emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
[MENTION=22602]Cuyo[/MENTION]
If he wants to pay the costs using insurance or whatever, that's fine.
But people who want to manage charity hospitals or spiritual healing programs
outside of govt should not be penalized for exercising other natural choices of health care
besides buying insurance. That should remain in the free market and not mandated by govt which methods or choices people use.
Insurance is not the only way, nor the best way to cover more people and costs.
Look at the taxes wasted on prisons and costs of crime.
If you are going to go after people being irresponsible and dumping costs on others,
why not go after CRIMINALS proven to have committed a crime and incurred costs.
Why go after LAW ABIDING citizens who haven't committed crimes and are happy to pay for health care on their own terms and free will,
and DEPRIVE THEM of their liberties -- because of the costs or crimes of other people?
Why not hold people responsible for their own costs, and then if they want to use insurance to cover those costs, that is their choice! You can still regulate insurance without forcing people to buy it. If all the people who BELIEVE in singlepayer or govt health care paid into the plans THEY BELIEVE in, that is plenty to negotiate group rates. there is no need to force it on more people who don't believe in paying for health care through govt.
I just commented in another thread that I hate when the debate is framed as "Right v privelige," but let me play devils advocate here.
When Bill shatters his leg and doesn't have insurance and will die without care... Let him die?
If he wants to pay the costs using insurance or whatever, that's fine.
But people who want to manage charity hospitals or spiritual healing programs
outside of govt should not be penalized for exercising other natural choices of health care
besides buying insurance. That should remain in the free market and not mandated by govt which methods or choices people use.
Insurance is not the only way, nor the best way to cover more people and costs.
Look at the taxes wasted on prisons and costs of crime.
If you are going to go after people being irresponsible and dumping costs on others,
why not go after CRIMINALS proven to have committed a crime and incurred costs.
Why go after LAW ABIDING citizens who haven't committed crimes and are happy to pay for health care on their own terms and free will,
and DEPRIVE THEM of their liberties -- because of the costs or crimes of other people?
Why not hold people responsible for their own costs, and then if they want to use insurance to cover those costs, that is their choice! You can still regulate insurance without forcing people to buy it. If all the people who BELIEVE in singlepayer or govt health care paid into the plans THEY BELIEVE in, that is plenty to negotiate group rates. there is no need to force it on more people who don't believe in paying for health care through govt.