometriosis, which causes pain, irregular bleeding and infertility, could be treated using oral contraceptives, but she would have to first submit a claim to her employer providing evidence of the medical condition. If the employer decided to cover the oral contraceptive for medical reasons and not pregnancy prevention, the woman would be charged an administrative fee.
Ariz.: Boss can ask about birth control - Health - Lifestyle - Dalje.com
It is no employer's business to be privy to the private lives of their employees in this manner.
Employers can decide what type of coverage they wish to provide as an employment benefit (for example not paying for contraception coverage if it violates their religious views), however I do agree with you that it is not the employers business what goes on between me and my doctor, just like its not the govt's business either (obamacare).
who go fired?
Hell, everybody knows the answer to that. It is the woman who won't put out for the horny boss once he finds out that she is on birth control pills.
I can see it now, in the bosses office, "Damn it bitch either put out or get out. I'm in charge here and one of my benefits is sex with whomever I want. If you don't want to play, go find another job."
And yes there really are people like that. In my home town my father helped men like that to disappear never to be seen again. Now a days that is considered illegal (the disapearances) and most men will not protect their women or girlfriends from predators.
Oh wonderful, Nuebarth the retard is back. Do you realize how colossally stupid you come off?
the thread title should be changed to
The Official Ravi is full of shit thread
the thread title should be changed to
The Official Ravi is full of shit thread
That would be an appropriate name for any thread she participates in.
A proposed new law in Arizona would give employers the power to request that women being prescribed birth control pills provide proof that they're using it for non-sexual reasons. And because Arizona's an at-will employment state, that means that bosses critical of their female employees' sex lives could fire them as a result.Law Will Allow Employers to Fire Women for Using Whore PillsYesterday, a Senate Judiciary Committee endorsed Republican Debbie Lesko's HB2625 by a vote of 6-2, which would allow an employer to request proof that a woman using insurance to buy birth control was being prescribed the birth control for reasons other than not wanting to get pregnant. It's all about freedom, she said
The freedom comment was really the icing on the cake.
And ... cue the "conservatives" saying there is not a war on women.
LOL OK stretch armstrongwho go fired?
Hell, everybody knows the answer to that. It is the woman who won't put out for the horny boss once he finds out that she is on birth control pills.
I can see it now, in the bosses office, "Damn it bitch either put out or get out. I'm in charge here and one of my benefits is sex with whomever I want. If you don't want to play, go find another job."
And yes there really are people like that. In my home town my father helped men like that to disappear never to be seen again. Now a days that is considered illegal (the disapearances) and most men will not protect their women or girlfriends from predators.
Oh wonderful, Nuebarth the retard is back. Do you realize how colossally stupid you come off?
It authorizes employers the right to use health care coverage that does not provide for contraception. This can be overcome by a medical report that the medication is necessary to treat a medical condition. It takes away no more rights than requiring a medical report that a nose job or eyelift is necessary to treat a medical condition rather than used for elective cosmetic surgery.
No one is denying women the right to use contraceptives at all. Libs are presenting this as some sort of right of an employer to fire women who are on the pill. Obviously that's not true. If a woman lies and presents a fraudulent medical report, that is fraud separate from her right to take the pill. Not to mention that a doctor writing a fraudulent medical report would have his own problems.
For example, a woman who wanted to prevent pregnancy would not be allowed health insurance coverage for oral contraceptives or a tubal ligation, a surgical procedure in which a woman's fallopian tubes are blocked, tied, or cut to permanently prevent pregnancy.
However, the bill does provide that a woman with endometriosis, which causes pain, irregular bleeding and infertility, could be treated using oral contraceptives, but she would have to first submit a claim to her employer providing evidence of the medical condition. If the employer decided to cover the oral contraceptive for medical reasons and not pregnancy prevention, the woman would be charged an administrative fee.
Ariz.: Boss can ask about birth control - Health - Lifestyle - Dalje.com
It is no employer's business to be privy to the private lives of their employees in this manner.
Employers can decide what type of coverage they wish to provide as an employment benefit (for example not paying for contraception coverage if it violates their religious views), however I do agree with you that it is not the employers business what goes on between me and my doctor, just like its not the govt's business either (obamacare).
Just goes to show the health insurance mandate is a slippery slope which goes against the best interest of individual freedom... Let's insist on access to affordable health insurance entirely independent of employment!
I guess she'd get fired.
I also wonder, what would happen if the doctor lied? A doctor is ethically bound to treat their patients, not dance to some stupid corporate bullshit. Is it ethical to deny a woman a birth control prescription out of fear of reprisal?
Give Tax Deductions to Individuals Who Don't Have Access to Employer Health Insurance - Romney believes that individuals should be able to have the same tax advantages as an employer when purchasing health insurance. It isn't fair that an individual be penalized with higher rates for health insurance simply because his/her employer doesn't provide it. Such a penalty dissuades many from buying insurance when it is not offered by their employer. Romney wants to level the playing field. Give consumers a choice of going with their employers plan or purchasing insurance on their own on the open market. Don't lock consumers into one path.
if you sign such a statement falsely, your insurance will be terminated for fraud. because insurance companies will do medical audits. they will also have the right to deny coverage if they think the contraceptives are "medically unnecessary".
Employers can decide what type of coverage they wish to provide as an employment benefit (for example not paying for contraception coverage if it violates their religious views), however I do agree with you that it is not the employers business what goes on between me and my doctor, just like its not the govt's business either (obamacare).
Just goes to show the health insurance mandate is a slippery slope which goes against the best interest of individual freedom... Let's insist on access to affordable health insurance entirely independent of employment!
As long as no one like Mittens Romney Or Barack Obummer are FORCING me to buy said affordable health care I'm on board
Romneycare Vs. Obamacare
For a more detailed summary, click here to visit Mitt Romney Central's health care page.
RomneyCare The Truth about Massachusetts Health Care | Mitt Romney Central
A recent article in The New Yorker magazine states that "Romney had accomplished a longstanding Democratic goal - universal health insurance - by combining three conservative policies." In other words, Romney had beaten Democrats at their own goal of providing universal health insurance. But Romney's novel approach accomplished this goal not with a government takeover, but with conservative principles. The success of Romney's healthcare law led many Democrats to consider adopting a similar approach to achieving universal health insurance.
The article goes on to say that in 2006 when Romneycare was passed, "most conservatives praised Romney's plan." The Bush administration sent a letter praising the passage of the new law. An often overlooked fact is that without the support of the Bush administration, Romney's healthcare law never would have become a reality.
The Boston Globe editorial board recently published an article defending Romneycare on conservative grounds. The editorial board states "the role Romney played on the state level was skillful, creative, and business friendly. Romney was a governor sensitive to business concerns and worried about the state's business climate."
Just goes to show the health insurance mandate is a slippery slope which goes against the best interest of individual freedom... Let's insist on access to affordable health insurance entirely independent of employment!
As long as no one like Mittens Romney Or Barack Obummer are FORCING me to buy said affordable health care I'm on board
Romneycare Vs. Obamacare
For a more detailed summary, click here to visit Mitt Romney Central's health care page.
RomneyCare The Truth about Massachusetts Health Care | Mitt Romney Central
A recent article in The New Yorker magazine states that "Romney had accomplished a longstanding Democratic goal - universal health insurance - by combining three conservative policies." In other words, Romney had beaten Democrats at their own goal of providing universal health insurance. But Romney's novel approach accomplished this goal not with a government takeover, but with conservative principles. The success of Romney's healthcare law led many Democrats to consider adopting a similar approach to achieving universal health insurance.
The article goes on to say that in 2006 when Romneycare was passed, "most conservatives praised Romney's plan." The Bush administration sent a letter praising the passage of the new law. An often overlooked fact is that without the support of the Bush administration, Romney's healthcare law never would have become a reality.
The Boston Globe editorial board recently published an article defending Romneycare on conservative grounds. The editorial board states "the role Romney played on the state level was skillful, creative, and business friendly. Romney was a governor sensitive to business concerns and worried about the state's business climate."
Mitt Romney and Healthcare: Romneycare Vs. Obamacare
Just goes to show the health insurance mandate is a slippery slope which goes against the best interest of individual freedom... Let's insist on access to affordable health insurance entirely independent of employment!
As long as no one like Mittens Romney Or Barack Obummer are FORCING me to buy said affordable health care I'm on board
Romneycare Vs. Obamacare
For a more detailed summary, click here to visit Mitt Romney Central's health care page.
RomneyCare The Truth about Massachusetts Health Care | Mitt Romney Central
A recent article in The New Yorker magazine states that "Romney had accomplished a longstanding Democratic goal - universal health insurance - by combining three conservative policies." In other words, Romney had beaten Democrats at their own goal of providing universal health insurance. But Romney's novel approach accomplished this goal not with a government takeover, but with conservative principles. The success of Romney's healthcare law led many Democrats to consider adopting a similar approach to achieving universal health insurance.
The article goes on to say that in 2006 when Romneycare was passed, "most conservatives praised Romney's plan." The Bush administration sent a letter praising the passage of the new law. An often overlooked fact is that without the support of the Bush administration, Romney's healthcare law never would have become a reality.
The Boston Globe editorial board recently published an article defending Romneycare on conservative grounds. The editorial board states "the role Romney played on the state level was skillful, creative, and business friendly. Romney was a governor sensitive to business concerns and worried about the state's business climate."
Mitt Romney and Healthcare: Romneycare Vs. Obamacare
).
if you sign such a statement falsely, your insurance will be terminated for fraud. because insurance companies will do medical audits. they will also have the right to deny coverage if they think the contraceptives are "medically unnecessary".
More Big Lie demagoguery from the shameful scum of the fucking liars party.
Piss on you, you lying pile of shit.
Does Romney believe that the state of Arizona can force woman to pay an extra fee to their employer to prove that she isn't using birth control for birth control?As long as no one like Mittens Romney Or Barack Obummer are FORCING me to buy said affordable health care I'm on board
Romneycare Vs. Obamacare
For a more detailed summary, click here to visit Mitt Romney Central's health care page.
RomneyCare The Truth about Massachusetts Health Care | Mitt Romney Central
A recent article in The New Yorker magazine states that "Romney had accomplished a longstanding Democratic goal - universal health insurance - by combining three conservative policies." In other words, Romney had beaten Democrats at their own goal of providing universal health insurance. But Romney's novel approach accomplished this goal not with a government takeover, but with conservative principles. The success of Romney's healthcare law led many Democrats to consider adopting a similar approach to achieving universal health insurance.
The article goes on to say that in 2006 when Romneycare was passed, "most conservatives praised Romney's plan." The Bush administration sent a letter praising the passage of the new law. An often overlooked fact is that without the support of the Bush administration, Romney's healthcare law never would have become a reality.
The Boston Globe editorial board recently published an article defending Romneycare on conservative grounds. The editorial board states "the role Romney played on the state level was skillful, creative, and business friendly. Romney was a governor sensitive to business concerns and worried about the state's business climate."
Mitt Romney and Healthcare: Romneycare Vs. Obamacare
In regard to ObamaCare, Romney firmly believes that each state should have the right to craft its own health care program. In his book, No Apology, Romney states:
"My own preference is to let each state fashion its own program to meet the distinct needs of its citizens. States could follow the Massachusetts model if they choose, or they could develop plans of their own. These plans, tested in the state 'laboratories of democracy,' could be evaluated, compared, improved upon, and adopted by others."
In keeping with the belief that states should be able to craft their own programs, Romney has said that on his first day as president, he would issue a waiver to all 50 states allowing them to opt out of ObamaCare. This waiver would allow states to postpone the implementation of ObamaCare while Romney works with congress to formally repeal the bill.
First of all, the bill doesn't state that a woman can be fired for being on the pill. It simply gives employers the right to require a woman to sign a statement that the pill is not being used for sexual purposes.
The article then points out that Arizona is a right to work state which means that if the woman claims it is for sexual purposes she could be fired for it and there would be nothing she or anyone else can do about it.
That being said, this is one mother f'ing stupid bill. The state has no business interfereing in this.
Immie
PS Please excuse the French.
