CDZ For what reason are kids having to learn about slavery ??

[saveliberty]

Yeah, an embryo is a baby.

Only if you let it develop...and consider rights to be universal to all humans.

actually there are no rights at all until after birth.

and the sole issue in Roe v Wade is when the governmental interest in protecting life exceeds the interest of the individual in governing her own body.

Interesting, considering we extend rights to dead people all the time. Ever hear of probate or estate settlement?

 

[koshergrl]

Yeah, an embryo is a baby.

Only if you let it develop...and consider rights to be universal to all humans.

Nonsense. THe term *baby* is relative. It just means undeveloped. Or the youngest.

And rights are universal. At least until you lose them.

 

[beagle9]

shouldn't they know that young black students had to be escorted by armed federal officers into southern schools?

Yes, but they should also be taught that Whites taught Blacks what a school is

why would we teach them lies?

Whats the lie?

pretty much everything you've posted here since 2009, but specifically this nonsense that whites showed blacks what schools were.

have you been to school?

. Unless history is wrong, I think that slaves learned from the whites how to read and write, but someone might correct me here. Thanks if you do. Any way it makes no difference in this thread, because I think the teaching of history in this form or way should start when kids get to 12th grade, and then let it be an elective.

 

[saveliberty]

Poor Jillian fighting the abortion issue in a slavery thread. ..talk about oppression....

 

[jillian]

Yeah, an embryo is a baby.

Only if you let it develop...and consider rights to be universal to all humans.

actually there are no rights at all until after birth.

and the sole issue in Roe v Wade is when the governmental interest in protecting life exceeds the interest of the individual in governing her own body.

Interesting, considering we extend rights to dead people all the time. Ever hear of probate or estate settlement?

there is no such thing as "pre-born" rights. that's silliness started by extremist anti-choice activist religious zealots.

probate doesn't have anything to do with the rights of a dead person. it disposes of the property of the dead person but addresses the rights of the heirs.

different issue

it's also very far afield from the thread topic....... which solely deals with the o/p's fear and anxiety about children being taught about slavery and discrimination.

 

[jillian]

Poor Jillian fighting the abortion issue in a slavery thread. ..talk about oppression....

I wasn't the one who raised it, snooks.

if you have a comment, you can make it to the person who said that if we teach history, then we should also teach all of the stages of the development of an embryo.

or did you not read that part.

 

[jillian]

shouldn't they know that young black students had to be escorted by armed federal officers into southern schools?

Yes, but they should also be taught that Whites taught Blacks what a school is

why would we teach them lies?

Whats the lie?

pretty much everything you've posted here since 2009, but specifically this nonsense that whites showed blacks what schools were.

have you been to school?

. Unless history is wrong, I think that slaves learned from the whites how to read and write, but someone might correct me here. Thanks if you do. Any way it makes no difference in this thread, because I think the teaching of history in this form or way should start when kids get to 12th grade, and then let it be an elective.

what????????

that is absurd.

why?

and how does ignorance benefit society?

 

[saveliberty]

there is no such thing as "pre-born" rights. that's silliness started by extremist anti-choice activist religious zealots.

probate doesn't have anything to do with the rights of a dead person. it disposes of the property of the dead person but addresses the rights of the heirs.

different issue

it's also very far afield from the thread topic....... which solely deals with the o/p's fear and anxiety about children being taught about slavery and discrimination.

Clearly estate settlement and probate are focus on dividing property according to the wishes of a now deceased person. You had to take some time to craft that poor response. Pretty funny.

 

[koshergrl]

Poor Jillian fighting the abortion issue in a slavery thread. ..talk about oppression....

I think she believes there will be no slaves to victimize if we just kill them in utero.

Or maybe she thinks if we deny them personhood when they're young, we won't have to deal with the uncomfortable issue of why some people get to decide whether or not other people live...based on the *fact* that if they aren't people, it doesn't matter....this is the same argument slave owners used back in the good old days, after all. They aren't human, they don't experience things the same, and thus it is right and good that we dispatch them as we see fit.

 

[jillian]

there is no such thing as "pre-born" rights. that's silliness started by extremist anti-choice activist religious zealots.

probate doesn't have anything to do with the rights of a dead person. it disposes of the property of the dead person but addresses the rights of the heirs.

different issue

it's also very far afield from the thread topic....... which solely deals with the o/p's fear and anxiety about children being taught about slavery and discrimination.

Clearly estate settlement and probate are focus on dividing property according to the wishes of a now deceased person. You had to take some time to craft that poor response. Pretty funny.

weren't you the one just complaining that the thread was going off track, dearie? but just to educate you, the EPTL in NY addresses the rights of heirs. yes, it's based on the wishes of the decedent, but those wishes aren't always followed under certain circumstances. it's also why all heirs have to receive notice of a probate proceeding, so they can object to the probate of the will if there is reason.

 

[Moonglow]

Beagle done let this thread go crazy...

 

[Correll]

there is no such thing as "pre-born" rights. that's silliness started by extremist anti-choice activist religious zealots.

probate doesn't have anything to do with the rights of a dead person. it disposes of the property of the dead person but addresses the rights of the heirs.

different issue

it's also very far afield from the thread topic....... which solely deals with the o/p's fear and anxiety about children being taught about slavery and discrimination.

Clearly estate settlement and probate are focus on dividing property according to the wishes of a now deceased person. You had to take some time to craft that poor response. Pretty funny.

BECAUSE of the property rights of that dead person. His rights to his property do not end with his life. He gets to decide what happens to them, even if the acts he put in writing don't occur for years or longer.

 

[saveliberty]

there is no such thing as "pre-born" rights. that's silliness started by extremist anti-choice activist religious zealots.

probate doesn't have anything to do with the rights of a dead person. it disposes of the property of the dead person but addresses the rights of the heirs.

different issue

it's also very far afield from the thread topic....... which solely deals with the o/p's fear and anxiety about children being taught about slavery and discrimination.

Clearly estate settlement and probate are focus on dividing property according to the wishes of a now deceased person. You had to take some time to craft that poor response. Pretty funny.

weren't you the one just complaining that the thread was going off track, dearie?

Me complaining? Nope. I just point out your errors and move on.

 

[del]

they had photography in the 1500s?

really?

 

[saveliberty]

Beagle done let this thread go crazy...

In fairness,the OP only had the crazy route available.

 

[IsaacNewton]

My granddaughter who goes to school with Blacks, Asians, Mexicans, whites (her color), etc just said to me "PaPa we're learning about slavery"... My heart sank knowing what the poor child was being exposed to, and how she will next be basically looked at by her black classmates in a different way, and this after they being themselves exposed to the events surrounding this time period in which waxes hot amongst so many Americans to this very day.

Blacks are running around trying all they can to erase history (destroying statues), etc. Yet they want the white children to be exposed to a government version of events in which will cause generations after generations of naive children to be saddled with white Guilt.

Then we have the upcoming "black history month", where the same results can also take place in this program just as well. What's wrong with changing the month to "AMERICAN HISTORY MONTH" instead ?????? In American History Month the children would be able to pick out their favorite person in American history to write an essay on.

What's wrong, scared a black child might pick a white person to write about or think highly of ??? Jessie Jackson, and old Al Sharpton along with Maxine Waters would have a cow wouldn't they ?

When are we truly gonna get beyond this bullcrap ??

Yes why teach children history, like the wholesale slaughter of native Americans. Why go into that just because it happened. Better to 'white' wash it.

Racists forever search for a way to make their racism noble.

 

[jillian]

there is no such thing as "pre-born" rights. that's silliness started by extremist anti-choice activist religious zealots.

probate doesn't have anything to do with the rights of a dead person. it disposes of the property of the dead person but addresses the rights of the heirs.

different issue

it's also very far afield from the thread topic....... which solely deals with the o/p's fear and anxiety about children being taught about slavery and discrimination.

Clearly estate settlement and probate are focus on dividing property according to the wishes of a now deceased person. You had to take some time to craft that poor response. Pretty funny.

weren't you the one just complaining that the thread was going off track, dearie?

Me complaining? Nope. I just point out your errors and move on.

you mean like I just pointed out yours, dearie?

 

[Moonglow]

My granddaughter who goes to school with Blacks, Asians, Mexicans, whites (her color), etc just said to me "PaPa we're learning about slavery"... My heart sank knowing what the poor child was being exposed to, and how she will next be basically looked at by her black classmates in a different way, and this after they being themselves exposed to the events surrounding this time period in which waxes hot amongst so many Americans to this very day.

Blacks are running around trying all they can to erase history (destroying statues), etc. Yet they want the white children to be exposed to a government version of events in which will cause generations after generations of naive children to be saddled with white Guilt.

Then we have the upcoming "black history month", where the same results can also take place in this program just as well. What's wrong with changing the month to "AMERICAN HISTORY MONTH" instead ?????? In American History Month the children would be able to pick out their favorite person in American history to write an essay on.

What's wrong, scared a black child might pick a white person to write about or think highly of ??? Jessie Jackson, and old Al Sharpton along with Maxine Waters would have a cow wouldn't they ?

When are we truly gonna get beyond this bullcrap ??

Yes why teach children history, like the wholesale slaughter of native Americans. Why go into that just because it happened. Better to 'white' wash it.

Racists forever search for a way to make their racism noble.

He's afraid of history..

 

[jillian]

My granddaughter who goes to school with Blacks, Asians, Mexicans, whites (her color), etc just said to me "PaPa we're learning about slavery"... My heart sank knowing what the poor child was being exposed to, and how she will next be basically looked at by her black classmates in a different way, and this after they being themselves exposed to the events surrounding this time period in which waxes hot amongst so many Americans to this very day.

Blacks are running around trying all they can to erase history (destroying statues), etc. Yet they want the white children to be exposed to a government version of events in which will cause generations after generations of naive children to be saddled with white Guilt.

Then we have the upcoming "black history month", where the same results can also take place in this program just as well. What's wrong with changing the month to "AMERICAN HISTORY MONTH" instead ?????? In American History Month the children would be able to pick out their favorite person in American history to write an essay on.

What's wrong, scared a black child might pick a white person to write about or think highly of ??? Jessie Jackson, and old Al Sharpton along with Maxine Waters would have a cow wouldn't they ?

When are we truly gonna get beyond this bullcrap ??

Yes why teach children history, like the wholesale slaughter of native Americans. Why go into that just because it happened. Better to 'white' wash it.

Racists forever search for a way to make their racism noble.

ta da!

 

[koshergrl]

This is what Whites found in Africa

But schools won't teach this part

Most definitely not a shithole. That I know for sure!