- Thread starter
- #221
I have to agree that 'socialists' subordinate religions and their superstitious beliefs. I throw all of it out as the promotion of lies that contradict modern science.So I didn't misstate anything. Perfect.I am a socialist according to Americans' view of the political spectrum.Just to confirm, Donald H ... you are a socialist and you would like for religion to perish, right?
I'm not misstating that, am I?
In Canada I'm a capitalist government supporter who leans about as far left as the majority of Canadians.
On religions and other superstitious beliefs, I'm of the opinion that they need to be discouraged and left to dying of their own accord. I wouldn't advocate banning religions but I take a stronger position on preventing them from being able to teach lies to children. Teaching children religious lies is child abuse and no socially responsible person should condone that!
That's not to say that christians need to throw out the parts of their biibles that promote child abuse. They should either support it totally or throw it all out!
You are proving my point that socialists subordinate religion. It's what you guys do.
You on the other hand only throw out some of your bible with your attempts to interpret it to suit what makes you comfortable.
Yet, you refuse to elaborate on what you can accept of your bibles, from that parts you are in the process of reinterpreting.
This is your issue to solve in your own mind but the issue continues to cause you discomfort. I know now that your issue with me and my beliefs are because I awaken your discomfort.
I don't know how I can make that better for you? You proclaim yourself to be a half-believer or a conditional believer.