paperview
Life is Good
Prosecution in their court documents declare her statements are corroborated.Her story is corroborated.
by whom?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Prosecution in their court documents declare her statements are corroborated.Her story is corroborated.
by whom?
Prosecution in their court documents declare her statements are corroborated.Her story is corroborated.
by whom?
Investigator: Why have you decided to come forward now? Not that that’s wrong. I mean I don’t want you to think that at all. I think that good but what has led you to come forward to us now?Okay, so 2 days after the shooting, she makes up a story to get herself in the spotlight, claiming sexual molestation since she was 6 and Zimmerman was 8. Sorry, I don't buy it....and saying that it happened IN FRONT of their families....you really believe that?
The shooting occurs 2/26/2012, she calls SFPD a couple of days later (call it 2/28/2012) - the case blows up and goes national around 3/20/2012 and the claim is she called to "get herself in the spotlight" a month before there was a spotlight to get into?
You really believe that?
>>>>
If she has an axe to grind then she would call when he was most vulnerable.
And that looks to be the case here as there is ZERO evidence of anything other than hher word against his.
She has no credibility. Why give her any?
Scumbag Angela Corey has released information that allegedly when Zimmerman was 8 and his cousin was 6 he molested her.
This is an admission that prosecutor Corey has NO EVIDENCE against Zimmerman.
Okay, so 2 days after the shooting, she makes up a story to get herself in the spotlight, claiming sexual molestation since she was 6 and Zimmerman was 8. Sorry, I don't buy it....and saying that it happened IN FRONT of their families....you really believe that?
The shooting occurs 2/26/2012, she calls SFPD a couple of days later (call it 2/28/2012) - the case blows up and goes national around 3/20/2012 and the claim is she called to "get herself in the spotlight" a month before there was a spotlight to get into?
You really believe that?
>>>>
If she has an axe to grind then she would call when he was most vulnerable.
And that looks to be the case here as there is ZERO evidence of anything other than hher word against his.
She has no credibility. Why give her any?
Has anyone heard from the 999 babes, who attacked a presidential running mate just at the right time, in which they did just to unhinge him from his run for the presidency? Isn't it just funny how they all disapeared once they achieved their goals ? Oh and forget about the hurt and pain and suffering they had aquirred in it all, just as long as they politically unseated the canidate in which became their target in what must have been a cunning and planned character assasination, but for whom did they do all this for, and where did they all go ?Okay, so 2 days after the shooting, she makes up a story to get herself in the spotlight, claiming sexual molestation since she was 6 and Zimmerman was 8. Sorry, I don't buy it....and saying that it happened IN FRONT of their families....you really believe that?
The shooting occurs 2/26/2012, she calls SFPD a couple of days later (call it 2/28/2012) - the case blows up and goes national around 3/20/2012 and the claim is she called to "get herself in the spotlight" a month before there was a spotlight to get into?
You really believe that?
>>>>
Yes, do you really think she didn't hear about the case before she brought her charges????
Prosecution in their court documents declare her statements are corroborated.Her story is corroborated.
by whom?
The law assumes he is innocent as of now.
People get the presumption of innocence in our system, you idiot. Not legislative Acts.
The shooting occurs 2/26/2012, she calls SFPD a couple of days later (call it 2/28/2012) - the case blows up and goes national around 3/20/2012 and the claim is she called to "get herself in the spotlight" a month before there was a spotlight to get into?
You really believe that?
>>>>
If she has an axe to grind then she would call when he was most vulnerable.
Of course she has an axe to grind. The original statement was that she called to get into the spotlight, called well before the case got any publicity.
And that looks to be the case here as there is ZERO evidence of anything other than hher word against his.
She has no credibility. Why give her any?
What makes you think, that I think, she has any credibility?
She has, as you put it, an "axe to grind" AND the charges about sexual contact with Zimmerman are totally irrelevant to the case for which he is charged.
>>>>
The law assumes he is innocent as of now.
I know that this may come as as surprise to you, but YOU ARE NOT THE LAW! Nor is anyone here.
Investigator: Why have you decided to come forward now? Not that thats wrong. I mean I dont want you to think that at all. I think that good but what has led you to come forward to us now?The shooting occurs 2/26/2012, she calls SFPD a couple of days later (call it 2/28/2012) - the case blows up and goes national around 3/20/2012 and the claim is she called to "get herself in the spotlight" a month before there was a spotlight to get into?
You really believe that?
>>>>
If she has an axe to grind then she would call when he was most vulnerable.
And that looks to be the case here as there is ZERO evidence of anything other than hher word against his.
She has no credibility. Why give her any?
W9: This is the first time in my life that I am not afraid of him (crying). I know that nothing can get to me, he cant get to me. I mean if I saw him on the street or if I saw him anywhere it would just make me breakdown in tears. But now with everything going on, I know hes not going to be out in public, you know I wont go to Target and see him anymore. Im not afraid of him now.
<snip>
W9: The thing is that growing up I told my friends, but I didnt tell my family. And those people would probably remember more than I would. I dont remember, I tried, tried so hard to forget it all and to make it go away that I even forgot the good stuff in my life (crying).
I: Well
W9: Theres things that my family talks about that sounded awesome but I dont remember that (crying) it sounds like they are talking about someone else. I dont (crying)
I: OK, OK. Just so Im clear person youre talking about that did this in Lake Mary whats his name?
W9: George Zimmerman
I: OK and whats his relationship to you?
W9: (redacted)
I: Alright, is there anything else that you can think of that we havent discussed that important that you wanted to share with me today about this?
W9: Does it count that he admitted it?
I: Did he admit it to you? Is that what youre saying?
9 - well yeah, my parents were there - my parents found out & they confronted him & his parents about what happene & they wanted to get together & talk about it because I think - they just don't believe it because he - he is that way that he MAKES HIMSELF LOOK SO GOOD THAT THEY WERE IN SHOCK. They had no idea and I never told them the depths of it, I told them I don't want to talk about it Just forget it, (NN - when did this happpen?/go into more detail) 2005 - My sister told them after I told her that night & she said that she told them, she had to tell my dad & she didn't know what else to do & I was so afraid and I WAS I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AFRAID OF HIM..
NN - what's your sister's last name (REDACTED) how old were you in '05?
9 - let's seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.... 20
NN -what happened when your sister told... what part did you tell your sister first?
9 - I just told her that things happened. That was it, I never... (NN - no specifics?) - NOTHING IN DETAIL - I was there when she called my dad & told him I was freaking out & very scared & said things happened w/George &....
NN - OK so what happens next in the sequence of that?
9 - we went to a restaurant it was the UNO in Lake Mary @ the time, we = me mom & dad annnd they told George we need to talk about this and INSTEAD OF TALKING ABOUT IT all he did was come in the room - the restaurant, he sat on the end of the booth and said "I'm sorry" AND JUST GOT UP AND WALKED OUT.
People get the presumption of innocence in our system, you idiot. Not legislative Acts.
Legislative acts get the presumption of constitutionality, though. But I'm sure you already knew that, what with being a lawyer and all. So you say.
I saw George Zimmerman club a baby seal.
I swear it's the truth.
People get the presumption of innocence in our system
Individual citizens are under no such constraint
People get the presumption of innocence in our system
Individual citizens are under no such constraint
I'm glad you finally are getting it.
Hannity scores a coup!
Sean Hannity Nabs First Interview With George Zimmerman, Airing Tonight