Hillary: Ban weapons of war; Bye bye pistols, deer rifles, shotguns....muskets...

there is no civilian lawful purpose for this type of military grade weapon.

Yes there is.... to protect ourselves from people like you and your Government whixg will try to take our Rights away from us.

How many times you need an assault rifle so far?
Too bad You don't know what an so called "assault weapon" is... Lol

Ah 50 dead and 50 injured and you are still playing the definition game. Sad.
 
there is no civilian lawful purpose for this type of military grade weapon.

Yes there is.... to protect ourselves from people like you and your Government whixg will try to take our Rights away from us.

How many times you need an assault rifle so far?
Too bad You don't know what an so called "assault weapon" is... Lol

Ah 50 dead and 50 injured and you are still playing the definition game. Sad.
The firearm has nothing to do with it... Lol
 
there is no civilian lawful purpose for this type of military grade weapon.

Yes there is.... to protect ourselves from people like you and your Government whixg will try to take our Rights away from us.

How many times you need an assault rifle so far?
Too bad You don't know what an so called "assault weapon" is... Lol

Ah 50 dead and 50 injured and you are still playing the definition game. Sad.
The firearm has nothing to do with it... Lol

Couldn't have done it with a derringer. The firearm has a lot to do with it. Glad you find innocent people killed so funny.
 
Yes there is.... to protect ourselves from people like you and your Government whixg will try to take our Rights away from us.

How many times you need an assault rifle so far?
Too bad You don't know what an so called "assault weapon" is... Lol

Ah 50 dead and 50 injured and you are still playing the definition game. Sad.
The firearm has nothing to do with it... Lol

Couldn't have done it with a derringer. The firearm has a lot to do with it. Glad you find innocent people killed so funny.
Nope, it's what Muslims do... kill people they disagree with. They prefer bombs
 
How many times you need an assault rifle so far?
Too bad You don't know what an so called "assault weapon" is... Lol

Ah 50 dead and 50 injured and you are still playing the definition game. Sad.
The firearm has nothing to do with it... Lol

Couldn't have done it with a derringer. The firearm has a lot to do with it. Glad you find innocent people killed so funny.
Nope, it's what Muslims do... kill people they disagree with. They prefer bombs

Well he used a gun made to shoot many really fast. How do you know what they prefer?
 
Too bad You don't know what an so called "assault weapon" is... Lol

Ah 50 dead and 50 injured and you are still playing the definition game. Sad.
The firearm has nothing to do with it... Lol

Couldn't have done it with a derringer. The firearm has a lot to do with it. Glad you find innocent people killed so funny.
Nope, it's what Muslims do... kill people they disagree with. They prefer bombs

Well he used a gun made to shoot many really fast. How do you know what they prefer?
It's all in your imagination
That's what they use in the Middle East...
 
Ah 50 dead and 50 injured and you are still playing the definition game. Sad.
The firearm has nothing to do with it... Lol

Couldn't have done it with a derringer. The firearm has a lot to do with it. Glad you find innocent people killed so funny.
Nope, it's what Muslims do... kill people they disagree with. They prefer bombs

Well he used a gun made to shoot many really fast. How do you know what they prefer?
It's all in your imagination
That's what they use in the Middle East...

They use what they can. In Israel it is a lot of knives because they have strong gun control. Why do you think they prefer anything?
 
The firearm has nothing to do with it... Lol

Couldn't have done it with a derringer. The firearm has a lot to do with it. Glad you find innocent people killed so funny.
Nope, it's what Muslims do... kill people they disagree with. They prefer bombs

Well he used a gun made to shoot many really fast. How do you know what they prefer?
It's all in your imagination
That's what they use in the Middle East...

They use what they can. In Israel it is a lot of knives because they have strong gun control. Why do you think they prefer anything?
Nothing like a bomb to get peoples attention
 
Couldn't have done it with a derringer. The firearm has a lot to do with it. Glad you find innocent people killed so funny.
Nope, it's what Muslims do... kill people they disagree with. They prefer bombs

Well he used a gun made to shoot many really fast. How do you know what they prefer?
It's all in your imagination
That's what they use in the Middle East...

They use what they can. In Israel it is a lot of knives because they have strong gun control. Why do you think they prefer anything?
Nothing like a bomb to get peoples attention
Orlando has gotten a lot of attention.
 
Nope, it's what Muslims do... kill people they disagree with. They prefer bombs

Well he used a gun made to shoot many really fast. How do you know what they prefer?
It's all in your imagination
That's what they use in the Middle East...

They use what they can. In Israel it is a lot of knives because they have strong gun control. Why do you think they prefer anything?
Nothing like a bomb to get peoples attention
Orlando has gotten a lot of attention.
A bomb would've killed more and got them a lot more attention… i'm sure they were disappointed they could not pull it off.
 
Well he used a gun made to shoot many really fast. How do you know what they prefer?
It's all in your imagination
That's what they use in the Middle East...

They use what they can. In Israel it is a lot of knives because they have strong gun control. Why do you think they prefer anything?
Nothing like a bomb to get peoples attention
Orlando has gotten a lot of attention.
A bomb would've killed more and got them a lot more attention… i'm sure they were disappointed they could not pull it off.

Bombings have very often killed less.
 
It's all in your imagination
That's what they use in the Middle East...

They use what they can. In Israel it is a lot of knives because they have strong gun control. Why do you think they prefer anything?
Nothing like a bomb to get peoples attention
Orlando has gotten a lot of attention.
A bomb would've killed more and got them a lot more attention… i'm sure they were disappointed they could not pull it off.

Bombings have very often killed less.
Na, not really.
 
They use what they can. In Israel it is a lot of knives because they have strong gun control. Why do you think they prefer anything?
Nothing like a bomb to get peoples attention
Orlando has gotten a lot of attention.
A bomb would've killed more and got them a lot more attention… i'm sure they were disappointed they could not pull it off.

Bombings have very often killed less.
Na, not really.

Yes really.
 
Yall saw the speech. Hillary says "Weapons of war have no place on our streets."

Nevermind the 2nd Amendment guarantee arms...which were weapons of war in 1776 (muskets and pistols).

Pistols...used in all wars.
Deer rifles....the founding father of battlefield sniper rifles...USMC and Army snipers to this day use bolt action single shot sniper rifles that are identical to grandpa's deer rifle.
Shotguns....also used in wars.

AR-15s.....actually not used much in war. M16 and M4 yes. AR-10 yes.


So libs....when she wants to ban "Weapons of War"....which ones? And how far back?

Because in 1776 there were only 2 firearms. Pistols and Musket rifles. All military infantry carried them. And the Founders granted citizens the right to them.

Why are you complaining? Obviously by "weapons of war" she meant Muslims, she has no went eve further than Trump and wants ALL Muslims banned.
 
Let's clean-up the OP's very tired and repetitious slippery slope.

Hillary Clinton is on record calling for bans almost identical to what Reagan achieved through his many reasonable regulations.

Like Reagan, she is looking to go after a certain class of automatic weapons. The phrase "weapons of war" is a convenient shorthand for the lay public.

If any legislation comes of this, it will resemble the reforms Reagan successfully introduced.
 
Let's clean-up the OP's very tired and repetitious slippery slope.

Hillary Clinton is on record calling for bans almost identical to what Reagan achieved through his many reasonable regulations.

Like Reagan, she is looking to go after a certain class of automatic weapons. The phrase "weapons of war" is a convenient shorthand for the lay public.

If any legislation comes of this, it will resemble the reforms Reagan successfully introduced.

Yeah, let's clean up your stupidity.


If Hillary wanted to reinstate the AWB she could have introduced a bill at ANY time while she was a Senator, she never even tried to do so, why not?

Also, the AWB had NOTHING to do with automatic weapons, it banned the sale of assault WEAPONS, not assault RIFLES which were and still are banned.
 
So never. That's what I thought.

The day you need it is 2 days too late to get it. I don't get in car accidents very often but I buy cars with seat belts. I've been in even few fights in my life but I carry self-defense tools at all times and take regular martial arts classes.

That's what you folks miss.... by the time you need it, it's far too late to get it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top