Giuliani: No 'Successful Radical Islamic' US Terror Attacks Before Obama

[kaz]

What Giuliani was saying was right no matter how much a leftist empty pants sock puppet (that's you) wants to say it isn't.

no, it wasn't

There were almost no terrorist attacks between 9/11 and Obama taking office

which was not giuliani's claim

Damn, you are a chick. I didn't see that one coming. Should have ...

so can you admit that what he said was not true?

To a dude? No, what he said is true. To a chick? If a man speaks in the forest far beyond where any woman can hear, is he still wrong? Fuck yeah!

I don't know what I can tell you, Darlene, no guy is ever right to you

wow. you are a misogynist and a dumbass.

what he said was either factually true or not.

here's a hint: it wasn't true

Misogynist? OMG, you're a virgin, aren't you? I think it's time you had "the talk" with your father so he can explain women to you ...

 

[Moonglow]

ACTUALLY the fact is there have been no successful Islamic Extremist attacks here in the United States SINCE Obama became President...
.
.
.
.
...only because, according to Barry, there's no such thing as 'Islamic Extremism'.

But there are terrorist that are Muslims..

 

[Moonglow]

no, it wasn't
which was not giuliani's claim

Damn, you are a chick. I didn't see that one coming. Should have ...

so can you admit that what he said was not true?

To a dude? No, what he said is true. To a chick? If a man speaks in the forest far beyond where any woman can hear, is he still wrong? Fuck yeah!

I don't know what I can tell you, Darlene, no guy is ever right to you

wow. you are a misogynist and a dumbass.

what he said was either factually true or not.

here's a hint: it wasn't true

Misogynist? OMG, you're a virgin, aren't you? I think it's time you had "the talk" with your father so he can explain women to you ...

Find a common interest and spend, spend, spend?

 

[easyt65]

were there attacks between 9/11/01 and 1/20/09?

yes or no will do

kaz

yes or no, were there terror attacks between 9/11/01 and 1/20/09?

In the context of the discussion, no

wow. you are not an honest person.

seriously, that's just ridiculous that you can't admit to historical fact.

What Giuliani was saying was right no matter how much a leftist empty pants sock puppet (that's you) wants to say it isn't.

There were almost no terrorist attacks between 9/11 and Obama taking office

What Giuliani was trying to say was that Bush kept us safe except for that time 3000 Americans were killed

The planning for 9/11/01 happened on Clinton's watch, the execution on Bush's..

After 9/11/01 there wasn't another successful terrorist attack in the US...until Obama came into office...and since there have been a lot.

Terrorists haven't just come here and haven't just committed terrorist attacks here, Obama has BROUGHT them here to comitt terrorist attacks...like in Ca.

UNLIKE Bush, Barry has supplied terrorists, he has financed terrorists, he has armed terrorists, he has trained terrorists, he has protected terrorists, and he has dragged the US into his own personal, unauthorized wars to HELP terrorists, like how he helped the terrorists who killed 3,000 Americans to take over their own country...

...with the help of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

 

[rightwinger]

kaz

yes or no, were there terror attacks between 9/11/01 and 1/20/09?

In the context of the discussion, no

wow. you are not an honest person.

seriously, that's just ridiculous that you can't admit to historical fact.

What Giuliani was saying was right no matter how much a leftist empty pants sock puppet (that's you) wants to say it isn't.

There were almost no terrorist attacks between 9/11 and Obama taking office

What Giuliani was trying to say was that Bush kept us safe except for that time 3000 Americans were killed

The planning for 9/11/01 happened on Clinton's watch, the execution on Bush's..

After 9/11/01 there wasn't another successful terrorist attack in the US...until Obama came into office...and since there have been a lot.

Terrorists haven't just come here and haven't just committed terrorist attacks here, Obama has BROUGHT them here to comitt terrorist attacks...like in Ca.

UNLIKE Bush, Barry has supplied terrorists, he has financed terrorists, he has armed terrorists, he has trained terrorists, he has protected terrorists, and he has dragged the US into his own personal, unauthorized wars to HELP terrorists, like how he helped the terrorists who killed 3,000 Americans to take over their own country...

...with the help of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Planning is easy......anyone can plan
Executing four successful hijackings that hit three high profile targets and killed 3000 Americans is difficult

Bush was asleep at the switch

 

[easyt65]

In the context of the discussion, no

wow. you are not an honest person.

seriously, that's just ridiculous that you can't admit to historical fact.

What Giuliani was saying was right no matter how much a leftist empty pants sock puppet (that's you) wants to say it isn't.

There were almost no terrorist attacks between 9/11 and Obama taking office

What Giuliani was trying to say was that Bush kept us safe except for that time 3000 Americans were killed

The planning for 9/11/01 happened on Clinton's watch, the execution on Bush's..

After 9/11/01 there wasn't another successful terrorist attack in the US...until Obama came into office...and since there have been a lot.

Terrorists haven't just come here and haven't just committed terrorist attacks here, Obama has BROUGHT them here to comitt terrorist attacks...like in Ca.

UNLIKE Bush, Barry has supplied terrorists, he has financed terrorists, he has armed terrorists, he has trained terrorists, he has protected terrorists, and he has dragged the US into his own personal, unauthorized wars to HELP terrorists, like how he helped the terrorists who killed 3,000 Americans to take over their own country...

...with the help of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Planning is easy......anyone can plan
Executing four successful hijackings that hit three high profile targets and killed 3000 Americans is difficult

Bush was asleep at the switch

Do you know how STUPID you sound claiming it was so easy to finance, plan, train for, and carry out a tertorist attack consisting of 4 simultaneous terrorist hijackings, getting past numerous security agencies through the entire process?!

You're a f*ing idiot.

Asleep at the wheel? Let me guess, YOU saw it coming?!

Airlines' security procedures called for pilots to comply with hijacker demands. Airliners had NEVER been used as weapons before. The smartest security people did not dream of this scenario, but your ignorant liberal ass would have prevented it had you been president...

 

[rightwinger]

wow. you are not an honest person.

seriously, that's just ridiculous that you can't admit to historical fact.

What Giuliani was saying was right no matter how much a leftist empty pants sock puppet (that's you) wants to say it isn't.

There were almost no terrorist attacks between 9/11 and Obama taking office

What Giuliani was trying to say was that Bush kept us safe except for that time 3000 Americans were killed

The planning for 9/11/01 happened on Clinton's watch, the execution on Bush's..

After 9/11/01 there wasn't another successful terrorist attack in the US...until Obama came into office...and since there have been a lot.

Terrorists haven't just come here and haven't just committed terrorist attacks here, Obama has BROUGHT them here to comitt terrorist attacks...like in Ca.

UNLIKE Bush, Barry has supplied terrorists, he has financed terrorists, he has armed terrorists, he has trained terrorists, he has protected terrorists, and he has dragged the US into his own personal, unauthorized wars to HELP terrorists, like how he helped the terrorists who killed 3,000 Americans to take over their own country...

...with the help of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Planning is easy......anyone can plan
Executing four successful hijackings that hit three high profile targets and killed 3000 Americans is difficult

Bush was asleep at the switch

Do you know how STUPID you sound claiming it was so easy to finance, plan, train for, and carry out a tertorist attack consisting of 4 simultaneous terrorist hijackings, getting past numerous security agencies through the entire process?!

You're a f*ing idiot.

Asleep at the wheel? Let me giess, YOU saw it coming?!

Airlines' security procedures called for pilots to comply with hijacker demands. Airliners had NEVER been used as weapons before. The smartest security people did not dream of this scenario, but your ignorant liberal ass would have prevented it had you been president...

Again, you can plan from anywhere, any time

Execution is the hard part. Bush did nothing to stop the attacks. Name a single antiterrorism initiative that came from Bush before the attacks. He did not give a shit about terrorism and we paid the price

 

[easyt65]

What Giuliani was saying was right no matter how much a leftist empty pants sock puppet (that's you) wants to say it isn't.

There were almost no terrorist attacks between 9/11 and Obama taking office

What Giuliani was trying to say was that Bush kept us safe except for that time 3000 Americans were killed

The planning for 9/11/01 happened on Clinton's watch, the execution on Bush's..

After 9/11/01 there wasn't another successful terrorist attack in the US...until Obama came into office...and since there have been a lot.

Terrorists haven't just come here and haven't just committed terrorist attacks here, Obama has BROUGHT them here to comitt terrorist attacks...like in Ca.

UNLIKE Bush, Barry has supplied terrorists, he has financed terrorists, he has armed terrorists, he has trained terrorists, he has protected terrorists, and he has dragged the US into his own personal, unauthorized wars to HELP terrorists, like how he helped the terrorists who killed 3,000 Americans to take over their own country...

...with the help of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Planning is easy......anyone can plan
Executing four successful hijackings that hit three high profile targets and killed 3000 Americans is difficult

Bush was asleep at the switch

Do you know how STUPID you sound claiming it was so easy to finance, plan, train for, and carry out a tertorist attack consisting of 4 simultaneous terrorist hijackings, getting past numerous security agencies through the entire process?!

You're a f*ing idiot.

Asleep at the wheel? Let me giess, YOU saw it coming?!

Airlines' security procedures called for pilots to comply with hijacker demands. Airliners had NEVER been used as weapons before. The smartest security people did not dream of this scenario, but your ignorant liberal ass would have prevented it had you been president...

Again, you can plan from anywhere, any time

Execution is the hard part. Bush did nothing to stop the attacks

You need to stop...you're embarassing yourself.

And again, UNLIKE Bush who failed to stop a terrorist attack, Barry supplied, financed, armed, trained, protected, and made excuses for terrorists and their terrorist activities....not to mention used our military to help Al Qaeida take over Libya.

There is no comparison between the 2.

After a terrorist attack on the US Bush vowed to bring the perpatrators to justice.

After terrorists killed Americans Hillary vowed to arrest an American for exercising his Constitutional Right, and Barry declared to the world, "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam."

 

[rightwinger]

What Giuliani was trying to say was that Bush kept us safe except for that time 3000 Americans were killed

The planning for 9/11/01 happened on Clinton's watch, the execution on Bush's..

After 9/11/01 there wasn't another successful terrorist attack in the US...until Obama came into office...and since there have been a lot.

Terrorists haven't just come here and haven't just committed terrorist attacks here, Obama has BROUGHT them here to comitt terrorist attacks...like in Ca.

UNLIKE Bush, Barry has supplied terrorists, he has financed terrorists, he has armed terrorists, he has trained terrorists, he has protected terrorists, and he has dragged the US into his own personal, unauthorized wars to HELP terrorists, like how he helped the terrorists who killed 3,000 Americans to take over their own country...

...with the help of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Planning is easy......anyone can plan
Executing four successful hijackings that hit three high profile targets and killed 3000 Americans is difficult

Bush was asleep at the switch

Do you know how STUPID you sound claiming it was so easy to finance, plan, train for, and carry out a tertorist attack consisting of 4 simultaneous terrorist hijackings, getting past numerous security agencies through the entire process?!

You're a f*ing idiot.

Asleep at the wheel? Let me giess, YOU saw it coming?!

Airlines' security procedures called for pilots to comply with hijacker demands. Airliners had NEVER been used as weapons before. The smartest security people did not dream of this scenario, but your ignorant liberal ass would have prevented it had you been president...

Again, you can plan from anywhere, any time

Execution is the hard part. Bush did nothing to stop the attacks

You need to stop...you're embarassing yourself.

And again, UNLIKE Bush who failed to stop a terrorist attack, Barry supplied, financed, armed, trained, protected, and made excuses for terrorists and their terrorist activities....not to mention ised our military to help Al Qaeida take over Libya.

President Obama killed bin Laden for his crimes

Bush let him go and gave up the chase

 

[easyt65]

The planning for 9/11/01 happened on Clinton's watch, the execution on Bush's..

After 9/11/01 there wasn't another successful terrorist attack in the US...until Obama came into office...and since there have been a lot.

Terrorists haven't just come here and haven't just committed terrorist attacks here, Obama has BROUGHT them here to comitt terrorist attacks...like in Ca.

UNLIKE Bush, Barry has supplied terrorists, he has financed terrorists, he has armed terrorists, he has trained terrorists, he has protected terrorists, and he has dragged the US into his own personal, unauthorized wars to HELP terrorists, like how he helped the terrorists who killed 3,000 Americans to take over their own country...

...with the help of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Planning is easy......anyone can plan
Executing four successful hijackings that hit three high profile targets and killed 3000 Americans is difficult

Bush was asleep at the switch

Do you know how STUPID you sound claiming it was so easy to finance, plan, train for, and carry out a tertorist attack consisting of 4 simultaneous terrorist hijackings, getting past numerous security agencies through the entire process?!

You're a f*ing idiot.

Asleep at the wheel? Let me giess, YOU saw it coming?!

Airlines' security procedures called for pilots to comply with hijacker demands. Airliners had NEVER been used as weapons before. The smartest security people did not dream of this scenario, but your ignorant liberal ass would have prevented it had you been president...

Again, you can plan from anywhere, any time

Execution is the hard part. Bush did nothing to stop the attacks

You need to stop...you're embarassing yourself.

And again, UNLIKE Bush who failed to stop a terrorist attack, Barry supplied, financed, armed, trained, protected, and made excuses for terrorists and their terrorist activities....not to mention ised our military to help Al Qaeida take over Libya.

President Obama killed bin Laden for his crimes

Bush let him go and gave up the chase

Bush set up the process that allowed Barry to find UBL.

And are you suggesting that giving the order to the MILITARY who took down UBL makes up for Barry supplying, financing, arming, training, protecting, and making excuses for terrorists and terrorist activities AND for using our military to help Al Qaeida take over Libya?

Are you out of your damn mind?!

 

[OKTexas]

According to Rudi "the Pride of New York" Giuliani there were no attacks carried out in the US by Islamic terrorists until President Obama was elected. Off the top of my head, I came up with two (2); 1993 world Trade Center bombing and the calamitous Twin towers attack on 9/11/2001 when that IDIOT Giuliani was Mayor of New York! He even ran for president waving his credentials of leadership reminding everyone of his mayoral prowess by repeating 9/11 several hundred times daily!

Here is what he claimed while on the stump for trump:

"“Before Obama came along, we didn’t have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attack inside the United States,” Giuliani said at an event for Donald Trump in Ohio."
Giuliani Claims No Successful 'Radical Islamic' Attacks in US Before Obama

Such are the type of people Trump and his campaign obtain to endorse their "efforts".

From your very own link:

Rudy Giuliani: In 8 years before Pres. Obama "we didn't have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attack" in US

If you freaks didn't have outright lies and out of context quotes you would have nothing at all. Now if you really want to get technical it was actually 7 yrs, 4 mos and 10 days, before the dear leader swore in. I guess you count on the regressive lemmings not going to the link and actually looking for themselves what was actually said, which I guess was a pretty good bet since the first few regressives to comment apparently didn't. But let's compare Bush's last 7+ years with your dear leaders seven.


SEVEN ISLAMIC TERRORIST ATTACKS IN USA IN SEVEN YEARS For Obama Administration

7 ISLAMIC TERRORIST ATTACKS IN 7 YEARS For Obama Admin

That headline is NOT in the article I linked, hotshot! Here again is the article I posted with the headline of the article hyperlinked;
Giuliani Claims No Successful 'Radical Islamic' Attacks in US Before Obama

You got that headline you posted from here, shit for brains, you know, the link you DIDN'T POST because it would have proven you a hack and a fraud!
ABC News Politics on Twitter
I don't fucking follow twitter, Tex!

All you got left is sharpshooting and you're missing the target. BTW, that other link you posted is nothing to do with the OP, "cowboy". You're still all fucking hat and no cattle!

It came right off your link shit for brains, your choosing to ignore the actual context speaks volumes about your intellectual dishonesty. Now run along, I think your mommy is calling.

Edit: BTW shit for brains if you watch the video he said exactly what I posted, and the video in your link was from ABC.

 

[OKTexas]

According to Rudi "the Pride of New York" Giuliani there were no attacks carried out in the US by Islamic terrorists until President Obama was elected. Off the top of my head, I came up with two (2); 1993 world Trade Center bombing and the calamitous Twin towers attack on 9/11/2001 when that IDIOT Giuliani was Mayor of New York! He even ran for president waving his credentials of leadership reminding everyone of his mayoral prowess by repeating 9/11 several hundred times daily!

Here is what he claimed while on the stump for trump:

"“Before Obama came along, we didn’t have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attack inside the United States,” Giuliani said at an event for Donald Trump in Ohio."
Giuliani Claims No Successful 'Radical Islamic' Attacks in US Before Obama

Such are the type of people Trump and his campaign obtain to endorse their "efforts".

Thanks for selectively quoting Rudy...he said the 8 years prior to Obama, and he's correct.
We had 2 attacks under Clinton and non under GW.

If you're counting the attack on the USS Cole, that was in the Port of Aden, Yemen, that is not inside the United States, which was the area to which Giuliani limited his statement. Regarding the 8 year prior period, that was not mentioned according to the article I cited along with the quote from that article posted in the OP.

Further, Bush was president on 9/11/2001 when the twin Towers fell. If you don't consider that a terrorist attack or are thinking someone else was POTUS on that day, then God Bless You!

If you have additional information regarding Giuliani's statement to augment the information in the article along with your assertions feel free to include it all.

Yet your article clearly showed the full context, which you chose not to include. See my previous post.

I already saw your precious post and proved you a fraud by trying to mix and match different sources! can we say belly crawlin' snake, Tex?

See the post above

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

According to Rudi "the Pride of New York" Giuliani there were no attacks carried out in the US by Islamic terrorists until President Obama was elected. Off the top of my head, I came up with two (2); 1993 world Trade Center bombing and the calamitous Twin towers attack on 9/11/2001 when that IDIOT Giuliani was Mayor of New York! He even ran for president waving his credentials of leadership reminding everyone of his mayoral prowess by repeating 9/11 several hundred times daily!

Here is what he claimed while on the stump for trump:

"“Before Obama came along, we didn’t have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attack inside the United States,” Giuliani said at an event for Donald Trump in Ohio."
Giuliani Claims No Successful 'Radical Islamic' Attacks in US Before Obama

Such are the type of people Trump and his campaign obtain to endorse their "efforts".

From your very own link:

Rudy Giuliani: In 8 years before Pres. Obama "we didn't have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attack" in US

If you freaks didn't have outright lies and out of context quotes you would have nothing at all. Now if you really want to get technical it was actually 7 yrs, 4 mos and 10 days, before the dear leader swore in. I guess you count on the regressive lemmings not going to the link and actually looking for themselves what was actually said, which I guess was a pretty good bet since the first few regressives to comment apparently didn't. But let's compare Bush's last 7+ years with your dear leaders seven.


SEVEN ISLAMIC TERRORIST ATTACKS IN USA IN SEVEN YEARS For Obama Administration

7 ISLAMIC TERRORIST ATTACKS IN 7 YEARS For Obama Admin

That headline is NOT in the article I linked, hotshot! Here again is the article I posted with the headline of the article hyperlinked;
Giuliani Claims No Successful 'Radical Islamic' Attacks in US Before Obama

You got that headline you posted from here, shit for brains, you know, the link you DIDN'T POST because it would have proven you a hack and a fraud!
ABC News Politics on Twitter
I don't fucking follow twitter, Tex!

All you got left is sharpshooting and you're missing the target. BTW, that other link you posted is nothing to do with the OP, "cowboy". You're still all fucking hat and no cattle!

It came right off your link shit for brains, your choosing to ignore the actual context speaks volumes about your intellectual dishonesty. Now run along, I think your mommy is calling.

Edit: BTW shit for brains if you watch the video he said exactly what I posted, and the video in your link was from ABC.

A little frustrated yet again I see! Your projection is duly noted, fool, even to your own dishonesty you wish to shed and unload upon me. You do know you can save all this frustration if you would simply STOP trying to sharp shoot what I post. You really aren't very good at it because you don't know when to shut the fuck up when you are knit picking with no basis in logic.

I cited a source, an article, and quoted text from the article justified by the title of the article sourced. You cited an embedded video within the article as if it was the source! Gawd Damn you are fucking dimwitted cowboy!! LOOKY, LOOKY OVER HERE AND PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE OP...LOOK WHAT I FOUND! Actually, you are a waste of oxygen and a true lump of dishonest horseshit, Tex; all bark and no fucking bite!

 

[OKTexas]

According to Rudi "the Pride of New York" Giuliani there were no attacks carried out in the US by Islamic terrorists until President Obama was elected. Off the top of my head, I came up with two (2); 1993 world Trade Center bombing and the calamitous Twin towers attack on 9/11/2001 when that IDIOT Giuliani was Mayor of New York! He even ran for president waving his credentials of leadership reminding everyone of his mayoral prowess by repeating 9/11 several hundred times daily!

Here is what he claimed while on the stump for trump:

"“Before Obama came along, we didn’t have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attack inside the United States,” Giuliani said at an event for Donald Trump in Ohio."
Giuliani Claims No Successful 'Radical Islamic' Attacks in US Before Obama

Such are the type of people Trump and his campaign obtain to endorse their "efforts".

From your very own link:

Rudy Giuliani: In 8 years before Pres. Obama "we didn't have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attack" in US

If you freaks didn't have outright lies and out of context quotes you would have nothing at all. Now if you really want to get technical it was actually 7 yrs, 4 mos and 10 days, before the dear leader swore in. I guess you count on the regressive lemmings not going to the link and actually looking for themselves what was actually said, which I guess was a pretty good bet since the first few regressives to comment apparently didn't. But let's compare Bush's last 7+ years with your dear leaders seven.


SEVEN ISLAMIC TERRORIST ATTACKS IN USA IN SEVEN YEARS For Obama Administration

7 ISLAMIC TERRORIST ATTACKS IN 7 YEARS For Obama Admin

That headline is NOT in the article I linked, hotshot! Here again is the article I posted with the headline of the article hyperlinked;
Giuliani Claims No Successful 'Radical Islamic' Attacks in US Before Obama

You got that headline you posted from here, shit for brains, you know, the link you DIDN'T POST because it would have proven you a hack and a fraud!
ABC News Politics on Twitter
I don't fucking follow twitter, Tex!

All you got left is sharpshooting and you're missing the target. BTW, that other link you posted is nothing to do with the OP, "cowboy". You're still all fucking hat and no cattle!

It came right off your link shit for brains, your choosing to ignore the actual context speaks volumes about your intellectual dishonesty. Now run along, I think your mommy is calling.

Edit: BTW shit for brains if you watch the video he said exactly what I posted, and the video in your link was from ABC.

A little frustrated yet again I see! Your projection is duly noted, fool, even to your own dishonesty you wish to shed and unload upon me. You do know you can save all this frustration if you would simply STOP trying to sharp shoot what I post. You really aren't very good at it because you don't know when to shut the fuck up when you are knit picking with no basis in logic.

I cited a source, an article, and quoted text from the article justified by the title of the article sourced. You cited an embedded video within the article as if it was the source! Gawd Damn you are fucking dimwitted cowboy!! LOOKY, LOOKY OVER HERE AND PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE OP...LOOK WHAT I FOUND! Actually, you are a waste of oxygen and a true lump of dishonest horseshit, Tex; all bark and no fucking bite!

Awh, is the little baby hurt because he got bitch slapped by the truth. You purposefully posted a link with a lying assed title and an out of context quote. That makes you an fucking propagandist with no interest in facts or truth, why else would you try to criticize me for quoting ABC when your link was to ABC, the video in the link was from ABC and the quote was contained in YOUR freaking link. BTW there's no reason to sharp shoot you because you present a target the size of TX with your dishonesty.

 

[Political Junky]

According to Rudi "the Pride of New York" Giuliani there were no attacks carried out in the US by Islamic terrorists until President Obama was elected. Off the top of my head, I came up with two (2); 1993 world Trade Center bombing and the calamitous Twin towers attack on 9/11/2001 when that IDIOT Giuliani was Mayor of New York! He even ran for president waving his credentials of leadership reminding everyone of his mayoral prowess by repeating 9/11 several hundred times daily!

Here is what he claimed while on the stump for trump:

"“Before Obama came along, we didn’t have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attack inside the United States,” Giuliani said at an event for Donald Trump in Ohio."
Giuliani Claims No Successful 'Radical Islamic' Attacks in US Before Obama

Such are the type of people Trump and his campaign obtain to endorse their "efforts".

What a fool Giuliani is.

 

[rightwinger]

Planning is easy......anyone can plan
Executing four successful hijackings that hit three high profile targets and killed 3000 Americans is difficult

Bush was asleep at the switch

Do you know how STUPID you sound claiming it was so easy to finance, plan, train for, and carry out a tertorist attack consisting of 4 simultaneous terrorist hijackings, getting past numerous security agencies through the entire process?!

You're a f*ing idiot.

Asleep at the wheel? Let me giess, YOU saw it coming?!

Airlines' security procedures called for pilots to comply with hijacker demands. Airliners had NEVER been used as weapons before. The smartest security people did not dream of this scenario, but your ignorant liberal ass would have prevented it had you been president...

Again, you can plan from anywhere, any time

Execution is the hard part. Bush did nothing to stop the attacks

You need to stop...you're embarassing yourself.

And again, UNLIKE Bush who failed to stop a terrorist attack, Barry supplied, financed, armed, trained, protected, and made excuses for terrorists and their terrorist activities....not to mention ised our military to help Al Qaeida take over Libya.

President Obama killed bin Laden for his crimes

Bush let him go and gave up the chase

Bush set up the process that allowed Barry to find UBL.

And are you suggesting that giving the order to the MILITARY who took down UBL makes up for Barry supplying, financing, arming, training, protecting, and making excuses for terrorists and terrorist activities AND for using our military to help Al Qaeida take over Libya?

Are you out of your damn mind?!

Bush did squat

Bush allowed bin Laden to escape in Tora Bora so that it wouldn't upset his Iraq invasion plans
Bush stopped the war on terror so that he could pursue his idiotic invasion of Iraq

 

[edthecynic]

Of course you left out the previous part of his statement where he detailed both trade center attacks.
Such are the type of people Hillary & her campaign obtain to endorse their lies & misdirection

Which proves Guiliani knew he was lying and mot that he was using "abbreviated language!"

 

[edthecynic]

Giuliani: No 'Successful Radical Islamic' US Terror Attacks Before Obama

Except 9-11. I wonder if Giuliani means he doesn't believe radical Islamics were behind 9-11? That could be one way of looking at what he meant when he said that..

If ever there was a Truther who would know that 9/11 was an inside job, it would be Guiliani!!!!

 

[edthecynic]

OK, Giuliani said eight years. He should have realized that you imbeciles won't get the reference to 9/11, which was actually seven and a half years before Obama took over and not eight.

Guiliani has been telling this lie for over 6 (SIX) years!

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

You purposefully posted a link with a lying assed title and an out of context quote.

You never fucking learn, cowboy...shooting from the LIP with blanks is downright STUPID! Both the title and the quote were directly from the article. If you have an issue with that take it up with ABC, dummy!

Because you want it to be so does not make it so, fool! Your judgment is clouded and prejudiced. Even your quote in my signature line displays the depth of your perception of the world around you! Your measure has been taken and found wanting, Tex!