Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's the rub. Trump didn't lose every lawsuit.Trump was perfectly able to contest the election in dozens of lawsuits and lost every single one.
After losing his lawsuits, he should have stopped because he was out of legal options. That's when he started using illegal methods to change the outcome because he ran out of legitimate methods.
You've never heard of an affirmative defense? Like a self defense case where the defendant is already copping to the act of killing someone, these Republicans could be argued to be copping to obstructing justice by their very attempt to remove Fani Willis from this case.The burden could be placed on them to prove they had legitimate reasons for attempting to remove her.Then it would be HER burden to prove that in a criminal court,...geez man...you really have no idea how our Govt works
Georgia Republicans are enacting a law to remove duly elected district attorneys. This is specifically designed to remove Fami Lewis from the Trump prosecution case. How low can you go?
Georgia GOP Gears Up to Remove Atlanta Prosecutor Who Indicted Donald Trump
The Georgia prosecutor who indicted Trump, Atlanta District Attorney Fani Willis, is being targeted by the GOP for removal under a new law.theintercept.com
Great. It just proves that Trump's complaints were heard and the outcome was correct.There's the rub. Trump didn't lose every lawsuit.
He won a few.
Course the media refuses to report this fact.
According to Bush v Gore, that's the right thing to do.Most of the ones that were ongoing when they certified the election were dismissed using the certification as an excuse for dismissal.
I never claimed it was "perfectly fine for Trump to use Ukraine to go after Biden because they weren't rivals." - another lie on your part.
It was and is perfectly fine for the US President to ensure the nation we were giving aid to was and is committed to rooting out corruption. In fact, I would argue it's the duty of the President and our Govt in general to ensure our tax dollars aren't being used to support a corrupt regime.
The fact the Xiden family was involved in a corrupt company in Ukraine and Xiden happens to be your current cult leader doesn't give him a pass
You've never heard of an affirmative defense? Like a self defense case where the defendant is already copping to the act of killing someone, these Republicans could be argued to be copping to obstructing justice by their very attempt to remove Fani Willis from this case.The burden could be placed on them to prove they had legitimate reasons for attempting to remove he
Sure he was. That’s why the Xidens Wanted him outThe objective was for Ukraine to clean up it's reputation for corruption so they could attract foreign investment. Shokin wouldn't prosecute corruption.
Let them try to hide behind that claim.In
I have but not sure how it’s relevant here
You claimed it was obstruction…its her job to prove its obstruction for them to do what the law literally commands them to do
There's the rub. Trump didn't lose every lawsuit.
He won a few.
Course the media refuses to report this fact.
Most of the ones that were ongoing when they certified the election were dismissed using the certification as an excuse for dismissal.
Sure he was. That’s why the Xidens Wanted him out
Progressives are mostly aligned on agendas. Whether they like it or not. Republicans have people who actually derail their own. And they really have an issue of getting conservatives elected. There are not that many of them.Sure he was what?
I hope they do, all defendants are entitled to that....at least so far....in the United States. The State has the burden of proof...i get that clearly upsets youLet them try to hide behind that claim.
prosecuting corruptionSure he was what?
www.foxnews.com
There's the rub. Trump didn't lose every lawsuit.
He won a few.
Course the media refuses to report this fact.
Most of the ones that were ongoing when they certified the election were dismissed using the certification as an excuse for dismissal.
www.brookings.edu
prosecuting corruption
Former Ukraine prosecutor makes explosive claims against Joe and Hunter Biden in new interview
EXCLUSIVE: Former Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin told Fox News he was fired in 2016 to prevent him from probing Burisma, the company where Hunter Biden worked.
Who are "we"?Maybe because we don't see prosecuting Trump as a political ploy.
I don't see how anyone can defend Trump's actions after the 2020 election. These are exactly the kinds of actions that should be prosecuted, or else they are going to keep happening. Trying to overturn elections you've lost isn't okay. It should never be okay.
"We" are people who aren't in Trump's cult.Who are "we"?
Are you referencing ALL ruminants when you say that?
This is only the beginning. You didn't think we would sit by while corrupt Democrats made a mockery of the law did you?
Not for affirmative defenses. That doesn't upset me one bit.I hope they do, all defendants are entitled to that....at least so far....in the United States. The State has the burden of proof...i get that clearly upsets you
That's a heap of fake news and projection.And yet you expected all Americans to sit back while Donald Trump made a mockery of the law, investigated and tried to jail his political enemies using Russian propaganda and "evidence" provided by the GRU, while Trump and his family were publically and openly taking bribes from China, the Saudis, and others, and then tried to steal the election.
That's one hell of a double standard you've got going there.
