Natural Citizen
American Made
- Aug 8, 2016
- 27,099
- 26,513
- 2,445
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The US Constitution charges our representatives with the protection of this country. It does not say we should use our tax dollars to get HUD homes in the suburbs and let anybody live there.
Defense spending and military spending are two entirely different things. The constitution also requires a declaration of war by congress to send our troops all over the world. Does it not? Not one bit of the trillions of dollars being printed out of thin air for that purpose is constitutional without a declaration of war. You're no less statist than the op by your model.
Stop the unconstitutional military spending and imperialism and bring them home and build bases here and then you can talk about defense spending. Not until then. Heck, I'd have more bases here at home than we do abroad. That's real defense spending.
We're trillions of dollars in debt.
With the trillions we spent on welfare since LBJ war on poverty we still have the same shit..
I don't think you understand the word defense. Also, Dem's repeatedly approved spending for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have you asked Dem's why they voted to fund them?
Show the thread and post number that you are quoting please!
I don't think you understand the word defense. Also, Dem's repeatedly approved spending for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have you asked Dem's why they voted to fund them?
I don't think you understand economics. I'm asking both parties why they do it. Not one or the other.
I already know the answer. But trying to convince a statist who thinks he's a conservative that he's actually a statist is like talking to the wall.
At least the folks on the left admit they're statists.
Give us single payer and we'll fund your Wall(with gold if you wish!) and double the size of enforcement. Would this be a good deal?.
Single payer would bankrupt us.
LOL, no, it wouldn't you walking right wing talking point.
Swing and a miss, I'm a fiscal conservative who called BS on the Iraq war on day 1 and Bush claim that it would only cost $74 billion and that we'd get paid back in oil money.
With the trillions we spent on welfare since LBJ war on poverty we still have the same shit..
If all the money we have spent overseas since World War II ended had been left in this country to let wealth grow, there would not be so many people using food stamps, the middle class would not be dwindling, and the jobs situation would be better in America.
What does military spending have to do with wealth, food stamps or the middle-class?
We have more wealthy people than any country in the world. Our so-called poor live in larger homes with more amenities than working people of Europe. Many industries (like mine) can't find enough workers. It's been so bad they've been bringing in foreigners to do the work they can't find Americans for. And our middle-class is dwindling because of consumer demand--not military spending. Everybody wants cheap products today no matter where they come from. Add automation to that problem and it's easy to see what happened to the middle-class.
The US Constitution charges our representatives with the protection of this country. It does not say we should use our tax dollars to get HUD homes in the suburbs and let anybody live there.
Defense spending and military spending are two entirely different things. The constitution also requires a declaration of war by congress to send our troops all over the world. Does it not? Not one bit of the trillions of dollars being printed out of thin air for that purpose is constitutional without a declaration of war. You're no less statist than the op by your model.
Stop the unconstitutional military spending and imperialism and bring them home and build bases here and then you can talk about defense spending. Not until then. Heck, I'd have more bases here at home than we do abroad. That's real defense spending.
We're trillions of dollars in debt.
You liberals are in no position to bargain for anything. You've lost the WH, both halls of Congress, the majority of state governments, etc. You are at OUR mercy, not the other way around and we DON'T make deals with your party of traitors.
Could have fooled me the way some Republicans act once they DO get power.
Because many RINO Republicans fellate as many muslim penises as liberals do. I don't identify as Republican either because of it. As much as I detest liberalfilth, I'm no fan of the R. party either. The crooked-as-Maui-Hana-Highway Bush family is completely Republican yet they sure love their fellatrix diet of muslim population-paste.
No, defense spending is military spending since it's only the military can defend this country from attackers of another country.
As for a declaration of war, we haven't had a declaration of war since WWII. They conveniently call them police actions or some other such terms. But nothing in the Constitution requires a declaration of war to send troops anywhere or build arms for defense.
Whether you agree with it or not, our military overseas is so that we don't have to wait until our homeland is attacked first. We used to do it that way, and then 911 happened.
The poor, middle class, and seniors are dwindling because of the monetary policy.They're being wiped out with inflation as a consequence of monetizing debt.
For god’s sake man. It is spelled imperialism.
Yes, I know. Thank You. I always do that with that word, though. I dunno why.
But was I right? What do you have to say about the argument? Anything?
No, defense spending is military spending since it's only the military can defend this country from attackers of another country.
As for a declaration of war, we haven't had a declaration of war since WWII. They conveniently call them police actions or some other such terms. But nothing in the Constitution requires a declaration of war to send troops anywhere or build arms for defense.
Whether you agree with it or not, our military overseas is so that we don't have to wait until our homeland is attacked first. We used to do it that way, and then 911 happened.
My goodness. You're fully indoctrinated, aren't you?
What does military spending have to do with wealth, food stamps or the middle-class?
We have more wealthy people than any country in the world. Our so-called poor live in larger homes with more amenities than working people of Europe. Many industries (like mine) can't find enough workers. It's been so bad they've been bringing in foreigners to do the work they can't find Americans for. And our middle-class is dwindling because of consumer demand--not military spending. Everybody wants cheap products today no matter where they come from. Add automation to that problem and it's easy to see what happened to the middle-class.
The poor, middle class, and seniors are dwindling because of the monetary policy.They're being wiped out with inflation as a consequence of monetizing debt.
No, defense spending is military spending since it's only the military can defend this country from attackers of another country.
As for a declaration of war, we haven't had a declaration of war since WWII. They conveniently call them police actions or some other such terms. But nothing in the Constitution requires a declaration of war to send troops anywhere or build arms for defense.
Whether you agree with it or not, our military overseas is so that we don't have to wait until our homeland is attacked first. We used to do it that way, and then 911 happened.
My goodness. You're fully indoctrinated, aren't you?
The poor, middle class, and seniors are dwindling because of the monetary policy.They're being wiped out with inflation as a consequence of monetizing debt.
They really need to read the book The Creature From Jekyll Island, by G.Edward Griffin. Then they'll get so angry at how we've been lied to and cheated… that they'll finally wake the hell up and stop supporting the frauds they keep voting for. That goes for both "sides."
What does military spending have to do with wealth, food stamps or the middle-class?
We have more wealthy people than any country in the world. Our so-called poor live in larger homes with more amenities than working people of Europe. Many industries (like mine) can't find enough workers. It's been so bad they've been bringing in foreigners to do the work they can't find Americans for. And our middle-class is dwindling because of consumer demand--not military spending. Everybody wants cheap products today no matter where they come from. Add automation to that problem and it's easy to see what happened to the middle-class.
The poor, middle class, and seniors are dwindling because of the monetary policy.They're being wiped out with inflation as a consequence of monetizing debt.