HAHA. Court forces black baker to bake cake for KKK party

[ShootSpeeders]

No, it's the south which is most racist. It was the south which attempted to secede from the union to maintain slavery.

HAHAHA. Now that is truly ming-boggling ignorance. The Civil War had very little to do with slavery. Read some history, please.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

But you do expose the reason why the government had to step in. Left to their own accord, the racist south would still be denying blacks opportunities to this day if they could.

Blacks have had equal opportunity for 150 years. In fact the last 45 years they've had AA and thus more opportunity than whites. And yet they're still failures. Fact the fact that blacks are mentally inferior. That's why africa has always been in the stone age except when whites take over. And then they go back to the stone age when whites leave. THINK

So true!

 

[sealybobo]

I love it when liberal idiocy is used against liberals. The solution ? Let PRIVATE businesses refuse service to anyone they please.

UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES BLACK BAKERY OWNER LOSES LAWSUIT FORCED TO BAKE RACIST KKK CAKE Washington Weekly News

april 2 2015
A Georgia court recently found that a bakery owner who happened to be black was guilty of discrimination because she refused to bake a racist cake for an upcoming KKK gathering.

And this is not a joke.

A Georgia court has ruled in favor of Marshall Saxby, the Grand Wizard of a local KKK chapter, in a lawsuit stemming from two years ago when a local bakery denied him service.

The three judge panel concluded unanimously that the bakery had violated civil rights laws by discriminating against Saxby when they refused to sell him a cake for his organization’s annual birthday party.

Elaine Bailey, who owns Bailey Bakeries, refused to bake a cake for the ceremony because it violated her religious beliefs.

Saxby filed the lawsuit claiming that Bailey’s refusal of service was discriminatory against his religious beliefs.

In some ways it is kind of like slavery. A white guy forces a black guy to do some work for him. Does anyone see the irony in this. It is even done in a southern state. Are we trying to bring back slavery?

In this case pay is given for services or goods.

Can I own a business and charge christians more?

Sure you can. As one of them, unlike the faggots, I'll simply take my business elsewhere. That's the difference between people with principles and whiny little bitches. The former simply move on and the latter demand people cater to them as a special class of spoiled brats.

I agree and I disagree. Should a business owner be allowed to deny a black?

Jeffrey Geiger was denied membership the the swank Detroit Athletic Club. Members said no. Maybe these restaurants should become private social clubs. Because a public business can't descriminate.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Yeah, how foolish of me to learn from an encyclopedia and not newsmax?

American Civil War

The secession of the Southern states (in chronological order, South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina) in 1860–61 and the ensuing outbreak of armed hostilities were the culmination of decades of growing sectional friction over slavery.​

Hey einstein if the civil war was about slavery why then

1. Were there 4 northern states (KY MD MO DE) that practiced slavery throughout the war.?

2. Were a lot of northern generals slave-owners during the war?

3. Was lincoln's second VP Andrew Johnson a slave-owner during the war.?

One more question. Can you think at all?

 

[sealybobo]

No, it's the south which is most racist. It was the south which attempted to secede from the union to maintain slavery.

HAHAHA. Now that is truly ming-boggling ignorance. The Civil War had very little to do with slavery. Read some history, please.

It had a lot to do with it. Would the west be slave states or free for example.

 

[sealybobo]

Yeah, how foolish of me to learn from an encyclopedia and not newsmax?

American Civil War

The secession of the Southern states (in chronological order, South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina) in 1860–61 and the ensuing outbreak of armed hostilities were the culmination of decades of growing sectional friction over slavery.​

Hey einstein if the civil war was about slavery why then

1. Were there 4 northern states (KY MD MO DE) that practiced slavery throughout the war.?

2. Were a lot of northern generals slave-owners during the war?

3. Was lincoln's second VP Andrew Johnson a slave-owner during the war.?

One more question. Can you think at all?

LBJ said the N word a lot but he did a lot for civil rights.

 

[Conservative65]

I love it when liberal idiocy is used against liberals. The solution ? Let PRIVATE businesses refuse service to anyone they please.

UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES BLACK BAKERY OWNER LOSES LAWSUIT FORCED TO BAKE RACIST KKK CAKE Washington Weekly News

april 2 2015
A Georgia court recently found that a bakery owner who happened to be black was guilty of discrimination because she refused to bake a racist cake for an upcoming KKK gathering.

And this is not a joke.

A Georgia court has ruled in favor of Marshall Saxby, the Grand Wizard of a local KKK chapter, in a lawsuit stemming from two years ago when a local bakery denied him service.

The three judge panel concluded unanimously that the bakery had violated civil rights laws by discriminating against Saxby when they refused to sell him a cake for his organization’s annual birthday party.

Elaine Bailey, who owns Bailey Bakeries, refused to bake a cake for the ceremony because it violated her religious beliefs.

Saxby filed the lawsuit claiming that Bailey’s refusal of service was discriminatory against his religious beliefs.

In some ways it is kind of like slavery. A white guy forces a black guy to do some work for him. Does anyone see the irony in this. It is even done in a southern state. Are we trying to bring back slavery?

In this case pay is given for services or goods.

Can I own a business and charge christians more?

Sure you can. As one of them, unlike the faggots, I'll simply take my business elsewhere. That's the difference between people with principles and whiny little bitches. The former simply move on and the latter demand people cater to them as a special class of spoiled brats.

I agree and I disagree. Should a business owner be allowed to deny a black?

Jeffrey Geiger was denied membership the the swank Detroit Athletic Club. Members said no. Maybe these restaurants should become private social clubs. Because a public business can't descriminate.

A black business should also be able to deny whites. I'm consistent.

A privately owned business doesn't become public unless it's publicly funded.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I love it when liberal idiocy is used against liberals. The solution ? Let PRIVATE businesses refuse service to anyone they please.

UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES BLACK BAKERY OWNER LOSES LAWSUIT FORCED TO BAKE RACIST KKK CAKE Washington Weekly News

april 2 2015
A Georgia court recently found that a bakery owner who happened to be black was guilty of discrimination because she refused to bake a racist cake for an upcoming KKK gathering.

And this is not a joke.

A Georgia court has ruled in favor of Marshall Saxby, the Grand Wizard of a local KKK chapter, in a lawsuit stemming from two years ago when a local bakery denied him service.

The three judge panel concluded unanimously that the bakery had violated civil rights laws by discriminating against Saxby when they refused to sell him a cake for his organization’s annual birthday party.

Elaine Bailey, who owns Bailey Bakeries, refused to bake a cake for the ceremony because it violated her religious beliefs.

Saxby filed the lawsuit claiming that Bailey’s refusal of service was discriminatory against his religious beliefs.

Yep... Subjective law will always return to bite ya in the ass. It never fails.

 

[Faun]

No, it's the south which is most racist. It was the south which attempted to secede from the union to maintain slavery.

HAHAHA. Now that is truly ming-boggling ignorance. The Civil War had very little to do with slavery. Read some history, please.

I just posted a piece of the history. Are you too stupid to understand it?

 

[ShootSpeeders]

HAHAHA. Now that is truly ming-boggling ignorance. The Civil War had very little to do with slavery. Read some history, please.

It had a lot to do with it. Would the west be slave states or free for example.

No it didn't you fool. Slavery was, of course, a very very big issue at the time. But it's not what the Civil War was about. The CW was about profiteering and tariffs and states rights and the right to secede and the fact that the north and south simply hated each other. Slavery was just a small part of it. But history is written by the victors and so for 150 years the gover-media has told us the north invaded the south and started a war that killed 600,000 americans because the north wanted to end slavery!!!

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Yeah, how foolish of me to learn from an encyclopedia and not newsmax?

American Civil War

The secession of the Southern states (in chronological order, South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina) in 1860–61 and the ensuing outbreak of armed hostilities were the culmination of decades of growing sectional friction over slavery.​

Hey einstein if the civil war was about slavery why then

1. Were there 4 northern states (KY MD MO DE) that practiced slavery throughout the war.?

2. Were a lot of northern generals slave-owners during the war?

3. Was lincoln's second VP Andrew Johnson a slave-owner during the war.?

One more question. Can you think at all?

LBJ said the N word a lot but he did a lot for civil rights.

LOL! "Civil Rights"... It's as if such are 'real'.

The Civil Rights act did not give ANYONE "Civil Rights". Because there's no such thing as Civil Rights.

The Civil Rights Act, merely conned the Blacks and the Left into 'believing' that The Government 'gave them their rights'.

Proving two things.. Idiots exist and nearly without exception, where you find an idiot, you have found a Democrat.

In truth, The Great Society, including the Civil Rights Act, was and remains among the most destructive legislation ever passed into law in human history.

 

[Faun]

HAHAHA. Now that is truly ming-boggling ignorance. The Civil War had very little to do with slavery. Read some history, please.

It had a lot to do with it. Would the west be slave states or free for example.

No it didn't you fool. Slavery was, of course, a very very big issue at the time. But it's not what the Civil War was about. The CW was about profiteering and tariffs and states rights and the right to secede and the fact that the north and south simply hated each other. Slavery was just a small part of it. But history is written by the victors and so for 150 years the gover-media has told us the north invaded the south and started a war that killed 600,000 americans because the north wanted to end slavery!!!

Typical conservative ... always the victim.

 

[sealybobo]

HAHAHA. Now that is truly ming-boggling ignorance. The Civil War had very little to do with slavery. Read some history, please.

It had a lot to do with it. Would the west be slave states or free for example.

No it didn't you fool. Slavery was, of course, a very very big issue at the time. But it's not what the Civil War was about. The CW was about profiteering and tariffs and states rights and the right to secede and the fact that the north and south simply hated each other. Slavery was just a small part of it. But history is written by the victors and so for 150 years the gover-media has told us the north invaded the south and started a war that killed 600,000 americans because the north wanted to end slavery!!!

I love how bi polar conservatives are. On one thread theyre pretending to love america not then on another post they want to secede or for america not to succeed.

I would have loved bush or newt or tom delay or boehner or McConnell to prove me wrong. I'd admit it. But not you with Obama. Top 5 all time.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I love how bi polar conservatives are. On one thread theyre pretending to love america not then on another post they want to secede or for america not to succeed...

LOL! That's only because you do not know what America is... but in fairness to you, very few British Socialists do.

 

[sealybobo]

I love it when liberal idiocy is used against liberals. The solution ? Let PRIVATE businesses refuse service to anyone they please.

In some ways it is kind of like slavery. A white guy forces a black guy to do some work for him. Does anyone see the irony in this. It is even done in a southern state. Are we trying to bring back slavery?

In this case pay is given for services or goods.

Can I own a business and charge christians more?

Sure you can. As one of them, unlike the faggots, I'll simply take my business elsewhere. That's the difference between people with principles and whiny little bitches. The former simply move on and the latter demand people cater to them as a special class of spoiled brats.

I agree and I disagree. Should a business owner be allowed to deny a black?

Jeffrey Geiger was denied membership the the swank Detroit Athletic Club. Members said no. Maybe these restaurants should become private social clubs. Because a public business can't descriminate.

A black business should also be able to deny whites. I'm consistent.

A privately owned business doesn't become public unless it's publicly funded.

I hope this encloseourages blacks to start their own businesses and blacks to buy from them. I'll shop there too. That will bring whiteys prices down and they'll be begging gays and blacks to come back.

There's no way its legal to not serve someone because they are gay. Can they? Maybe on religions grounds?

 

[Conservative65]

In some ways it is kind of like slavery. A white guy forces a black guy to do some work for him. Does anyone see the irony in this. It is even done in a southern state. Are we trying to bring back slavery?

In this case pay is given for services or goods.

Can I own a business and charge christians more?

Sure you can. As one of them, unlike the faggots, I'll simply take my business elsewhere. That's the difference between people with principles and whiny little bitches. The former simply move on and the latter demand people cater to them as a special class of spoiled brats.

I agree and I disagree. Should a business owner be allowed to deny a black?

Jeffrey Geiger was denied membership the the swank Detroit Athletic Club. Members said no. Maybe these restaurants should become private social clubs. Because a public business can't descriminate.

A black business should also be able to deny whites. I'm consistent.

A privately owned business doesn't become public unless it's publicly funded.

I hope this encloseourages blacks to start their own businesses and blacks to buy from them. I'll shop there too. That will bring whiteys prices down and they'll be begging gays and blacks to come back.

There's no way its legal to not serve someone because they are gay. Can they? Maybe on religions grounds?

Since over 20% of blacks are unemployed, how are they going to get the money to start a business? Bet you support special loans to blacks so they can.

Don't worry about whitey. We've survived for a long time without relying on blacks.

Apparently it's legal for a homo to not serve someone wanting a cake. Once again, if a homo didn't want to serve me because I oppose same sex marriage, I'll go elsewhere and not whine about it. They don't. They demand acceptance and for others to do for them simply because they ask.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

In some ways it is kind of like slavery. A white guy forces a black guy to do some work for him. Does anyone see the irony in this. It is even done in a southern state. Are we trying to bring back slavery?

In this case pay is given for services or goods.

Can I own a business and charge christians more?

Sure you can. As one of them, unlike the faggots, I'll simply take my business elsewhere. That's the difference between people with principles and whiny little bitches. The former simply move on and the latter demand people cater to them as a special class of spoiled brats.

I agree and I disagree. Should a business owner be allowed to deny a black?

Jeffrey Geiger was denied membership the the swank Detroit Athletic Club. Members said no. Maybe these restaurants should become private social clubs. Because a public business can't descriminate.

A black business should also be able to deny whites. I'm consistent.

A privately owned business doesn't become public unless it's publicly funded.

I hope this encloseourages blacks to start their own businesses and blacks to buy from them. I'll shop there too. That will bring whiteys prices down and they'll be begging gays and blacks to come back.

There's no way its legal to not serve someone because they are gay. Can they? Maybe on religions grounds?

Isn't it cool how the premise is that people are refusing to serve people who they have no way of knowing are a sexual deviant, when no one is refusing to serve people because they're a sexual deviant.

Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance... the Fundamental Elements of Left-think, OKA: Relativism, AKA: EVIL!

 

[sealybobo]

In this case pay is given for services or goods.

Can I own a business and charge christians more?

Sure you can. As one of them, unlike the faggots, I'll simply take my business elsewhere. That's the difference between people with principles and whiny little bitches. The former simply move on and the latter demand people cater to them as a special class of spoiled brats.

I agree and I disagree. Should a business owner be allowed to deny a black?

Jeffrey Geiger was denied membership the the swank Detroit Athletic Club. Members said no. Maybe these restaurants should become private social clubs. Because a public business can't descriminate.

A black business should also be able to deny whites. I'm consistent.

A privately owned business doesn't become public unless it's publicly funded.

I hope this encloseourages blacks to start their own businesses and blacks to buy from them. I'll shop there too. That will bring whiteys prices down and they'll be begging gays and blacks to come back.

There's no way its legal to not serve someone because they are gay. Can they? Maybe on religions grounds?

Since over 20% of blacks are unemployed, how are they going to get the money to start a business? Bet you support special loans to blacks so they can.

Don't worry about whitey. We've survived for a long time without relying on blacks.

Apparently it's legal for a homo to not serve someone wanting a cake. Once again, if a homo didn't want to serve me because I oppose same sex marriage, I'll go elsewhere and not whine about it. They don't. They demand acceptance and for others to do for them simply because they ask.

You've survived without blacks when? Before you enslaved them and had them and every other immigrant built america for you?

 

[Conservative65]

Sure you can. As one of them, unlike the faggots, I'll simply take my business elsewhere. That's the difference between people with principles and whiny little bitches. The former simply move on and the latter demand people cater to them as a special class of spoiled brats.

I agree and I disagree. Should a business owner be allowed to deny a black?

Jeffrey Geiger was denied membership the the swank Detroit Athletic Club. Members said no. Maybe these restaurants should become private social clubs. Because a public business can't descriminate.

A black business should also be able to deny whites. I'm consistent.

A privately owned business doesn't become public unless it's publicly funded.

I hope this encloseourages blacks to start their own businesses and blacks to buy from them. I'll shop there too. That will bring whiteys prices down and they'll be begging gays and blacks to come back.

There's no way its legal to not serve someone because they are gay. Can they? Maybe on religions grounds?

Since over 20% of blacks are unemployed, how are they going to get the money to start a business? Bet you support special loans to blacks so they can.

Don't worry about whitey. We've survived for a long time without relying on blacks.

Apparently it's legal for a homo to not serve someone wanting a cake. Once again, if a homo didn't want to serve me because I oppose same sex marriage, I'll go elsewhere and not whine about it. They don't. They demand acceptance and for others to do for them simply because they ask.

You've survived without blacks when? Before you enslaved them and had them and every other immigrant built america for you?

Since my family didn't come to the U.S. until around 1910, none of them had anything to do with enslaving people. Before coming as LEGAL IMMIGRANTS, they were peasants under the Russian czars. They came and helped build America. They didn't nor do their descendants, that means me, demand someone owes them anything as a result. We earned it and considered ourselves full Americans not hyphenated Americans. While my family history may be E. European, I don't consider myself European. I've never been to Europe much like most blacks have never been to any of the over 50 countries of Africa. While I may cook and eat ethnic food from recipes passed down from my grandmothers, I consider myself 100% American. My great grandparents, the generation that came from Europe also did the same. Don't think they weren't mistreated. Unlike immigrants from W. Europe, they didn't speak much English. Unlike immigrants today, they didn't demand they be taught in their language until they learned English. However, many blacks still consider themselves as much African as they do American based on the use of the politically correct term.

 

[dblack]

Yup. She can refuse to put any language on the cake she doesn't believe in, but she has to make the cake. No surprises here.

How sad that something this fucked up is "no surprise".