gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 68,710
- 36,773
- 2,605
WTF are you posting about. Ginsburg still sits on the SC.Really. Her statement clearly indicates she believes in eugenics. Are you a eugenicist too? Do you wish to limit the populations of people we don't want too many of, by killing their unborn babies?So, you admit Nazi Ginsburg is a eugenicist.Here is the FULL CONTEXT of what Justice Ginsberg actually said back in July 2009 in that NY Times interview with the full question followed by the full response;Yes because she wanted to limit the number of blacks in America. Is this not racist and proof she was a eugenicist?
She like our wonderful Nazi Jewish SC judge Ginsburg stated the need for abortion to limit the number of undesirables. It is most sickening, but the elites and dumb asses like it.
Ginsburg first advocated taxpayer funding of abortions and followed it up by saying she backed Roe to eliminate “populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
Q: Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women? ~~ http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html?_r=0 ~~
Are you a paid propagandist or is it just a hobby for you?JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong. ~~ Ibid ~~
I guess that makes you an unpaid propagandist.
She did, I'm no sure if you are aware but she passed away a few decades ago. Lot's of people were into eugenics then, and fyi, eugenicists were not all racists. Ultimately she wanted everyone to have access to birth control, especially those who couldn't afford it because they were least prepared for large families.
Of course now you're conflating all of this with abortion, probably because your dim and have poor genes. (see what I did there?)