Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong. The entire point of the investigation was whether she committed a crime having the servers in her house, or wherever it was she had it, and whether she transmitted classified information. The FBI said, "Nope". So, you can keep calling it "illegal' if you want, no law enforcement investigatory agency agrees with your assessment. Not that that matters to you guys. You know full well that Hillary is going to beat the orangutan-haired Carnival Barker cockslpat hands down, so you're desperate to find a scandal, any scandal, that you can tie her to, to disqualify her from running. Sorry. You tried. You failed. She's running. Trump is toast.You're mixing up your Clinton scandals. The FBI hasn't said there is nothing to see here regarding the State Dept emails illegally kept on Clinton's server.It clearly wasn't illegal since The FBI said, "Nuthin to see here". You guys keep throwing this word "illegal" around, and yet the people who are paid, and trained to recognise crimes have made no such determinations. Like I said, "We have already made up our minds. Please do not try to confuse us with the facts,"
Oh BTW, the Clinton Foundation is being looked into as well.
And you're confusing FOX with the FBI. Well...we'll see. Apparently the FBI isn't going to release their report until after the conventions. I can't wait. I am so sick of this stupid distraction.Wrong. The entire point of the investigation was whether she committed a crime having the servers in her house, or wherever it was she had it, and whether she transmitted classified information. The FBI said, "Nope". So, you can keep calling it "illegal' if you want, no law enforcement investigatory agency agrees with your assessment. Not that that matters to you guys. You know full well that Hillary is going to beat the orangutan-haired Carnival Barker cockslpat hands down, so you're desperate to find a scandal, any scandal, that you can tie her to, to disqualify her from running. Sorry. You tried. You failed. She's running. Trump is toast.You're mixing up your Clinton scandals. The FBI hasn't said there is nothing to see here regarding the State Dept emails illegally kept on Clinton's server.It clearly wasn't illegal since The FBI said, "Nuthin to see here". You guys keep throwing this word "illegal" around, and yet the people who are paid, and trained to recognise crimes have made no such determinations. Like I said, "We have already made up our minds. Please do not try to confuse us with the facts,"
Oh BTW, the Clinton Foundation is being looked into as well.
You are confusing CNN with the FBI...the FBI has issued no such statements as you falsely claim....admit you are a liar and take a hike.
Meanwhile back at the Ranch: FBI drops hints they will indict hillary.................BREAKING NEWS: FBI Drops Hints They Are Ready to INDICT Hillary Clinton!
Breaking: FBI Will Make A HUGE Move Against Hillary Rodham Clinton
FBI Source Tells Fox News, Agents Are ‘Livid’ About Clinton-Lynch MeetingCould this be why Bill was in such a rush to meet with Loretta Lynch...despite all the backlash that generated.
I would guess he had lynch relay a message to obama...something to the effect...if you indict hillary we will reveal stuff you do not want revealed. Just my opinion...I could be wrong.
Breaking News: Clinton Interviewed by FBI for 3 and 1/2 Hours About Private Email Server
And you're confusing FOX with the FBI. Well...we'll see. Apparently the FBI isn't going to release their report until after the conventions. I can't wait. I am so sick of this stupid distraction.Wrong. The entire point of the investigation was whether she committed a crime having the servers in her house, or wherever it was she had it, and whether she transmitted classified information. The FBI said, "Nope". So, you can keep calling it "illegal' if you want, no law enforcement investigatory agency agrees with your assessment. Not that that matters to you guys. You know full well that Hillary is going to beat the orangutan-haired Carnival Barker cockslpat hands down, so you're desperate to find a scandal, any scandal, that you can tie her to, to disqualify her from running. Sorry. You tried. You failed. She's running. Trump is toast.You're mixing up your Clinton scandals. The FBI hasn't said there is nothing to see here regarding the State Dept emails illegally kept on Clinton's server.It clearly wasn't illegal since The FBI said, "Nuthin to see here". You guys keep throwing this word "illegal" around, and yet the people who are paid, and trained to recognise crimes have made no such determinations. Like I said, "We have already made up our minds. Please do not try to confuse us with the facts,"
Oh BTW, the Clinton Foundation is being looked into as well.
You are confusing CNN with the FBI...the FBI has issued no such statements as you falsely claim....admit you are a liar and take a hike.
Meanwhile back at the Ranch: FBI drops hints they will indict hillary.................BREAKING NEWS: FBI Drops Hints They Are Ready to INDICT Hillary Clinton!
Breaking: FBI Will Make A HUGE Move Against Hillary Rodham Clinton
...and cleared
Just hours after the Clinton-FBI meeting had wrapped up, word was released that Clinton would not have to worry about charges being filed against her for the possible illegal use of the server, which sent Republican nominee Donald Trump into a frenzy.
As reported by The Hill earlier in the day, Clinton gave a "voluntary interview," as it was described by her campaign in a statement released to the media. The meeting took place in Washington, D.C. at the headquarters of the FBI. CNN reported that an official announcement will be made within the next two weeks, to avoid an issue with the upcoming Democratic National Convention. If Clinton were to be indicted, the Democrats could take that into consideration if they decided they wanted to nominate another candidate.
Now, of course this isn't going to make a bit of difference to the Hillary bashers on the right. After all, they decided that Hillary was guilty months ago, and the investigation was just a formality. They already had their narratives all lined up:
Had the FBI decided that Hillary had committed a crime, and needed to be charges with a crime, then the reaction from the right would have been, "See? We tyold you she was a criminal!"
Now that the FBI has determined that she didn't commit a crime, the reaction from the right is going to be, "See? We all knew this corrupt administration was going to cover cor the criminal!"
See how nicely that works out? The hacks on the right don't have to admit they were wrong, or even let the fake scandal drop, because either narrative makes them, regardless of the actual facts.
And you're confusing FOX with the FBI. Well...we'll see. Apparently the FBI isn't going to release their report until after the conventions. I can't wait. I am so sick of this stupid distraction.Wrong. The entire point of the investigation was whether she committed a crime having the servers in her house, or wherever it was she had it, and whether she transmitted classified information. The FBI said, "Nope". So, you can keep calling it "illegal' if you want, no law enforcement investigatory agency agrees with your assessment. Not that that matters to you guys. You know full well that Hillary is going to beat the orangutan-haired Carnival Barker cockslpat hands down, so you're desperate to find a scandal, any scandal, that you can tie her to, to disqualify her from running. Sorry. You tried. You failed. She's running. Trump is toast.You're mixing up your Clinton scandals. The FBI hasn't said there is nothing to see here regarding the State Dept emails illegally kept on Clinton's server.It clearly wasn't illegal since The FBI said, "Nuthin to see here". You guys keep throwing this word "illegal" around, and yet the people who are paid, and trained to recognise crimes have made no such determinations. Like I said, "We have already made up our minds. Please do not try to confuse us with the facts,"
Oh BTW, the Clinton Foundation is being looked into as well.
You are confusing CNN with the FBI...the FBI has issued no such statements as you falsely claim....admit you are a liar and take a hike.
Meanwhile back at the Ranch: FBI drops hints they will indict hillary.................BREAKING NEWS: FBI Drops Hints They Are Ready to INDICT Hillary Clinton!
Breaking: FBI Will Make A HUGE Move Against Hillary Rodham Clinton
...and cleared
Just hours after the Clinton-FBI meeting had wrapped up, word was released that Clinton would not have to worry about charges being filed against her for the possible illegal use of the server, which sent Republican nominee Donald Trump into a frenzy.
As reported by The Hill earlier in the day, Clinton gave a "voluntary interview," as it was described by her campaign in a statement released to the media. The meeting took place in Washington, D.C. at the headquarters of the FBI. CNN reported that an official announcement will be made within the next two weeks, to avoid an issue with the upcoming Democratic National Convention. If Clinton were to be indicted, the Democrats could take that into consideration if they decided they wanted to nominate another candidate.
Now, of course this isn't going to make a bit of difference to the Hillary bashers on the right. After all, they decided that Hillary was guilty months ago, and the investigation was just a formality. They already had their narratives all lined up:
Had the FBI decided that Hillary had committed a crime, and needed to be charges with a crime, then the reaction from the right would have been, "See? We tyold you she was a criminal!"
Now that the FBI has determined that she didn't commit a crime, the reaction from the right is going to be, "See? We all knew this corrupt administration was going to cover cor the criminal!"
See how nicely that works out? The hacks on the right don't have to admit they were wrong, or even let the fake scandal drop, because either narrative makes them
"Just hours after the Clinton-FBI meeting had wrapped up, word was released that Clinton would not have to worry about charges being filed against her for the possible illegal use of the server....."
Who released the words, Hillary or Bill?
...and cleared
Just hours after the Clinton-FBI meeting had wrapped up, word was released that Clinton would not have to worry about charges being filed against her for the possible illegal use of the server, which sent Republican nominee Donald Trump into a frenzy.
As reported by The Hill earlier in the day, Clinton gave a "voluntary interview," as it was described by her campaign in a statement released to the media. The meeting took place in Washington, D.C. at the headquarters of the FBI. CNN reported that an official announcement will be made within the next two weeks, to avoid an issue with the upcoming Democratic National Convention. If Clinton were to be indicted, the Democrats could take that into consideration if they decided they wanted to nominate another candidate.
Now, of course this isn't going to make a bit of difference to the Hillary bashers on the right. After all, they decided that Hillary was guilty months ago, and the investigation was just a formality. They already had their narratives all lined up:
Had the FBI decided that Hillary had committed a crime, and needed to be charges with a crime, then the reaction from the right would have been, "See? We tyold you she was a criminal!"
Now that the FBI has determined that she didn't commit a crime, the reaction from the right is going to be, "See? We all knew this corrupt administration was going to cover cor the criminal!"
See how nicely that works out? The hacks on the right don't have to admit they were wrong, or even let the fake scandal drop, because either narrative makes them
"Just hours after the Clinton-FBI meeting had wrapped up, word was released that Clinton would not have to worry about charges being filed against her for the possible illegal use of the server....."
Who released the words, Hillary or Bill?
It was just CNN spinning and attempting to deceive as usual.
...and cleared
Just hours after the Clinton-FBI meeting had wrapped up, word was released that Clinton would not have to worry about charges being filed against her for the possible illegal use of the server, which sent Republican nominee Donald Trump into a frenzy.
As reported by The Hill earlier in the day, Clinton gave a "voluntary interview," as it was described by her campaign in a statement released to the media. The meeting took place in Washington, D.C. at the headquarters of the FBI. CNN reported that an official announcement will be made within the next two weeks, to avoid an issue with the upcoming Democratic National Convention. If Clinton were to be indicted, the Democrats could take that into consideration if they decided they wanted to nominate another candidate.
Now, of course this isn't going to make a bit of difference to the Hillary bashers on the right. After all, they decided that Hillary was guilty months ago, and the investigation was just a formality. They already had their narratives all lined up:
Had the FBI decided that Hillary had committed a crime, and needed to be charges with a crime, then the reaction from the right would have been, "See? We tyold you she was a criminal!"
Now that the FBI has determined that she didn't commit a crime, the reaction from the right is going to be, "See? We all knew this corrupt administration was going to cover cor the criminal!"
See how nicely that works out? The hacks on the right don't have to admit they were wrong, or even let the fake scandal drop, because either narrative makes them
"Just hours after the Clinton-FBI meeting had wrapped up, word was released that Clinton would not have to worry about charges being filed against her for the possible illegal use of the server....."
Who released the words, Hillary or Bill?
I wonder how many hours were spent on "I don't recall", "I don't know what that is", etc., etc, etc.
I wonder how many hours were spent on "I don't recall", "I don't know what that is", etc., etc, etc.
I wonder was she wiping their servers with the cloth or something...
Personally, I think that anyone that is hoping for an indictment or any sort of serious charges is in for a disappointment.
...and cleared
Just hours after the Clinton-FBI meeting had wrapped up, word was released that Clinton would not have to worry about charges being filed against her for the possible illegal use of the server, which sent Republican nominee Donald Trump into a frenzy.
As reported by The Hill earlier in the day, Clinton gave a "voluntary interview," as it was described by her campaign in a statement released to the media. The meeting took place in Washington, D.C. at the headquarters of the FBI. CNN reported that an official announcement will be made within the next two weeks, to avoid an issue with the upcoming Democratic National Convention. If Clinton were to be indicted, the Democrats could take that into consideration if they decided they wanted to nominate another candidate.
Now, of course this isn't going to make a bit of difference to the Hillary bashers on the right. After all, they decided that Hillary was guilty months ago, and the investigation was just a formality. They already had their narratives all lined up:
Had the FBI decided that Hillary had committed a crime, and needed to be charges with a crime, then the reaction from the right would have been, "See? We tyold you she was a criminal!"
Now that the FBI has determined that she didn't commit a crime, the reaction from the right is going to be, "See? We all knew this corrupt administration was going to cover cor the criminal!"
See how nicely that works out? The hacks on the right don't have to admit they were wrong, or even let the fake scandal drop, because either narrative makes them
And did they get her a Burrito Bowl from Chipotle for lunch?I wonder how many hours were spent on "I don't recall", "I don't know what that is", etc., etc, etc.
I wonder was she wiping their servers with the cloth or something...
And did they get her a Burrito Bowl from Chipotle for lunch?I wonder how many hours were spent on "I don't recall", "I don't know what that is", etc., etc, etc.
I wonder was she wiping their servers with the cloth or something...
Maybe they asked her if she donated to Jeb just to get that guacamole bowl and his secret recipe.
Did any of Hillary's email ever end up on government servers?
Right. Clinton is not a sexual predator who cheated on Hillary and she is not using his name as a platform for her political career.If that's the case then Lynch will allege sexual assault by Hillary's husband.Could this be why Bill was in such a rush to meet with Loretta Lynch...despite all the backlash that generated.
I would guess he had lynch relay a message to obama...something to the effect...if you indict hillary we will reveal stuff you do not want revealed. Just my opinion...I could be wrong.
moron
I can't find anything about Epstein "hanging out" with Trump. Can you point me in the right direction, shitstain
I can't find anything about Epstein "hanging out" with Trump. Can you point me in the right direction, shitstain
You're unaware that Trump is being sued over the rape he allegedly inflicted on an underage girl at one of Epstein's parties? it looks like the fact-filters that your masters have put in place are working well.
Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein Rape Lawsuit and Affidavits
---
Plaintiff Jane Doe, proceeding under a pseudonym, brings this action against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein, and alleges that:
---
That's why once Trump became the nominee, most Republicans instantly dropped the "Bill Clinton is a pedophile!" line. Given Trump's long association of partying with Epstein, and given there's an independent witness to the alleged rape, there's much more evidence to put a pedophile label on Trump, so that line of attack hurts Trump much more.
And yes, given the timing, such stories should be approached with caution. It's why I don't bring it up, except to throw it in the face of a guy trying to paint Clinton as a pedophile. In such a case, it's completely justifiable.
