...hehe... Guess who resigned from the FBI today??? And is testifying on Capitol Hill tomorrow?!!! --Is this all true?!!

That’s his job as a prosecutor, dupe. To assess if the evidence would support a guilty verdict. He determined the evidence would not.

Nope. He is not a jury, and he cannot decide for a jury. His job is to assess if a crime has been committed, and to prosecute according to what he admitted himself, that a reasonable jury might find Biden liable for.

Hur committed plain obvious, word-trickery, yep the same double talk like you are attempting here now. But, it won't ever work on me.

You heard him list them himself, the elements that a reasonable jury might find Biden liable of --while at the same time saying he did not charge Biden with crimes because he feels a jury would not convict. lol Its. Double. Talk!!
 
Nope. He is not a jury, and he cannot decide for a jury. His job is to assess if a crime has been committed, and to prosecute according to what he admitted himself, that a reasonable jury might find Biden liable for.

He committed plan obvious, word-trickery, yep the same double talk like you are attempting here now. But, it won't ever work on me.

You heard him list them himself, the elements that a reasonable jury might find Biden liable of --while at the same time saying he did not charge Biden with crimes because of he feels a jury would not convict.
Its. Double. Talk!!
All lies.

He made a clear case why Biden should not and would not be prosecuted. And bidens appearance in front of a jury was not germane to that argument.

You're embarrassing yourself.
 
Nope. He is not a jury, and he cannot decide for a jury. His job is to assess if a crime has been committed, and to prosecute according to what he admitted himself, that a reasonable jury might find Biden liable for.

He committed plan obvious, word-trickery, yep the same double talk like you are attempting here now. But, it won't ever work on me.

You heard him list them himself, the elements that a reasonable jury might find Biden liable of --while at the same time saying he did not charge Biden with crimes because of he feels a jury would not convict.
Its. Double. Talk!!
Comey said "no reasonable prosecutor" speaking for the prosecutors and this guy thinks he can speak for a jury. Bullshit.
 
Comey said "no reasonable prosecutor" speaking for the prosecutors and this guy thinks he can speak for a jury. Bullshit.

at this point I just enjoy seeing how Democrat voters foolishly agree with Hur's line of thinking. His reasoning and rationale that he somehow gets to, brag about, how he can think for a jury --at the same time he claims he cannot think for a jury. lol

It gives us a grim reminder and a proverbial, meter, to tally up who all needs to be
IDENTIFIED as the true haters of our great nation
 
Comey said "no reasonable prosecutor" speaking for the prosecutors and this guy thinks he can speak for a jury. Bullshit.
What they did was both times address that Biden/Hills did illegal activities but other considerations guided them to not charge
It’s called wanting it both ways
 

Forum List

Back
Top