Rinata
Gold Member
- Oct 5, 2009
- 6,790
- 973
- 153
again its politics. Osama does not want the term "terrorists attack" used. it reflect on him.
OMG, you guys want to hang something on him so badly!!! It's really pathetic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
again its politics. Osama does not want the term "terrorists attack" used. it reflect on him.
again its politics. Osama does not want the term "terrorists attack" used. it reflect on him.
OMG, you guys want to hang something on him so badly!!! It's really pathetic.
I'm convinced he should be shot in his face, preferably in public.
I consider The D.C. Snipers Terrorist. How about You?
Don't know....what is the difference between a terrorist and a serial killer or mass murderer?
What if the person is psychotic?
I consider The D.C. Snipers Terrorist. How about You?
Don't know....what is the difference between a terrorist and a serial killer or mass murderer?
What if the person is psychotic?
Officer in the military = Court MartialHe is an American citizen and deserves his day in court.
Nope there would still be no debate - it STILL would not be an act of terrorism. It doesn't fit the definition because of the targets - the METHOD doesn't mean squat in terms of defining it as an act of terrorism.
You can try to ignore the definition and proclaim "I am right" until you are blue in the face. THAT doesn't make you correct in labeling this an act of terrorism either.
What the guy did (allegedy) was a deplorable, reprehensible act that (IMHO) deserves the most severe punishment we can dish out.
But it wasn't an act of terrorism - even if the guy turns out to be a sleeper agent for Al Qaeda, that doesn't change the definition. THIS was not an act of terrorism.
Bill O' Reilly has decided it is an act of terrorism. And he is one of the people that the right wing adores. His opinion becomes theirs. They certainly never use critical thinking skills to come to any conclusions.
People choose to use words incorrectly every day - for a bunch of different reasons.
Here's my take:
The guy is a muslim. He killed a bunch of people.
Whether his killing of a bunch of people was specifically linked to his muslimness, or more specifically to an organized terrorist group, remains to be seen.
Regardless, his actions do not make me feel that we need to ban all muslims from the military. I also think that we should be racially profiling muslims or any specific group.
On the otherhand, we also need to be a bit more vigilant and encourage reporting any activity that is considered suspicious, which apparently was not done in this situation in the name of being "politically correct" and "promoting diversity". Not reporting and investigating concerning activity of an individual is "politically stupid".
When it comes to the military, each and every person in the military should have a full background check and should have intermittent monitoring while they are enlisted. I don't support monitoring civilians, however the military is a captive audience and all of the people in the military should be the best of the best.
again its politics. Osama does not want the term "terrorists attack" used. it reflect on him.
OMG, you guys want to hang something on him so badly!!! It's really pathetic.
nope....just pointing some things....really no differnt than you not wanting him to be responsible for anything.......
there is the he can only do wrong crowd.....and the he can do no worng crowd....
then there is the waht is he doing and why is he doing that crowd....
how about this....name a mistake he has made.....or soemthing he is doing that you disagree with....
again its politics. Osama does not want the term "terrorists attack" used. it reflect on him.
OMG, you guys want to hang something on him so badly!!! It's really pathetic.
Let me share with my fellow board members a theory that helps us explain all of the administration and MSM proclamations that...
1. Major Hasan was just a nut, and his actions were not related to Islamofascist terrorism
2. We should wait until all the evidence is in
3. Better we take a pass on identifying Major Hasans motivations than risk losing diversity
4. It's all those right-wingers...
Here is the real skinny
1. Anyone who hasnt lived in a distant cave for the last decade knows that this was an act of Islamo-fascist terrorism
2. We had to rely on the British press to find out Major Hasans outbursts and links to terrorists.
3. Red-flags as to the dangers posed by this individual were buried based on a fear of being painted with the red letter R for racist.
Here is Dick Morris analysis, one which ties together both sets of bullet-points:
A major criticism of both Candidate Obama and of President Obama was that his attitude and actions with respect to protecting this country form Moslem terrorism was both the laxity and use of the power of government to investigate and restrict, vis-à-vis the Bush Administration.
1. Close Gitmo
2. Make nice with captured terrorists
3. Pressure interrogators to restrict investigations
4. Create the atmosphere that makes citizens reluctant to question any 'strange' activities
Many said we would suffer the effects of this new attitude, and that if there were to be acts of terrorism, they would be the responsibility of President Obama..
Now we see the big push by the administration and the media to shield the President by announcing that this was surely not terrorism: anything but.
It's your call.
Utter nonsense.
Maybe the media is just following the dictates of the rightwing earlier this year when it insisted we not jump to conclusions that the killing of the abortion doctor was terrorism.
OMG, you guys want to hang something on him so badly!!! It's really pathetic.
nope....just pointing some things....really no differnt than you not wanting him to be responsible for anything.......
there is the he can only do wrong crowd.....and the he can do no worng crowd....
then there is the waht is he doing and why is he doing that crowd....
how about this....name a mistake he has made.....or soemthing he is doing that you disagree with....
Although I do have criticisms, this is the last place I would voice them. And this crap about libs thinking Obama is perfect, is just more crap. That's what Bush supporters did, and then projected that onto us.
And I'll keep repeating this until you people get it. At least we gave Bush a chance. We did not make the first months of his presidency a nightmare. And the left totally supported him after the terrorist attack on 9/11.
Why don't you answer something?? If 9/11 had happened on Obama's watch, would he have gotten the same support from the right?? Hell no!!! And I firmly believe that.
Here's Why The Media Denies it Was Terrorism
Political chickletts you are one goofy broad. I heard Limbaugh say it was terrorism and if anything he represents 90% of talk radio. AKA THE MEDIA YA dumb twat!
again its politics. Osama does not want the term "terrorists attack" used. it reflect on him.
OMG, you guys want to hang something on him so badly!!! It's really pathetic.
It really is pathetic - all the more since doesn't solve the problem of why they couldn't get rid of this guy when they first had concerns about him.
Let me share with my fellow board members a theory that helps us explain all of the administration and MSM proclamations that...
1. Major Hasan was just a nut, and his actions were not related to Islamofascist terrorism
2. We should wait until all the evidence is in
3. Better we take a pass on identifying Major Hasans motivations than risk losing diversity
4. It's all those right-wingers...
Here is the real skinny
1. Anyone who hasnt lived in a distant cave for the last decade knows that this was an act of Islamo-fascist terrorism
2. We had to rely on the British press to find out Major Hasans outbursts and links to terrorists.
3. Red-flags as to the dangers posed by this individual were buried based on a fear of being painted with the red letter R for racist.
Here is Dick Morris analysis, one which ties together both sets of bullet-points:
A major criticism of both Candidate Obama and of President Obama was that his attitude and actions with respect to protecting this country form Moslem terrorism was both the laxity and use of the power of government to investigate and restrict, vis-à-vis the Bush Administration.
1. Close Gitmo
2. Make nice with captured terrorists
3. Pressure interrogators to restrict investigations
4. Create the atmosphere that makes citizens reluctant to question any 'strange' activities
Many said we would suffer the effects of this new attitude, and that if there were to be acts of terrorism, they would be the responsibility of President Obama..
Now we see the big push by the administration and the media to shield the President by announcing that this was surely not terrorism: anything but.
It's your call.
LOL It's funny how you end your spin and propaganda with "it's your call" when you had already prepped your counter insult and attack if the reader didn't agree with your spin. oh and since you went there when were "red flags" discovered and who buried them??
The sad thing is that you are trying to spin this that the administration and media are out to "shield" the president while you are apparently out to blame him based on your spin from dick morris when you have presented no factual evidence to support your OPINIONS.
Wow, you are quick!
In no time at all you read the post, analyzed the language, put two and two together...and almost figured out what I said!
Did you miss "... a theory that helps us explain all of the administration and MSM proclamations that..."?
Next time bust out that dust covered Collegiate Dictionary and check out the meaning of 'theory."
See, it's a theory, one which connects many of the events in recent days, 'theory'- that's why "It's your call." Duh.
Now, here is another of your problems: "when were "red flags" discovered and who buried them?"
An understanding of this OP requires that one that one was immersed in the series of events, and followed the myriad posts outlining the statements of fellow students in medical school about outburst by the Major, the FBI's admission that they knew he tried to contact Al Qaeda, his PowerPoint presentation about Islam, Muslims, and the military, etc.
See, these are 'Red Flags.'
"...you are trying to spin this that the administration and media are out to "shield" the president..."
Wrong. I am clearly stating a persuasive theory, and if you had the intellect, you would parry my thrust by outlining a counter-theory that would connect the dots, i.e. all of the MSM coming up with the same concept, as an alternative.
Instead, you are reduced to something along the lines of 'you meany, you just don't like the President..."
So, you blew it. Today could have been your annual 'smart day.'
I consider The D.C. Snipers Terrorist. How about You?
Don't know....what is the difference between a terrorist and a serial killer or mass murderer?
What if the person is psychotic?
Not too much after the Patriot Act redefined domestic terrorism.
OMG, you guys want to hang something on him so badly!!! It's really pathetic.
It really is pathetic - all the more since doesn't solve the problem of why they couldn't get rid of this guy when they first had concerns about him.
I'd just like to see Him spend as much energy on making decisions as He does on avoiding them. We are set up for another 3 years of Him Voting Present? How about putting out some Fires, without Bankrupting Us.