toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
Proof no court will look at?
The most recent judge refused to consider the evidence because he felt it should have been filed 15 months ago back during the election, but the evidence wasn't even defined then. The courts are far more interested in following their own procedural regulations they can lord over others which impede discovery then actually getting at the actual TRUTH, probably to avoid the social scandal. Then he criticized it as being "speculative," no worse a criticism than Pelosi and Schiff's 2 year long 30 million dollar Russian witch-hunt that all turned out to be a farce contrived by the DNC and Hillary.
The question HERE is not about some court we have no control over but why you bother joining a discussion board and ridiculing a topic that you yourself aren't even willing to spend an hour watching a documentary to even be able to debate the material both informed and intelligently, instead, all you tards hide behind coy insults and putdowns to avoid actually discussing why the evidence may or may not be materially VALID obviously because you have no confidence nor proof to back up the tired rhetoric that the election fraud is all baseless and has been debunked!