Harris gets no post debate bump...but Trump improves...

[Missourian]

Here's a twist for ya... 50% of respondents to this NY Post Poll taken after Tuesday's debate agree that Kamala Harris won the debate...but her new poll numbers were exactly the same as pre-debate.

Who improved?

Donald J. Trump!

Trump gain a percentage point from undecided voters!

Ain't life grand.

"In the survey conducted by Leger, half of respondents who watched at least some portion of the ABC News debate said Harris was the winner, while 29% said Trump had gotten the better of the VP and 13% said neither candidate had won the Philadelphia showdown.

However, the poll also shows Trump gained one percentage point of support among likely voters from a pre-debate survey taken following the Democratic National Convention in late August, while Harris held steady."

Exclusive | Kamala Harris clearly won debate over Donald Trump but VP got no bump from voters after performance: poll

Vice President Kamala Harris clashed with former President Donald Trump during Tuesday night’s debate in Philadelphia.

nypost.com

 

[mamooth]

Cool, a right wing tabloid! You got us there.

 

[Missourian]

Cool, a right wing tabloid! You got us there.

Can't refute the message?

Shoot the messenger.

 

[mamooth]

Can't refute the message?

How's batboy doing?

By your standards, you must agree batboy exists, since nobody has refuted that tabloid story.

No wonder you're a Trump cultist.

 

[Missourian]

How's batboy doing?

By your standards, you must agree batboy exists, since nobody has refuted that tabloid story.

No wonder you're a Trump cultist.

Can't debunk the message?

Still shooting the messenger.

Yet, here they are, right next to the New York Times polling...

2024 National: Trump vs. Harris | RealClearPolling

Next?

 

[candycorn]

The debate ended less than 48 hours ago.

 

[Hellokitty]

How's batboy doing?

By your standards, you must agree batboy exists, since nobody has refuted that tabloid story.

No wonder you're a Trump cultist.

Maybe batboy is guarding the pee pee tapes...

 

[hadit]

Cool, a right wing tabloid! You got us there.

So post a source that says otherwise. Did Kamala (what have I been doing for 4 years?) get a bump in the polls or did TRUMP!? It should be easy for you to find.

 

[Blaster]

I'm not surprised by this. Most intelligent people believe that Trump made strong points and Kamala avoided direct questions.

 

[mamooth]

Curious, that the Trump cultists are pushing a poll that says Harris +3.

I looked at it more. The NY Post doesn't do the poll, a company called "Leger" does. They've been given a 2-star rating.

The suspicious thing is how fast they got their numbers out. That would indicate some sort of online polling.

 

[Rambunctious]

The woman runs from cameras and reporters... wake up America you may as well vote for a head of lettuce....

 

[mamooth]

The woman runs from cameras and reporters...

Nah, she just won't cater to the nutty conservative MSM.

And boy howdy, does that trigger the Trump cult losers into a spittle-flecked rage. I can see why.

Trump needs the MSM, Harris doesn't.

The Trump cult depends entirely on the conservative MSM to push their agenda. The MSM put Trump in office in 2016, tried their best to do so in 2020, and is still trying hard in 2024.

Harris is making the nutty conservative MSM irrelevent, so Trump has zero chance. The Trump cultists know it, hence their weeping.

Harris gave the MSM their chance to show they're not just Trump shills. They failed spectacularly. Dana Bash just presented a list of right-wing talking points, thus confirming how worthless the MSM is.

 

[BackAgain]

How's batboy doing?

By your standards, you must agree batboy exists, since nobody has refuted that tabloid story.

No wonder you're a Trump cultist.

Wrong tabloid, you retard.

 

[mamooth]

Wrong tabloid, you retard.

So, Mothman?

 

[Ava]

Cool, a right wing tabloid! You got us there.

Yeah, sure but...dig a little deeper and see which party it supported in the recent past.

The Post editorial board endorsed Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012; Hillary Clinton in 2016; and Joe Biden for 2020. While the newspaper predominantly endorses Democrats in congressional, state, and local elections, it has occasionally endorsed Republican candidates.

 

[BackAgain]

So, Mothman?

Let’s try to help the poor retard, manboob.

The National Enquirer is not a newspaper. It is a crappy tabloid.

The NY Post is not a tabloid. Like it or not, it is a newspaper.

And yes. You are engaging in the fallacy of attacking the messenger — as was noted, previously. See post # 3, above.

 

[Rambunctious]

Nah, she just won't cater to the nutty conservative MSM.

And boy howdy, does that trigger the Trump cult losers into a spittle-flecked rage. I can see why.

Trump needs the MSM, Harris doesn't.

The Trump cult depends entirely on the conservative MSM to push their agenda. The MSM put Trump in office in 2016, tried their best to do so in 2020, and is still trying hard in 2024.

Harris is making the nutty conservative MSM irrelevent, so Trump has zero chance. The Trump cultists know it, hence their weeping.

Harris gave the MSM their chance to show they're not just Trump shills. They failed spectacularly. Dana Bash just presented a list of right-wing talking points, thus confirming how worthless the MSM is.

She is afraid... afraid of tough questions... that's pretty bad...

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It’s not a win if it’s rigged.

 

[mamooth]

The NY Post is not a tabloid.

AHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

Talk about desperarte. Wow.

I should be more sympathetic. You do what you have to do to cope.

 

[BackAgain]

AHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

Talk about desperarte. Wow.

I should be more sympathetic. You do what you have to do to cope.

You certainly do.

Dishonesty comes naturally to you.

Obviously.