Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
While someone is in the process of declaring you indigent, and parents and wife are talking about practically rummaging through the sofa cushions to find money to raise the bond -- you don't mention 200K, that is a sin of omission.
His lawyer verified Zimmerman knew about that money at the time of the Bond hearing.
He asked for money for legal fees AND living expenses. That makes any money an asset. An asset he didn't report.While someone is in the process of declaring you indigent, and parents and wife are talking about practically rummaging through the sofa cushions to find money to raise the bond -- you don't mention 200K, that is a sin of omission.
His lawyer verified Zimmerman knew about that money at the time of the Bond hearing.
The bond hearing is not the application.
Knowing that someone set up a site begging for money does not mean you know that it has succeeded in "raising" even one thin dime.
Raising money to pay for legal fees is also not the same thing as assuming you have any claim to any such money for other purposes, such as posting some bail.
Raising money to pay for legal fees is also not the same thing as assuming you have any claim to any such money for other purposes, such as posting some bail.
Wonder what he spent $50,000 dollars on in such a short time.
Wonder what he spent $50,000 dollars on in such a short time.
Bodyguards and a down payment on a house in Mexico.
Wonder what he spent $50,000 dollars on in such a short time.
Bodyguards and a down payment on a house in Mexico.
I think that Zimmerman has to good of a case to flee. And Mexico sure wouldn't be the place if he did.
the defense asking the cop a question?? What the hell??At approximate 1:57 you can hear O'Mara objecting to a question that was out of scope to the direct.
George Zimmerman bond hearing :: WRAL.com
>>>>
That was the defense asking the cop a question.
NO. That was THE STATE asking Zimmerman a question that goes beyond the scope...exactly as I said. The second the prosecution goes outside the scope, the defense objects: "Outside the scope of direct examination. I object your honor!"
The objection is sustained.
Floriduh. And yeah, those that sit in jail do so because they don't have the money to hire an attorney, unlike Zimmerman.
Everyone gets an attorney, not everyone gets bail. One is a right, the other you have to pay for. If it really worked the way you claimed no one would be in jail until after they are found guilty.
There's a huge difference between hiring an attorney and using a court appointed one that doesn't have the time and many times the motivation to advise his or her client properly.
Shows that he makes generalizations based on his stereotypical thinking.I dont miss driving around scared to hit mexicans walkin on the side of the street, soft ass wanna be thugs messin with peoples cars when they aint around (what are you provin, that you can dent a car when no ones watchin) dont make you a man in my book. Workin 96 hours to get a decent pay check, gettin knifes pulled on you by every mexican you run into!
Why did you highlight the above text in red?
Wonder what he spent $50,000 dollars on in such a short time.
Raising money to pay for legal fees is also not the same thing as assuming you have any claim to any such money for other purposes, such as posting some bail.
O'Mara said in court that Zimmerman had already used part of the $204,000 collected and that about $150,000 was remaining. He indicated that Zimmerman used part of the difference for living expenses and $5,000 as part of the money for the bond.
>>>>
the defense asking the cop a question?? What the hell??That was the defense asking the cop a question.
NO. That was THE STATE asking Zimmerman a question that goes beyond the scope...exactly as I said. The second the prosecution goes outside the scope, the defense objects: "Outside the scope of direct examination. I object your honor!"
The objection is sustained.
Excuse me, genius, I am specifically referring to the video that World Watcher posted, not the imaginary one in your head. The man on the stand is old, fat, has a gray beard, and has a badge clipped to his suit pocket. If you think that is Zimmerman, and that Zimmerman's attorney now works for the state, you are in worst shape than I thought.
By the way, the defense in that video clearly had medical records that indicate Zimmerman had a broken nose.
the defense asking the cop a question?? What the hell??
NO. That was THE STATE asking Zimmerman a question that goes beyond the scope...exactly as I said. The second the prosecution goes outside the scope, the defense objects: "Outside the scope of direct examination. I object your honor!"
The objection is sustained.
Excuse me, genius, I am specifically referring to the video that World Watcher posted, not the imaginary one in your head. The man on the stand is old, fat, has a gray beard, and has a badge clipped to his suit pocket. If you think that is Zimmerman, and that Zimmerman's attorney now works for the state, you are in worst shape than I thought.
1 Hour and 57 Minutes into the linked video it's Zimmerman on the stand.
By the way, the defense in that video clearly had medical records that indicate Zimmerman had a broken nose.
No they didn't, if you watch the video the State says they don't have the medical records and the Defense offers to provide them to the prosecution.
>>>>
Raising money to pay for legal fees is also not the same thing as assuming you have any claim to any such money for other purposes, such as posting some bail.
O'Mara said in court that Zimmerman had already used part of the $204,000 collected and that about $150,000 was remaining. He indicated that Zimmerman used part of the difference for living expenses and $5,000 as part of the money for the bond.
>>>>
How did Zimmerman access his PayPal account from inside jail? Just because some of the money was used for bail does not mean Zimmerman himself used it.
the defense asking the cop a question?? What the hell??That was the defense asking the cop a question.
NO. That was THE STATE asking Zimmerman a question that goes beyond the scope...exactly as I said. The second the prosecution goes outside the scope, the defense objects: "Outside the scope of direct examination. I object your honor!"
The objection is sustained.
Excuse me, genius, I am specifically referring to the video that World Watcher posted, not the imaginary one in your head. The man on the stand is old, fat, has a gray beard, and has a badge clipped to his suit pocket. If you think that is Zimmerman, and that Zimmerman's attorney now works for the state, you are in worst shape than I thought.
By the way, the defense in that video clearly had medical records that indicate Zimmerman had a broken nose.
Worldwatcher said:At approximate 1:57 you can hear O'Mara objecting to a question that was out of scope to the direct.
George Zimmerman bond hearing :: WRAL.com
Excuse me, genius, I am specifically referring to the video that World Watcher posted, not the imaginary one in your head. The man on the stand is old, fat, has a gray beard, and has a badge clipped to his suit pocket. If you think that is Zimmerman, and that Zimmerman's attorney now works for the state, you are in worst shape than I thought.
1 Hour and 57 Minutes into the linked video it's Zimmerman on the stand.
And the question was asking about something in a text message, not his finances.
How does you pointing out that the defense is offering to provide medical records to the prosecution contradict my statement that the defense said they have the medical records?
