For Every Democrat Who Used The Word "Insurrection"....

[citygator]

REUTERS – The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials.

As you know they never said it wasn’t an insurrection. They said it wasn’t centrally organized. That’s a big difference.

 

[Chillicothe]

........they didn’t find any evidence of an insurrection you dumb leftist.

The FBI has found scant evidence........

--------------------------------------------------------

Yeah, even tho he ain't the brightest candle on the cake....even my poor avatar recognizes there's a notable difference between ...not any.....and "scant".

So I'll give him credit for noting the difference.

Eh?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

As you know they never said it wasn’t an insurrection. They said it wasn’t centrally organized. That’s a big difference.

Nope. If not organized it has zero chance of doing anything. You lose worm eater.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

--------------------------------------------------------

Yeah, even tho he ain't the brightest candle on the cake....even my poor avatar recognizes there's a notable difference between ...not any.....and "scant".

So I'll give him credit for noting the difference.

Eh?

Scant means zippo baby. Means it’s a nothing burger. But you’re still a dumb leftist.

 

[Chillicothe]

"But you’re still a dumb leftist."

----------------------------------------------------------------
Well, good poster Defiler, you are half right on that.
Accordingly, take your victories where you find 'em.

'Cause they ain't always easy for you.
For example: Poster Defiler scolds the forum with --"Scant means zippo baby."
But the dictionaries offer: "Scant --- having a small supply."

Defiler, it's gotta be hard being you. No?

At least you can spell. A hat tip.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

----------------------------------------------------------------
Well, good poster Defiler, you are half right on that.
Accordingly, take your victories where you find 'em.

'Cause they ain't always easy for you.
For example: Poster Defiler scolds the forum with --"Scant means zippo baby."
But the dictionaries offer: "Scant --- having a small supply."

Defiler, it's gotta be hard being you. No?

At least you can spell. A hat tip.

So you admit you’re a dumb leftist. Thank you. There is scant evidence that you’re not a dumb leftist.

 

[Chillicothe]

I kinda sorta think I got a Bazinga!

Like Defiler...... I gotta take my victories wherever I find 'em.
Am pretty cool with that.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

They said they didn’t find any evidence of an insurrection you dumb leftist.

NFBW wrote (reply to 21NOV18-POST#197 ) “But the FBI has so far found no evidence” Do you AzogtheDefiler know what “so far” means?

The FBI has said nothing about their investigation is the reality . The rightwing disinformation tale you are spreading comes from anonymous sources supposedly connected to the FBI. But if the anonymous sources are legit the next step for truth is the statements made by the anonymous sources say they have not found - - - Oh hell - read it for yourself

“””” But the FBI has so far found no evidence (regarding AlexJones and Riger Stone )

Exclusive: FBI finds scant evidence U.S. Capitol attack was coordinated - sources
that he or people directly around him were involved in organizing the violence, according to the four current and former law enforcement officials. “”””

AND “at this point”

Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations.

Scant means zippo baby. Means it’s a nothing burger. But you’re still a dumb leftist.

NFBW wrote (reply to 21NOV18-POST#204 ) Read the Reuters link you posted. - The investigation is not finished and ‘scant’ is five percent of the nearly 600 arrests so far. You are a worm AzogtheDefiler - a lying illiterate worm 21NOV19-POST#208

 

[NotfooledbyW]

I've seen worse at Walmart on Black Friday.

NFBW wrote (reply to 21NOV18-POST#117 ) Which Walmart? What year? Where was a uniformed police officer beaten by an American flag? AND which Walmart was not open to the general public when shoppers broke in and started fighting amongst themselves? If no link -you are a liar. 21NOV19 -POST#209

 

[NotfooledbyW]

NFBW wrote: We are witness to AzogtheDefiler posting a link to Reuters that proves AzogtheDefiler is an idiot who lies or a bonafide liar who is an idiot. 21NOV19 -POST#210

citygator wrote: Wtf are you talking about moron? FBI didn’t say anything about no insurrection. 21NOV18-POST#196

AzogtheDefiler wrote: They said they didn’t find any evidence of an insurrection you dumb leftist. 21NOV18-POST#197

citygator wrote: Quote them saying that. I’ll eat some worms. 21NOV18-POST#198

AzogtheDefiler posts a link: REUTERS – The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials. 21NOV18-POST#200

AzogtheDefiler posts a link: REUTERS – The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials. 21NOV18-POST#200

NFBW wrote: Today is November 19 but here Here is AzogtheDefiler ’s 60 day old Reuters Aug. 20, 2021 statement on all that (excerpts a thru ) 21NOV19 -POST#210

(a) WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials.

(b) Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources,

(c) FBI investigators did find that cells of protesters, including followers of the far-right Oath Keepers and Proud Boys groups, had aimed to break into the Capitol. But they found no evidence that the groups had serious plans about what to do if they made it inside, the sources said. - - - Prosecutors have filed conspiracy charges against 40 of those defendants, alleging that they engaged in some degree of planning before the attack.
They alleged that one Proud Boy leader recruited members and urged them to stockpile bulletproof vests and other military-style equipment in the weeks before the attack and on Jan. 6 sent members forward with a plan to split into groups and make multiple entries to the Capitol.

(d) But so far prosecutors have steered clear of more serious, politically-loaded charges that the sources said had been initially discussed by prosecutors, such as seditious conspiracy or racketeering. - - - The FBI's assessment could prove relevant for a congressional investigation that also aims to determine how that day's events were organized and by whom.
- - - Senior lawmakers have been briefed in detail on the results of the FBI's investigation so far and find them credible, a Democratic congressional source said.

(e) But one source said there has been little, if any, recent discussion by senior Justice Department officials of filing charges such as "seditious conspiracy" to accuse defendants of trying to overthrow the government. They have also opted not to bring racketeering charges, often used against organized criminal gangs. - - - Senior officials had discussed filing such charges in the weeks after the attack, the sources said.
Prosecutors have also not brought any charges alleging that any individual or group played a central role in organizing or leading the riot. Law-enforcement sources told Reuters no such charges appeared to be pending. - - Conspiracy charges that have been filed allege that defendants discussed their plans in the weeks before the attack and worked together on the day itself. But prosecutors have not alleged that this activity was part of a broader plot.


NFBW wrote: I will be referring to these excerpts in future posts, but for now it is clear the four anonymous sources did not say the FBI did NOT find any evidence of an insurrection. AzogtheDefiler is pushing disinformation. 21NOV19 -POST#210

 

[playtime]

I appreciate you providing that x-ray of your brain in each of your posts.

 

[playtime]

Nope. If not organized it has zero chance of doing anything. You lose worm eater.

auCONtraire, zoggy.

if ... IF there's scant evidence of coordination - then that would mean those that brought weapons & marched to the capital & stormed it, vandalized it, went hunting for congress critters - including the speaker of the house - all did so because they were incited to do it. they were ginned up & encouraged to.

by whom?

8 U.S. Code § 2102.Definitions​

• U.S. Code
• Notes

prev next
(a)
As used in this chapter, the term “riot” means a public disturbance involving (1) an act or acts of violence by one or more persons part of an assemblage of three or more persons, which act or acts shall constitute a clear and present danger of, or shall result in, damage or injury to the property of any other person or to the person of any other individual

or

(2) a threat or threats of the commission of an act or acts of violence by one or more persons part of an assemblage of three or more persons having, individually or collectively, the ability of immediate execution of such threat or threats, where the performance of the threatened act or acts of violence would constitute a clear and present danger of, or would result in, damage or injury to the property of any other person or to the person of any other individual.
(b)
As used in this chapter, the term “to incite a riot”, or “to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot”, includes, but is not limited to, urging or instigating other persons to riot, but shall not be deemed to mean the mere oral or written (1) advocacy of ideas or (2) expression of belief, not involving advocacy of any act or acts of violence or assertion of the rightness of, or the right to commit, any such act or acts.
(Added Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 104(a), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 76.)

18 U.S. Code § 2102 - Definitions

Code of the District of Columbia

§ 22–1322. Rioting or inciting to riot.​

(a) A riot in the District of Columbia is a public disturbance involving an assemblage of 5 or more persons
[ there were ] which by tumultuous and violent conduct or the threat thereof creates grave danger of damage or injury to property or persons. [ there was ]

(d) If in the course and as a result of a riot a person suffers serious bodily harm [ there was ] or there is property damage in excess of $5,000, [ there was ] every person who willfully incited or urged others to engage in the riot [ donny, squid boy, mo brooks, traitor tot ... ]shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine of not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01, or both.

 

[AZrailwhale]

You can't be that silly without help.
There is footage of trump behind screens promoting it and I think he encouraged everyone yo attend and said it will be big. .it was. The biggest mistake the republicans every made.
If there is evidence of nothing, why are they charging those people?

It wasn't long ago, republicans were screaming how the FBI were corrupt towards Biden. My my. How things change now they produce a document that suits you. No more corruption now ducky? All's good.

You're not so smart now.

Yeah Trump was promoting a peaceful march.

 

[PoliticalChic]

NFBW wrote (reply to 21NOV18-POST#117 ) Which Walmart? What year? Where was a uniformed police officer beaten by an American flag? AND which Walmart was not open to the general public when shoppers broke in and started fighting amongst themselves? If no link -you are a liar. 21NOV19 -POST#209

No police were beaten by pro-Trump protesters.

Thousands were assaulted by Biden voters.

Study: up to 95 percent of 2020 U.S. riots are linked to Black Lives Matter​

ACLED is a nonprofit organization that tracks conflict across the globe. Its U.S. project that collected the summer protest data is supported by Princeton University. The project’s spreadsheet collating tens of thousands of data points documents 12,045 incidents of U.S. civil unrest from May 26, 2020 to Sept. 5, 2020. May 26 is the day after George Floyd’s death in police custody with enough fentanyl in his system to have died of an overdose if police had never touched him.

Of the 633 incidents coded as riots, 88 percent are recorded as involving Black Lives Matter activists. Data for 51 incidents lack information about the perpetrators’ identities. BLM activists were involved in 95 percent of the riots for which there is information about the perpetrators’ affiliation.

Violent demonstrations, meanwhile, have been limited to fewer than 220 locations —

Study: up to 95 percent of 2020 U.S. riots are linked to Black Lives Matter - The Frontier Post

Monitoring Desk WASHINGTON: Contrary to corporate media narratives, up to 95 percent of this summer’s riots are linked to Black Lives Matter activism, according to data collected by the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED). The data also show that nearly 6 percent — or more...

thefrontierpost.com

“Jaw-Dropping: Police Chief Association Releases Number of Officers Injured During Violent Riots

The Major Cities Chiefs Association released a report detailing the number of violent riots and the number of police officers injured during the riots U.S. cities faced after the death of George Floyd in May.The MCCA, which has members in 69 of the largest cities in the U.S., released the findings of their survey in October and compiled data from May 25 to July 31, 2020. In total, 8,700 protests took place in major American cities during that time period.Of the 8,700 protests, 574 of them were riots that saw mass looting and destruction.

During the riots cities experienced, the MCCA said their survey found at least 2,000 police officers were injured:

"In cities where violence did occur, assaults on police officers, looting, and arson were the most common criminal activities. Approximately, 72% of major city law enforcement agencies had officers harmed during the protests. This included nearly every agency that experienced at least one violent protest. In total, over the course of the civil unrest from May to July, more than 2,000 officers sustained injuries in the line of duty. One agency reported 50 officers being injured in a single week of protests. Another agency reported that 462 of their officers were injured during the protests in their jurisdiction.

"Looting was also a common occurrence (2,385 instances), with 62% of major city law enforcement agencies indicating that at least one incident of looting occurred in their cities. “

Jaw-Dropping: Police Chief Association Releases Number of Officers Injured During Violent Riots

townhall.com

Every single one due to Biden voters.

Riots, arson, anarchism, assaults, lawlessness rewarded, neither lives nor property safe.....under Democrat governance.
One wonders why citizens pay taxes, and what they expect from government, when the above is the norm from Democrats officials.

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[NotfooledbyW]

22lcidw wrote in reference to Dr Jill Biden: Doctor Jill is not a Christian. In fact, she is evil. 21OCT19-POST#036

22lcidw wrote in reference to DJT: Progs keep reminding everyone. And yet he was good for the Christians. 21NOV18-POST#181

NFBW wrote: So tell us 22lcidw are you a real Christian who has received divine authority from Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God, and MASCOT of the DJT/Paula White Prosperity Gospel Temple. to determine which Christians are REAL Christians and which Christians are evil Christians 21NOV19-POST#216

“””+” Megachurch pastor and televangelist Paula White-Cain, who is spiritual adviser to President Donald Trump, delivered a prayer service Wednesday night in an effort to secure Trump's reelection.

During the service, which was streamed on Facebook Live, White-Cain called on "angelic reinforcement" from the continents of Africa and South America.

"I hear a sound of victory, the Lord says it is done," she said. "For angels have even been dispatched from Africa right now... In the name of Jesus from South America, they're coming here." 20NOV06-USAtoday-pWhite

Pastor Paula White calls on angels from Africa and South America to bring Trump victory

White's video has gone viral since it went online Wednesday night. And many have expressed outrage over her words.

"God is sending angels from a place Trump called a [expletive] to help him get re-elected?" Bishop Talbert Swan, a pastor, activist and NAACP Chapter President, wrote on Twitter. "'I hear the sounds of victory...' Consider a hearing aid."

"She’ll be lucky if Stephen Miller doesn’t send those angels to ICE Detention Centers," wrote Ana Navarro-Cárdenas, political strategist and commentator for CNN, Telemundo and The View. “””+”


22lcidw wrote: Are the vast majority of attendees of Black churches evil because the voted for Dr Jill’s husband and helped us white secular Americans boot an amoral disgusting asshole out of the White House according to the Constitutional ejection process that he tried to subvert once the African and South American CHRISTIAN ANGELS fire south for the winter. 21NOV19-POST#216

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

NFBW wrote (reply to 21NOV18-POST#197 ) “But the FBI has so far found no evidence” Do you AzogtheDefiler know what “so far” means?

The FBI has said nothing about their investigation is the reality . The rightwing disinformation tale you are spreading comes from anonymous sources supposedly connected to the FBI. But if the anonymous sources are legit the next step for truth is the statements made by the anonymous sources say they have not found - - - Oh hell - read it for yourself

“””” But the FBI has so far found no evidence (regarding AlexJones and Riger Stone )

Exclusive: FBI finds scant evidence U.S. Capitol attack was coordinated - sources
that he or people directly around him were involved in organizing the violence, according to the four current and former law enforcement officials. “”””

AND “at this point”

Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations.

NFBW wrote (reply to 21NOV18-POST#204 ) Read the Reuters link you posted. - The investigation is not finished and ‘scant’ is five percent of the nearly 600 arrests so far. You are a worm AzogtheDefiler - a lying illiterate worm 21NOV19-POST#208

You seem upset. It’s been almost a year. How much time do they need?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

NFBW wrote: We are witness to AzogtheDefiler posting a link to Reuters that proves AzogtheDefiler is an idiot who lies or a bonafide liar who is an idiot. 21NOV19 -POST#210

citygator wrote: Wtf are you talking about moron? FBI didn’t say anything about no insurrection. 21NOV18-POST#196

AzogtheDefiler wrote: They said they didn’t find any evidence of an insurrection you dumb leftist. 21NOV18-POST#197

citygator wrote: Quote them saying that. I’ll eat some worms. 21NOV18-POST#198

AzogtheDefiler posts a link: REUTERS – The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials. 21NOV18-POST#200

AzogtheDefiler posts a link: REUTERS – The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials. 21NOV18-POST#200

NFBW wrote: Today is November 19 but here Here is AzogtheDefiler ’s 60 day old Reuters Aug. 20, 2021 statement on all that (excerpts a thru ) 21NOV19 -POST#210

(a) WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials.

(b) Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources,

(c) FBI investigators did find that cells of protesters, including followers of the far-right Oath Keepers and Proud Boys groups, had aimed to break into the Capitol. But they found no evidence that the groups had serious plans about what to do if they made it inside, the sources said. - - - Prosecutors have filed conspiracy charges against 40 of those defendants, alleging that they engaged in some degree of planning before the attack.
They alleged that one Proud Boy leader recruited members and urged them to stockpile bulletproof vests and other military-style equipment in the weeks before the attack and on Jan. 6 sent members forward with a plan to split into groups and make multiple entries to the Capitol.

(d) But so far prosecutors have steered clear of more serious, politically-loaded charges that the sources said had been initially discussed by prosecutors, such as seditious conspiracy or racketeering. - - - The FBI's assessment could prove relevant for a congressional investigation that also aims to determine how that day's events were organized and by whom.
- - - Senior lawmakers have been briefed in detail on the results of the FBI's investigation so far and find them credible, a Democratic congressional source said.

(e) But one source said there has been little, if any, recent discussion by senior Justice Department officials of filing charges such as "seditious conspiracy" to accuse defendants of trying to overthrow the government. They have also opted not to bring racketeering charges, often used against organized criminal gangs. - - - Senior officials had discussed filing such charges in the weeks after the attack, the sources said.
Prosecutors have also not brought any charges alleging that any individual or group played a central role in organizing or leading the riot. Law-enforcement sources told Reuters no such charges appeared to be pending. - - Conspiracy charges that have been filed allege that defendants discussed their plans in the weeks before the attack and worked together on the day itself. But prosecutors have not alleged that this activity was part of a broader plot.


NFBW wrote: I will be referring to these excerpts in future posts, but for now it is clear the four anonymous sources did not say the FBI did NOT find any evidence of an insurrection. AzogtheDefiler is pushing disinformation. 21NOV19 -POST#210

Ha ha ahaha I am in your head more so than maybe even Trump.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

auCONtraire, zoggy.

if ... IF there's scant evidence of coordination - then that would mean those that brought weapons & marched to the capital & stormed it, vandalized it, went hunting for congress critters - including the speaker of the house - all did so because they were incited to do it. they were ginned up & encouraged to.

by whom?

8 U.S. Code § 2102.Definitions​

• U.S. Code
• Notes

prev next
(a)
As used in this chapter, the term “riot” means a public disturbance involving (1) an act or acts of violence by one or more persons part of an assemblage of three or more persons, which act or acts shall constitute a clear and present danger of, or shall result in, damage or injury to the property of any other person or to the person of any other individual

or

(2) a threat or threats of the commission of an act or acts of violence by one or more persons part of an assemblage of three or more persons having, individually or collectively, the ability of immediate execution of such threat or threats, where the performance of the threatened act or acts of violence would constitute a clear and present danger of, or would result in, damage or injury to the property of any other person or to the person of any other individual.
(b)
As used in this chapter, the term “to incite a riot”, or “to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot”, includes, but is not limited to, urging or instigating other persons to riot, but shall not be deemed to mean the mere oral or written (1) advocacy of ideas or (2) expression of belief, not involving advocacy of any act or acts of violence or assertion of the rightness of, or the right to commit, any such act or acts.
(Added Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 104(a), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 76.)

18 U.S. Code § 2102 - Definitions

Code of the District of Columbia

§ 22–1322. Rioting or inciting to riot.​

(a) A riot in the District of Columbia is a public disturbance involving an assemblage of 5 or more persons
[ there were ] which by tumultuous and violent conduct or the threat thereof creates grave danger of damage or injury to property or persons. [ there was ]

(d) If in the course and as a result of a riot a person suffers serious bodily harm [ there was ] or there is property damage in excess of $5,000, [ there was ] every person who willfully incited or urged others to engage in the riot [ donny, squid boy, mo brooks, traitor tot ... ]shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine of not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01, or both.

So you’re talking about BLM and Antifa? Yes those were insurrections as was CHAZ. Thanks for agreeing with me.

 

[playtime]

Yeah Trump was promoting a peaceful march.

is that why he knew enough to go back to the WH after lying that he was gonna 'walk to the capital ' with his flying monkeys & shirley knew what was happening but took hours to tell them to go home, & that he loved them?