candycorn
Diamond Member
- Aug 25, 2009
- 111,013
- 51,498
- Thread starter
- #1,301
and you stated it didn't turn you against anyone.I think you may have swallowed some kool-aid again. I think he says the rich are not paying their fair share. Provide a specific example and I'll be happy to retract that.SO you are calling him divisive why exactly?
I'm calling him divisive because he's consistently BEEN divisive! He blames the rich for the plight of the poor.
In this case, you are right in a few instances. He has cited the police for being overly aggressive. In some cases they were.He blames the Police for conflict with civilians.
Every president blames the opposition at some point. C'mon....He blames Republicans for his own inability to govern.
When people who are suspected of being sympathetic to terrorism and are on a no-fly list can buy weapons, I think he has a point that there are some areas where our law are not consistent; The guy is seen as a threat to aircraft but we'll allow him to buy as many guns as possible????He blames a lack of gun control laws for mass shootings.
Barack Obama's method of running a government isn't to build coalitions it's to create divides and then exploit them.
Yet, there are no examples of his dividing anyone against anyone else--as you have testified (Sidebar: No conservative has ever given an example of being turned against someone by the President yet everyone of you guys swear he is "divisive" for some reason). As for "blaming" as you pointed out above...there has never been a President in recent history that hasn't taken political opponents to task for obstructing his plans....
"Income inequality" has been a featured Obama criticism for years now, Candy...do you really need me to provide examples of him blaming the rich?
At some point you need to show us how he turned you if you're claiming he is turning people against one another.
QUOTE="Oldstyle, post: 13190723, member: 31215"]
Most Presidents do blame the opposition when they can't get things passed, Candy...but Barry did so when Democrats controlled the House and the Senate! Then he couldn't seem to understand why the GOP members of Congress hated him so much. Not only was what he did divisive...it was stupid from a political standpoint...akin to poisoning the well.
Obama blamed gun control immediately following every mass shooting, Candy...WAY before the facts were known about each shooter. That's using a crisis to push an agenda...and you don't get much more divisive than that.
I think he (and most people assumed) that someone who does one of these rampage killings is mentally sick. Unless you're one of those who thinks sick people should have full access to weaponry, he had good reason to cite lax gun laws.
LOL...just because Obama's rhetoric DIDN'T turn me against the rich...or DIDN'T make me feel guilty for being a white heterosexual male...or DIDN'T make me think the police were deliberately murdering blacks...doesn't mean that he wasn't being divisive, Candy! I just don't buy into that kind of bullshit and never have. That doesn't mean that his words didn't affect countless others. I still don't think Barry realizes how much the words coming out of the mouth of the President of the United States can affect combustible situations like Ferguson.
[/quote]. Oh I see, you're assuming all others are weaker than you and that people have been "turned"
By Obama even though he certainly isn't the only voice that speaks on any issue.
As for gun control? Correct me if I'm wrong but don't we already have gun control laws on the books prohibiting mentally ill people from getting guns? So you want tighter gun control laws when you haven't enforced the ones we now have?
They are enforced. Except at widely advertised gun shows.
Like this one,
Be honest, Candy...you'd like to make it harder for EVERYONE to get a gun...not just the crazies...and that is a violation of Second Amendment rights. If you want to change that...then get the votes in Congress and change the Constitution!
You try being honest for once and we'll see how it goes.