Guns are great, great for killing, maiming and used for fun.

[westwall]

What they call "Collateral Damage".

No, we call it stupid. Assholes, like you, constantly let the most violent criminals out of prison, then blame an inanimate tool for the evils that YOUR violent criminals do.

DURRRRRR

 

[Stashman]

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,....."

No longer the case, and the Amendment now protects every unhinged radical, including fascist Neo-GOP thugs, arming themselves to the teeth.

Every person that undergoes a background check to get a gun has NEVER committed a crime. These are the people who pay the price for new gun laws that make no sense.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

What they call "Collateral Damage".

So?

Arm yourselves or get the fuck out.

 

[Auld Phart]

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,....."

No longer the case, and the Amendment now protects every unhinged radical, including fascist Neo-GOP thugs, arming themselves to the teeth.

Why didn't you post the rest of the Amendment?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

The problem you face is that "gun control", as libs see it, has a net zero effect on criminals. You can enact all the gun control laws you want and it will not change the reality that law-abiding citizens will be the ones affected, while criminals will not be impacted an iota.

How many times do we have to tell them before this actually sinks in?

Damn! That is some stubborn-ass brainwashing!

 

[Flash]

10 people shot in Brooklyn subway attack

Ten people were shot in an attack on a subway train in Brooklyn, N.Y., on Tuesday morning, authorities said, and a manhunt for a suspect is underway.

www.yahoo.com

I'm certain to see this thread put in the proper forum, one that will immediately be able to post off topic posts and an excuse that mass shooting of innocent human beings is rare and no excuse to have gun controls.

Is it trolling, or some other excuse to allow the gun lovers to use the same claim that mass shooting is no reason to deny them with their absolute right: "shall not be infringed"? And innocent men, women and children maimed and murdered is simply a rare event - almost daily in the United States - and their rights to own, possess and have in their custody and control this right, and of course, their right to be armed to everyone will be the solution to these rare events.

A crime takes place in a Democrat controlled big city shithole where the Democrat leaders have supported the idea of defunding the police and you want to do away with the Bill of Rights????

Go fuck yourself Moon Bat.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Gee, I wonder if the shooters have long criminal histories? Check

I wonder if the shooters were let out early? Check.

I wonder if the shooters are prohibited persons? Check.

So, basically, you have criminals being let out to prey on the innocent and dear old Rye can't help himself and has to blame guns, and not the violent perps.

Because he is retarded

Or even more nonsensical yet, blame the law abiding gun owners who have never harmed or even intimated a single soul?

 

[Canon Shooter]

How many times do we have to tell them before this actually sinks in?

Damn! That is some stubborn-ass brainwashing!

The obvious problem is that idiot libs feel it's more important to feel as though they're addressing the problem instead of actually addressing the problem. As long as they continue that, we will see no real progress in cutting down on gun crime...

 

[BlindBoo]

These mass shootings are the price we pay for living in a free country.

Everybody had guns in the 60's and most shooting victims were shot accidentally.

Why didn't you post the rest of the Amendment?

Why was it included in the first place. Why didn't it say every Tom, Dick, and Harriette can have a firearm?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Get this straight in your fucked up brain RIGHT FUCKING NOW..

We will use these gun to kill you if you try to take them or otherwise ban or restrict them IN ANY FUCKING WAY!!!

Understand?

Just keep pissing us off, pussy leftist scum.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

The obvious problem is that idiot libs feel it's more important to feel as though they're addressing the problem instead of actually addressing the problem. As long as they continue that, we will see no real progress in cutting down on gun crime...

Brilliant reply!

 

[Auld Phart]

Everybody had guns in the 60's and most shooting victims were shot accidentally.

Why was it included in the first place. Why didn't it say every Tom, Dick, and Harriette can have a firearm?

Why didn't it say every Tom, Dick, and Harriette can have a firearm?

Basically, it did.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

 

[bigrebnc1775]

10 people shot in Brooklyn subway attack

Ten people were shot in an attack on a subway train in Brooklyn, N.Y., on Tuesday morning, authorities said, and a manhunt for a suspect is underway.

www.yahoo.com

I'm certain to see this thread put in the proper forum, one that will immediately be able to post off topic posts and an excuse that mass shooting of innocent human beings is rare and no excuse to have gun controls.

Is it trolling, or some other excuse to allow the gun lovers to use the same claim that mass shooting is no reason to deny them with their absolute right: "shall not be infringed"? And innocent men, women and children maimed and murdered is simply a rare event - almost daily in the United States - and their rights to own, possess and have in their custody and control this right, and of course, their right to be armed to everyone will be the solution to these rare events.

Yep great job on that gun control

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Let the OP list their request they believe will end the mass shootings and the let debate it like adults…

 

[Hellbilly]

Get this straight in your fucked up brain RIGHT FUCKING NOW..

We will use these gun to kill you if you try to take them or otherwise ban or restrict them IN ANY FUCKING WAY!!!

Understand?

 

[Flash]

Isn't it amazing that the Democrat controlled big city shitholes that have the most gun crime also have the nation's most stringent gun control laws?

I know these Moon Bats aren't very smart but anybody with an IQ over 60 could surmise that gun control laws don't stop criminal from using firearms for crimes if they want.

 

[BlindBoo]

In terms of who has their right to keep and bear arms protected by the 2nd Amendment, this part of the amendment has always been irrelevant.
So... "No longer the case" is a lie.

It bestowed the right on Citizens and it went hand in hand with the obligation of property owners to join their local Militia. Not every Tom, Dick or Harriette was a Citizen when was written either.

The only viable way to change it however is a new Amendment and that ain't happening any time soon.

 

[Auld Phart]

It bestowed the right on Citizens and it went hand in hand with the obligation of property owners to join their local Militia. Not every Tom, Dick or Harriette was a Citizen when was written either.

The only viable way to change it however is a new Amendment and that ain't happening any time soon.

It bestowed the right on Citizens and it went hand in hand with the obligation of property owners to join their local Militia. Not every Tom, Dick or Harriette was a Citizen when was written either.

point out where is says 'citizens'

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

 

[Rye Catcher]

The problem you face is that "gun control", as libs see it, has a net zero effect on criminals. You can enact all the gun control laws you want and it will not change the reality that law-abiding citizens will be the ones affected, while criminals will not be impacted an iota.

You want to cut down on gun violence? Make the punishments for crimes committed with firearms downright draconian. Dream up the harshest penalties you can, and then increase them by a factor of ten.

Possess a firearm while committing a crime (but don't brandish it)? Your sentence is 25 years in prison. Period. You get one appeal within 90 days of your conviction. No possibility of parole.

Brandish, but don't discharge a firearm while committing a crime? Your sentence is 35 years in prison. You get one appeal within 90 days of your conviction. No possibility of parole.

Discharge a firearm while committing a crime? Your sentence is 50 years in prison. You get one appeal within 90 days of your conviction. No possibility of parole.

Discharge and shoot someone while committing a crime? Your sentence is life in prison. You get one appeal within 90 days of your conviction. No possibility of parole.

Shoot and kill someone while committing a crime? Mandatory death sentence. You get one appeal within 90 days of your conviction. If that appeal fails you are led directly to the death chamber so your sentence can be carried out.

We need to stop fucking around with criminals who use guns. Criminals need to understand that the decision to have a firearm while committing a crime is basically a life-ender. You want those guns off the streets? Get the criminals off the streets and leave good citizens alone...

How many people singularly shoot innocent people in schools, movie theaters, restaurants, at concerts, parks, public buildings and even military bases, who have never committed a crime?

Your solution doesn't unbury the dead.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Hey, I've got a great idea.

Why don't we stop supporting the party that lets all the violent criminals out of jail because, you know, "social justice" n stuff?