GOP led Benghazi report refutes conspiracy theories

[Listening]

Oh look...the dems have a "report" that the "GOP" put out.

The NRC didn't put anything out. This is a house report that had input from both sides.

And wait.....

It came from congress.....

Those guys the left is famous for telling us have single digit approval ratings.

But they put out a REPORT.

OMGosh.

They are O.K. now.

You're right it's very important that we go off of your imaginary information from now on.

And what imaginary information did I provide ?

You mean you don't have a report. ?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Oh look...the dems have a "report" that the "GOP" put out.

The NRC didn't put anything out. This is a house report that had input from both sides.

And wait.....

It came from congress.....

Those guys the left is famous for telling us have single digit approval ratings.

But they put out a REPORT.

OMGosh.

They are O.K. now.

You're right it's very important that we go off of your imaginary information from now on.

And what imaginary information did I provide ?

You mean you don't have a report. ?

You're hopeless.

 

[Listening]

Oh look...the dems have a "report" that the "GOP" put out.

The NRC didn't put anything out. This is a house report that had input from both sides.

And wait.....

It came from congress.....

Those guys the left is famous for telling us have single digit approval ratings.

But they put out a REPORT.

OMGosh.

They are O.K. now.

You're right it's very important that we go off of your imaginary information from now on.

And what imaginary information did I provide ?

You mean you don't have a report. ?

You're hopeless.

Which translates to an admission of being full of shit.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Oh look...the dems have a "report" that the "GOP" put out.

The NRC didn't put anything out. This is a house report that had input from both sides.

And wait.....

It came from congress.....

Those guys the left is famous for telling us have single digit approval ratings.

But they put out a REPORT.

OMGosh.

They are O.K. now.

You're right it's very important that we go off of your imaginary information from now on.

And what imaginary information did I provide ?

You mean you don't have a report. ?

You're hopeless.

Which translates to an admission of being full of shit.

No the GOP House's report is an admission of being full of shit.

 

[Listening]

Oh look...the dems have a "report" that the "GOP" put out.

The NRC didn't put anything out. This is a house report that had input from both sides.

And wait.....

It came from congress.....

Those guys the left is famous for telling us have single digit approval ratings.

But they put out a REPORT.

OMGosh.

They are O.K. now.

You're right it's very important that we go off of your imaginary information from now on.

And what imaginary information did I provide ?

You mean you don't have a report. ?

You're hopeless.

Which translates to an admission of being full of shit.

No the GOP House's report is an admission of being full of shit.

That made a lot of sense.

Are you drinking ?

 

[TheOldSchool]

You're right it's very important that we go off of your imaginary information from now on.

And what imaginary information did I provide ?

You mean you don't have a report. ?

You're hopeless.

Which translates to an admission of being full of shit.

No the GOP House's report is an admission of being full of shit.

That made a lot of sense.

Are you drinking ?

I know reading is hard for you but try looking at it again.

 

[Listening]

And what imaginary information did I provide ?

You mean you don't have a report. ?

You're hopeless.

Which translates to an admission of being full of shit.

No the GOP House's report is an admission of being full of shit.

That made a lot of sense.

Are you drinking ?

I know reading is hard for you but try looking at it again.

Still makes no sense.

At least you are consistent.

 

[TheOldSchool]

You're hopeless.

Which translates to an admission of being full of shit.

No the GOP House's report is an admission of being full of shit.

That made a lot of sense.

Are you drinking ?

I know reading is hard for you but try looking at it again.

Still makes no sense.

At least you are consistent.

Here have a family member help you out with this: Get Ready to Read

 

[Listening]

Which translates to an admission of being full of shit.

No the GOP House's report is an admission of being full of shit.

That made a lot of sense.

Are you drinking ?

I know reading is hard for you but try looking at it again.

Still makes no sense.

At least you are consistent.

Here have a family member help you out with this: Get Ready to Read

I looked for "How to read stupid" and your name kept popping up.

 

[Faun]

Republican congressional investigations on Benghazi have included ... .

Isn't it wonderful how the entire premise rests upon the would-be 'Report" being exclusively "Republican"... when in truth, the Committee was comprised largely of Democrats whose purpose was to produce precisely what was produced which is a report which is wholly detached from reality.

First the 'report' concludes that the White House did not purposefully mislead anyone regarding 'The Youtube Video'. The report false states that after US Intelligence confirmed that there was no protest, of anykind, much less one stemming from the Youtube Video, that the WhiteHouse abandoned the "The Video" explanation.

Of course this is false and is demonstrated in the Video of the Peasantpimp itself speaking ot the UN WEEKS after US Intelligence made it clear to the White House that 'The Video' has no relevance to the Benghazi Attack:

Actually, according to the report, it was only the day before Obama addressed the U.N. when U.S. intelligence changed its assessment about a protest.

 

[Nyvin]

Benghazi is dead. Get over it.

 

[Listening]

Benghazi is dead. Get over it.

Actually 4 people were killed.

Tough to get over that.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Benghazi is dead. Get over it.

It was never 'alive' to begin with.

 

[rightwinger]

Republican-led report debunks Benghazi accusations - CNN.com

The final report, from Chairman Mike Rogers, R-Michigan, and ranking member Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, D-Maryland, concludes there was no intelligence failure prior to the attack, no stand-down order to CIA operatives trying to go assist at the besieged consular building and found conflicting intelligence in the wake of the attack about the motive and cause, which were reflected in early public comments by the administration.

Chairman Mike Rogers is a RINO who hates America, and will vote for Hillary.

Well...I guess he is a RINO now

Failure to blame Obama......an unforgivable sin

 

[Freewill]

Republican congressional investigations on Benghazi have included ... .

Isn't it wonderful how the entire premise rests upon the would-be 'Report" being exclusively "Republican"... when in truth, the Committee was comprised largely of Democrats whose purpose was to produce precisely what was produced which is a report which is wholly detached from reality.

First the 'report' concludes that the White House did not purposefully mislead anyone regarding 'The Youtube Video'. The report false states that after US Intelligence confirmed that there was no protest, of anykind, much less one stemming from the Youtube Video, that the WhiteHouse abandoned the "The Video" explanation.

Of course this is false and is demonstrated in the Video of the Peasantpimp itself speaking ot the UN WEEKS after US Intelligence made it clear to the White House that 'The Video' has no relevance to the Benghazi Attack:

Actually, according to the report, it was only the day before Obama addressed the U.N. when U.S. intelligence changed its assessment about a protest.

So now we know he knew a day before that what they said wasn't true. Let's consider why they would do what they did.

Obama is up for election. This is a bad situation to happen just prior to the election. So he has to make the best of it he can.

What is better, a spontaneous riot caused the deaths or a coordinated attack that the administration, through the CIA, knew nothing about?

Obviously if it was a coordinated attack then it is all on the administration for intelligence failure.

But if it is blamed on an American made video and the ME can be riled up then it would appear that nothing could have been done it is the video maker's fault. So arrest him. Claim ignorance muddy the water then change the story. Tell congress that to claim anything else would be a breach of national security. That the story much be defended. It must be repeated until believed. Anything else makes the administration and congress look like inept fools.

Finally release the flying monkeys to continue the story just as we are seeing in this thread.

Really, who puts men in harms way as the administration let our ambassador? What kind of inept fool puts a man in that position in a country where we just bombed the crap out of them? Who then says there were no resources to bomb the crap out of them?

Come on, nothing is going to happen over Benghazi but even the left has to really see that what the administration did was nothing but political cover.

 

[Freewill]

Benghazi is dead. Get over it.

You mean Ambassador Stevens is needlessly dead along with 3 Americans. Tell their parents to "get over it."

 

[paperview]

Republican congressional investigations on Benghazi have included ... .

Isn't it wonderful how the entire premise rests upon the would-be 'Report" being exclusively "Republican"... when in truth, the Committee was comprised largely of Democrats whose purpose was to produce precisely what was produced which is a report which is wholly detached from reality.

First the 'report' concludes that the White House did not purposefully mislead anyone regarding 'The Youtube Video'. The report false states that after US Intelligence confirmed that there was no protest, of anykind, much less one stemming from the Youtube Video, that the WhiteHouse abandoned the "The Video" explanation.

Of course this is false and is demonstrated in the Video of the Peasantpimp itself speaking ot the UN WEEKS after US Intelligence made it clear to the White House that 'The Video' has no relevance to the Benghazi Attack:

Actually, according to the report, it was only the day before Obama addressed the U.N. when U.S. intelligence changed its assessment about a protest.

So now we know he knew a day before that what they said wasn't true. Let's consider why they would do what they did.

Obama is up for election. This is a bad situation to happen just prior to the election. So he has to make the best of it he can.
.....

Yes...yes..goofball pubbies, if only if only Obama had said "terrorist attack" - then you'd get to have Romney retroactive president.

 

[Redfish]

Republican congressional investigations on Benghazi have included ... .

Isn't it wonderful how the entire premise rests upon the would-be 'Report" being exclusively "Republican"... when in truth, the Committee was comprised largely of Democrats whose purpose was to produce precisely what was produced which is a report which is wholly detached from reality.

First the 'report' concludes that the White House did not purposefully mislead anyone regarding 'The Youtube Video'. The report false states that after US Intelligence confirmed that there was no protest, of anykind, much less one stemming from the Youtube Video, that the WhiteHouse abandoned the "The Video" explanation.

Of course this is false and is demonstrated in the Video of the Peasantpimp itself speaking ot the UN WEEKS after US Intelligence made it clear to the White House that 'The Video' has no relevance to the Benghazi Attack:

Actually, according to the report, it was only the day before Obama addressed the U.N. when U.S. intelligence changed its assessment about a protest.

So now we know he knew a day before that what they said wasn't true. Let's consider why they would do what they did.

Obama is up for election. This is a bad situation to happen just prior to the election. So he has to make the best of it he can.
.....

Yes...yes..goofball pubbies, if only if only Obama had said "terrorist attack" - then you'd get to have Romney retroactive president.

"terrorist attack caused by a anti-muslim video" thats what your hero liar said. HE LIED AND HE KNEW HE WAS LYING WHEN HE SAID IT. SAME APPLIES TO HRC.

 

[Freewill]

Republican congressional investigations on Benghazi have included ... .

Isn't it wonderful how the entire premise rests upon the would-be 'Report" being exclusively "Republican"... when in truth, the Committee was comprised largely of Democrats whose purpose was to produce precisely what was produced which is a report which is wholly detached from reality.

First the 'report' concludes that the White House did not purposefully mislead anyone regarding 'The Youtube Video'. The report false states that after US Intelligence confirmed that there was no protest, of anykind, much less one stemming from the Youtube Video, that the WhiteHouse abandoned the "The Video" explanation.

Of course this is false and is demonstrated in the Video of the Peasantpimp itself speaking ot the UN WEEKS after US Intelligence made it clear to the White House that 'The Video' has no relevance to the Benghazi Attack:

Actually, according to the report, it was only the day before Obama addressed the U.N. when U.S. intelligence changed its assessment about a protest.

So now we know he knew a day before that what they said wasn't true. Let's consider why they would do what they did.

Obama is up for election. This is a bad situation to happen just prior to the election. So he has to make the best of it he can.
.....

Yes...yes..goofball pubbies, if only if only Obama had said "terrorist attack" - then you'd get to have Romney retroactive president.

Actually I never said that. Obama can't stand looking bad in any situation his ego won't allow. Would have telling the truth from the beginning made an election difference, I don't think so.

So it is up to the left to explain his behavior which regardless of the report we all heard and saw what was said and done.

 

[Nyvin]

Benghazi is dead. Get over it.

Actually 4 people were killed.

Tough to get over that.

Yeah, Michael Brown was killed too, should we fault Obama and Hillary for that?

How about all the people that died in Iraq and Afganistan...is that Obama's fault too?

You can't simply say someone got killed and then blame it on the White House without some kind of connection or wrong doing, this report showed there was no connection and no wrong doing