- Jan 22, 2020
- 13,945
- 12,625
- 2,290
I have watched the testimony
Trump’s peaceful protest has been discussed along with those who made him put it in the speech
Cool story bro. Doesn’t answer the question but you know that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have watched the testimony
Trump’s peaceful protest has been discussed along with those who made him put it in the speech
McCarthy Won. Hands down. The illicit fake committee has lived down to its beginnings.Pelosi outplayed McCarthy on this one
He thought he could block the commission, Nancy outplayed him at every step and Republicans ended up outside looking in
You Trumpleton's should listen to these guys.
Ex-cultists deliver the most effective message for Republicans
Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), determined to rescue her party from the MAGA cult, has gone out of her way to offer her fellow Republicans models of exemplary behavior to follow. Her argument: Don’t copy the example of defeated former president Donald Trump. Look instead to Republican officials who stood up to the defeated former president, such as former acting attorney general Jeffrey Rosen, Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers or even former vice president Mike Pence.
Two rather sad characters conveyed this “you don’t have to keep following Trump blindly” message at the House Jan. 6 select committee’s hearing on Tuesday. One was former Oath Keepers spokesperson Jason Van Tatenhove; the other was Stephen Ayres, who illegally entered the Capitol on Jan. 6. Both appeared deflated, diminished and embarrassed by their association with insurgents based on the “big lie” of a stolen election.
Again, every panel member who was in the Capital that day is a material witness. You "summarily" dismisding facts does not change them into non-facts.McCarthy forced Pelosi's hand by first rejecting the compromise that was reached on a 9/11 style bipartisan commission, then putting up two Repubs who were material witnesses to what happened on 1/6. He did so intentionally. How many times are you going to deny the facts?
the dude berg thinks the committee folks are jurors. hahahaahahahahahahahahaha and that two mccarthey reps is stacking the panel. hahahahaahahahahah His brain must be mosh.McCarthy Won. Hands down. The illicit fake committee has lived down to its beginnings.
seriously dude, stop while you can. If that was the case there wouldn't have been a need for this thread. fk dude, go the fk back to your tinker toys already.Have you noticed nothing you're saying would have changed the testimony we've heard?
Berg TDSingThe Orange Messiah doesn't think so. Ironically, it was Trump that McCarthy was trying to please when he decided to take his ball and go home.
That's the most stupid thing anyone has said on this thread.Again, every panel member who was in the Capital that day is a material witness.
EXACTLY, EXACTLY And they don't even know the difference between a cross examiner and a juror. I mean seriously, how can one have a legitimate discussion with these towel heads?Again, every panel member who was in the Capital that day is a material witness. You "summarily" dismisding facts does not change them into non-facts.
McCarthy proposed members who were potential witnesses and compromised
There were 212 other Republican Congress members available to serve. McCarthy forbid them to serve on the panel.
I've explained it in several posts. search my name and read up. everyone was in that building that's on that panel, as such, they are all witnesses.That's the most stupid thing anyone has said on this thread.
![]()
Trump, Jordan spoke for 10 minutes morning of Jan. 6 attack
Former President Trump and Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) spoke on the phone for 10 minutes the morning of the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol in 2021, two sources told CNN.The two sources reviewed call …thehill.com
There was “testimony”??? Maybe that’s a matter of definition.Have you noticed nothing you're saying would have changed the testimony we've heard?
why were they declined? what would that be about. It's his picks. see again, you lied. don't you don anything else?Because after his first picks were declined, McCarthy used this as an excuse to walk away from the Committee. As usual, Republicans playing political games and fuck the people, the Constitution, and the rule of law.
If he had won, he wouldn’t be whining so loudlyMcCarthy Won. Hands down. The illicit fake committee has lived down to its beginnings.
well, they aren't investigators, the FBI is and they have already finished. kangaroo court to grandstand and shame someone. Ain't working.There was “testimony”??? Maybe that’s a matter of definition.
Have you noticed that the committee hasn’t revealed anything that wasn’t already in the news? Have you noticed that they haven’t actually “investigated” a damn thing?
Didn’t think so.
Jurors can ask questions in many courts actually. Its just not used regularlyMarty, his post was absolutely hilarious the reps aren’t jurors. How many jurors you see asking questions of a witness. It’s deflection