Hannity, Limbaugh and O'Reilly are Union members

Where has the left ever enforced wealth redistribution?

The redistribution of wealth over the last 30 years was perpetrated by the right and it went to the wealthiest 4% of Americans

and truth matters seems to have reaped the benifits from that redistribution

And I'm sure he pays taxes on what he owns.....less however without the Reagan redistribution of wealth

ow else do you think se was able to have ownership in two homes and and co-ownership in a beach home?
 
Excellent. Young teenagers would be able to babysit for their next door neighbors again.

Teenagers have always been able to babysit the neighbors kids. Why do you think they specifically mentioned hotels, motels and inns? What kind of work do you think children will be doing there? Why remove any inspection authority?

What kind of unintended consequences do you think this bill may have?

Why? The kids are probably the children of the owners of said establishments, and currently prohibited from helping out in the family business.

Good point. Simply make an exception in the bill for children employees of owners of small businesses.
 
Moonbat Definition of Substandard: Whatever they are now being paid.

Public Employee Unions will always claim that they are being underpaid because the only two purposes they serve are: (1.) GET MORE from the taxpayers, so that they can (2.) funnel campaign donations to the Democrats, so that they can do (1.) again and so on.

Real definition of substandard:
not enough to pay the mortgage
Not enough to send your kids to college
Not enough to pay your medical bills

And yet with all the MASSIVE government help added over the years we have finally hit a point where neither people nor Government can afford it... Weird because it was predicted.
 
Moonbat Definition of Substandard: Whatever they are now being paid.

Public Employee Unions will always claim that they are being underpaid because the only two purposes they serve are: (1.) GET MORE from the taxpayers, so that they can (2.) funnel campaign donations to the Democrats, so that they can do (1.) again and so on.

Real definition of substandard:
not enough to pay the mortgage
Not enough to send your kids to college
Not enough to pay your medical bills

And who determines how much that is? What if some people have a bigger house or more kids or more health problems should they make more money because of that?
 
Moonbat Definition of Substandard: Whatever they are now being paid.

Public Employee Unions will always claim that they are being underpaid because the only two purposes they serve are: (1.) GET MORE from the taxpayers, so that they can (2.) funnel campaign donations to the Democrats, so that they can do (1.) again and so on.

Real definition of substandard:
not enough to pay the mortgage
Not enough to send your kids to college
Not enough to pay your medical bills

And who determines how much that is? What if some people have a bigger house or more kids or more health problems should they make more money because of that?

That is a disconnect, leweman. Rephrase your questions to reflect the reality of "real definitions".
 
Teenagers have always been able to babysit the neighbors kids. Why do you think they specifically mentioned hotels, motels and inns? What kind of work do you think children will be doing there? Why remove any inspection authority?

What kind of unintended consequences do you think this bill may have?

Why? The kids are probably the children of the owners of said establishments, and currently prohibited from helping out in the family business.

Good point. Simply make an exception in the bill for children employees of owners of small businesses.

Your own children had already been protected in state statutes.
 
Boedicaa: Moonbat Definition of Substandard: Whatever they are now being paid // Public Employee Unions will always claim that they are being underpaid because the only two purposes they serve are: (1.) GET MORE from the taxpayers, so that they can (2.) funnel campaign donations to the Democrats, so that they can do (1.) again and so on

What a naive statement. Go talk to the bankers and their lobbyists, body. Judas Priest, what a stupid statement.

The teacher union members don't get rich yet the students in such states have the highest graduation rates and the lowest state deficits in the nation. The states without collective bargaining for teachers have the highest deficits.

What a fucking stupid statement.
 
Boedicaa: Moonbat Definition of Substandard: Whatever they are now being paid // Public Employee Unions will always claim that they are being underpaid because the only two purposes they serve are: (1.) GET MORE from the taxpayers, so that they can (2.) funnel campaign donations to the Democrats, so that they can do (1.) again and so on

What a naive statement. Go talk to the bankers and their lobbyists, body. Judas Priest, what a stupid statement.

The teacher union members don't get rich yet the students in such states have the highest graduation rates and the lowest state deficits in the nation. The states without collective bargaining for teachers have the highest deficits.

What a fucking stupid statement.


Reading comprehension owns you, boy. In the above post, boe never stated union members get rich, how can they when so much of their money gets funneled to your beloved democrat party? It's a brutal cycle you're too dumb to see.........
 
and truth matters seems to have reaped the benifits from that redistribution

And I'm sure he pays taxes on what he owns.....less however without the Reagan redistribution of wealth

ow else do you think se was able to have ownership in two homes and and co-ownership in a beach home?

Not knowing his financial situation, I might guess inheritance had something to do with it

Regardless, I don't see him on the board every day whining about what he is expected to contribute to our society
 
Moonbat Definition of Substandard: Whatever they are now being paid.

Public Employee Unions will always claim that they are being underpaid because the only two purposes they serve are: (1.) GET MORE from the taxpayers, so that they can (2.) funnel campaign donations to the Democrats, so that they can do (1.) again and so on.

Real definition of substandard:
not enough to pay the mortgage
Not enough to send your kids to college
Not enough to pay your medical bills

And yet with all the MASSIVE government help added over the years we have finally hit a point where neither people nor Government can afford it... Weird because it was predicted.

The decline in standard of living has been coming for thirty years not just the last few. The reason government has to step in and subsidize housing, food, education and healthcare is because employers are paying less and less while taxpayers pick up the slack
 
And I'm sure he pays taxes on what he owns.....less however without the Reagan redistribution of wealth

ow else do you think se was able to have ownership in two homes and and co-ownership in a beach home?

Not knowing his financial situation, I might guess inheritance had something to do with it

Regardless, I don't see him on the board every day whining about what he is expected to contribute to our society

How many middle class people do ou know that owns two homes, and has a third home co-owner at the beach? She needs to start doing the obama dream.
 
And I'm sure he pays taxes on what he owns.....less however without the Reagan redistribution of wealth
Yes Comrade. All money is the people's money. By not taking away enough of the rich's money so they don't have more money then other people, they are redistributing wealth. For them to want to keep the money they earned is greed, you want to take their money because you are generous. You are determined, no matter the collapse of the Soviet Union you long for the day...
 
When they're paid with taxpayers money, then it's our business. They aren't. It isn't. I have no real issue with private sector unions. It's the bastards sucking the taxpayer dry that's the problem. Public sector employees are paid for by us, we pay for their greed.

*I'm not saying that all public sector people are greedy - but their unions are destroying the country.*
Only in America do the wealthy deserve a "tax cut," BUT teachers are stripped of their bargaining rights because they are "too greedy!"

Unfortunately, America's teachers will have to be counted among the "wealthy" before the Republicans will see fit to step in and protect their rights and switch to "demonizing" some other group!

Is "California Girl" and her associates arguing that public employees should, by definition, be content to be 2nd class citizens with fewer constitutional rights - as compared to their private counterparts?
 
Last edited:
Only in America do the wealthy deserve a "tax cut," BUT teachers are stripped of their bargaining rights because they are "too greedy!"

Only government teachers are being discussed, not "teachers." Liberals chain us to government schools, then complain when government teachers can't negotiate with bureaucrats and send us a check? So why should unaccountable bureaucrats be able to deal with unionized government workers and send taxpayers the bill without taxpayers being represented at the table?
 
Is "California Girl" arguing that public employees should be content to be 2nd class citizens with less rights - as compared to their private counterparts?

Private schools have to serve customers and compete or they get shut down. Government teachers work for a system that confiscates money from taxpayers and get it whether the kids go there or not. Private school teachers are accountable to parents. Too many complaints or not enough performance and they are canned. Government teachers are accountable to no one. Some are good, but only by choice, the system doesn't require it. And some are horrible and you can't get rid of them. To call that second class is nonsense.
 
And I'm sure he pays taxes on what he owns.....less however without the Reagan redistribution of wealth
Yes Comrade. All money is the people's money. By not taking away enough of the rich's money so they don't have more money then other people, they are redistributing wealth. For them to want to keep the money they earned is greed, you want to take their money because you are generous. You are determined, no matter the collapse of the Soviet Union you long for the day...

Ye Comrade this is what happens when people get to keep more money than they should. They have more than one house.:lol:
 
When they're paid with taxpayers money, then it's our business. They aren't. It isn't. I have no real issue with private sector unions. It's the bastards sucking the taxpayer dry that's the problem. Public sector employees are paid for by us, we pay for their greed.

*I'm not saying that all public sector people are greedy - but their unions are destroying the country.*
Only in America do the wealthy deserve a "tax cut," BUT teachers are stripped of their bargaining rights because they are "too greedy!"

Unfortunately, America's teachers will have to be counted among the "wealthy" before the Republicans will see fit to step in and protect their rights and switch to "demonizing" some other group!

Is "California Girl" and her associates arguing that public employees should, by definition, be content to be 2nd class citizens with fewer constitutional rights - as compared to their private counterparts?
Wait a minute, hasn't the CON$ervative Brotherhood been telling us that "Greed is GOOD?" So the GOP want to strip teachers of colective bargaining because teachers are "too CAPITALISTIC!"
 
When they're paid with taxpayers money, then it's our business. They aren't. It isn't. I have no real issue with private sector unions. It's the bastards sucking the taxpayer dry that's the problem. Public sector employees are paid for by us, we pay for their greed.

*I'm not saying that all public sector people are greedy - but their unions are destroying the country.*
Only in America do the wealthy deserve a "tax cut," BUT teachers are stripped of their bargaining rights because they are "too greedy!"

Unfortunately, America's teachers will have to be counted among the "wealthy" before the Republicans will see fit to step in and protect their rights and switch to "demonizing" some other group!

Is "California Girl" and her associates arguing that public employees should, by definition, be content to be 2nd class citizens with fewer constitutional rights - as compared to their private counterparts?
Wait a minute, hasn't the CON$ervative Brotherhood been telling us that "Greed is GOOD?"


Never heard of the conservative brotherhood and it was Gordon Gecko (a fictional character from an 80's movie) that said "greed is good". But keep up the charade, please, it's quite amusing......
 
Is "California Girl" arguing that public employees should be content to be 2nd class citizens with less rights - as compared to their private counterparts?

Private schools have to serve customers and compete or they get shut down. Government teachers work for a system that confiscates money from taxpayers and get it whether the kids go there or not. Private school teachers are accountable to parents. Too many complaints or not enough performance and they are canned. Government teachers are accountable to no one. Some are good, but only by choice, the system doesn't require it. And some are horrible and you can't get rid of them. To call that second class is nonsense.
Private schools are not forced to accept handicapped or juvenile delinquent trouble-making students like the public schools are. Public schools can't get rid of the trouble-making students. Good teachers can't teach because the trouble-makers disrupt the classes. When public schools can get rid of the trouble-makers first, then and only then can the performance of the teachers be rated.

I would like to see the private schools be forced to teach the handicapped and JDs and see how well they compete against the public schools on an equal playing field.
 
Boedicaa: Moonbat Definition of Substandard: Whatever they are now being paid // Public Employee Unions will always claim that they are being underpaid because the only two purposes they serve are: (1.) GET MORE from the taxpayers, so that they can (2.) funnel campaign donations to the Democrats, so that they can do (1.) again and so on

What a naive statement. Go talk to the bankers and their lobbyists, body. Judas Priest, what a stupid statement.

The teacher union members don't get rich yet the students in such states have the highest graduation rates and the lowest state deficits in the nation. The states without collective bargaining for teachers have the highest deficits.

What a fucking stupid statement.


Reading comprehension owns you, boy. In the above post, boe never stated union members get rich, how can they when so much of their money gets funneled to your beloved democrat party? It's a brutal cycle you're too dumb to see.........

Are you brain cramped, son? Do you have a learning problem? Go back and read carefully. I am a Republican, you moron, and we are making a boatload of money from the bankers and the corporations at the expense of the stockholders. And you worry about measly union donations to the other party?

This country runs best with two parties on a level playing field.

You don't like it? Join Khaddafi. Fucking moron,
 

Forum List

Back
Top