Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where do ya'll get this wacky notion that this feller was a "good guy"? A "good guy" would not flee the scene. Good guys own up to it when they make a mistake and take responsibility for their actions. Good intentions are not enough to make one a "good guy". That some of you don't understand this is pretty freakin depressing for our country.
A "good guy" might take responsibility if he had Faith in the system that he would be treated fairly.
The anti-gun, anti-self defense libs have shown that would not be the case.
While working on my boat I observed five or six young negro thugs attempting to steal a boat near my boat. They were having trouble figuring out how to start the engine. That's how fucking stupid they were.
I had a pair of vicegrips in my hand AND a licensed CC hand gun in my waistband hidden by a long T-shirt.
I walked down the dock towards them. One of them saw me AND my shiny pair of vicegrips. He yelled: "He's got a gun!".
The fucking rats all jumped off the boat and ran away.
It was the luckiest day of their miserable lives. If the asshole had yelled: "It's only a pair of vicegrips" instead and they started towards me I would have 'got my limit' that day.
Legal guns in the hands of responsible owners save millions of lives a year. So do vice grips.
Noting here changes the fact that you proudly start with "I hate guns!" and work backwards from there.You often get gender wrong Shooter?Poor Sallow -- SO eager to illustrate her hatred for the idea that people can legally carry guns and then legally kill others while doing so.
Numbers collected from the Armed Citizen?
Which would self select OUT all the relatively boring examples where the brandishing of a gun convinced the thugs to move on.
Do you have another study that states how often a criminal is shot and killed?
Why would I care about how often a criminal is shot and killed?
That's the bar YOU set.
Me? I care about how often innocent Citizens protect themselves.
Because those are done in defense obviously.
LIke I said, I care about how often innocent Citizens protect themselves.
And what number do you put on that?
Your words.
"Well we know there are about 230 criminals shot and killed in defense each year. Then there are 50 or so stories that make the news each year. They happen, but not in any significant numbers."
Yes I was stating what we know. I didn't state those are the only ones.
Stop your lying.
YOu used that number to base your conclusion "They happen, but not in any significant numbers".
Yes not in significant numbers, I didn't put a number on it. You are dense.
NO, you're lying.
You made your claim and you are playing games instead of supporting it.
You are the one lying and making things up. Where did I put a number on it?
Who got hit?The car jackers should now own that murder charge. I hope they go away forever.
THe victim did not die.
Do you have another study that states how often a criminal is shot and killed?
Why would I care about how often a criminal is shot and killed?
That's the bar YOU set.
Me? I care about how often innocent Citizens protect themselves.
Because those are done in defense obviously.
LIke I said, I care about how often innocent Citizens protect themselves.
And what number do you put on that?
A lot more than you are trying to say.
Yes I was stating what we know. I didn't state those are the only ones.
Stop your lying.
YOu used that number to base your conclusion "They happen, but not in any significant numbers".
Yes not in significant numbers, I didn't put a number on it. You are dense.
NO, you're lying.
You made your claim and you are playing games instead of supporting it.
You are the one lying and making things up. Where did I put a number on it?
RIght above. "not in any significant numbers"
Using semantics to lie is still lying.
Where do ya'll get this wacky notion that this feller was a "good guy"? A "good guy" would not flee the scene. Good guys own up to it when they make a mistake and take responsibility for their actions. Good intentions are not enough to make one a "good guy". That some of you don't understand this is pretty freakin depressing for our country.
A "good guy" might take responsibility if he had Faith in the system that he would be treated fairly.
The anti-gun, anti-self defense libs have shown that would not be the case.
A "good guy" has faith in God and does the right thing, despite of what he or she thinks of the system. Harming someone you allegedly were trying to help and then running off like a common criminal is not the mark of a "good guy" , cupcake.
Stop your lying.
YOu used that number to base your conclusion "They happen, but not in any significant numbers".
Yes not in significant numbers, I didn't put a number on it. You are dense.
NO, you're lying.
You made your claim and you are playing games instead of supporting it.
You are the one lying and making things up. Where did I put a number on it?
RIght above. "not in any significant numbers"
Using semantics to lie is still lying.
That isn't a number...
Wait. ... Brain is lying to you?Yes not in significant numbers, I didn't put a number on it. You are dense.
NO, you're lying.
You made your claim and you are playing games instead of supporting it.
You are the one lying and making things up. Where did I put a number on it?
RIght above. "not in any significant numbers"
Using semantics to lie is still lying.
That isn't a number...
Sure it is. It's a general number, and you used it to base your conclusion.
Stop using semantics to lie.
Why do you hold a position that you have to purposefully lie about in order to defend it?
Yes not in significant numbers, I didn't put a number on it. You are dense.
NO, you're lying.
You made your claim and you are playing games instead of supporting it.
You are the one lying and making things up. Where did I put a number on it?
RIght above. "not in any significant numbers"
Using semantics to lie is still lying.
That isn't a number...
Sure it is. It's a general number, and you used it to base your conclusion.
Stop using semantics to lie.
Why do you hold a position that you have to purposefully lie about in order to defend it?
Wait. ... Brain is lying to you?NO, you're lying.
You made your claim and you are playing games instead of supporting it.
You are the one lying and making things up. Where did I put a number on it?
RIght above. "not in any significant numbers"
Using semantics to lie is still lying.
That isn't a number...
Sure it is. It's a general number, and you used it to base your conclusion.
Stop using semantics to lie.
Why do you hold a position that you have to purposefully lie about in order to defend it?
No way!
Wait. ... Brain is lying to you?NO, you're lying.
You made your claim and you are playing games instead of supporting it.
You are the one lying and making things up. Where did I put a number on it?
RIght above. "not in any significant numbers"
Using semantics to lie is still lying.
That isn't a number...
Sure it is. It's a general number, and you used it to base your conclusion.
Stop using semantics to lie.
Why do you hold a position that you have to purposefully lie about in order to defend it?
No way!
NO, you're lying.
You made your claim and you are playing games instead of supporting it.
You are the one lying and making things up. Where did I put a number on it?
RIght above. "not in any significant numbers"
Using semantics to lie is still lying.
That isn't a number...
Sure it is. It's a general number, and you used it to base your conclusion.
Stop using semantics to lie.
Why do you hold a position that you have to purposefully lie about in order to defend it?
You are the one lying and making things up.
So what is your number?
You are the one lying and making things up. Where did I put a number on it?
RIght above. "not in any significant numbers"
Using semantics to lie is still lying.
That isn't a number...
Sure it is. It's a general number, and you used it to base your conclusion.
Stop using semantics to lie.
Why do you hold a position that you have to purposefully lie about in order to defend it?
You are the one lying and making things up.
So what is your number?
I already told you. A lot more than you think.
I hope he gets caught and loses his gun.Texas ‘good guy with a gun’ shoots carjacking victim in head — then runs away
At least he didn't kill him.
Texas ‘good guy with a gun’ shoots carjacking victim in head — then runs away
At least he didn't kill him.
RIght above. "not in any significant numbers"
Using semantics to lie is still lying.
That isn't a number...
Sure it is. It's a general number, and you used it to base your conclusion.
Stop using semantics to lie.
Why do you hold a position that you have to purposefully lie about in order to defend it?
You are the one lying and making things up.
So what is your number?
I already told you. A lot more than you think.
I see so you want to lie and avoid answering questions. Let me know when you grow up.
