Gay Marriage Is About to Be Legal in Alabama

[WinterBorn]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

No. When George Wallace stood on the steps of the UA, the majority of the state was behind him in wanting segregation. They wanted to be able to have state laws trump the US Constitution. He wanted state laws to be able to defy federal judges.

Moore is playing "Wallace" in this instance.

But 80% of Alabamans don't want same sex marriage. They dont want their state Constitution subverted.

The number of people who want something that has been ruled unconstitutional has no relevance. As I said before, the overwhelming majority voted for Wallace and his campaign was based on the slogan "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever". The overwhelming majority of Alabamians in the early 60s were in favor of segregation.

If 80% of the people in a state want Christianity as the official state religion, or want guns banned, it is still unconstitutional and will be overturned.

 

[WinterBorn]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

And now, those heterosexuals can also marry someone of the same gender. The law that banned same-sex marriage has been overturned by a federal court and the SCOTUS refused to issue a stay.

It is now the law of the land.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

The right to equal protection of the law, where same-sex couples are eligible to enter into marriage contracts, the same contracts as opposite-sex couples; to deny same-sex couples access to laws they're eligible to participate in is un-Constitutional.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

The right to equal protection of the law, where same-sex couples are eligible to enter into marriage contracts, the same contracts as opposite-sex couples; to deny same-sex couples access to laws they're eligible to participate in is un-Constitutional.

You don't provide equal protection to entities that aren't equal. Homos cannot procreate as heteros can.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

And now, those heterosexuals can also marry someone of the same gender. The law that banned same-sex marriage has been overturned by a federal court and the SCOTUS refused to issue a stay.

It is now the law of the land.

That doesn't mean it needs to be accepted on moral and logical grounds. Slavery used to be legal and the law of the land.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

False logic, Rosh, as SCOTUS and federal rulings keep telling you.

Alito, apparently, has switch to join Roberts and Kennedy with the four liberals. Only Scalia and Thomas are holding out.

Again, slavery used to the law of the land and upheld by the SCOTUS.
Forcing subsidization in the name of an irrelevant personal behavior is the same as official discrimination rooted in something as irrelevant as skin color. The homo agenda is the new Jim Crow. I guess it's now called Byron Crow or Butch Crow.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

No. When George Wallace stood on the steps of the UA, the majority of the state was behind him in wanting segregation. They wanted to be able to have state laws trump the US Constitution. He wanted state laws to be able to defy federal judges.

Moore is playing "Wallace" in this instance.

But 80% of Alabamans don't want same sex marriage. They dont want their state Constitution subverted.

One's civil rights are not determined by majority rule; and a provision of a state's constitution that violates the Federal Constitution cannot be 'subverted.'

Gay Americans living in Alabama are citizens of the United States first and foremost, residents of Alabama subordinate to that; their rights as American citizens are paramount, immune from attack by the states, safeguarded by the Constitution and its case law.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

The right to equal protection of the law, where same-sex couples are eligible to enter into marriage contracts, the same contracts as opposite-sex couples; to deny same-sex couples access to laws they're eligible to participate in is un-Constitutional.

You don't provide equal protection to entities that aren't equal. Homos cannot procreate as heteros can.

Incorrect.

Gay Americans are entitled to equal protection of (equal access to) the law, just like any other American.

In no state is the ability to procreate a prerequisite to enter into a marriage contract, as infertile opposite-sex couples are allowed to marry.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

No. When George Wallace stood on the steps of the UA, the majority of the state was behind him in wanting segregation. They wanted to be able to have state laws trump the US Constitution. He wanted state laws to be able to defy federal judges.

Moore is playing "Wallace" in this instance.

But 80% of Alabamans don't want same sex marriage. They dont want their state Constitution subverted.

One's civil rights are not determined by majority rule; and a provision of a state's constitution that violates the Federal Constitution cannot be 'subverted.'

Gay Americans living in Alabama are citizens of the United States first and foremost, residents of Alabama subordinate to that; their rights as American citizens are paramount, immune from attack by the states, safeguarded by the Constitution and its case law.

The states aren't attacking gays.

 

[WinterBorn]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

The right to equal protection of the law, where same-sex couples are eligible to enter into marriage contracts, the same contracts as opposite-sex couples; to deny same-sex couples access to laws they're eligible to participate in is un-Constitutional.

You don't provide equal protection to entities that aren't equal. Homos cannot procreate as heteros can.

And procreation is not the issue. marriage is the issue.

 

[WinterBorn]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

And now, those heterosexuals can also marry someone of the same gender. The law that banned same-sex marriage has been overturned by a federal court and the SCOTUS refused to issue a stay.

It is now the law of the land.

That doesn't mean it needs to be accepted on moral and logical grounds. Slavery used to be legal and the law of the land.

Indeed it did. And folks like Garrett wishes it was still the law of the land.

Unfortunately, the laws now are more fair. And the equality of marriage is coming around one state at a time.

That you think homosexuality is immoral is your opinion. But they WILL be marrying in Alabama.

 

[bodecea]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

The right to equal protection of the law, where same-sex couples are eligible to enter into marriage contracts, the same contracts as opposite-sex couples; to deny same-sex couples access to laws they're eligible to participate in is un-Constitutional.

You don't provide equal protection to entities that aren't equal. Homos cannot procreate as heteros can.

Procreating isn't a requirement for legal marriage. You know that. Stop being silly.

 

[WinterBorn]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

No. When George Wallace stood on the steps of the UA, the majority of the state was behind him in wanting segregation. They wanted to be able to have state laws trump the US Constitution. He wanted state laws to be able to defy federal judges.

Moore is playing "Wallace" in this instance.

But 80% of Alabamans don't want same sex marriage. They dont want their state Constitution subverted.

One's civil rights are not determined by majority rule; and a provision of a state's constitution that violates the Federal Constitution cannot be 'subverted.'

Gay Americans living in Alabama are citizens of the United States first and foremost, residents of Alabama subordinate to that; their rights as American citizens are paramount, immune from attack by the states, safeguarded by the Constitution and its case law.

The states aren't attacking gays.

The chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court certainly is. He is denying them equality under the law and demandng that the probate judges in Alabama defy a federal judge's ruling.

 

[hipeter924]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

The right to equal protection of the law, where same-sex couples are eligible to enter into marriage contracts, the same contracts as opposite-sex couples; to deny same-sex couples access to laws they're eligible to participate in is un-Constitutional.

You don't provide equal protection to entities that aren't equal. Homos cannot procreate as heteros can.

You serious? Many straight couples go through medical treatment and use other sperm/eggs and have them inserted artificially. You really are behind on medical science.

But when gays or lesbians do the same you call it 'wrong'.

Kinda ironic, since you don't complain when we keep babies alive through artificial means or people alive with artificial means.

That life has to be 'natural or naturally supported' argument fell to pieces ages ago, don't know why you even push it - since every time you push it you undermine the pro-life argument.

After all if all life has to be 'natural' what about the people on life support or born too soon, you would have to turn the switch and let them die because they are supported artificially.

In the case of gay and lesbian would be babies, you would be denying them existence too by denying gays and lesbians the right to reproduce and donate their sperm and eggs.

 

[WinterBorn]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

No. When George Wallace stood on the steps of the UA, the majority of the state was behind him in wanting segregation. They wanted to be able to have state laws trump the US Constitution. He wanted state laws to be able to defy federal judges.

Moore is playing "Wallace" in this instance.

But 80% of Alabamans don't want same sex marriage. They dont want their state Constitution subverted.

One's civil rights are not determined by majority rule; and a provision of a state's constitution that violates the Federal Constitution cannot be 'subverted.'

Gay Americans living in Alabama are citizens of the United States first and foremost, residents of Alabama subordinate to that; their rights as American citizens are paramount, immune from attack by the states, safeguarded by the Constitution and its case law.

The states aren't attacking gays.

Steve, go sit in the corner while the grownups discuss the issue. Anyone who thinks blacks are only 3/5 of a person or that blacks are not humans is too ignorant to be relevant to this discussion.

We'll let you know when we need comic relief. Then you can express your misguided notions of the world.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

The right to equal protection of the law, where same-sex couples are eligible to enter into marriage contracts, the same contracts as opposite-sex couples; to deny same-sex couples access to laws they're eligible to participate in is un-Constitutional.

You don't provide equal protection to entities that aren't equal. Homos cannot procreate as heteros can.

Incorrect.

Gay Americans are entitled to equal protection of (equal access to) the law, just like any other American.

In no state is the ability to procreate a prerequisite to enter into a marriage contract, as infertile opposite-sex couples are allowed to marry.

Infertile heteros should be allowed to adopt as they provide the necessary mom/dad situation as nature intended and empirical data demonstrates is necessary for society. Moreover, marriage law was created before infertility could be determined. If you want to change the law and make it specific to fertility and infertile hetero adoption I'd have no problem with that. But changing the law to accommodate those who cannot procreate by nature and do not provide a mom/dad situation is bad for any potentially adopted children and contributes to social demise.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

The right to equal protection of the law, where same-sex couples are eligible to enter into marriage contracts, the same contracts as opposite-sex couples; to deny same-sex couples access to laws they're eligible to participate in is un-Constitutional.

You don't provide equal protection to entities that aren't equal. Homos cannot procreate as heteros can.

And procreation is not the issue. marriage is the issue.

Procreation is the only tangible issue for legal marriage. It's the only reason the law needs to be involved.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

And now, those heterosexuals can also marry someone of the same gender. The law that banned same-sex marriage has been overturned by a federal court and the SCOTUS refused to issue a stay.

It is now the law of the land.

That doesn't mean it needs to be accepted on moral and logical grounds. Slavery used to be legal and the law of the land.

Indeed it did. And folks like Garrett wishes it was still the law of the land.

Unfortunately, the laws now are more fair. And the equality of marriage is coming around one state at a time.

That you think homosexuality is immoral is your opinion. But they WILL be marrying in Alabama.

I don't think homosexuality is immoral, per se. It's that making homo marriage a legal thing potentially forces children into rearing situations devoid of a mother and a father and that is immoral and cruel and child abuse.

 

[bodecea]

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

The right to equal protection of the law, where same-sex couples are eligible to enter into marriage contracts, the same contracts as opposite-sex couples; to deny same-sex couples access to laws they're eligible to participate in is un-Constitutional.

You don't provide equal protection to entities that aren't equal. Homos cannot procreate as heteros can.

And procreation is not the issue. marriage is the issue.

Procreation is the only tangible issue for legal marriage. It's the only reason the law needs to be involved.

Nope...it isn't. If it were, it would be a requirement for legal marriage. It's not even mentioned.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

The right to equal protection of the law, where same-sex couples are eligible to enter into marriage contracts, the same contracts as opposite-sex couples; to deny same-sex couples access to laws they're eligible to participate in is un-Constitutional.

You don't provide equal protection to entities that aren't equal. Homos cannot procreate as heteros can.

Procreating isn't a requirement for legal marriage. You know that. Stop being silly.

Procreation is the impetus for legal marriage in the first place. Using its occasional lack of instance as a wedge is a homo agenda MO.