- Thread starter
- Banned
- #981
Thats 1/100 in the Senate.
And the Senate is only part of the Legislative branch, is it not?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thats 1/100 in the Senate.
Glenn spent all 8 years of the administration ripping President Bush a new one when he disagreed with him.
Oh you mean they never showed that on Olberfuhrer's program?
No, he means they never showed that on BECK's program.
oh, of that i'm sure
and i highly doubt Beck supported the PA
or TARP
or most of the other crazy spending that was done
but i dont have any proof
that doesnt look like a line item veto to meuh, line item veto(the way it was done) was ruled unconstutional by SCOTUS and removedNo, no no.
Now, I see where you are coming from, but, the president has the power of the Veto, and now the power of the Line-Item-Veto. He has much more power than each individual member of congress, as any decision they make individually can be negated by the decisions of any of the other 535 members of congress.
Except that Bush effectively revived it in Executive Order 13457, "Protecting American Taxpayers From Government Spending on Wasteful Earmarks".
Check it out here:
Executive Order 13457 - Wikisource
i think that has been fairly well debunkedYou know, even after all this, I still haven't seen anything showing Beck called for people to physically assault anyone.
he never did
actually, there were a lot of republicans that had issues with those programs BEFORE they were passedoh, of that i'm sure
and i highly doubt Beck supported the PA
or TARP
or most of the other crazy spending that was done
but i dont have any proof
Which is the reason the Republicans conveniently got Bush to take all the blame for those programs.
He was already unpopular, and on his way out. It was easy for republicans to distance themselves from Bush after the fact.
And you thought no-one noticed.... LOL.
that doesnt look like a line item veto to meuh, line item veto(the way it was done) was ruled unconstutional by SCOTUS and removed
Except that Bush effectively revived it in Executive Order 13457, "Protecting American Taxpayers From Government Spending on Wasteful Earmarks".
Check it out here:
Executive Order 13457 - Wikisource
more like the executive refusing to spend earmarked money
no, you have shown that you ARE that guyi think that has been fairly well debunkedYou know, even after all this, I still haven't seen anything showing Beck called for people to physically assault anyone.
he never did
Yep, in whatever bizarro world you live in where I actually said Beck said "Go Physically assault someone".
Of course, you all know exactly what I mean in this thread, you're just being willfully dense to protect your boy Beck. I understand. Lot's of people did it for Clinton back in the day too.
"Party over country", right?
I mean, I'm not that kind of guy, but I see you all are.
yesthat doesnt look like a line item veto to meExcept that Bush effectively revived it in Executive Order 13457, "Protecting American Taxpayers From Government Spending on Wasteful Earmarks".
Check it out here:
Executive Order 13457 - Wikisource
more like the executive refusing to spend earmarked money
Do you know what a "Line-Item-Veto" is?
no, you have shown that you ARE that guy
you dont have ANY problems with what the dems are doing right now
yes
its actually vetoing the actual item not just refusing to spend the money approprriated
Thats 1/100 in the Senate.
And the Senate is only part of the Legislative branch, is it not?
actually, there were a lot of republicans that had issues with those programs BEFORE they were passed
myself included
Thats 1/100 in the Senate.
And the Senate is only part of the Legislative branch, is it not?
So is the Supreme Court, outside of their Enumerated Powers.![]()
And the Senate is only part of the Legislative branch, is it not?
So is the Supreme Court, outside of their Enumerated Powers.![]()
They gave us a Bush presidency..that was sweet!
So is the Supreme Court, outside of their Enumerated Powers.![]()
They gave us a Bush presidency..that was sweet!
Which certainly was NOT part of their "Enumerated Powers".
I'm still trying to figure out how all the conservative "traditionalists" rationalized that little gem as being "Constitutional".
Talk about "Activist Judges"!
And the Senate is only part of the Legislative branch, is it not?
So is the Supreme Court, outside of their Enumerated Powers.![]()
They gave us a Bush presidency..that was sweet!
So is the Supreme Court, outside of their Enumerated Powers.![]()
They gave us a Bush presidency..that was sweet!
No they didn't.
Florida Votes were counted how many times?
The Constitution would have put the decision to the House, Bush would have carried that.
The Florida Supreme Court over stepped it's powers, even it's own chief justice opposing it.
Your days of obtaining concession by whining are done. We are paying attention now.
Glen is doing a great job today, huh... Radio show went well this morning, TV show going great as we speak. I think that his tie clashes with his suit though. Tie stripes and suit stripes clash. Do you think that there might be a subliminal message inciting violence there? Michele Malkin is hot huh.
If Wikipedia said it, it must be true? LOL.
Huggy don't start melting down on us now.
Gore's greatest achievement was distancing himself from Clinton in 02. Had he carried his home state he would have been pres.
Gore's second greatest achievment was kissing his wife on SNL.
Gores third greatest achievement he was named for at the Academy Awards. He did get busted for plagiarism on that one though.
If Wikipedia said it, it must be true? LOL.
Huggy don't start melting down on us now.
Gore's greatest achievement was distancing himself from Clinton in 02. Had he carried his home state he would have been pres.
Gore's second greatest achievment was kissing his wife on SNL.
Gores third greatest achievement he was named for at the Academy Awards. He did get busted for plagiarism on that one though.
That was a straight forward piece. You know it but just don't have the nut sack to admit it. Here is the kicker littledicker..I voted for Bush in that election. I just plain don't like ...can't abide by.....liars.
Was Ike a LIAR? no! Was Barry Goldwater liar? no! Every republican since Nixon was a fucking Liar but I still voted for both Bushs' That is except Bush2's 2nd term. All that terror bullshit got real stale. I like picking my own enemies..thank you very much!
I think for myself and recommend it for everyone.