Pogo
Diamond Member
- Dec 7, 2012
- 123,708
- 22,749
Whatever the details of that may be, nobody was named in either of the tweets in question, which is the first and biggest most obvious reason he has no case.
My post above was to ask Ray if his analogy of the store burglar applies to the shooting event. From what I'm reading it would appear it does not.
No it was assault and battery with bodily injury. Zimmerman defended himself. It's just that simple.
Once again --- the question was put to Ray, who brought up the analogy.
Once again, thugs engaging in criminal activity are fully aware there decisions could cost them everything. Ray simply used one example, there are thousands of possible scenarios.
.
Once AGAIN --- THE QUESTION WAS FOR THE POSTER WHO MADE THE ANALOGY. YOU ARE NOT THAT POSTER AND YOU DO NOT SPEAK FOR HIM. I've got three bigger fonts plus bold if that didn't get through.
Got it, you're only interested in playing a game of semantics, here's a clue for ya commie, semantics is the last bastion of a loser.
ONCE AGAIN -- the post CLEARLY responded to *Ray* and *NOT TO YOU*. It's right there in the fucking quote nest. There is nothing you can do to change that.
There has literally never been a moment when that was not the case.