Getting 911 correct - simple question

[irosie91]

No shit

Bush never would have gotten approval to invade Iraq if not for post 9-11 hysteria

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

for the record-----the jerks also falsely claim "BUSH SAID SADDAM HAS NUCLEAR BOMBS"<<NOPE

He certainly implied it when, as justification for war with Iraq, he warned a “mushroom cloud” could be the “smoking gun” if action was not taken...

”Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past. Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons. If the Iraqi regime is able to produce, buy, or steal an amount of highly-enriched uranium a little larger than a single softball, it could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year. And if we allow that to happen, a terrible line would be crossed. Saddam Hussein would be in a position to blackmail anyone who opposes his aggression. He would be in a position to dominate the Middle East. He would be in a position to threaten America. And Saddam Hussein would be in a position to pass nuclear technology to terrorists. Some citizens wonder: After 11 years of living with this problem, why do we need to confront it now? There is a reason. We have experienced the horror of September 11. We have seen that those who hate America are willing to crash airplanes into buildings full of innocent people. Our enemies would be no less willing -- in fact they would be eager -- to use a biological, or chemical, or a nuclear weapon. Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.” ~ George Bush, 10.8.2002

​

^^^^^^ that statement by Bush was 100% accurate and realistic------you wanted lies?​

You unmitigated moron... that statement was not “100% accurate.” Hussein had not been rebuilding their nuclear facilities. The attempted purchase of Uranium was based on a fake document. The Uranium that was found in Iraq and subsequently brought to the U.S. still had the U.N. seals from when it was first discovered after the first Gulf war. And he tied it to 9.11 to play on America’s fears when Iraq had nothing to do with 9.11.

Wrong again you LIAR ---The ONLY reason that Saddam was not busy building a nuclear
bomb is because he did not have the means YET. He was knocking himself out on chemicals
and biologicals and any other brutality that he could conjure up-----<<<<<AND THAT IS THE GIST
OF THE ACCURATE MESSAGE OF BUSH AT THAT TIME-----which at no point included an accusation
that SADDAM did 9-11. (YOU LIAR) DID YOU DANCE ON THE DEAD BODIES OF KURDISH
KIDS ROTTING IN THE SUN? I am not at all surprised that some americans imagined that he did
say "saddam did 9-11" My fellow americans are that stupid . He "implied"??? no such implication
screwed my mind------some people have EASILY SCREWED MINDS

 

[Faun]

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

for the record-----the jerks also falsely claim "BUSH SAID SADDAM HAS NUCLEAR BOMBS"<<NOPE

He certainly implied it when, as justification for war with Iraq, he warned a “mushroom cloud” could be the “smoking gun” if action was not taken...

”Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past. Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons. If the Iraqi regime is able to produce, buy, or steal an amount of highly-enriched uranium a little larger than a single softball, it could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year. And if we allow that to happen, a terrible line would be crossed. Saddam Hussein would be in a position to blackmail anyone who opposes his aggression. He would be in a position to dominate the Middle East. He would be in a position to threaten America. And Saddam Hussein would be in a position to pass nuclear technology to terrorists. Some citizens wonder: After 11 years of living with this problem, why do we need to confront it now? There is a reason. We have experienced the horror of September 11. We have seen that those who hate America are willing to crash airplanes into buildings full of innocent people. Our enemies would be no less willing -- in fact they would be eager -- to use a biological, or chemical, or a nuclear weapon. Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.” ~ George Bush, 10.8.2002

​

^^^^^^ that statement by Bush was 100% accurate and realistic------you wanted lies?​

You unmitigated moron... that statement was not “100% accurate.” Hussein had not been rebuilding their nuclear facilities. The attempted purchase of Uranium was based on a fake document. The Uranium that was found in Iraq and subsequently brought to the U.S. still had the U.N. seals from when it was first discovered after the first Gulf war. And he tied it to 9.11 to play on America’s fears when Iraq had nothing to do with 9.11.

Wrong again you LIAR ---The ONLY reason that Saddam was not busy building a nuclear
bomb is because he did not have the means YET. He was knocking himself out on chemicals
and biologicals and any other brutality that he could conjure up-----<<<<<AND THAT IS THE GIST
OF THE ACCURATE MESSAGE OF BUSH AT THAT TIME-----which at no point included an accusation
that SADDAM did 9-11. (YOU LIAR) DID YOU DANCE ON THE DEAD BODIES OF KURDISH
KIDS ROTTING IN THE SUN? I am not at all surprised that some americans imagined that he did
say "saddam did 9-11"

You're truly fucking crazy and live in your own historically revised bubble.

In reality, Hussein had over 4 years of not being monitored, from the time the U.N. inspectors were withdrawn in 1998 until we invaded in 2003, and at no time during that period did Hussein rebuild his weapons programs.

Furthermore, you idiotically claim Bush's statement was 100% accurate. Great -- show proof that Iraq was rebuilding their nuclear facilities......

My fellow americans are that stupid . He "implied"??? no such implication
screwed my mind------some people have EASILY SCREWED MINDS

Spits the retard who admits he didn't even know Cheney drew a false connection between Iraq and 9.11. It's not that no one screwed your mind -- it's that your mind was shut down to actual information.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Saudi Arabia hunted down Al qaeda terrorists. What was to gain by attacking the US for the Saudi Government? Without our help, they would be open to attack by Iran at their leisure?

By the same reasoning, why would we attack the Saudi people for what a few of their countryman did? Using that logic, we should have executed every single Japanese-American after Pearl Harbor.

You have been reading too many conspiracy theories and not doing enough thinking on your own, if that is possible.

Very true

Instead...we attacked Iraq

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. That's why we never invaded until March of 2003, 18 months later.

No shit

Bush never would have gotten approval to invade Iraq if not for post 9-11 hysteria

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

Many, many people b’lieved Iraq was involved in 9.11; not because they were confused but because the Bush Administration was pushing that narrative for a while...

On Dec. 9, 2001, Cheney said on "Meet The Press" that "it's been pretty well confirmed that he did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack."

More at: Iraq, 9/11 Still Linked Cheney​

That information was confirmed by multiple intelligence sources which all turned out to be wrong. There was no intent to deceive anyone except Saddam Hussein trying to bolster his claim of possessing WMDs.

 

[Faun]

Very true

Instead...we attacked Iraq

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. That's why we never invaded until March of 2003, 18 months later.

No shit

Bush never would have gotten approval to invade Iraq if not for post 9-11 hysteria

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

Many, many people b’lieved Iraq was involved in 9.11; not because they were confused but because the Bush Administration was pushing that narrative for a while...

On Dec. 9, 2001, Cheney said on "Meet The Press" that "it's been pretty well confirmed that he did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack."

More at: Iraq, 9/11 Still Linked Cheney​

That information was confirmed by multiple intelligence sources which all turned out to be wrong. There was no intent to deceive anyone except Saddam Hussein trying to bolster his claim of possessing WMDs.

That was never confirmed by any intelligence agency and was thoroughly discredited when a memo surfaced...

http://2d0yaz2jiom3c6vy7e7e5svk.wpe...content/uploads/2012/06/cheneyiraq911memo.pdf

Indicating our intelligence community knew it was bullshit and sent that memo to the White House Situation Room on December 8th, 2001.

The next day Cheney went on national television, and in stark contrast to the CIA memo, declared...

"Well, what we now have that's developed since you and I last talked, Tim, of course, was that report that--it's been pretty well confirmed that he [9.11 hijacker Mohammed Atta] did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack. Now, what the purpose of that was, what transpired between them, we simply don't know at this point, but that's clearly an avenue that we want to pursue." ~ Dick Cheney, 12.9.2001​

So no, our intelligence agencies were not wrong. The vice president was. And it took the Bush Administration almost two years, and after invading Iraq, to straighten the record.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. That's why we never invaded until March of 2003, 18 months later.

No shit

Bush never would have gotten approval to invade Iraq if not for post 9-11 hysteria

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

Many, many people b’lieved Iraq was involved in 9.11; not because they were confused but because the Bush Administration was pushing that narrative for a while...

On Dec. 9, 2001, Cheney said on "Meet The Press" that "it's been pretty well confirmed that he did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack."

More at: Iraq, 9/11 Still Linked Cheney​

That information was confirmed by multiple intelligence sources which all turned out to be wrong. There was no intent to deceive anyone except Saddam Hussein trying to bolster his claim of possessing WMDs.

That was never confirmed by any intelligence agency and was thoroughly discredited when a memo surfaced...

http://2d0yaz2jiom3c6vy7e7e5svk.wpe...content/uploads/2012/06/cheneyiraq911memo.pdf

Indicating our intelligence community knew it was bullshit and sent that memo to the White House Situation Room on December 8th, 2001.

The next day Cheney went on national television, and in stark contrast to the CIA memo, declared...

"Well, what we now have that's developed since you and I last talked, Tim, of course, was that report that--it's been pretty well confirmed that he [9.11 hijacker Mohammed Atta] did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack. Now, what the purpose of that was, what transpired between them, we simply don't know at this point, but that's clearly an avenue that we want to pursue." ~ Dick Cheney, 12.9.2001​

So no, our intelligence agencies were not wrong. The vice president was. And it took the Bush Administration almost two years, and after invading Iraq, to straighten the record.

You have your sources, and I have mine. I trust mine more than the media.

 

[Faun]

No shit

Bush never would have gotten approval to invade Iraq if not for post 9-11 hysteria

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

Many, many people b’lieved Iraq was involved in 9.11; not because they were confused but because the Bush Administration was pushing that narrative for a while...

On Dec. 9, 2001, Cheney said on "Meet The Press" that "it's been pretty well confirmed that he did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack."

More at: Iraq, 9/11 Still Linked Cheney​

That information was confirmed by multiple intelligence sources which all turned out to be wrong. There was no intent to deceive anyone except Saddam Hussein trying to bolster his claim of possessing WMDs.

That was never confirmed by any intelligence agency and was thoroughly discredited when a memo surfaced...

http://2d0yaz2jiom3c6vy7e7e5svk.wpe...content/uploads/2012/06/cheneyiraq911memo.pdf

Indicating our intelligence community knew it was bullshit and sent that memo to the White House Situation Room on December 8th, 2001.

The next day Cheney went on national television, and in stark contrast to the CIA memo, declared...

"Well, what we now have that's developed since you and I last talked, Tim, of course, was that report that--it's been pretty well confirmed that he [9.11 hijacker Mohammed Atta] did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack. Now, what the purpose of that was, what transpired between them, we simply don't know at this point, but that's clearly an avenue that we want to pursue." ~ Dick Cheney, 12.9.2001​

So no, our intelligence agencies were not wrong. The vice president was. And it took the Bush Administration almost two years, and after invading Iraq, to straighten the record.

You have your sources, and I have mine. I trust mine more than the media.

Moron.

Mine is not the media. Mine was a memo from the CIA to inform the White House that the Mohammed Atta in Prague was not the same Mohammed Atta who flew a jet into the World Trade Center.

I also note, you didn't actually show evidence to support your claims. You merely said it, uncorroborated, sourcing no one.

 

[Skylar]

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

for the record-----the jerks also falsely claim "BUSH SAID SADDAM HAS NUCLEAR BOMBS"<<NOPE

He certainly implied it when, as justification for war with Iraq, he warned a “mushroom cloud” could be the “smoking gun” if action was not taken...

”Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past. Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons. If the Iraqi regime is able to produce, buy, or steal an amount of highly-enriched uranium a little larger than a single softball, it could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year. And if we allow that to happen, a terrible line would be crossed. Saddam Hussein would be in a position to blackmail anyone who opposes his aggression. He would be in a position to dominate the Middle East. He would be in a position to threaten America. And Saddam Hussein would be in a position to pass nuclear technology to terrorists. Some citizens wonder: After 11 years of living with this problem, why do we need to confront it now? There is a reason. We have experienced the horror of September 11. We have seen that those who hate America are willing to crash airplanes into buildings full of innocent people. Our enemies would be no less willing -- in fact they would be eager -- to use a biological, or chemical, or a nuclear weapon. Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.” ~ George Bush, 10.8.2002

​

^^^^^^ that statement by Bush was 100% accurate and realistic------you wanted lies?​

You unmitigated moron... that statement was not “100% accurate.” Hussein had not been rebuilding their nuclear facilities. The attempted purchase of Uranium was based on a fake document. The Uranium that was found in Iraq and subsequently brought to the U.S. still had the U.N. seals from when it was first discovered after the first Gulf war. And he tied it to 9.11 to play on America’s fears when Iraq had nothing to do with 9.11.

Wrong again you LIAR ---The ONLY reason that Saddam was not busy building a nuclear
bomb is because he did not have the means YET. He was knocking himself out on chemicals
and biologicals and any other brutality that he could conjure up-----<<<<<AND THAT IS THE GIST
OF THE ACCURATE MESSAGE OF BUSH AT THAT TIME-----which at no point included an accusation
that SADDAM did 9-11. (YOU LIAR) DID YOU DANCE ON THE DEAD BODIES OF KURDISH
KIDS ROTTING IN THE SUN? I am not at all surprised that some americans imagined that he did
say "saddam did 9-11" My fellow americans are that stupid . He "implied"??? no such implication
screwed my mind------some people have EASILY SCREWED MINDS

Bush's message was that Saddam was in immediate possession of weapons of mass destruction.

Saddam didn't have them.

 

[irosie91]

for the record-----the jerks also falsely claim "BUSH SAID SADDAM HAS NUCLEAR BOMBS"<<NOPE

He certainly implied it when, as justification for war with Iraq, he warned a “mushroom cloud” could be the “smoking gun” if action was not taken...

”Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past. Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons. If the Iraqi regime is able to produce, buy, or steal an amount of highly-enriched uranium a little larger than a single softball, it could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year. And if we allow that to happen, a terrible line would be crossed. Saddam Hussein would be in a position to blackmail anyone who opposes his aggression. He would be in a position to dominate the Middle East. He would be in a position to threaten America. And Saddam Hussein would be in a position to pass nuclear technology to terrorists. Some citizens wonder: After 11 years of living with this problem, why do we need to confront it now? There is a reason. We have experienced the horror of September 11. We have seen that those who hate America are willing to crash airplanes into buildings full of innocent people. Our enemies would be no less willing -- in fact they would be eager -- to use a biological, or chemical, or a nuclear weapon. Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.” ~ George Bush, 10.8.2002

​

^^^^^^ that statement by Bush was 100% accurate and realistic------you wanted lies?​

You unmitigated moron... that statement was not “100% accurate.” Hussein had not been rebuilding their nuclear facilities. The attempted purchase of Uranium was based on a fake document. The Uranium that was found in Iraq and subsequently brought to the U.S. still had the U.N. seals from when it was first discovered after the first Gulf war. And he tied it to 9.11 to play on America’s fears when Iraq had nothing to do with 9.11.

Wrong again you LIAR ---The ONLY reason that Saddam was not busy building a nuclear
bomb is because he did not have the means YET. He was knocking himself out on chemicals
and biologicals and any other brutality that he could conjure up-----<<<<<AND THAT IS THE GIST
OF THE ACCURATE MESSAGE OF BUSH AT THAT TIME-----which at no point included an accusation
that SADDAM did 9-11. (YOU LIAR) DID YOU DANCE ON THE DEAD BODIES OF KURDISH
KIDS ROTTING IN THE SUN? I am not at all surprised that some americans imagined that he did
say "saddam did 9-11" My fellow americans are that stupid . He "implied"??? no such implication
screwed my mind------some people have EASILY SCREWED MINDS

Bush's message was that Saddam was in immediate possession of weapons of mass destruction.

Saddam didn't have them.

Neither did Hitler. I listened to Bush's speeches------I did not hear "HE's GOT NUCLEAR BOMBS" ----
but I did know then------and a lot more since ,,,that he had the means to commit terrorist acts around
the world and was HIGHLY motivated to do so. Do you have any idea why he invaded Kuwait?

 

[Skylar]

He certainly implied it when, as justification for war with Iraq, he warned a “mushroom cloud” could be the “smoking gun” if action was not taken...

”Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past. Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons. If the Iraqi regime is able to produce, buy, or steal an amount of highly-enriched uranium a little larger than a single softball, it could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year. And if we allow that to happen, a terrible line would be crossed. Saddam Hussein would be in a position to blackmail anyone who opposes his aggression. He would be in a position to dominate the Middle East. He would be in a position to threaten America. And Saddam Hussein would be in a position to pass nuclear technology to terrorists. Some citizens wonder: After 11 years of living with this problem, why do we need to confront it now? There is a reason. We have experienced the horror of September 11. We have seen that those who hate America are willing to crash airplanes into buildings full of innocent people. Our enemies would be no less willing -- in fact they would be eager -- to use a biological, or chemical, or a nuclear weapon. Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.” ~ George Bush, 10.8.2002

​

^^^^^^ that statement by Bush was 100% accurate and realistic------you wanted lies?​

You unmitigated moron... that statement was not “100% accurate.” Hussein had not been rebuilding their nuclear facilities. The attempted purchase of Uranium was based on a fake document. The Uranium that was found in Iraq and subsequently brought to the U.S. still had the U.N. seals from when it was first discovered after the first Gulf war. And he tied it to 9.11 to play on America’s fears when Iraq had nothing to do with 9.11.

Wrong again you LIAR ---The ONLY reason that Saddam was not busy building a nuclear
bomb is because he did not have the means YET. He was knocking himself out on chemicals
and biologicals and any other brutality that he could conjure up-----<<<<<AND THAT IS THE GIST
OF THE ACCURATE MESSAGE OF BUSH AT THAT TIME-----which at no point included an accusation
that SADDAM did 9-11. (YOU LIAR) DID YOU DANCE ON THE DEAD BODIES OF KURDISH
KIDS ROTTING IN THE SUN? I am not at all surprised that some americans imagined that he did
say "saddam did 9-11" My fellow americans are that stupid . He "implied"??? no such implication
screwed my mind------some people have EASILY SCREWED MINDS

Bush's message was that Saddam was in immediate possession of weapons of mass destruction.

Saddam didn't have them.

Neither did Hitler. I listened to Bush's speeches------I did not hear "HE's GOT NUCLEAR BOMBS" ----
but I did know then------and a lot more since ,,,that he had the means to commit terrorist acts around
the world and was HIGHLY motivated to do so. Do you have any idea why he invaded Kuwait?

The justification for the war was Weapons of Mass Destruction. That term was hammered again and again. Nuclear, biological, chemical. We were shown photos of vehicles we were assured were carrying them, facilities we were promised were manufacturing them, yellow cake we were promised Saddam was in possession of.

None of it was true. We were lied to.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

^^^^^^ that statement by Bush was 100% accurate and realistic------you wanted lies?​

You unmitigated moron... that statement was not “100% accurate.” Hussein had not been rebuilding their nuclear facilities. The attempted purchase of Uranium was based on a fake document. The Uranium that was found in Iraq and subsequently brought to the U.S. still had the U.N. seals from when it was first discovered after the first Gulf war. And he tied it to 9.11 to play on America’s fears when Iraq had nothing to do with 9.11.

Wrong again you LIAR ---The ONLY reason that Saddam was not busy building a nuclear
bomb is because he did not have the means YET. He was knocking himself out on chemicals
and biologicals and any other brutality that he could conjure up-----<<<<<AND THAT IS THE GIST
OF THE ACCURATE MESSAGE OF BUSH AT THAT TIME-----which at no point included an accusation
that SADDAM did 9-11. (YOU LIAR) DID YOU DANCE ON THE DEAD BODIES OF KURDISH
KIDS ROTTING IN THE SUN? I am not at all surprised that some americans imagined that he did
say "saddam did 9-11" My fellow americans are that stupid . He "implied"??? no such implication
screwed my mind------some people have EASILY SCREWED MINDS

Bush's message was that Saddam was in immediate possession of weapons of mass destruction.

Saddam didn't have them.

Neither did Hitler. I listened to Bush's speeches------I did not hear "HE's GOT NUCLEAR BOMBS" ----
but I did know then------and a lot more since ,,,that he had the means to commit terrorist acts around
the world and was HIGHLY motivated to do so. Do you have any idea why he invaded Kuwait?

The justification for the war was Weapons of Mass Destruction. That term was hammered again and again. Nuclear, biological, chemical. We were shown photos of vehicles we were assured were carrying them, facilities we were promised were manufacturing them, yellow cake we were promised Saddam was in possession of.

None of it was true. We were lied to.

Here is the problem with what you believe. Yes, we were lied to about all of those things but it was Saddam's henchman who defected and he believed all of those things to be the gospel because that is what everyone in Saddam's inner circle were led to believe.

If I am told that the US has live aliens captured and held in Area 51 because I have seen documentation from the government of that fact, and then it turns out that it wasn't true, who lied to you? Not me!

 

[Faun]

He certainly implied it when, as justification for war with Iraq, he warned a “mushroom cloud” could be the “smoking gun” if action was not taken...

”Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past. Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons. If the Iraqi regime is able to produce, buy, or steal an amount of highly-enriched uranium a little larger than a single softball, it could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year. And if we allow that to happen, a terrible line would be crossed. Saddam Hussein would be in a position to blackmail anyone who opposes his aggression. He would be in a position to dominate the Middle East. He would be in a position to threaten America. And Saddam Hussein would be in a position to pass nuclear technology to terrorists. Some citizens wonder: After 11 years of living with this problem, why do we need to confront it now? There is a reason. We have experienced the horror of September 11. We have seen that those who hate America are willing to crash airplanes into buildings full of innocent people. Our enemies would be no less willing -- in fact they would be eager -- to use a biological, or chemical, or a nuclear weapon. Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.” ~ George Bush, 10.8.2002

​

^^^^^^ that statement by Bush was 100% accurate and realistic------you wanted lies?​

You unmitigated moron... that statement was not “100% accurate.” Hussein had not been rebuilding their nuclear facilities. The attempted purchase of Uranium was based on a fake document. The Uranium that was found in Iraq and subsequently brought to the U.S. still had the U.N. seals from when it was first discovered after the first Gulf war. And he tied it to 9.11 to play on America’s fears when Iraq had nothing to do with 9.11.

Wrong again you LIAR ---The ONLY reason that Saddam was not busy building a nuclear
bomb is because he did not have the means YET. He was knocking himself out on chemicals
and biologicals and any other brutality that he could conjure up-----<<<<<AND THAT IS THE GIST
OF THE ACCURATE MESSAGE OF BUSH AT THAT TIME-----which at no point included an accusation
that SADDAM did 9-11. (YOU LIAR) DID YOU DANCE ON THE DEAD BODIES OF KURDISH
KIDS ROTTING IN THE SUN? I am not at all surprised that some americans imagined that he did
say "saddam did 9-11" My fellow americans are that stupid . He "implied"??? no such implication
screwed my mind------some people have EASILY SCREWED MINDS

Bush's message was that Saddam was in immediate possession of weapons of mass destruction.

Saddam didn't have them.

Neither did Hitler. I listened to Bush's speeches------I did not hear "HE's GOT NUCLEAR BOMBS" ----
but I did know then------and a lot more since ,,,that he had the means to commit terrorist acts around
the world and was HIGHLY motivated to do so. Do you have any idea why he invaded Kuwait?

You already admitted you weren’t paying attention to what was going on and I posted the excerpt from a Bush speech where he claimed Iraq was rebuilding their nuclear facilities, trying to obtain nuclear materials which could used to manufacture a nuclear weapon in under a year which could have been passed to terrorists to attack us, like the 9.11 terrorists, resulting in a nuclear bomb being set off in an American city. None of which was true.

That he said all that and you still can’t see it is a reflection on you and your G-d given limitations more than anything else.

 

[Faun]

You unmitigated moron... that statement was not “100% accurate.” Hussein had not been rebuilding their nuclear facilities. The attempted purchase of Uranium was based on a fake document. The Uranium that was found in Iraq and subsequently brought to the U.S. still had the U.N. seals from when it was first discovered after the first Gulf war. And he tied it to 9.11 to play on America’s fears when Iraq had nothing to do with 9.11.

Wrong again you LIAR ---The ONLY reason that Saddam was not busy building a nuclear
bomb is because he did not have the means YET. He was knocking himself out on chemicals
and biologicals and any other brutality that he could conjure up-----<<<<<AND THAT IS THE GIST
OF THE ACCURATE MESSAGE OF BUSH AT THAT TIME-----which at no point included an accusation
that SADDAM did 9-11. (YOU LIAR) DID YOU DANCE ON THE DEAD BODIES OF KURDISH
KIDS ROTTING IN THE SUN? I am not at all surprised that some americans imagined that he did
say "saddam did 9-11" My fellow americans are that stupid . He "implied"??? no such implication
screwed my mind------some people have EASILY SCREWED MINDS

Bush's message was that Saddam was in immediate possession of weapons of mass destruction.

Saddam didn't have them.

Neither did Hitler. I listened to Bush's speeches------I did not hear "HE's GOT NUCLEAR BOMBS" ----
but I did know then------and a lot more since ,,,that he had the means to commit terrorist acts around
the world and was HIGHLY motivated to do so. Do you have any idea why he invaded Kuwait?

The justification for the war was Weapons of Mass Destruction. That term was hammered again and again. Nuclear, biological, chemical. We were shown photos of vehicles we were assured were carrying them, facilities we were promised were manufacturing them, yellow cake we were promised Saddam was in possession of.

None of it was true. We were lied to.

Here is the problem with what you believe. Yes, we were lied to about all of those things but it was Saddam's henchman who defected and he believed all of those things to be the gospel because that is what everyone in Saddam's inner circle were led to believe.

If I am told that the US has live aliens captured and held in Area 51 because I have seen documentation from the government of that fact, and then it turns out that it wasn't true, who lied to you? Not me!

Hussein denied having WMD...

”We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons -- the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have.” ~ George Bush, 2.8.2003​

Turns out, Saddam Hussein was the one telling the truth; while it was our own government who was lying to the world.

 

[saltydancin]

for the record-----the jerks also falsely claim "BUSH SAID SADDAM HAS NUCLEAR BOMBS"<<NOPE

He certainly implied it when, as justification for war with Iraq, he warned a “mushroom cloud” could be the “smoking gun” if action was not taken...
”There is a reason. We have experienced the horror of September 11. We have seen that those who hate America are willing to crash airplanes into buildings full of innocent people.

​

^^^^^^ that statement by Bush was 100% accurate and realistic------you wanted lies?​

Bush's message was that Saddam was in immediate possession of weapons of mass destruction.
Saddam didn't have them.

Ye ole immaculate conception of a fabricated misnomer......for that super ego megalomaniacal patriot act.

 

[daisiesRwild]

anyone who calls anything conspiracy theory still are just falling for the lies and propaganda created to keep you dumbed down do some research its staggering wake up

 

[irosie91]

^^^^^^ that statement by Bush was 100% accurate and realistic------you wanted lies?​

You unmitigated moron... that statement was not “100% accurate.” Hussein had not been rebuilding their nuclear facilities. The attempted purchase of Uranium was based on a fake document. The Uranium that was found in Iraq and subsequently brought to the U.S. still had the U.N. seals from when it was first discovered after the first Gulf war. And he tied it to 9.11 to play on America’s fears when Iraq had nothing to do with 9.11.

Wrong again you LIAR ---The ONLY reason that Saddam was not busy building a nuclear
bomb is because he did not have the means YET. He was knocking himself out on chemicals
and biologicals and any other brutality that he could conjure up-----<<<<<AND THAT IS THE GIST
OF THE ACCURATE MESSAGE OF BUSH AT THAT TIME-----which at no point included an accusation
that SADDAM did 9-11. (YOU LIAR) DID YOU DANCE ON THE DEAD BODIES OF KURDISH
KIDS ROTTING IN THE SUN? I am not at all surprised that some americans imagined that he did
say "saddam did 9-11" My fellow americans are that stupid . He "implied"??? no such implication
screwed my mind------some people have EASILY SCREWED MINDS

Bush's message was that Saddam was in immediate possession of weapons of mass destruction.

Saddam didn't have them.

Neither did Hitler. I listened to Bush's speeches------I did not hear "HE's GOT NUCLEAR BOMBS" ----
but I did know then------and a lot more since ,,,that he had the means to commit terrorist acts around
the world and was HIGHLY motivated to do so. Do you have any idea why he invaded Kuwait?

You already admitted you weren’t paying attention to what was going on and I posted the excerpt from a Bush speech where he claimed Iraq was rebuilding their nuclear facilities, trying to obtain nuclear materials which could used to manufacture a nuclear weapon in under a year which could have been passed to terrorists to attack us, like the 9.11 terrorists, resulting in a nuclear bomb being set off in an American city. None of which was true.

That he said all that and you still can’t see it is a reflection on you and your G-d given limitations more than anything else.

do you have any idea why he invaded Kuwait? was he looking for a summer resort?

 

[irosie91]

^^^^^^ that statement by Bush was 100% accurate and realistic------you wanted lies?​

You unmitigated moron... that statement was not “100% accurate.” Hussein had not been rebuilding their nuclear facilities. The attempted purchase of Uranium was based on a fake document. The Uranium that was found in Iraq and subsequently brought to the U.S. still had the U.N. seals from when it was first discovered after the first Gulf war. And he tied it to 9.11 to play on America’s fears when Iraq had nothing to do with 9.11.

Wrong again you LIAR ---The ONLY reason that Saddam was not busy building a nuclear
bomb is because he did not have the means YET. He was knocking himself out on chemicals
and biologicals and any other brutality that he could conjure up-----<<<<<AND THAT IS THE GIST
OF THE ACCURATE MESSAGE OF BUSH AT THAT TIME-----which at no point included an accusation
that SADDAM did 9-11. (YOU LIAR) DID YOU DANCE ON THE DEAD BODIES OF KURDISH
KIDS ROTTING IN THE SUN? I am not at all surprised that some americans imagined that he did
say "saddam did 9-11" My fellow americans are that stupid . He "implied"??? no such implication
screwed my mind------some people have EASILY SCREWED MINDS

Bush's message was that Saddam was in immediate possession of weapons of mass destruction.

Saddam didn't have them.

Neither did Hitler. I listened to Bush's speeches------I did not hear "HE's GOT NUCLEAR BOMBS" ----
but I did know then------and a lot more since ,,,that he had the means to commit terrorist acts around
the world and was HIGHLY motivated to do so. Do you have any idea why he invaded Kuwait?

The justification for the war was Weapons of Mass Destruction. That term was hammered again and again. Nuclear, biological, chemical. We were shown photos of vehicles we were assured were carrying them, facilities we were promised were manufacturing them, yellow cake we were promised Saddam was in possession of.

None of it was true. We were lied to.

you got a picture of that yellow cake you saw. Nope-----all true----he had stuff useful for terrorism and
was very eager to promote more and more terrorism ------he even paid people to tie bombs to their asses
around the world--------not enough for you?

 

[daisiesRwild]

most all of it has to do with the elite taking over their banks

 

[irosie91]

most all of it has to do with the elite taking over their banks

whose banks?

 

[daisiesRwild]

most all of it has to do with the elite taking over their banks

whose banks?

the world bank the ones that own the federal reserve and every bank but three the elite global bankers

 

[daisiesRwild]

Only Three Countries Left Without a ROTHSCHILD Central Bank!