Hillary Indictment Already Handed Down By FBI And Obama Justice Department Is Sitting On It

[mudwhistle]

It appears that a Grand Jury has been convened in secret to look at evidence that Hillary, or somebody they want to make out as a fall guy, mishandled Tops Secret information on Hillary Clinton's personal server. Fux Noise spokesman Judge Nepolitano said this was going on under the radar. One of Hillary's employees has already been granted immunity and the case is going forward. What this means is an indictment or indictments have been recommended, and it's just a matter of the DoJ announcing if they are going to take up the case.

Figure the odds that Obama is going to destroy the Democrat's chances of winning the White House. However, if he doesn't allow the crime to be prosecuted, it will be a scandal even worse than Watergate, and will hound him the rest of his administration and beyond.

If he was a Republican president, he would be toast. I doubt the media will even acknowledge any of this is real. This is corruption at it's worst. It is widely reported that Hillary even offered a Supreme Court seat to Obama as a bribe to convince him not to go forward with the case. I'm sure he'd love that.......but it would be an outright embarrassment to the court to have him playing video games on his cell phone while everyone else is writing their briefs on court decisions.

Links
FBI recommends DoJ to indict Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified info

Why the Justice Department Won’t Work with the FBI on Clinton’s E-mail Case, by Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review

Report: FBI Probing Whether Clinton Aides ‘Cut and Pasted’ Intel

 

[bucs90]

Yep. Any other time she'd be going to jail.

She did promise Obama a SCOTUS spot. Remember Blagojevich in Chicago trying to sell Obamas Senate seat?? Thats how Chicago politicians work.

Obama is bribing Clinton. He'll protect her if she hooks him up with SCOTUS

 

[JoeB131]

The FBI can't hand down indictments.

They can make recommendations, but utlimately, it's the AG who had to make the determination if a case is 1) Worth pursuing or 2) Winnable.

Sorry, any case against Hillary isn't winnable. there are people out there who will vote to acquit her if you had video of her handing a briefcase full of secrets to Putin, much less the horrible crime of not using the right kind of e-mail (OMFG!!!!)

The only purpose of filing such a case would be to damage her chances of winning, but frankly, the GOP is pretty much wrapping it up for her by nominating a Reality TV Rodeo Clown.

 

[Freewill]

Assuming there is a shred of truth to this or it does not get buried. Why does the president get to decide if it moves forward? Why, if there is an indictment and a grand jury recommending trial, does he get to obstruct justice?

More then likely what happens is they have a grand jury and the prosecutor just does a crappy job under orders from the top. That way it gives the appearance of impartiality.

 

[Meathead]

God, that looks like a wide body, the plane I mean. The landing strip for it is just to Obie's right.

 

[Freewill]

The FBI can't hand down indictments.

They can make recommendations, but utlimately, it's the AG who had to make the determination if a case is 1) Worth pursuing or 2) Winnable.

Sorry, any case against Hillary isn't winnable. there are people out there who will vote to acquit her if you had video of her handing a briefcase full of secrets to Putin, much less the horrible crime of not using the right kind of e-mail (OMFG!!!!)

The only purpose of filing such a case would be to damage her chances of winning, but frankly, the GOP is pretty much wrapping it up for her by nominating a Reality TV Rodeo Clown.

Not using email incorrectly, having incorrect information in her email. Why must the left spin everything, oh right because the truth seldom works. Bill wasn't impeached because of a BJ, he lied under oath. Mrs. Tuluza is not being investigated for using a personal server, she is being investigated for having classified information on a personal server. Which would be, and probably was, easy to hack.

 

[Freewill]

God, that looks like a wide body, the plane I mean. The landing strip for it is just to Obie's right.

She is bigger then Obama, I never realized that.

 

[Meathead]

God, that looks like a wide body, the plane I mean. The landing strip for it is just to Obie's right.

She is bigger then Obama, I never realized that.

No, she's just much wider. The Prez gets off first.

 

[mudwhistle]

The FBI can't hand down indictments.

They can make recommendations, but utlimately, it's the AG who had to make the determination if a case is 1) Worth pursuing or 2) Winnable.

Sorry, any case against Hillary isn't winnable. there are people out there who will vote to acquit her if you had video of her handing a briefcase full of secrets to Putin, much less the horrible crime of not using the right kind of e-mail (OMFG!!!!)

The only purpose of filing such a case would be to damage her chances of winning, but frankly, the GOP is pretty much wrapping it up for her by nominating a Reality TV Rodeo Clown.

Recommendation is too long to put in the title. So I simply used handed down to shorten the title.

And the only reason the FBI would recommend an indictment in an Obama FBI is if there was grounds for an indictment.

The only reason an indictment recommendation would be refused is because of political pressure from the White House, which is a refusal by the president to enforce the law. A breaking of his oath of office.

 

[JoeB131]

Not using email incorrectly, having incorrect information in her email. Why must the left spin everything, oh right because the truth seldom works. Bill wasn't impeached because of a BJ, he lied under oath. Mrs. Tuluza is not being investigated for using a personal server, she is being investigated for having classified information on a personal server. Which would be, and probably was, easy to hack.

So essentially, you want to prosecute her for what other people did (sent her e-mails over the wrong system) because of what other people MIGHT have done (Hacked her server if they were aware it existed).

So what did SHE actually do that was criminal? Not what other people did that might have caused inadvertant criminality on her part.

 

[Freewill]

I will actually, logically, defend Mrs. Tuluza Clinton.

1. Most other cases like this involved the release of classified information, knowingly.

2. It appears to me that although damage "could" have been done by the insecure nature of the server no one as of yet has shown any damage.

3. It seems to me that Mrs. Tuluza is more guilty of negligence then intentional thwarting of security procedures.

That said, it is just one more reason why her Tuluza lie is so revealing. IF she is so obviously willing to so freely lie like she did, how can we even pretend to believe anything she has to say?

She isn't going down because of this, she is an insider and will be protected.

We the people have to bring her down and if that means electing a tyrant like Trump, so be it.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

The FBI can't hand down indictments.

They can make recommendations, but utlimately, it's the AG who had to make the determination if a case is 1) Worth pursuing or 2) Winnable.

Sorry, any case against Hillary isn't winnable. there are people out there who will vote to acquit her if you had video of her handing a briefcase full of secrets to Putin, much less the horrible crime of not using the right kind of e-mail (OMFG!!!!)

The only purpose of filing such a case would be to damage her chances of winning, but frankly, the GOP is pretty much wrapping it up for her by nominating a Reality TV Rodeo Clown.

Not using the right kind of email?...Holy Shit. You go around making such random understatements all the time?
It seems you are also one of those who would vote to pardon her no matter what.

 

[Freewill]

The FBI can't hand down indictments.

They can make recommendations, but utlimately, it's the AG who had to make the determination if a case is 1) Worth pursuing or 2) Winnable.

Sorry, any case against Hillary isn't winnable. there are people out there who will vote to acquit her if you had video of her handing a briefcase full of secrets to Putin, much less the horrible crime of not using the right kind of e-mail (OMFG!!!!)

The only purpose of filing such a case would be to damage her chances of winning, but frankly, the GOP is pretty much wrapping it up for her by nominating a Reality TV Rodeo Clown.

Recommendation is too long to put in the title. So I simply used handed down to shorten the title.

And the only reason the FBI would recommend an indictment in an Obama FBI is if there was grounds for an indictment.

The only reason an indictment recommendation would be refused is because of political pressure from the White House, which is a refusal by the president to enforce the law. A breaking of his oath of office.

There is another reason, the FBI is running cover. If they produced no recommendations then they would be accused of a cover up, rightly or wrongly. This way it is in the hands of a prosecutor who will pretty much be able to sway the jury which ever way he wants. I was once called for a federal grand jury. It was going to be a year assignment, a weekend a month then two weeks sometime during the year. It was easy for anyone to plead hardship and get out of it. Those picked really had nothing better to do. One woman who was picked the judge actually singled her out and "are you sure you really want to go." She replied, "go where?" She was still selected.

 

[Freewill]

Not using email incorrectly, having incorrect information in her email. Why must the left spin everything, oh right because the truth seldom works. Bill wasn't impeached because of a BJ, he lied under oath. Mrs. Tuluza is not being investigated for using a personal server, she is being investigated for having classified information on a personal server. Which would be, and probably was, easy to hack.

So essentially, you want to prosecute her for what other people did (sent her e-mails over the wrong system) because of what other people MIGHT have done (Hacked her server if they were aware it existed).

So what did SHE actually do that was criminal? Not what other people did that might have caused inadvertant criminality on her part.

I see you adhere to what I have been saying. If anyone goes down for this it will be a low level flunky, not, too big to fail Mrs. Clinton. Why is it that the buck never seems to stop at the top when dealing with liberals? Unless of course it is something good, to them, like killing OBL.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

The FBI can't hand down indictments.

They can make recommendations, but utlimately, it's the AG who had to make the determination if a case is 1) Worth pursuing or 2) Winnable.

Sorry, any case against Hillary isn't winnable. there are people out there who will vote to acquit her if you had video of her handing a briefcase full of secrets to Putin, much less the horrible crime of not using the right kind of e-mail (OMFG!!!!)

The only purpose of filing such a case would be to damage her chances of winning, but frankly, the GOP is pretty much wrapping it up for her by nominating a Reality TV Rodeo Clown.

This is pretty much correct, although I personally wish it could be true. As long as the current people are in charge of her coming to justice for her crimes against the country are protecting her, nothing can happen.
Now once President Trump puts the right people in position, Hillary could be toast if there is really anything out there.
Another reason for Washington and the left to fear Trump.

 

[Freewill]

Not using email incorrectly, having incorrect information in her email. Why must the left spin everything, oh right because the truth seldom works. Bill wasn't impeached because of a BJ, he lied under oath. Mrs. Tuluza is not being investigated for using a personal server, she is being investigated for having classified information on a personal server. Which would be, and probably was, easy to hack.

So essentially, you want to prosecute her for what other people did (sent her e-mails over the wrong system) because of what other people MIGHT have done (Hacked her server if they were aware it existed).

So what did SHE actually do that was criminal? Not what other people did that might have caused inadvertant criminality on her part.

It is not like she didn't see the emails. It is not like she should not have known the rules. But as I have said all along, if there was a crime committed Mrs Tuluza won't go down for it, it will be "someone" else. As is usual with the Clinton crime family.

 

[Moonglow]

Same with the Trump scam university..

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Same with the Trump scam university..

If in fact the Trump university was a scam, it did not put our country at risk.
Its not the same.

 

[Moonglow]

Same with the Trump scam university..

If in fact the Trump university was a scam, it did not put our country at risk.
Its not the same.

yet a scammer none the less, and both running for president..

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Same with the Trump scam university..

If in fact the Trump university was a scam, it did not put our country at risk.
Its not the same.

yet a scammer none the less, and both running for president..

dont know if it was a scam or a poorly run school.
but again, what risk did Trump put the country into with that?