Gay Marriage Is About to Be Legal in Alabama

[Preacher]

I believe if I counted right literally ONLY 8 counties are issuing queers marriage licenses... The rest are either no issuing ANYONE marriage license,Are accepting apps but not issuing licenses

 

[WinterBorn]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

 

[Preacher]

I am thrilled! Sure it might be a temporary thing but its so exciting to see people standing up to federal tyranny.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

 

[Syriusly]

The answer is that is regulating marriage. You don't like it, don't marry someone who looks like you.

You didn't answer my question. You just made a detached comment. Why should the public be forced to subsidize male-on-male buttfucking?

Marriage isn't about sex. As demonstrated by all the infertile and childless folks that are allowed to marry or remain married.

So the entire premise of your argument is invalid. A classic 'when did you stop beating your wife' question.

Then how can homosexual marriage be defined as homosexual marriage if it isn't about homosexuality? Root word, sex.

Because there is no such thing as 'homosexual marriage' – or 'gay marriage,' for that matter.

There is only one marriage contract law written by the states and administered by state courts, where two equal, consenting adult partners agree to enter into a committed relationship recognized by the state – same- or opposite-sex, it makes no difference.

This is why it's un-Constitutional for states to deny same-sex couples access to marriage contract law they're currently eligible to participate in.

Which takes it back to the stipulations within that contract. Homos cannot procreate as heteros can so the tax break for the homos is unnecessary. Why should we all be forced by law to subsidize male-on-male buttfucking since it is of no consequence beyond the participating people?

LOL- which takes us back to 'why should we all be forced by law to subsidize male on female buttfucking?

You are clearly obsessed with the image of men buttfucking- apparently it is all you think about.

As a married man, i happen to know that marriage is about more than fucking- of any kind.

So sad you don't know that, and probably never will.

 

[Syriusly]

For the same reason that male on female anal sex does not influence marriage laws: marriage is about two people joingin together.

Children can be and often are conceived, born, and raised outside of marriage.

I've already addressed that flawed rationale.

Yes, you did and got blown (ha ha) out of the water.

Marriage Equality will be the law of the land in a few months, and you will just be a foolish type of Alan Keyes or Where_r_my_Keys on this issue.

Laws are often flawed and incomplete. /QUOTE]

And the courts are clearly addressing these flawed laws.

Soon bans on gay marriage will be looked at as bigoted and as idiotic as bans on mixed race marriages were......bans which Alabama only overturned 15 years ago.

 

[Syriusly]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

LOL- yeah- you keep telling yourself that- that the bigots are the ones asking for marriage equality.

In a few years people will look at you bigots just like we all look at Wallace today.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

 

[WinterBorn]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

No. When George Wallace stood on the steps of the UA, the majority of the state was behind him in wanting segregation. They wanted to be able to have state laws trump the US Constitution. He wanted state laws to be able to defy federal judges.

Moore is playing "Wallace" in this instance.

 

[Syriusly]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

It cannot be repeated often enough:

Alabama was the last state to actually repeal mixed race marriages- only 15 years ago.

23 years after the Supreme Court told them that such bans were unconstitutional- and the year before Judge Moore became Judge.

If Judge Moore could do so, I am quite certain he would overturn the Federal Government on Loving v. Virginia too.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

You type people are so sensitive.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

No. When George Wallace stood on the steps of the UA, the majority of the state was behind him in wanting segregation. They wanted to be able to have state laws trump the US Constitution. He wanted state laws to be able to defy federal judges.

Moore is playing "Wallace" in this instance.

You're referring to the mechanics of the law and I'm referring to the bigotry of the agenda. Wallace was a bigot in favor of maintaining a popular bigotry and this time around the bigotry is being opposed on a local level.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

No. When George Wallace stood on the steps of the UA, the majority of the state was behind him in wanting segregation. They wanted to be able to have state laws trump the US Constitution. He wanted state laws to be able to defy federal judges.

Moore is playing "Wallace" in this instance.

But 80% of Alabamans don't want same sex marriage. They dont want their state Constitution subverted.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

What homo's rights are being violated? They have the right to legally a marry a consenting adult of the opposite gender the same as heteros do.

Exactly. Their state Constitution has granted them those rights just as equally as heterosexuals. And the US Constitution grants them the same rights as everyone else.

 

[WinterBorn]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

And this is an example of the ignorance and hate which render laws seeking to violate the rights of gay Americans invalid.

You type people are so sensitive.

Not necessarily sensitive. We simply refuse to allow bigots and liars, such as you, to get away with things anymore.

 

[WinterBorn]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

No. When George Wallace stood on the steps of the UA, the majority of the state was behind him in wanting segregation. They wanted to be able to have state laws trump the US Constitution. He wanted state laws to be able to defy federal judges.

Moore is playing "Wallace" in this instance.

You're referring to the mechanics of the law and I'm referring to the bigotry of the agenda. Wallace was a bigot in favor of maintaining a popular bigotry and this time around the bigotry is being opposed on a local level.

No, that is absolute bullshit. Gays don't care if straights get married. Gays only want equality.

And in many ways, this is the same as the argument back then. In both cases a federal court ruled against state law. In both cases an official (Wallace then, Moore now) tried to stand against it. In both cases the stands were wrong.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

Correct.

Moore's 'tactic' is un-Constitutional; indeed, he's at war with the Constitution, in violation of the Supremacy Clause and its case law.

This issue was settled more than a generation ago when the Supreme Court in Cooper v. Aaron (1958) reaffirmed the fact that the Constitution and its case law were the supreme law of the land, that the rulings of Federal courts were binding on the states and local jurisdictions, where the states and local jurisdictions had no authority whatsoever to ignore the Constitution or defy the rulings of Federal Courts.

 

[JakeStarkey]

And in 8 counties in Alabama, same-sex couples were married. Sorry, but you are fighting a losing battle on this one.

Roy Moore's tactic is a delay at best. This is him trying to be George Wallace standing on the steps at the Univ of Alabama. That was wrong and so it Moore. Moore wants a theocracy.

The federal courts have ruled and the SCOTUS refuses to overturn it.

No, this is him preventing George Wallace from forcing bigoted legislation. The homo agenda are the bigots on this issue.

No. When George Wallace stood on the steps of the UA, the majority of the state was behind him in wanting segregation. They wanted to be able to have state laws trump the US Constitution. He wanted state laws to be able to defy federal judges.

Moore is playing "Wallace" in this instance.

But 80% of Alabamans don't want same sex marriage. They dont want their state Constitution subverted.

You tried Jacksonian Democracy in 1861 Constitutional Republicanism. How do you think it worked out then? How is it working out now? This is almost over, and then you all will need to find a new cause to fight to lose.

 

[JakeStarkey]

False logic, Rosh, as SCOTUS and federal rulings keep telling you.

Alito, apparently, has switch to join Roberts and Kennedy with the four liberals. Only Scalia and Thomas are holding out.