"Gun Nuts" ???

[legaleagle_45]

I have no problem banning books containing child porn
Just like I have no problem banning guns used to kill first graders

When you find a law that bans child porn but provides a specific exemption so as to allow police and governemet officials to have and use child porn, let me know, ok?

Irrelevant

Relevant

 

[Hardcandy]

You think we don't ban certain books?

Ever been to the child porn section of your local library?

This is the best you can do?

We don't ban the written word.

Images that exploit children and those not able to legally consent are prohibited. Just as shooting people in the face is prohibited. Neither have anything to do with the civil rights involved.

Again, you have no objection to banning certain classes of books, such as conservative books, or books critical of Muhammad, right?

After all, there will still be a lot of books allowed, you're not banning all books.

Maybe Dianne Feinstein can have a book burning on the floor of the Senate?

I have no problem banning books containing child porn
Just like I have no problem banning guns used to kill first graders

Let's suppose Feinstein's Gun Ban Bill was voted into law and let's say 10 years from now there is no noticeable drop in related gun homosides, would you be okay with lifting the ban?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You think we don't ban certain books?

Ever been to the child porn section of your local library?

This is the best you can do?

We don't ban the written word.

Images that exploit children and those not able to legally consent are prohibited. Just as shooting people in the face is prohibited. Neither have anything to do with the civil rights involved.

Again, you have no objection to banning certain classes of books, such as conservative books, or books critical of Muhammad, right?

After all, there will still be a lot of books allowed, you're not banning all books.

Maybe Dianne Feinstein can have a book burning on the floor of the Senate?

I have no problem banning books containing child porn
Just like I have no problem banning guns used to kill first graders

Well hell you can have my blessing banning any firearm that will kill a first grader, guess what you still want get mine because mine will never be used to kill first graders, just the uninvited government people that come too my home.

 

[rightwinger]

This is the best you can do?

We don't ban the written word.

Images that exploit children and those not able to legally consent are prohibited. Just as shooting people in the face is prohibited. Neither have anything to do with the civil rights involved.

Again, you have no objection to banning certain classes of books, such as conservative books, or books critical of Muhammad, right?

After all, there will still be a lot of books allowed, you're not banning all books.

Maybe Dianne Feinstein can have a book burning on the floor of the Senate?

I have no problem banning books containing child porn
Just like I have no problem banning guns used to kill first graders

Let's suppose Feinstein's Gun Ban Bill was voted into law and let's say 10 years from now there is no noticeable drop in related gun homosides, would you be okay with lifting the ban?

Why not?

Let's move to full gun registration and background checks

 

[rightwinger]

This is the best you can do?

We don't ban the written word.

Images that exploit children and those not able to legally consent are prohibited. Just as shooting people in the face is prohibited. Neither have anything to do with the civil rights involved.

Again, you have no objection to banning certain classes of books, such as conservative books, or books critical of Muhammad, right?

After all, there will still be a lot of books allowed, you're not banning all books.

Maybe Dianne Feinstein can have a book burning on the floor of the Senate?

I have no problem banning books containing child porn
Just like I have no problem banning guns used to kill first graders

Well hell you can have my blessing banning any firearm that will kill a first grader, guess what you still want get mine because mine will never be used to kill first graders, just the uninvited government people that come too my home.

I don't want to take your gun. I want you registered and a background check

 

[Conservadude]

Liberals like to refer to people who support the Second Amendment as being "gun nuts".

By this rationale would those who support the First Amendment be considered "word nuts"?

Proud gun nut!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I have no problem banning books containing child porn
Just like I have no problem banning guns used to kill first graders

Well hell you can have my blessing banning any firearm that will kill a first grader, guess what you still want get mine because mine will never be used to kill first graders, just the uninvited government people that come too my home.

I don't want to take your gun. I want you registered and a background check

I have no guns to register.

 

[rightwinger]

Well hell you can have my blessing banning any firearm that will kill a first grader, guess what you still want get mine because mine will never be used to kill first graders, just the uninvited government people that come too my home.

I don't want to take your gun. I want you registered and a background check

I have no guns to register.

So what do you have to worry about?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I don't want to take your gun. I want you registered and a background check

I have no guns to register.

So what do you have to worry about?

My concern unlike yours is for others

 

[Agit8r]

there are plenty of people who support the second amendment, who are not mentally unstable

there are however people who are mentally unwell and also happen to think that they should be allowed unfettered access to weaponry.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

there are plenty of people who support the second amendment, who are not mentally unstable

there are however people who are mentally unwell and also happen to think that they should be allowed unfettered access to weaponry.

What is your expertise in the medical field?

 

[rightwinger]

I have no guns to register.

So what do you have to worry about?

My concern unlike yours is for others

Those who pass background checks have nothing to worry about do they?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

So what do you have to worry about?

My concern unlike yours is for others

Those who pass background checks have nothing to worry about do they?

We already have back ground checks so what's your beef about again?
OH that's right behind the argument for registration comes the confiscation.

 

[zonly1]

Liberals like to refer to people who support the Second Amendment as being "gun nuts".

By this rationale would those who support the First Amendment be considered "word nuts"?

Without the second there would not be a first...think about it.

Bullshit.

Most industrialized countries have freedom of speech, religion, etc. without widespread gun ownership.

In fact, Americans probalby have less freedom of speech. Probably because all our speech is controlled by big corporations.

Your arguments are incoherent as usual.

The 2nd amendment was designed against tyrannical goverments, like the one we see to day with hoax sandy hook event and the constant misrepresenting the facts of that event.

You are nothing but an incoherent troll. Obama signed an attacked EO on freedom of speach but I'm sure you've got your head up your ass as usual.

And Fuck off Joe, gutless tool of the left wing radicals.

 

[zonly1]

If you fear the government and arm yourself to take up arms against your country.....you ARE a gun nut

If you are willing to kill to protect your guns.........you ARE a gun nut

I guess the founding fathers were nuts (read my sig).

I guess the Patriots at Lexington and Concord, protecting their armory from the Brits were also gun nuts.

You sir, are a classic Loyalist.

]

I don't get gooey over the founding slave rapists, frankly.

They saved us from being - gasp - Canadians.

Sorry, man, I've been to Canada. Other than the weather, it's rather nice.

I could careless if you've been to Canada..as if it makes your straw man.

 

[zonly1]

So what do you have to worry about?

My concern unlike yours is for others

Those who pass background checks have nothing to worry about do they?

the bad guys are still going to get those banned guns and we don't have enough police officers to make an effect street presents in the communities.

Man your dumb.

 

[zonly1]

I have no problem banning books containing child porn
Just like I have no problem banning guns used to kill first graders

Well hell you can have my blessing banning any firearm that will kill a first grader, guess what you still want get mine because mine will never be used to kill first graders, just the uninvited government people that come too my home.

I don't want to take your gun. I want you registered and a background check

Okay I want to know ever financial transaction you make including your friends and family.

 

[JoeB131]

Without the second there would not be a first...think about it.

Bullshit.

Most industrialized countries have freedom of speech, religion, etc. without widespread gun ownership.

In fact, Americans probalby have less freedom of speech. Probably because all our speech is controlled by big corporations.

Your arguments are incoherent as usual.

The 2nd amendment was designed against tyrannical goverments, like the one we see to day with hoax sandy hook event and the constant misrepresenting the facts of that event.

You are nothing but an incoherent troll. Obama signed an attacked EO on freedom of speach but I'm sure you've got your head up your ass as usual.

And Fuck off Joe, gutless tool of the left wing radicals.

Dude, your arguments would be mildly amusing if you could spell.

But your illiteracy makes them downright hysterical.

The best argument for gun control is a five minute conversation with a gun nut.

 

[JoeB131]

My concern unlike yours is for others

Those who pass background checks have nothing to worry about do they?

the bad guys are still going to get those banned guns and we don't have enough police officers to make an effect street presents in the communities.

Man your dumb.

The vast majority of gun deaths are suicides and domestic murders.

if we limited our gun deaths to JUST those committed by career criminals, we'd have a murder rate about the level of most European countries- down in the hundreds instead of the tens of thousands.

 

[zonly1]

Those who pass background checks have nothing to worry about do they?

the bad guys are still going to get those banned guns and we don't have enough police officers to make an effect street presents in the communities.

Man your dumb.

The vast majority of gun deaths are suicides and domestic murders.

if we limited our gun deaths to JUST those committed by career criminals, we'd have a murder rate about the level of most European countries- down in the hundreds instead of the tens of thousands.

But when you throw out incoherence you seem to leave out the fact the gun violence(US) has dropped with overall violence, moron. Furthermore, why do you compare apples to oranges US vs England. In englands, in removing or disarming the citizen, case violent crime is up, dumbass.

If your going to use England as the reference point, why not look at Switzerland? eh clown.