Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean except John Kerry, right?
You know, I should know better than to take ANY of you Tea Baggers at your word.
Read this, you fucking idiot:
Mitt Romney Misled About John Kerry's Tax Returns
Fuck off Derp. You had no idea if he had or hadn't until you went looking for it just now, and this is from your link...
A newspaper archive search confirmed their disclosure.
On April 19, 1997, the Boston Globe reported that Kerry had paid nearly $40,000 in federal and state income taxes on an income of $143,795 "according to income tax returns he released yesterday." Most of the senator's reported income came from his $126,920 salary.
One year earlier, the Globe reported that, "Kerry's six-year total income is $724,042; according to his federal tax returns, he earmarked just under seven-10ths of 1 percent for charitable contributions."
On October 29, 1990, the Globe reported that Kerry was badgering his Republican opponent -- real estate developer Jim Rappaport -- "by demanding that Rappaport release five years of federal and state tax returns, as Kerry has done."
But while Kerry was forthcoming when it came to releasing personal tax returns, the same couldnt be said of his wife. In fact, Teresa Heinz Kerry's unwillingness to provide her personal tax return data during the 2004 campaign became a point of friction on par with Romney's own refusal in 2012. The heiress to the Heinz ketchup fortune would eventually relent, but not fully. She released two pages of her 1040 form, arguing that she had already provided plenty of relevant information through the financial disclosure reports that she and her husband filed as part of the ethics requirements for a U.S. senator.
So it seems that the Heinz family fortune was kept just as hidden as the Romney's.
That's fair enough to me, how about you??
As an aside, notice the bolded portion. That's a real philanthropic fellow you got there, ain't it? 7/10 of 1%?? Really??
Conservadick has been a member for 1 month (32 days) and within the next 15 minutes will put up his 2000th post.
Who has that kind of time (if they have a job) ?
I do. And I have a lovely full-time job. It's amazing that you can THINK you know something, and yet you don't.
Thanks for the message on my wall, Sweetie. I'll come over later and we'll suck'n'fuck all night long if you want.
You WERE trying to tell me you wanted to be in me when you posted on my visitor page, right?
Uh no, that would been Dante's dog.
Wow....you've got a job that allows that much time at a computer to spout BS all day long ?
Must be nice.
Most of you cons seem to feel there's nothing wrong with what Romney has done to make his money, to shelter his money and to avoid paying all but the most minimal amount of taxes on his money because it's legal. You probably wouldn't see anything wrong with murder if it were legal. What shining beacons of morality and ethics you are.
There is nothing shady, immoral or wrong in operating within the bounds of established law, no matter how much you libturds wish it were otherwise. Your blatant attempts to convict by innuendo will fly back in your faces, and your calls for 'transparency' will be an anchor around ObaMessiah's neck.
Good job, idiots!!!
Geezus, has it never occurred to any of you that the tax laws that he takes full advantage of didn't come from some sense of what's best for society. They came from a bunch of other sociopathic douchebags who benefit unfairly from them. How hard do you think he'll work to right that wrong?
Conservadick has been a member for 1 month (32 days) and within the next 15 minutes will put up his 2000th post.
Who has that kind of time (if they have a job) ?
I do. And I have a lovely full-time job. It's amazing that you can THINK you know something, and yet you don't.
Thanks for the message on my wall, Sweetie. I'll come over later and we'll suck'n'fuck all night long if you want.
You WERE trying to tell me you wanted to be in me when you posted on my visitor page, right?
Uh no, that would been Dante's dog.
Wow....you've got a job that allows that much time at a computer to spout BS all day long ?
Must be nice.
There is nothing shady, immoral or wrong in operating within the bounds of established law, no matter how much you libturds wish it were otherwise. Your blatant attempts to convict by innuendo will fly back in your faces, and your calls for 'transparency' will be an anchor around ObaMessiah's neck.
Good job, idiots!!!
Geezus, has it never occurred to any of you that the tax laws that he takes full advantage of didn't come from some sense of what's best for society. They came from a bunch of other sociopathic douchebags who benefit unfairly from them. How hard do you think he'll work to right that wrong?
You're right, those tax laws came from a Congress that has been dominated by Democrats for 50 fucking years!
You know, I should know better than to take ANY of you Tea Baggers at your word.
Read this, you fucking idiot:
Mitt Romney Misled About John Kerry's Tax Returns
Fuck off Derp. You had no idea if he had or hadn't until you went looking for it just now, and this is from your link...
A newspaper archive search confirmed their disclosure.
On April 19, 1997, the Boston Globe reported that Kerry had paid nearly $40,000 in federal and state income taxes on an income of $143,795 "according to income tax returns he released yesterday." Most of the senator's reported income came from his $126,920 salary.
One year earlier, the Globe reported that, "Kerry's six-year total income is $724,042; according to his federal tax returns, he earmarked just under seven-10ths of 1 percent for charitable contributions."
On October 29, 1990, the Globe reported that Kerry was badgering his Republican opponent -- real estate developer Jim Rappaport -- "by demanding that Rappaport release five years of federal and state tax returns, as Kerry has done."
But while Kerry was forthcoming when it came to releasing personal tax returns, the same couldnt be said of his wife. In fact, Teresa Heinz Kerry's unwillingness to provide her personal tax return data during the 2004 campaign became a point of friction on par with Romney's own refusal in 2012. The heiress to the Heinz ketchup fortune would eventually relent, but not fully. She released two pages of her 1040 form, arguing that she had already provided plenty of relevant information through the financial disclosure reports that she and her husband filed as part of the ethics requirements for a U.S. senator.
So it seems that the Heinz family fortune was kept just as hidden as the Romney's.
That's fair enough to me, how about you??
As an aside, notice the bolded portion. That's a real philanthropic fellow you got there, ain't it? 7/10 of 1%?? Really??
Oh, so I have to fuck off since you were the one who made the false claim about John Kerry? Jesus, 8 years later and you fuckfaces are still Swift-Boating him.
Admit it GuyMcFuckface, you lied. You straight-up lied. Just like Romney lied, and that lie will be put on this list:
Daily Kos: ALL of Romney's Lies in One Place! UPDATED YET AGAIN!
LOL@ the liar telling the guy who caught his lie to fuck off.
What are you rambling on about?
How about just one question .... where's his college transcripts? Why doesn't he show them? According to the left Mittens must surely be hiding something since he hasn't released 12 years of tax returns so logically, so must Obutthead for not releasing his transcripts ... if he didn't have something to hide he'd release them, right? Oh wait, he had them sealed didn't he? And the leftists say "oh but that's ok, he's Obama!"Like I said, leftist are a bunch of hypocritical assholes. I hope Mittens makes a statement that he'll release his tax info just as soon as Obutthead release his records.
Oh and btw? It IS Obutthead's economy.
Why won't Romney release his past tax returns? What's he hiding?
Why won't Obama release his college records? What's he hiding?
Obama can go first, he's had 4 years to release them.
Geezus, has it never occurred to any of you that the tax laws that he takes full advantage of didn't come from some sense of what's best for society. They came from a bunch of other sociopathic douchebags who benefit unfairly from them. How hard do you think he'll work to right that wrong?
You're right, those tax laws came from a Congress that has been dominated by Democrats for 50 fucking years!
Well I'm glad you've finally seen the inequity in the system. So Romney's a dick for taking advantage, isn't he.
The only thing the loser lefties can do is insult and demonize Romney. Their leaders have made a collosal glittering mess after spending billions and billions and taxing us to hell. The American people can do better than this.
Why won't Romney release his past tax returns? What's he hiding?
Why won't Obama release his college records? What's he hiding?
Obama can go first, he's had 4 years to release them.
Romneys been running for President for over four years, why doesnt he release his tax returns? Obamas been busy running the country.
Obamas been busy ruining the country.
Straight up lied?? OK, I repeated something I had heard without fact-checking it, I'm guilty of the same mistake you make on a daily basis.
The only difference is I made the mistake inadvertently, while you spend an incredible amount of time manufacturing yours.
.Excuse the fuck out of me, Mr. Holier-than-thou Douchenozzle.
You're right, those tax laws came from a Congress that has been dominated by Democrats for 50 fucking years!
Well I'm glad you've finally seen the inequity in the system. So Romney's a dick for taking advantage, isn't he.
Each and every one of us 'take advantage' of every loophole and deduction we can to limit our tax liability. You're a bald-faced liar if you claim you don't.
What's the fucking difference?
The only thing the loser lefties can do is insult and demonize Romney. Their leaders have made a collosal glittering mess after spending billions and billions and taxing us to hell. The American people can do better than this.
The only thing the radical right can do is insult and demonize Obama. Their leaders have made a collosal mess spending billions and billions and not getting the revenue to pay for their spending. The America People can do better than them.
Why won't Obama release his college records? What's he hiding?
Obama can go first, he's had 4 years to release them.
Romneys been running for President for over four years, why doesnt he release his tax returns? Obamas been busy running the country.
I think you made a typo... Here, let me correct it for you.
Obamas been busy ruining the country.
Why won't Obama release his college records? What's he hiding?
Obama can go first, he's had 4 years to release them.
Romneys been running for President for over four years, why doesnt he release his tax returns? Obamas been busy running the country.
I think you made a typo... Here, let me correct it for you.
Obamas been busy ruining the country.
Well I'm glad you've finally seen the inequity in the system. So Romney's a dick for taking advantage, isn't he.
Each and every one of us 'take advantage' of every loophole and deduction we can to limit our tax liability. You're a bald-faced liar if you claim you don't.
What's the fucking difference?
The difference is hiding money vs finding the rules in the code that allow you to keep the money.
One is decietful and unpatriotic, the other is just having good sense.
Romneys been running for President for over four years, why doesnt he release his tax returns? Obamas been busy running the country.
I think you made a typo... Here, let me correct it for you.
Obamas been busy ruining the country.
27 consecutive months of private sector job growth says youre wrong.
You're right, those tax laws came from a Congress that has been dominated by Democrats for 50 fucking years!
Well I'm glad you've finally seen the inequity in the system. So Romney's a dick for taking advantage, isn't he.
Each and every one of us 'take advantage' of every loophole and deduction we can to limit our tax liability. You're a bald-faced liar if you claim you don't.
What's the fucking difference?
Each and every one of us 'take advantage' of every loophole and deduction we can to limit our tax liability. You're a bald-faced liar if you claim you don't.
What's the fucking difference?
The difference is hiding money vs finding the rules in the code that allow you to keep the money.
One is decietful and unpatriotic, the other is just having good sense.
If the rules allow you to park your money somewhere other than Stateside, how is that 'hiding' it?
