teapartysamurai
Gold Member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 20,056
- 2,562
And conservatives argue by claiming that the Supreme Court has been getting it wrong since 1803.No, the USSC doesn't, according to the Constitution.
That was Madison vs. Marbury and the USSC just did a power grab in claiming that last word on the Constitution for themselves.
Another example of bad law by passed by an out of control USSC.
It should have been resisted a lontg time ago.
So after we get rid of the Supreme Court, how do you plan to strike down state laws that you believe violate the 1st amendment religious protections, or violate the 2nd amendment?
This is how liberal argue when they are losing.
They create false alternatives and straw men and expect you to fall for the premise of arguing from those false narratives.
Would you please show where I called for "getting rid" of the USSC.
When you do that, let me know.
So you agree with:
Plessy vs. Fergusen (Separate but Equal) Plessy v. Ferguson - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Dred Scott vs. Sanford: (Blacks are not Citizens) Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Korematsu v. U.S. 1944 (Right to Intern the Japanese) Korematsu v. United States - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Or how about Bush v. Gore, that gets you libs's panties in such a bunch?
Aren't those decisions gone?
I thought you said the Supreme Court was the last word?
Um, no YOU guys said it was the last word.
I'm saying these are examples of why that's wrong.