Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People attack Trump personally and that's ok with liberals but when he attacks back, he's a despicable person.
Hillary Fired for Lies, Unethical Behavior from Congressional Job: Former BossHillary Clinton's lying is well known all around the world. Long lists of her lies have been published. Everything from her 1973 Watergate days, when she was kicked off a committee, to her recent lies about not having classified information on her emails (which are undoubtedly now in the hands of Russia, China, Iran, ISIS, etc).
So it's no surprise that she would lie again in connection with her current run for the presidency. It is a bit surprising though that with very high unfavorable ratings and low trustworthiness ratings, she would undertake such a foolish lie (that a video of Trump was given to ISIS), that could easily be refuted.
In order for Hillary to display an ounce of decency, and show even a modicum of trustworthiness, and not have her trust numbers sink even lower, she MUST now apologize to Donald Trump, and to the entire Republican Party, for spreading yet another video lie (while we're still reeling from the Benghazi one). If she doesn't do that, she openly admits her lack of integrity, and the stark contrast between her deceitfulness, and the clear honesty and forthrightfulness of Donald Trump.
Everything from her 1973 Watergate days, when she was kicked off a committee
gosh, it's so hard to keep up with all of the lies put out there by right wingers that you guys swallow up!
Hillary was NOT fired from the Watergate Commission committee she was on....
Goodness gracious, the committee she was on DISSOLVED, because Nixon had finally resigned.
She was not attacked on the basis of her gender. That is dishonest.And the other thing is... Megyn Kelly may be more of a public figure but you don't attack someone on the basis of their gender.
She was not attacked on the basis of her gender. That is dishonest.And the other thing is... Megyn Kelly may be more of a public figure but you don't attack someone on the basis of their gender.
Hillary Fired for Lies, Unethical Behavior from Congressional Job: Former BossHillary Clinton's lying is well known all around the world. Long lists of her lies have been published. Everything from her 1973 Watergate days, when she was kicked off a committee, to her recent lies about not having classified information on her emails (which are undoubtedly now in the hands of Russia, China, Iran, ISIS, etc).
So it's no surprise that she would lie again in connection with her current run for the presidency. It is a bit surprising though that with very high unfavorable ratings and low trustworthiness ratings, she would undertake such a foolish lie (that a video of Trump was given to ISIS), that could easily be refuted.
In order for Hillary to display an ounce of decency, and show even a modicum of trustworthiness, and not have her trust numbers sink even lower, she MUST now apologize to Donald Trump, and to the entire Republican Party, for spreading yet another video lie (while we're still reeling from the Benghazi one). If she doesn't do that, she openly admits her lack of integrity, and the stark contrast between her deceitfulness, and the clear honesty and forthrightfulness of Donald Trump.
Everything from her 1973 Watergate days, when she was kicked off a committee
gosh, it's so hard to keep up with all of the lies put out there by right wingers that you guys swallow up!
Hillary was NOT fired from the Watergate Commission committee she was on....
Goodness gracious, the committee she was on DISSOLVED, because Nixon had finally resigned.
Hillary Clinton's former boss says he fired her from an investigative position because she was a "liar" and "unethical"-Truth! & Fiction!
Hillarys Bold Lie Omission FIRED Staff Position | Video | C-SPAN.org
True, but he is using dumb ass delusional "conservatives"for wall paper...they lessen the effect of thrown stones.Trump and his supporters need to put down the stones – they live in a very big glass house.
Zeifman is a KNOWN LIAR, all that he has said lately are BIG FAT LIES....Hillary Fired for Lies, Unethical Behavior from Congressional Job: Former BossHillary Clinton's lying is well known all around the world. Long lists of her lies have been published. Everything from her 1973 Watergate days, when she was kicked off a committee, to her recent lies about not having classified information on her emails (which are undoubtedly now in the hands of Russia, China, Iran, ISIS, etc).
So it's no surprise that she would lie again in connection with her current run for the presidency. It is a bit surprising though that with very high unfavorable ratings and low trustworthiness ratings, she would undertake such a foolish lie (that a video of Trump was given to ISIS), that could easily be refuted.
In order for Hillary to display an ounce of decency, and show even a modicum of trustworthiness, and not have her trust numbers sink even lower, she MUST now apologize to Donald Trump, and to the entire Republican Party, for spreading yet another video lie (while we're still reeling from the Benghazi one). If she doesn't do that, she openly admits her lack of integrity, and the stark contrast between her deceitfulness, and the clear honesty and forthrightfulness of Donald Trump.
Everything from her 1973 Watergate days, when she was kicked off a committee
gosh, it's so hard to keep up with all of the lies put out there by right wingers that you guys swallow up!
Hillary was NOT fired from the Watergate Commission committee she was on....
Goodness gracious, the committee she was on DISSOLVED, because Nixon had finally resigned.
Hillary Clinton's former boss says he fired her from an investigative position because she was a "liar" and "unethical"-Truth! & Fiction!
Hillarys Bold Lie Omission FIRED Staff Position | Video | C-SPAN.org
None of your examples indicate a generalization of ALL women. The ones you mentioned ALL personally attacked Trump first. Are you suggesting he is not permitted to respond to their personal attacks with personal attacks himself because they are women?She was not attacked on the basis of her gender. That is dishonest.And the other thing is... Megyn Kelly may be more of a public figure but you don't attack someone on the basis of their gender.
Perhaps you hadn't heard.
“There was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her… wherever.” (here, and a million other places)
Followed by:
Then of course there's the phsical appearance comments on .... Carly Fiorina... Arianna Huffington... Rosie O'Donnell....
Then there's ...
>> Referring to Trump's bankruptcy rumours, New York Times journalist Gail Collins called Trump a "financially embattled thousandaire" in print.
In reponse, Trump allegedly sent Collins a copy of her column, with her face circled and the words "Face of a dog!" written over it << (here)
Then there was...
Not to mention having the hots for his own daughter....
Mind you, this is only the sexism department. Not even going into the xenophobia, the mocking of the handicapped, the blanket statements, the religious bigotry, or the contempt for the Constitution in general.
Now if a petulant child-man can't handle a pointed question from a TV talking head, from a friendly source no less ---- how the hell is he going to handle foreign affairs -- where they play for real?
Snopes is not a credible source, and calling Jerry Zeifman a "known liar" does not make your case.Zeifman is a KNOWN LIAR, all that he has said lately are BIG FAT LIES....Hillary Fired for Lies, Unethical Behavior from Congressional Job: Former BossHillary Clinton's lying is well known all around the world. Long lists of her lies have been published. Everything from her 1973 Watergate days, when she was kicked off a committee, to her recent lies about not having classified information on her emails (which are undoubtedly now in the hands of Russia, China, Iran, ISIS, etc).
So it's no surprise that she would lie again in connection with her current run for the presidency. It is a bit surprising though that with very high unfavorable ratings and low trustworthiness ratings, she would undertake such a foolish lie (that a video of Trump was given to ISIS), that could easily be refuted.
In order for Hillary to display an ounce of decency, and show even a modicum of trustworthiness, and not have her trust numbers sink even lower, she MUST now apologize to Donald Trump, and to the entire Republican Party, for spreading yet another video lie (while we're still reeling from the Benghazi one). If she doesn't do that, she openly admits her lack of integrity, and the stark contrast between her deceitfulness, and the clear honesty and forthrightfulness of Donald Trump.
Everything from her 1973 Watergate days, when she was kicked off a committee
gosh, it's so hard to keep up with all of the lies put out there by right wingers that you guys swallow up!
Hillary was NOT fired from the Watergate Commission committee she was on....
Goodness gracious, the committee she was on DISSOLVED, because Nixon had finally resigned.
Hillary Clinton's former boss says he fired her from an investigative position because she was a "liar" and "unethical"-Truth! & Fiction!
Hillarys Bold Lie Omission FIRED Staff Position | Video | C-SPAN.org
he didn't fire her, he couldn't, he was not her boss nor on the same committee as Hillary
hillary didn't create the idea of Nixon not having council, she was ORDERED by her boss to write this brief....not to do so, would have been insubordination.
But as noted above, Zeifman had no authority to "terminate" Hillary. They were members of different staffs, and Zeifman had no hiring or firing authority over members of the Impeachment Inquiry staff for which Hillary worked. (That authority rested with Special Counsel John Doar and, ultimately, with House Judiciary Committee Chairman Peter Rodino.) Quite tellingly, Zeifman made absolutely no mention of having "fired" or "terminated" Hillary Rodham, nor of telling her that he "could not recommend her for any further positions," in his 1995 book; he only started claiming so much later. Back in 1995 he noted that Hillary had remained with the inquiry staff up until the end, leaving only when President Nixon's August 1974 resignation made the issue of impeachment moot and the Judiciary Committee's impeachment inquiry staff was therefore disbanded:
Hillary was twenty-seven when the impeachment inquiry staff was disbanded. The next morning she took a train down to Little Rock, Arkansas. She moved in with Bill Clinton and they eventually married.
And again in 1998, Zeifman was quoted in a Scripps Howard News Service article as unambiguously confirming that not only did he not "fire" Hillary, but that it was not even within his power to do so:
Jerome Zeifman, chief Democratic counsel on the House Judiciary Committee in 1974 ... does not have flattering memories of Rodham's work on the committee. "If I had the power to fire her, I would have fired her," he said.
Zeifman made no bones about having an ax to grind with Hillary Clinton (putting out the anti-Clinton paperback Hillary's Pursuit of Power in 2006), and as its blade grew sharper over the years, he quite obviously shifted his recollections of events from the
1973-74 timeframe to conform to his current point of view rather than the other way around.
Back in April 2008, Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign site responded to Zeifman's claims by asserting:
In a column circulating on the internet Jerry Zeifman alleges that Hillary was fired from her job on the House Judiciary Committee in the 1970s.
This is false. Hillary was not fired.
They also noted that the Washington Post's reviewer found (as we did) much of Zeifman's book to be mere repetition of speculation with little or no evidence to substantiate it:
[The book] will surely excite conspiracy buffs on the lookout for sinister coverups in high places. But those wary of such unsubstantiated theories (myself included) will find Zeifman's book an unconvincing, if imaginative, tale of intrigue.
The lack of evidence makes his theory hard to swallow. Zeifman's most reliable source — his diary — contains few revelations and seems little more than a chronicle of his suspicions and speculations. The book's jacket cover, which promises readers "truths even more startling than those brought out in Oliver Stone's movies 'Nixon' and 'JFK', " does not help matters. Perhaps the book's publicists forgot that "Nixon" and "JFK" were, after all, only Hollywood movies.
much much much more to read here:
Zeif-geist
She was not attacked on the basis of her gender. That is dishonest.And the other thing is... Megyn Kelly may be more of a public figure but you don't attack someone on the basis of their gender.
Perhaps you hadn't heard.
“There was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her… wherever.” (here, and a million other places)
Followed by:
Then of course there's the physical appearance comments on .... Carly Fiorina... Arianna Huffington... Rosie O'Donnell....
Then there's ...
>> Referring to Trump's bankruptcy rumours, New York Times journalist Gail Collins called Trump a "financially embattled thousandaire" in print.
In reponse, Trump allegedly sent Collins a copy of her column, with her face circled and the words "Face of a dog!" written over it << (here)
Then there was...
Not to mention having the hots for his own daughter....
Mind you, this is only the sexism department. Not even going into the xenophobia, the mocking of the handicapped, the blanket statements, the religious bigotry, or the contempt for the Constitution in general.
Now if a petulant child-man can't handle a pointed question from a TV talking head, from a friendly source no less ---- how the hell is he going to handle foreign affairs -- where they play for real?
None of your examples indicate a generalization of ALL women. The ones you mentioned ALL personally attacked Trump first. Are you suggesting he is not permitted to respond to their personal attacks with personal attacks himself because they are women?
Snopes is not a credible source, and calling Jerry Zeifman a "known liar" does not make your case.Zeifman is a KNOWN LIAR, all that he has said lately are BIG FAT LIES....Hillary Fired for Lies, Unethical Behavior from Congressional Job: Former BossHillary Clinton's lying is well known all around the world. Long lists of her lies have been published. Everything from her 1973 Watergate days, when she was kicked off a committee, to her recent lies about not having classified information on her emails (which are undoubtedly now in the hands of Russia, China, Iran, ISIS, etc).
So it's no surprise that she would lie again in connection with her current run for the presidency. It is a bit surprising though that with very high unfavorable ratings and low trustworthiness ratings, she would undertake such a foolish lie (that a video of Trump was given to ISIS), that could easily be refuted.
In order for Hillary to display an ounce of decency, and show even a modicum of trustworthiness, and not have her trust numbers sink even lower, she MUST now apologize to Donald Trump, and to the entire Republican Party, for spreading yet another video lie (while we're still reeling from the Benghazi one). If she doesn't do that, she openly admits her lack of integrity, and the stark contrast between her deceitfulness, and the clear honesty and forthrightfulness of Donald Trump.
Everything from her 1973 Watergate days, when she was kicked off a committee
gosh, it's so hard to keep up with all of the lies put out there by right wingers that you guys swallow up!
Hillary was NOT fired from the Watergate Commission committee she was on....
Goodness gracious, the committee she was on DISSOLVED, because Nixon had finally resigned.
Hillary Clinton's former boss says he fired her from an investigative position because she was a "liar" and "unethical"-Truth! & Fiction!
Hillarys Bold Lie Omission FIRED Staff Position | Video | C-SPAN.org
he didn't fire her, he couldn't, he was not her boss nor on the same committee as Hillary
hillary didn't create the idea of Nixon not having council, she was ORDERED by her boss to write this brief....not to do so, would have been insubordination.
But as noted above, Zeifman had no authority to "terminate" Hillary. They were members of different staffs, and Zeifman had no hiring or firing authority over members of the Impeachment Inquiry staff for which Hillary worked. (That authority rested with Special Counsel John Doar and, ultimately, with House Judiciary Committee Chairman Peter Rodino.) Quite tellingly, Zeifman made absolutely no mention of having "fired" or "terminated" Hillary Rodham, nor of telling her that he "could not recommend her for any further positions," in his 1995 book; he only started claiming so much later. Back in 1995 he noted that Hillary had remained with the inquiry staff up until the end, leaving only when President Nixon's August 1974 resignation made the issue of impeachment moot and the Judiciary Committee's impeachment inquiry staff was therefore disbanded:
Hillary was twenty-seven when the impeachment inquiry staff was disbanded. The next morning she took a train down to Little Rock, Arkansas. She moved in with Bill Clinton and they eventually married.
And again in 1998, Zeifman was quoted in a Scripps Howard News Service article as unambiguously confirming that not only did he not "fire" Hillary, but that it was not even within his power to do so:
Jerome Zeifman, chief Democratic counsel on the House Judiciary Committee in 1974 ... does not have flattering memories of Rodham's work on the committee. "If I had the power to fire her, I would have fired her," he said.
Zeifman made no bones about having an ax to grind with Hillary Clinton (putting out the anti-Clinton paperback Hillary's Pursuit of Power in 2006), and as its blade grew sharper over the years, he quite obviously shifted his recollections of events from the
1973-74 timeframe to conform to his current point of view rather than the other way around.
Back in April 2008, Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign site responded to Zeifman's claims by asserting:
In a column circulating on the internet Jerry Zeifman alleges that Hillary was fired from her job on the House Judiciary Committee in the 1970s.
This is false. Hillary was not fired.
They also noted that the Washington Post's reviewer found (as we did) much of Zeifman's book to be mere repetition of speculation with little or no evidence to substantiate it:
[The book] will surely excite conspiracy buffs on the lookout for sinister coverups in high places. But those wary of such unsubstantiated theories (myself included) will find Zeifman's book an unconvincing, if imaginative, tale of intrigue.
The lack of evidence makes his theory hard to swallow. Zeifman's most reliable source — his diary — contains few revelations and seems little more than a chronicle of his suspicions and speculations. The book's jacket cover, which promises readers "truths even more startling than those brought out in Oliver Stone's movies 'Nixon' and 'JFK', " does not help matters. Perhaps the book's publicists forgot that "Nixon" and "JFK" were, after all, only Hollywood movies.
much much much more to read here:
Zeif-geist
When you can be honest, we can discuss it.She was not attacked on the basis of her gender. That is dishonest.And the other thing is... Megyn Kelly may be more of a public figure but you don't attack someone on the basis of their gender.
Perhaps you hadn't heard.
“There was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her… wherever.” (here, and a million other places)
Followed by:
Then of course there's the physical appearance comments on .... Carly Fiorina... Arianna Huffington... Rosie O'Donnell....
Then there's ...
>> Referring to Trump's bankruptcy rumours, New York Times journalist Gail Collins called Trump a "financially embattled thousandaire" in print.
In reponse, Trump allegedly sent Collins a copy of her column, with her face circled and the words "Face of a dog!" written over it << (here)
Then there was...
Not to mention having the hots for his own daughter....
Mind you, this is only the sexism department. Not even going into the xenophobia, the mocking of the handicapped, the blanket statements, the religious bigotry, or the contempt for the Constitution in general.
Now if a petulant child-man can't handle a pointed question from a TV talking head, from a friendly source no less ---- how the hell is he going to handle foreign affairs -- where they play for real?
None of your examples indicate a generalization of ALL women. The ones you mentioned ALL personally attacked Trump first. Are you suggesting he is not permitted to respond to their personal attacks with personal attacks himself because they are women?
Actually, since they all involve aspects of being women, and/or physical appearance (and by the same token none refer to any actual issue), they all involve a generalization of all women. See how that works?
Moreover the instances cited were not responses to "personal attacks" -- they were themselves personal attacks, from Rump, in response to political issues or pointed questions.
Again, the behaviour of a ten-year-old, from which Rump apparently never evolved.
Politifact isn't Politifact. it is PolitiFALSE. I just wrote an OP just 2 days ago exposing them, for the frauds they are. What a laughingstock using Politifact as a source.
Politifact Is a Joke
When you can be honest, we can discuss it.She was not attacked on the basis of her gender. That is dishonest.And the other thing is... Megyn Kelly may be more of a public figure but you don't attack someone on the basis of their gender.
Perhaps you hadn't heard.
“There was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her… wherever.” (here, and a million other places)
Followed by:
Then of course there's the physical appearance comments on .... Carly Fiorina... Arianna Huffington... Rosie O'Donnell....
Then there's ...
>> Referring to Trump's bankruptcy rumours, New York Times journalist Gail Collins called Trump a "financially embattled thousandaire" in print.
In reponse, Trump allegedly sent Collins a copy of her column, with her face circled and the words "Face of a dog!" written over it << (here)
Then there was...
Not to mention having the hots for his own daughter....
Mind you, this is only the sexism department. Not even going into the xenophobia, the mocking of the handicapped, the blanket statements, the religious bigotry, or the contempt for the Constitution in general.
Now if a petulant child-man can't handle a pointed question from a TV talking head, from a friendly source no less ---- how the hell is he going to handle foreign affairs -- where they play for real?
None of your examples indicate a generalization of ALL women. The ones you mentioned ALL personally attacked Trump first. Are you suggesting he is not permitted to respond to their personal attacks with personal attacks himself because they are women?
Actually, since they all involve aspects of being women, and/or physical appearance (and by the same token none refer to any actual issue), they all involve a generalization of all women. See how that works?
Moreover the instances cited were not responses to "personal attacks" -- they were themselves personal attacks, from Rump, in response to political issues or pointed questions.
Again, the behaviour of a ten-year-old, from which Rump apparently never evolved.
If that makes you happy, fine. Merry Christmas.When you can be honest, we can discuss it.She was not attacked on the basis of her gender. That is dishonest.
Perhaps you hadn't heard.
“There was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her… wherever.” (here, and a million other places)
Followed by:
Then of course there's the physical appearance comments on .... Carly Fiorina... Arianna Huffington... Rosie O'Donnell....
Then there's ...
>> Referring to Trump's bankruptcy rumours, New York Times journalist Gail Collins called Trump a "financially embattled thousandaire" in print.
In reponse, Trump allegedly sent Collins a copy of her column, with her face circled and the words "Face of a dog!" written over it << (here)
Then there was...
Not to mention having the hots for his own daughter....
Mind you, this is only the sexism department. Not even going into the xenophobia, the mocking of the handicapped, the blanket statements, the religious bigotry, or the contempt for the Constitution in general.
Now if a petulant child-man can't handle a pointed question from a TV talking head, from a friendly source no less ---- how the hell is he going to handle foreign affairs -- where they play for real?
None of your examples indicate a generalization of ALL women. The ones you mentioned ALL personally attacked Trump first. Are you suggesting he is not permitted to respond to their personal attacks with personal attacks himself because they are women?
Actually, since they all involve aspects of being women, and/or physical appearance (and by the same token none refer to any actual issue), they all involve a generalization of all women. See how that works?
Moreover the instances cited were not responses to "personal attacks" -- they were themselves personal attacks, from Rump, in response to political issues or pointed questions.
Again, the behaviour of a ten-year-old, from which Rump apparently never evolved.
We just did.
I won.
Come on. All the things Strump has said about Muslims? You think they haven't heard them? You think they don't use them for recruitment? Coming from the leading US presidential candidate?
Grow up.
Then you should be able to post a recruitment video with Trump in it.Come on. All the things Strump has said about Muslims? You think they haven't heard them? You think they don't use them for recruitment? Coming from the leading US presidential candidate?
Grow up.
So this is thegosh, it's so hard to keep up with all of the lies put out there by right wingers that you guys swallow up!
Hillary was NOT fired from the Watergate Commission committee she was on....
Goodness gracious, the committee she was on DISSOLVED, because Nixon had finally resigned.
your liberal masters are programming you with, huh ? Not surprising. Liberal media is a constantly flowing river of lies.
