First they complained about the makeup of the commission.........

It was a brute force attack on Congress to halt the constitutionally mandated process of counting the EC votes for the winner of the presidential election. That was not the only Trump Plot they have discovered many details of relating to illegal activities trying to overturn the election results.
It was a tepid effort at best by a mob none of whom were armed. And it wasn’t to halt anything. It was to delay a presumed invalid certification. (Many if you libtards start braying like jackasses at this point, so I’ll head you off. Noting the distinction between what you claim and what they apparently really sought to do isn’t a defense of what they sought to do. But if we’re going to discuss it, your propaganda spin shouldn’t control the discussion.)

There has been no evidence of any Trump “plot,” at all. There was no evidence of any effort to overturn “the” election results. There were some plans to prevent the theft of the “actual” election results — as they saw it.

In totality, beyond lib fantasy and spin, the 1/6 scam committee hasn’t accomplished anything. Of course, no actual accomplishment was ever the intent.
 
The speaker may have the right but they usually never exercise it. Here they decided they wanted quisling RINO's.

The committee has been a shitshow, you just don't see it because you are too busy jerking off to it.
Ha ha....

Lets compare that to Trump...

  • Pardons friends as a method of keeping there loyalty...
  • Didn't concede
  • Told a pack of lies about the Election
  • ....
Could you ever fuck off with norms... Trump took a shit on norms... This is what you get back...
 
Ha ha....

Lets compare that to Trump...

  • Pardons friends as a method of keeping there loyalty...
  • Didn't concede
  • Told a pack of lies about the Election
  • ....
Could you ever fuck off with norms... Trump took a shit on norms... This is what you get back...

No, we get a demented doddering old fool and people who think women have penises running things.
 
This isn't a "kangaroo court" at all. In fact, it's not a court at all. It's a body which is gathering evidence. That's all they're doing. They're finding out how January 6th happened, and why.

Republicans have claimed it was a "spontaneous demonstration" that got out of hand. But the evidence shows that it was anything but a spontaneous demonstration at all. It was planned and orchestrated to be a violent insurrection to frighten House members into overturning the election.
Show is the evidence of the planning of a violent insurrection, Dumbass.
 
.........which was BS since Dems agreed to a 9/11 style commission.

WASHINGTON — House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., on Tuesday voiced opposition to legislation to create a bipartisan commission to investigate the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

In a lengthy statement a day before the House is set to vote on the measure, McCarthy complained about the negotiations, argued that multiple investigations into the riot already exist and said he wants the panel to also look into other instances of violence.

The legislation is the product of a compromise announced Friday by the top Democrat and Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, Reps. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and John Katko, R-N.Y., who reached a deal on the guidelines for the panel to model it after the 9/11 Commission.


Then they claimed no one was paying attention, which is self-evidently absurd since the revelations from the hearings have consistently been stunning front page news and the talk of the board.

Then they claimed the hearings were one sided despite the fact that the witnesses who theoretically would be presenting the Trumpian point of view refused to testify for fear of self incrimination and or to protect the Orange Insurrectionist.

Then they claimed the hearings lacked due process. Well, yeah, they are hearings, not a legal proceeding. The evidentiary standards are not the same as in a court case. Anyone who is indicted will have an opportunity to defend themselves in court. Everyone understands that except Trumpleton's.

Then they claimed it was all hearsay even though the irrefutable fact is that witness testimony has corroborated the evidence, and the testimony of other witnesses, not disputed it.

What next? How about Liz Cheney wears Army boots. Yeah but.........Hillary. Inflation! Hey......squirrel.
Americans don't give a fuck about this fake bullshit. It will backfire come election time. And when you try to cheat again we're going to burn down the house
 
Which lawmaker was in immediate danger from Babbit so that she had to killed on the spot?
Looked like a point of no return since it was the last door into the hallway that would let the MOB into the House Chamber. She was the tip of the spear and that spear was blunted. To bad she was swept up in the Great Trump Lie. He is the real architect of her shooting. Had he not lied to her she would still be alive.
 
Looked like a point of no return since it was the last door into the hallway that would let the MOB into the House Chamber. She was the tip of the spear and that spear was blunted. To bad she was swept up in the Great Trump Lie. He is the real architect of her shooting. Had he not lied to her she would still be alive.
they weren't there.
 
the other.


Facts you ignore. you're actually childish.

Remarkable insight from a 13 second clip. The committee has released much more footage which shows how officers had to pull back once they were out flanked. Why do you think the article stated it like this?

"it appears DC Metropolitan Police removed barriers to allow clear access by protestors into the Capitol building."
 
Looked like a point of no return since it was the last door into the hallway that would let the MOB into the House Chamber. She was the tip of the spear and that spear was blunted. To bad she was swept up in the Great Trump Lie. He is the real architect of her shooting. Had he not lied to her she would still be alive.
That "tip of the spear," and "point of no return," idea? Is that in the Capital Police training manuals? Or any police training manual in the United States?

If an ANTIFA or BLM rioter had been summarily executed like that, liberals would have been outraged. And for once in their sad existences, they would have been right.

You lose credibility in all you say about Jan 6th when you refuse to admit what poor to the point of criminality police work the killing of Ashli Babbitt was.

Hell, you don't even have to "admit" it. Just say, "of course that was a bad shooting, no one in their right mind would defend it, but . . . " and then go on to blame Trump for putting her and the officer in the situation. That would be credible at least.
 
It was to delay a presumed invalid certification.
There was no valid or legal challenge to any states certified election. Just the objections of the loser in the form of unsubstantiated allegations of widespread multi state fraud.
There has been no evidence of any Trump “plot,” at all.
What did the Trumpyberra pressure Pence so hard to do, and why did he pressure him? Who directed the effort to have fraudulent slates of electors sent to Congress?
 
Remarkable insight from a 13 second clip. The committee has released much more footage which shows how officers had to pull back once they were out flanked. Why do you think the article stated it like this?

"it appears DC Metropolitan Police removed barriers to allow clear access by protestors into the Capitol building."
No national guard . Why not?
 
There was no valid or legal challenge to any states certified election. Just the objections of the loser in the form of unsubstantiated allegations of widespread multi state fraud
There were affidavits to clean up. Didn’t happen. No authority for the certification
 
....doing the marching and surrounding the Capitol like that? It would have been tear gas and rubber bullets from word go!
Yes, as the National Guard would have been prepared to do to the Capital rioters, if Pelosi had accepted the Trump admininstration's offer.
 
Yes, as the National Guard would have been prepared to do to the Capital rioters, if Pelosi had accepted the Trump admininstration's offer.
Even if there was a legitimate offer, what makes you think the Speaker or the Majority Leader, had a say in it? Why would that stop the Commander in Chief from picking up the phone and ordering that the Capitol and Congress be protected after it became clear the building was breached?
 
Even if there was a legitimate offer, what makes you think the Speaker or the Majority Leader, had a say in it? Why would that stop the Commander in Chief from picking up the phone and ordering that the Capitol and Congress be protected after it became clear the building was breached?
No pivot point for you is there? Bullheaded ass to anything. True demofk. Never agree to negotiate
 
Even if there was a legitimate offer, what makes you think the Speaker or the Majority Leader, had a say in it? Why would that stop the Commander in Chief from picking up the phone and ordering that the Capitol and Congress be protected after it became clear the building was breached?
Respect for a co-equal branch of government that had expressed a desire not to have the National Guard.
 
There was no valid or legal challenge to any states certified election. Just the objections of the loser in the form of unsubstantiated allegations of widespread multi state fraud.

Thanks for sharing your mere opinion.
What did the Trumpyberra pressure Pence so hard to do, and why did he pressure him?

Let me translate your nonsense. President Trump didn’t “pressure” Vice President Pence to do anything. Nobody can say why he did an alleged thing which he didn’t, in fact, do.
Who directed the effort to have fraudulent slates of electors sent to Congress?
Nobody. There were no fraudulent slates of electors. There were slates of proposed alternative electors.
 

Forum List

Back
Top