Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, basically fluke was doing the old dimwit twist the lie to look like the truth trick. She is a liar and a fluke.If that's the case, Dragon then Ms. Fluke would be best served not to make statements like the following:
Why? I'm perfectly capable of understanding that she was using a particular case as an illustration to point out a principle, and that she was talking about the principle rather than asking for something for herself alone.
Why is it so hard for YOU to figure that out?
First of all you tell me that Fluke wasn't talking about "herself" at all but when I quote her and show you that she was INDEED doing just that...you do a rhetorical song and dance and state that she was talking about "the principle" and not asking for something for herself? Then you ask if it's too hard for me to figure out?
When you're using double talk like that to explain your point of view...yeah, I'm having a hard time figuring it out.
"...using a particular case as an illustration to point out a principle and that she was talking about the principle rather than asking for something for herself..."
What Ms. Fluke DID was use another student's medical problems with ovarian cysts to "illustrate" the hardship that not having birth control pills covered under the health plan at Georgetown caused for Fluke and her fellow students...but then Fluke admited that the woman with the ovarian cysts actually DOES get covered for her birth control pills. So why even bring the woman up in the first place? If that was the best "illustration" that Ms Fluke could come up with...it's pretty obvious that there isn't a real problem there in the first place...know what I mean? Fluke is studying to be a lawyer? Studying to be a lawyer but making an argument like that? If I were the judge and I heard testimony like that I'd have a nice little "chat" with Ms. Fluke about not bringing nonsensical testimony into my courtroom.
Wow. An actual excuse for Fluke making shit up! Amazing.
Whether Fluke was telling the truth in the examples she presented, and whether there is an excuse for that, is irrelevant to this thread and no concern of mine here.
All I am saying here is that the fact she was able to take a trip to Spain MEANS NOTHING. I am particularly riding this bullshit because I have seen it brought out before, e.g. about Occupy, and it's absolute garbage. People advocating for a cause are asking for something for EVERYONE, not just for themselves. Offering advice to improve their personal situation, or pointing out that their personal situation is fine and needs no attention, is completely bogus and needs to get the smack-down whenever it's presented.
Nor does the validity of Fluke's argument that contraceptives should be required coverage in health-care policies depend on whether she, personally, was being completely honest in her testimony. That might be relevant to an assessment of her character, but not to the validity of the cause she's advocating for. So unless you're writing her biography, or you're mad at her for stealing your boyfriend, there's no good reason for you to harp on it.
What all of this says to me is that the opponents of covering birth control can't make their cases without resort to logical fallacies.
Privacy is a right. The choice to use contraception falls under the right of privacy.
OE: This post was neg repped by KosherGirl.
Privacy is a right. The choice to use contraception falls under the right of privacy.
OE: This post was neg repped by KosherGirl.
You may have the right to purchase contraceptives, but you don't have the right to have them provided to you at no cost.
You have the right to request.
But having them provided to you in your insurance isn't a right.
Loser.
I don't think any employer should be forced to provide insurance in the first place.
And I don't think the government should tell insurance companies what they must cover.
That's just me. It has nothing to do with religion.
I don't think any employer should be forced to provide insurance in the first place.
And I don't think the government should tell insurance companies what they must cover.
That's just me. It has nothing to do with religion.
I never understood why we would want our employer to make healthcare decisions for us anyway
Wow. What amazing efforts you make to cover up the fact Fluke lied!
Birth control is legal and affordable, no one is saying those who want to take it can't.
The government shouldn't force insurance companies to pay for any more than they should force insurance companies to pay for my make up. You realize it makes me feel better, therefore it's necessary for my mental health. I think my insurance company needs to pay for all my personal stuff.![]()
Privacy is a right. The choice to use contraception falls under the right of privacy.
OE: This post was neg repped by KosherGirl.
You may have the right to purchase contraceptives, but you don't have the right to have them provided to you at no cost.
But you do have a right to request that they be included in the insurance you pay for
Birth control is legal and affordable, no one is saying those who want to take it can't.
The government shouldn't force insurance companies to pay for any more than they should force insurance companies to pay for my make up. You realize it makes me feel better, therefore it's necessary for my mental health. I think my insurance company needs to pay for all my personal stuff.![]()
I don't get your point?
Of course you don't.....
So, here it is: If you can afford to travel to Spain, you can afford to buy your own fucking birth control.
There ya go.
Pregnancy is an illness?