eflatminor
Classical Liberal
- May 24, 2011
- 10,643
- 1,669
- 245
I am sure the cops and robbers will enjoy the new law.
You think robbers give two shits about any law? Are you really that ignorant?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am sure the cops and robbers will enjoy the new law.
If that is the case then why does Wyoming not have the lowest crime rate? Why do many states with less guns have lower crime rates than Wyoming? Why is the Louisiana crime rate so high? Sorry the theory doesn't work.
the theory does work, overall, states with more guns have lower rates.
Louisiana has the most crime of any state and high gun ownership so no it doesn't.
neither are guns and cars. should we ban cars? should we ban cars from parking at a bar or a restaurant that serves alcohol
There are laws against drinking and driving, so I guess you should not be allowed to carry a firearm when consuming alcohol.
When you obtain your carry permit you are given fair warning about consuming alcohol while carrying. It isn't illegal to have a drink or two while carrying as long as you are not legally intoxicated. Being intoxicated you run the risk of not only being arrested but losing your carry permit as well. It basically boils down to being responsible.
According to the chart NH has .04% gun murders compared to WY with .09%
Don't see how relevant that is when compared to the population NH at 1.3 million and WY at just over 500 thousand.
So you don't even understand the chart. How surprising. Read again the population of the state doesn't matter. Post again when you understand the numbers in the chart.
I understand the chart but I don't understand what point you're trying to make.
Both states has guns, both states have crime. What's your point?
the theory does work, overall, states with more guns have lower rates.
Louisiana has the most crime of any state and high gun ownership so no it doesn't.
DC has the least amount of guns but hte highest crime rate, so by your logic of trying to cherry pick one example to validate your claim, yes it does
There are laws against drinking and driving, so I guess you should not be allowed to carry a firearm when consuming alcohol.
When you obtain your carry permit you are given fair warning about consuming alcohol while carrying. It isn't illegal to have a drink or two while carrying as long as you are not legally intoxicated. Being intoxicated you run the risk of not only being arrested but losing your carry permit as well. It basically boils down to being responsible.
But many people are not responsible when they drink, and should not be carrying a firearm in a bar. If you live in a place where you feel that you need a firearm to socialize with friends or go to church, why would you live there?
So you don't even understand the chart. How surprising. Read again the population of the state doesn't matter. Post again when you understand the numbers in the chart.
I understand the chart but I don't understand what point you're trying to make.
Both states has guns, both states have crime. What's your point?
If more guns equals less gun murder then Wyoming would have the least murder. New Hampshire has far less guns and less gun murder than Wyoming, so the theory doesn't hold.
If you understood the chart you wouldn't have asked your dumb population question.
Absolutely. Criminals will think twice before attempting to commit a gun related crime if they know that there's a good chance that they will be met with armed resistance.I am sure the cops and robbers will enjoy the new law.
cops are for it, robbers now no longer have an armed advantage
States with high levels of gun ownership, generally have lower gun related murders. In the chart below, the District of Columbia with the lowest rate of gun ownership (3.6%), has the highest rate of gun murders (16.5%). Wyoming with the highest rate of gun ownership (59.7%) has one of the lowest rates of gun murders (0.9%).
![]()
Gun violence in the United States by state - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
People carrying firearms in bars where they are getting drunk is real smart.
Is getting drunk the purpose of going to a bar?
I go to bars to socialize with my friends and have a few drinks, getting drunk is not intended nor welcomed. Some of us are responsible with alcohol but I'm sure that's a hard concept for you to grasp.
I hope you have a designated driver when you hit a bar.
Are you saying that no one who goes into a bar to have a couple of drinks and socialize with friends ever has too much to drink. An amount if alcohol can effect you differently at different times too.
As far as a designated driver, I rarely drink, and do not go to bars.
Absolutely. Criminals will think twice before attempting to commit a gun related crime if they know that there's a good chance that they will be met with armed resistance.cops are for it, robbers now no longer have an armed advantage
States with high levels of gun ownership, generally have lower gun related murders. In the chart below, the District of Columbia with the lowest rate of gun ownership (3.6%), has the highest rate of gun murders (16.5%). Wyoming with the highest rate of gun ownership (59.7%) has one of the lowest rates of gun murders (0.9%).
![]()
Gun violence in the United States by state - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Actually lonestar that is what he was saying. Again your lost.
Absolutely. Criminals will think twice before attempting to commit a gun related crime if they know that there's a good chance that they will be met with armed resistance.
States with high levels of gun ownership, generally have lower gun related murders. In the chart below, the District of Columbia with the lowest rate of gun ownership (3.6%), has the highest rate of gun murders (16.5%). Wyoming with the highest rate of gun ownership (59.7%) has one of the lowest rates of gun murders (0.9%).
![]()
Gun violence in the United States by state - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Actually lonestar that is what he was saying. Again your lost.
I haven't lost anything. That charts supports my position that high gun ownership doesn't equal high gun crime. You have the highest gun ownership state with one of the lowest gun crime rating.
I call that a win!
Actually lonestar that is what he was saying. Again your lost.
I haven't lost anything. That charts supports my position that high gun ownership doesn't equal high gun crime. You have the highest gun ownership state with one of the lowest gun crime rating.
I call that a win!
And they also have no big cities. And Louisiana has lots of guns and highest gun murder rate of any state.
I haven't lost anything. That charts supports my position that high gun ownership doesn't equal high gun crime. You have the highest gun ownership state with one of the lowest gun crime rating.
I call that a win!
And they also have no big cities. And Louisiana has lots of guns and highest gun murder rate of any state.
So?
What is your point?
DC has 30% fewer gun owners with a gun murder rate two times higher than that of Louisiana.
And they also have no big cities. And Louisiana has lots of guns and highest gun murder rate of any state.
So?
What is your point?
DC has 30% fewer gun owners with a gun murder rate two times higher than that of Louisiana.
Point being there is no correlation.
I understand the chart but I don't understand what point you're trying to make.
Both states has guns, both states have crime. What's your point?
If more guns equals less gun murder then Wyoming would have the least murder. New Hampshire has far less guns and less gun murder than Wyoming, so the theory doesn't hold.
If you understood the chart you wouldn't have asked your dumb population question.
No one has said that "more guns equals less gun murder".
Nice strawman you built.
If more guns equals less gun murder then Wyoming would have the least murder. New Hampshire has far less guns and less gun murder than Wyoming, so the theory doesn't hold.
If you understood the chart you wouldn't have asked your dumb population question.
No one has said that "more guns equals less gun murder".
Nice strawman you built.
[ame=http://youtu.be/q7SEvadjMxk]Rhode Island State Senator Tells Second Amendment Supporter To Go Fuck Yourself! - YouTube[/ame]
So?
What is your point?
DC has 30% fewer gun owners with a gun murder rate two times higher than that of Louisiana.
Point being there is no correlation.
Sure there is. You simply choose to ignore it. That's not to say there isn't anomalies.
Places that have strict gun control laws has the most gun related crime. Where gun control laws are lax there is less gun related crime.
Point being there is no correlation.
Sure there is. You simply choose to ignore it. That's not to say there isn't anomalies.
Places that have strict gun control laws has the most gun related crime. Where gun control laws are lax there is less gun related crime.
Back that up with some links and we can discuss. I find large cities definitely have more gun related crime. But that is just common sense.
Absolutely. Criminals will think twice before attempting to commit a gun related crime if they know that there's a good chance that they will be met with armed resistance.cops are for it, robbers now no longer have an armed advantage
States with high levels of gun ownership, generally have lower gun related murders. In the chart below, the District of Columbia with the lowest rate of gun ownership (3.6%), has the highest rate of gun murders (16.5%). Wyoming with the highest rate of gun ownership (59.7%) has one of the lowest rates of gun murders (0.9%).
![]()
Gun violence in the United States by state - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Vermont and Utah have lower ownership and lower rate of gun murder. Your theory seems flawed.
No one has said that "more guns equals less gun murder".
Nice strawman you built.
[ame=http://youtu.be/q7SEvadjMxk]Rhode Island State Senator Tells Second Amendment Supporter To Go Fuck Yourself! - YouTube[/ame]
Good to see State Senators respecting the Constitution.
What was the Senators name?
I'd like to see how his re-election went or goes.