jillian
Princess
actually, he referred you to marbury v madison. that is the decision that says who is the final arbiter of what is constitutional. and it isn't the 'masses'. in fact, the 'masses' are the last people who are supposed to construe it.
you should try reading it, it might be helpful to you.
until then, yes, the constitution is briliant. and when you understand it, i'm sure you'll think it is even more so.
Hmmm. And what was Marbury v Madison? Supreme Court decision, wasn't it? So where do you get off saying, "Actually" to me, as though I was incorrect?
I can only assume that when you say, "Understand it", you mean, "Accept that what we tell you is correct is correct, and stop that horrible thinking for yourself stuff." And believe me, when I want lessons on being a mindless sheep led to the fleecing and slaughter, you'll be the first teacher I come to.
Keep going, please. It's fascinating. Like a particularly nasty train wreck.
she isn't getting it at all, is she?
the people who wrote the document she keeps talking about, but knows nothing about, DIDN'T WANT THE PEOPLE ANYWHERE NEAR IT.
lol.. they didn't even want most of 'THE PEOPLE" to vote.
they so don't get it... the 'masses' weren't supposed to infringe on people's rights. the only way to assure that was to make sure that there was a higher power that could step between the "people" and those they wanted to stomp on