Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a half of a billion dollars. You know that, right?Solyndra was less than $300 million.
Solyndra was $535 million, stupid. Any other misinformation you'd like to post that I can humiliate you on?
Google-Owned Solar Company Requests $540 Million Bailout To Help Pay $1.6 Billion Loan
Obama administration mulled Solyndra bailout days before company's demise
Solyndra: Obama’s First Green Bail-Out | Fox Business
*Making Synthaholic my personal bitch since July 21, 2010
Very good, you've outlined one of many economic strategies. Now see if you can expand beyond singular thinking.What does it say about you that you can't even grasp simple?God you are simple... Our economy is a little more complex than that old man.... Two factors affect our debt spending and revenue. If you can't admit that then you have no place in any kind of economic discussion. This is really basic Stuff
There is only one way that debt can be accumulated - spending. If you don't spend beyond what you bring in, then it is literally impossible to accumulate debt. If you know you've cut taxes, then you cut spending to account for that. Only a libtard can't grasp this.
The debt would go up, if you already have debt.If you spent $0.00 - would that add to your debt? Would it??? Well???
You are the pitcher on the mound who tosses a home run ball, underhanded, to Synthaholic, who hits out of the park. And you start your happy dance screaming, "I struck him out."Omnibus alone surpassed $1 billion you moron. Do you read it all or do you just glance and respond? Obamacare alone is around $1 trillion. How dumb are you? Read.You fucking moron - all that added together doesn't even make $1 billion, never mind $1 trillion, never mind $8.75 trillion.I already did you illiterate tool. Post #236. It exposed how ignorant you are about what is really happening. Now back to my victory dance....So show me where Obama spent $8.75 trillion.You can't increase debt by less revenue genius.I'll start you off: $725 billion for the stimulus (although 1/3 of it was tax cuts).
You can only increase debt by spending. If the federal government cut all taxes to 0% and had no money coming in at all (not even a single penny) but they didn't write a single check for anything (not even payroll for government employees) - guess what their debt would be? $0.
It's fall down hilarious how liberals don't have a single clue about basic economics and basic finance.
You can't - you're a fraud.
Hey - I know...why don't you tell us again how tax cuts create "debt"
*Making Synthaholic my personal bitch since July 21, 2010
And as Jake pointed out, it's all from Bush's spending.
You really are a jackass.
Back to my victory dance after humiliating you for the third time today...
*Making Synthaholic my personal bitch since July 21, 2010
In typical libtard fashion - you failed to provide enough information. Why am I not shocked that you lack the attention to detail to even make your argument?Let's say the debt is 5 trillion and in one year the gov spends 1Trillion and makes 2 Trillion in revenue... What is the debt after that year?
You can do this, I got faith!!!
You first - back up your claim that Solyndra was less than $300 million.Oh, really? Care to back that up?Obamacare alone is around $1 trillion.
Interest is already accounted for junior. The bonds have interest accounted for at the time they are sold. Oops...The debt would go up, if you already have debt.If you spent $0.00 - would that add to your debt? Would it??? Well???
Do I need to teach you about interest, also?
Yes, if you have debt and you spend 0 then the debt increases by whatever intrest is accumulating. What's your point?In typical libtard fashion - you failed to provide enough information. Why am I not shocked that you lack the attention to detail to even make your argument?Let's say the debt is 5 trillion and in one year the gov spends 1Trillion and makes 2 Trillion in revenue... What is the debt after that year?
You can do this, I got faith!!!
In your pitiful example - the government has $1 trillion more than they spent. But you failed to mention whether or not they are applying any of that money towards the debt.
Now - I asked you a simple question three times which you continue to run from because you're not mature enough to admit when you're wrong or mature enough to admit that you can't be critical of your previous (and failed) liberal ideology. Can you add debt if you spend $0.00? Yes or No?
Oh, really? Care to back that up?Obamacare alone is around $1 trillion.
You're flailing and grasping. You didn't even look up the deficit before they took control, did you?
I say let Afghanistan be their own police.
No American life is worth losing in order to drag these people into the 20th century, never mind the 21st.
1964.
Correction: Obama wanted to pay our debts and Republicans wanted to default on them.
If you mean Hannity is whining and so are you, sure. But I am not liberal and you are not a patriot.
I am a Republican who bases crazy far cons and socons all the time, not good Republicans.If you mean Hannity is whining and so are you, sure. But I am not liberal and you are not a patriot.
Of course you're not. You're a conservative that bashes Republicans all the time, that's not a liberal in any sense of the word.
Republicans cutting funds don't make up the driving force affecting food stamps. When people get jobs they get off food stamps, more people are now employed so less are on food stamps. It's pretty simple. Do you remember 2008? Stats aside, you know the economy and iobs are much better today as it was then.I've heard Liberals say we have a strong economy that is trending in the right direction but there is still much more work to do. I think that is more accurate than the Rights, "we are a sinking ship", analysis. Unemployment has gotten MUCH better over the past 7 years and food stamp recipients are trending down after peaking in 2012. The major challenge at this time is wage growth. The major complaint from the Right isn't about a major economic crash or massive unemployment/poverty, or a crushing depression, or a weak dollar... it is about "Slow Growth"
The only reason food stamps are going down is because the Republicans are slowly cutting funds to it. Then there are state Republicans such as those in Maine who put qualifications to apply or stay on the program which scared many off of it.
The unemployment isn't MUCH better, only the numbers are because if people say they are not working nor looking for work, they don't count as unemployed. And since we still have a record number of working age Americans not working (over 1/3 of our working population) then of course the numbers drop considerably.
I am a Republican who bases crazy far cons and socons all the time, not good Republicans.
Don't know if this was a win loss thingRepublicans cutting funds don't make up the driving force affecting food stamps. When people get jobs they get off food stamps, more people are now employed so less are on food stamps. It's pretty simple. Do you remember 2008? Stats aside, you know the economy and iobs are much better today as it was then.I've heard Liberals say we have a strong economy that is trending in the right direction but there is still much more work to do. I think that is more accurate than the Rights, "we are a sinking ship", analysis. Unemployment has gotten MUCH better over the past 7 years and food stamp recipients are trending down after peaking in 2012. The major challenge at this time is wage growth. The major complaint from the Right isn't about a major economic crash or massive unemployment/poverty, or a crushing depression, or a weak dollar... it is about "Slow Growth"
The only reason food stamps are going down is because the Republicans are slowly cutting funds to it. Then there are state Republicans such as those in Maine who put qualifications to apply or stay on the program which scared many off of it.
The unemployment isn't MUCH better, only the numbers are because if people say they are not working nor looking for work, they don't count as unemployed. And since we still have a record number of working age Americans not working (over 1/3 of our working population) then of course the numbers drop considerably.
From one of your very own, Mother Fn Jones:
Republicans won the food stamp war
