- Aug 10, 2008
- 47,637
- 21,335
- 2,645
I'm not saying that you can keep your eyes on your child every second. However, I hold this woman partially responsible because she should have at least had a chaperone. The zoo is also partly responsible for not having sufficient barriers between the animals (dangerous and unpredictable WILD animals) and the people who are visiting the zoo. A tiny little toddler should not be able to slip in between the bars and gain access to the wild animals. They don't put up sufficient enclosures because that would lead to a view that was not as good for the people. I've been to some zoos/circuses in the past, where I've realized how dangerous it could be for everyone if the animal was to freak out. They are unpredictable. They are also extremely strong. They have to be to survive in the wild.
And the gorilla should have been in the wild to start with. I have stated before that I hate zoo's. This is a prime example of why. Cages and fake areas for primates doesn't get it for me. It's cruel to have the animals locked up to start with.
I agree if she (the mother) was 100% alone with a lot of children, there should have been others. But, I do not know the woman, and I am not going to attack her over parenting skills. Accidents DO happen. That is why we have that word.
I have had accidents to happen to me while I was under supervision. Still have the big scar on my thigh from the 9 stitches I took.
Things do happen. It's tragic.