2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,175
- 52,419
- 2,290
This is a lie.Please point out where it says you can't require a competency test and licensing? Seems to me that would fall into line with the "well regulated" part of your militia
While I would be willing to accept competency testing and licensing even, it would have to be state of local.
The Constitution is clear there is no federal jurisdiction at all over any weapons.
Any test for the exercise of a Right is unConstitutional...as is any fee for the exercise of a Right.....
So slander and libel laws are unConstitutional?
I thought you claimed to be a "scholar". Did you mean "wanker"?
No, dipshit..... you keep making things up about me......do you really need to mix booze with your meds? It isn't helping you.
Slander and Libel violate the Rights of others.....that is why there is a defined punishment for doing it......but you can say anything you want until you violate the Rights of others.....then you break the law.
You asshats want to punish people who do not use their guns for crime.....for simply owning and carrying guns.
No one seeks to ‘punish’ lawful gunowners.
Firearm regulatory measures such as background checks, training requirements, and registration fees are perfectly Constitutional and consistent with the Second Amendment – in no manner ‘violating’ gunowners’ rights.
And you are wrong, the same way Poll Taxes and Literacy tests are not Constitutional for voting.