Guns Don't Kill Peope

gundemocrats.jpg


A Republican speaking out and not staying with the RINO status quo.

Via The Hill


Edge:
No comment :eek:

It's just that statistically and factually speaking, guns obviously make it 100% EASIER for people to kill people:


Compare Rate of Gun Homicide per 100,000 People
Chart In Japan, the annual rate of firearm homicide per 100,000 population is


2008: 0.09
2002: 0.0412
2001: 0.04
1997: 0.0313
1996: 0.03
1995: 0.03
1994: 0.0214


http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/japan
Go to this website and select a region and give it a whirl if you can handle it.
And then go here: http://www.politifact.com/virginia/...m-moran-says-us-gun-homicide-rate-20-times-h/

"The U.S. gun homicide rate is 20 times the combined rate of other western nations."
Jim Moran on Tuesday, January 10th, 2012 in a newspaper column.

Really, so sorry that you don't pay attention to how other developing nations have handled this problem.
 
Last edited:
Is this a Democrats are pussies thread and hate the 2nd amendment thread or a I'm afraid of Dems with guns thread?
 

Guns don't buy guns

People buy guns, the regulation is on the people

Banning certain weapons is not about the people you moron, it's about the guns.

I knew better than to think you had an ounce of intellectual honesty in you.

Guns that do not have a magazine disconnect safety cannot be sold in California through a FFL the Springfield XD-S is a perfect example. Again that has nothing to do with people, but with the gun itself.
 
Then why regulate guns?

Guns don't buy guns

People buy guns, the regulation is on the people

Banning certain weapons is not about the people you moron, it's about the guns.

I knew better than to think you had an ounce of intellectual honesty in you.

Guns that do not have a magazine disconnect safety cannot be sold in California through a FFL the Springfield XD-S is a perfect example. Again that has nothing to do with people, but with the gun itself.

Ok RW'er since this guy said its about guns you now have to change your mind :eusa_boohoo: and argue his strawman instead of how you feel. Thems the rules :eusa_boohoo:
 
Let me guess. you are a member of the NRA.....

Let me guess. You're too stupid to understand what tongue-in-cheek means.

Here ya go dumb ass:

tongue-in-cheek

adjective & adverb

-with ironic or flippant intent.
-characterized by insincerity, irony, or whimsical exaggeration

Sorry. I didn't realize that you were just making it all up..... I assumed that you were copying someone ELSE who had made it all up.
 
Last edited:
Then why regulate guns?

Guns don't buy guns

People buy guns, the regulation is on the people

Banning certain weapons is not about the people you moron, it's about the guns.

I knew better than to think you had an ounce of intellectual honesty in you.

Guns that do not have a magazine disconnect safety cannot be sold in California through a FFL the Springfield XD-S is a perfect example. Again that has nothing to do with people, but with the gun itself.

Guns don't kill people you moron, people with guns kill people

Those laws prevent PEOPLE from getting those guns
 
Guns don't buy guns

People buy guns, the regulation is on the people

Banning certain weapons is not about the people you moron, it's about the guns.

I knew better than to think you had an ounce of intellectual honesty in you.

Guns that do not have a magazine disconnect safety cannot be sold in California through a FFL the Springfield XD-S is a perfect example. Again that has nothing to do with people, but with the gun itself.

Guns don't kill people you moron, people with guns kill people

Those laws prevent PEOPLE from getting those guns

There are laws against people killing people. How's that working out?
 

Forum List

Back
Top