"Gun Nuts" ???

[RoadVirus]

As I have previously stated

Gun Nuts have Red Dawn fantasies of someday fighting off invading armies or a tyrannical government.
In reality, they would wet themselves if actually confronted

You're probably thinking more of yourself.

 

[tjvh]

Yes...you caught me

I do consider myself superior to those who plan to take up arms against my country

Do you ever by chance happen to read any of your own posts Rightwinger???

You really suck at presenting a rational position, defending your position and rebutting opposing positions.

It seems your only tactic is to dodge a discussion by dancing around the issues and sorry to say, you even suck at that.

Perhaps you're not quite ready to participate in a political forum...Maybe a sports or cooking forum might better suite you.

Do you know anything about sports or cooking???

As I have previously stated

Gun Nuts have Red Dawn fantasies of someday fighting off invading armies or a tyrannical government.
In reality, they would wet themselves if actually confronted

Is any of your lunacy based upon facts? Nope, this is more of your irrational ramblings in a vain attempt to further the liberal agenda driven War on Guns.

 

[RoadVirus]

Why do you always have to take despicable personal shots at southerners when you are trying to make your silly points? Can't you simply argue your point without the ugliness? Your ugliness really destroys any credibility you might have had, and makes you sound extremely ignorant.

Rightwinger is apparently what's known as a geo-supremacist.

ie, someone who thinks they're superior to others because of where they're from or happen to live.

I've noticed that many geo-supremacists are Californians, Texans and New Yorkers and usually liberal.

I've also noticed the areas they most commonly target as inferior are the midwest and particularly the southern states.

Disclaimer: No disrespect intended to the good people of California, Texas and New York.

And as to why Rightwinger chose to "take despicable personal shots"???

Because he had absolutely no rational argument in defense of "his point" against my rock solid facts and logic.

Yes...you caught me

I do consider myself superior to those who plan to take up arms against my country

Um...who's planning to take up arms against the government?

Let me guess....you're getting the basis for your argument from the latest SPLC report right? If so, then that makes you a moron. The SPLC overblows 99% of the shit it reports. Talk about fear mongering.

 

[rightwinger]

I know of nobody who has been marched to the ovens

I know of nobody who has taken up arms.

Then what the fuck are you bitching about?

 

[rightwinger]

Rightwinger is apparently what's known as a geo-supremacist.

ie, someone who thinks they're superior to others because of where they're from or happen to live.

I've noticed that many geo-supremacists are Californians, Texans and New Yorkers and usually liberal.

I've also noticed the areas they most commonly target as inferior are the midwest and particularly the southern states.

Disclaimer: No disrespect intended to the good people of California, Texas and New York.

And as to why Rightwinger chose to "take despicable personal shots"???

Because he had absolutely no rational argument in defense of "his point" against my rock solid facts and logic.

Yes...you caught me

I do consider myself superior to those who plan to take up arms against my country

Um...who's planning to take up arms against the government?

Let me guess....you're getting the basis for your argument from the latest SPLC report right? If so, then that makes you a moron. The SPLC overblows 99% of the shit it reports. Talk about fear mongering.

Try to keep up with the thread....

I made the assertion that those who stock arms to someday take up arms against their country are.......by definition......Gun Nuts

 

[Uncensored2008]

Then what the fuck are you bitching about?

The plans by you of the Khmer Rouge to crush basic civil liberties.

 

[rightwinger]

Do you ever by chance happen to read any of your own posts Rightwinger???

You really suck at presenting a rational position, defending your position and rebutting opposing positions.

It seems your only tactic is to dodge a discussion by dancing around the issues and sorry to say, you even suck at that.

Perhaps you're not quite ready to participate in a political forum...Maybe a sports or cooking forum might better suite you.

Do you know anything about sports or cooking???

As I have previously stated

Gun Nuts have Red Dawn fantasies of someday fighting off invading armies or a tyrannical government.
In reality, they would wet themselves if actually confronted

Is any of your lunacy based upon facts? Nope, this is more of your irrational ramblings in a vain attempt to further the liberal agenda driven War on Guns.

War on Guns?

We have 300 million fucking guns

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

As I have previously stated

Gun Nuts have Red Dawn fantasies of someday fighting off invading armies or a tyrannical government.
In reality, they would wet themselves if actually confronted

Is any of your lunacy based upon facts? Nope, this is more of your irrational ramblings in a vain attempt to further the liberal agenda driven War on Guns.

War on Guns?

We have 300 million fucking guns

'War on guns'?

lol

 

[Uncensored2008]

'War on guns'?

lol

Yeah, your war is on civil rights, not guns.

 

[Uncensored2008]

War on Guns?

We have 300 million fucking guns

We have about 4 trillion books in this nation.

So I guess it would be okay to start banning some. Not all of them - I mean if we only ban some books, it's not an infringement of the 1st amendment, right? Maybe just books by Mark Steyn and Ann Coulter, and anyone writing critically of Barack Obama.... Rights are not absolute, so you can ban bad books...

 

[tjvh]

Is any of your lunacy based upon facts? Nope, this is more of your irrational ramblings in a vain attempt to further the liberal agenda driven War on Guns.

War on Guns?

We have 300 million fucking guns

'War on guns'?

lol

Yup... I believe that if you keep calling the Democrat gun control agenda the War on Guns, hopefully it just might stick.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Yup... I believe that if you keep calling the Democrat gun control agenda the War on Guns, hopefully it just might stick.

It's better, and more accurate, to make it the "democrat war on civil rights."

 

[tjvh]

As I have previously stated

Gun Nuts have Red Dawn fantasies of someday fighting off invading armies or a tyrannical government.
In reality, they would wet themselves if actually confronted

Is any of your lunacy based upon facts? Nope, this is more of your irrational ramblings in a vain attempt to further the liberal agenda driven War on Guns.

War on Guns?

We have 300 million fucking guns

You have no fucking idea just how many illegal guns there are in the United States. That is why going against people who obtained them legally is such pure nonsense. Gun control isn't about controlling guns, it's about controlling people and all it does is empower those who own illegal guns. But you leftist loons already knew that, because you've already been to murder capitols like Detroit, NYC, and Chicago.

 

[rightwinger]

War on Guns?

We have 300 million fucking guns

We have about 4 trillion books in this nation.

So I guess it would be okay to start banning some. Not all of them - I mean if we only ban some books, it's not an infringement of the 1st amendment, right? Maybe just books by Mark Steyn and Ann Coulter, and anyone writing critically of Barack Obama.... Rights are not absolute, so you can ban bad books...

You think we don't ban certain books?

Ever been to the child porn section of your local library?

 

[Uncensored2008]

You think we don't ban certain books?

Ever been to the child porn section of your local library?

This is the best you can do?

We don't ban the written word.

Images that exploit children and those not able to legally consent are prohibited. Just as shooting people in the face is prohibited. Neither have anything to do with the civil rights involved.

Again, you have no objection to banning certain classes of books, such as conservative books, or books critical of Muhammad, right?

After all, there will still be a lot of books allowed, you're not banning all books.

Maybe Dianne Feinstein can have a book burning on the floor of the Senate?

 

[Hardcandy]

As I have previously stated

Gun Nuts have Red Dawn fantasies of someday fighting off invading armies or a tyrannical government.
In reality, they would wet themselves if actually confronted

Is any of your lunacy based upon facts? Nope, this is more of your irrational ramblings in a vain attempt to further the liberal agenda driven War on Guns.

War on Guns?

We have 300 million fucking guns

And every time Obama parts his purple lips, Americans buy millions fucking more!

Do ya think gun shops and manufacturers might be closet contributors to the Democrat Party at election time?!

 

[rightwinger]

You think we don't ban certain books?

Ever been to the child porn section of your local library?

This is the best you can do?

We don't ban the written word.

Images that exploit children and those not able to legally consent are prohibited. Just as shooting people in the face is prohibited. Neither have anything to do with the civil rights involved.

Again, you have no objection to banning certain classes of books, such as conservative books, or books critical of Muhammad, right?

After all, there will still be a lot of books allowed, you're not banning all books.

Maybe Dianne Feinstein can have a book burning on the floor of the Senate?

I have no problem banning books containing child porn
Just like I have no problem banning guns used to kill first graders

 

[rightwinger]

Is any of your lunacy based upon facts? Nope, this is more of your irrational ramblings in a vain attempt to further the liberal agenda driven War on Guns.

War on Guns?

We have 300 million fucking guns

And every time Obama parts his purple lips, Americans buy millions fucking more!

Do ya think gun shops and manufacturers might be closet contributors to the Democrat Party at election time?!

Gun nuts overpaying for guns and ammo?

Doesn't bother me

 

[legaleagle_45]

I have no problem banning books containing child porn
Just like I have no problem banning guns used to kill first graders

When you find a law that bans child porn but provides a specific exemption so as to allow police and governemet officials to have and use child porn, let me know, ok?

 

[rightwinger]

I have no problem banning books containing child porn
Just like I have no problem banning guns used to kill first graders

When you find a law that bans child porn but provides a specific exemption so as to allow police and governemet officials to have and use child porn, let me know, ok?

Irrelevant