Governors, States Now REJECTING Syrian 'Refugees'

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

In other words, there's no language saying states have to admit refugees.

States don't have the legal power to keep somebody out. Louisiana can't escort someone to Mississippi and say don't come back. Are you really this dense?

Really? They can't kick out non-us citizens? Why not?

Only the federal government can deport people. Keep beating a dead horse and making an ass out of yourself if that's your desire.

 

[bripat9643]

Defend Obama's position at all costs! Even if it means risking American lives.

Unbelievably disgusting

This doesn't have anything to do with Obama, as far as I'm concerned.

Of course it has to do with Obama. He's the one who made the decision to bring them here.

 

[bripat9643]

In other words, there's no language saying states have to admit refugees.

States don't have the legal power to keep somebody out. Louisiana can't escort someone to Mississippi and say don't come back. Are you really this dense?

Really? They can't kick out non-us citizens? Why not?

Only the federal government can deport people. Keep beating a dead horse and making an ass out of yourself if that's your desire.

Who's talking about deporting anyone? I'm just talking about barring them from entering the state.

 

[Meathead]

That's only one reason to keep them out. The main reason is that they're muzzie savages who will eventually overwhelm and destroy our culture. We don't need any more Muslims in this couintry.

I could effectively argue we don't need more people like you in this country.

That's a bit of a slippery slope. Anyway, The Federal government controls matter of immigration, that's clear. State can refuse to cooperate and politicians can choose to make a political issue of it. It is a lose-lose situation for Obama even without factoring in the distinct possibility that some of the immigrants could indeed commit terrorist acts.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Refugee Act of 1980.

Cite the language that says so.

The whole law.

Read it, you'll notice there's no mention of states having veto power over refugee designations.

In other words, there's no language saying states have to admit refugees.

Once the federal government grants a refugee legal status, the state has no say.

They have a say about where they can live.

The anarchist is now going to school us on the laws of the Statists.

Proceed.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

In other words, there's no language saying states have to admit refugees.

States don't have the legal power to keep somebody out. Louisiana can't escort someone to Mississippi and say don't come back. Are you really this dense?

Really? They can't kick out non-us citizens? Why not?

Only the federal government can deport people. Keep beating a dead horse and making an ass out of yourself if that's your desire.

Who's talking about deporting anyone? I'm just talking about barring them from entering the state.

Which has already pointed out to you numerous times they can't do, dipshit. I'm not going to argue with you about it anymore. A child can understand this.

 

[Synthaholic]

Good for them. All the States should refuse to accept any Syrian refugee's.

If Obumble want them then they can all live in DC. and the DC taxpayers can support them.

^^^ Dumbass, clueless conservative.

 

[Claudette]

Good for them. All the States should refuse to accept any Syrian refugee's.

If Obumble want them then they can all live in DC. and the DC taxpayers can support them.

^^^ Dumbass, clueless conservative.

Dumbass, clueless asshole.

Big-Wide-and deep.

 

[Ravi]

In other words, there's no language saying states have to admit refugees.

States don't have the legal power to keep somebody out. Louisiana can't escort someone to Mississippi and say don't come back. Are you really this dense?

Really? They can't kick out non-us citizens? Why not?

Only the federal government can deport people. Keep beating a dead horse and making an ass out of yourself if that's your desire.

Who's talking about deporting anyone? I'm just talking about barring them from entering the state.

Are you going to build walls around states now?

 

[mudwhistle]

That's only one reason to keep them out. The main reason is that they're muzzie savages who will eventually overwhelm and destroy our culture. We don't need any more Muslims in this couintry.

I could effectively argue we don't need more people like you in this country.

That's a bit of a slippery slope. Anyway, The Federal government controls matter of immigration, that's clear. State can refuse to cooperate and politicians can choose to make a political issue of it. It is a lose-lose situation for Obama even without factoring in the distinct possibility that some of the immigrants could indeed commit terrorist acts.

I have to question either Obama's sanity or his motives.

There's no law against rejecting refugees on that basis.

Denying him the ability to put Americans at risk just to help his Muslim brothers is an act of Patriotism.

 

[Synthaholic]

Are you going to build walls around states now?

These people are fleeing a shithole. Why would they head to Alabama?

 

[bripat9643]

Cite the language that says so.

The whole law.

Read it, you'll notice there's no mention of states having veto power over refugee designations.

In other words, there's no language saying states have to admit refugees.

Once the federal government grants a refugee legal status, the state has no say.

They have a say about where they can live.

The anarchist is now going to school us on the laws of the Statists.

Proceed.

Most anarchist are thoroughly knowledgeable about the law. We have to be to shoot down all the bilge servile idiots like you are always spewing.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The whole law.

Read it, you'll notice there's no mention of states having veto power over refugee designations.

In other words, there's no language saying states have to admit refugees.

Once the federal government grants a refugee legal status, the state has no say.

They have a say about where they can live.

The anarchist is now going to school us on the laws of the Statists.

Proceed.

Most anarchist are thoroughly knowledgeable about the law. We have to be to shoot down all the bilge servile idiots like you are always spewing.

Fine then tell us how states can get around the Constitution.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It really doesn't matter if the states want to accept these refugees or not. The bigger issue is that this big-eared clown in the White House is going against the will of the American people........again.

At the cost of billions of dollars we don't have, can any of you leftist tell me what advantage to us these refugees will be? Because if you can't, then there is no reason to let them into this country. If these refugees were white Christians, you would see how fast DumBama would slam the door on their faces.

 

[NYcarbineer]

That's only one reason to keep them out. The main reason is that they're muzzie savages who will eventually overwhelm and destroy our culture. We don't need any more Muslims in this couintry.

I could effectively argue we don't need more people like you in this country.

That's a bit of a slippery slope. Anyway, The Federal government controls matter of immigration, that's clear. State can refuse to cooperate and politicians can choose to make a political issue of it. It is a lose-lose situation for Obama even without factoring in the distinct possibility that some of the immigrants could indeed commit terrorist acts.

I have to question either Obama's sanity or his motives.

There's no law against rejecting refugees on that basis.

Denying him the ability to put Americans at risk just to help his Muslim brothers is an act of Patriotism.

How many refugees is your country taking? Are you allowed to move around America?

 

[NYcarbineer]

It really doesn't matter if the states want to accept these refugees or not. The bigger issue is that this big-eared clown in the White House is going against the will of the American people........again.

At the cost of billions of dollars we don't have, can any of you leftist tell me what advantage to us these refugees will be? Because if you can't, then there is no reason to let them into this country. If these refugees were white Christians, you would see how fast DumBama would slam the door on their faces.

You wanted to meddle in the Middle East, now you get to enjoy the consequences.

 

[bripat9643]

In other words, there's no language saying states have to admit refugees.

Once the federal government grants a refugee legal status, the state has no say.

They have a say about where they can live.

The anarchist is now going to school us on the laws of the Statists.

Proceed.

Most anarchist are thoroughly knowledgeable about the law. We have to be to shoot down all the bilge servile idiots like you are always spewing.

Fine then tell us how states can get around the Constitution.

Where does the Constitution state that states have to allow refugees?

 

[bripat9643]

It really doesn't matter if the states want to accept these refugees or not. The bigger issue is that this big-eared clown in the White House is going against the will of the American people........again.

At the cost of billions of dollars we don't have, can any of you leftist tell me what advantage to us these refugees will be? Because if you can't, then there is no reason to let them into this country. If these refugees were white Christians, you would see how fast DumBama would slam the door on their faces.

You wanted to meddle in the Middle East, now you get to enjoy the consequences.

Nobody wanted to "meddle" in the Middle East anymore than we wanted to "meddle" in Europe when we invaded it. The Middle East has been a constant threat to itself and its neighbors.

 

[Conservative65]

Once the federal government grants a refugee legal status, the state has no say.

They have a say about where they can live.

The anarchist is now going to school us on the laws of the Statists.

Proceed.

Most anarchist are thoroughly knowledgeable about the law. We have to be to shoot down all the bilge servile idiots like you are always spewing.

Fine then tell us how states can get around the Constitution.

Where does the Constitution state that states have to allow refugees?

Are you going to build walls around states now?

These people are fleeing a shithole. Why would they head to Alabama?

Because it's better than the shithole where you live. In fact, anywhere you happen to go is a shithole at least on a temporary basis until you leave.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Once the federal government grants a refugee legal status, the state has no say.

They have a say about where they can live.

The anarchist is now going to school us on the laws of the Statists.

Proceed.

Most anarchist are thoroughly knowledgeable about the law. We have to be to shoot down all the bilge servile idiots like you are always spewing.

Fine then tell us how states can get around the Constitution.

Where does the Constitution state that states have to allow refugees?

Where it establishes the Constitution as the supreme law of the land.