Hillary Out in 2016. Who Will Dems Run?

[Pogo]

Yeah, he did redefine sex you nitwit. Before the 90's, EVERYONE considered a BJ to be sex. Duh!



So, you agree with everything I said then?



You believe that we should degrade that moral fiber of the nation and practice Machiavellian politics. Nice. Most of us here always did suspect you were always a POS.

here's what I find funny and how republicans are so desperast to be correct... when you looked up sexual relations, Clintons wording, to the public it ment sexual intercourse ... then when you look up the term sexual intercourse it did not have the wording of oral sex in it any where... thats right it wasn't anywhere to be found under the term sexual intercourse or sexual relations....... about 6 months ago I was debating the issue of him lying under oath... that clinton never was convicted of lying under oath ... he was convicted of giving misleading testomoney, which isn't lying under oath ... my whole debate was bassed on the term sexual relation.... the people who change the meaning of words usually come from Texas when it comes to books and dictionaries ... there it was in print ... the republicans added to the diffiniton of sexual intercourse
oral sex ....

still Clinton convictions was giving misleading testomoney and not lying under oath
... it never fails when the want to be right they chand the meaning of what right is....

Maybe he'll shake his finger and scold us about not having sex with that underage girl. Because it depends what is is. lol.

23 years old isn't under age ... if you're going to debate a issue please look it up before opening mount and inserting foot ... MMM'kay!!!!

15 years old is considered underage. Ask that friend of Bill, a certain Mr. Epstein.

my bad again ... maybe you need to be a little more forth coming ... just becasue someone is a past friend doesn't mean that frendship remains ... again I don't know what his friendship with Mr Epsein is now ... I guess if you speak to the KKK and realize later in years thats a bad thing, doesn't make you a KKK supporter ... it make you look like you will do anything for money

Exactly -- how come this is an issue (for a politician already out of office), yet Scalise isn't an issue (for a politician currently IN office)?

Then there's Diaper David Vitter.... oh wait he's still in office too, never mind.

Having it both ways: Priceless

 

[Pogo]

The most entertaining part of this is that the woman herself denies that Bill was ever part of it.

The usual nutters will just say the room was dark.

Or some such blather as that.

AND - they will believe it because if its on the InterWebs and if it supports their idiot agenda, then its just got to be true. So, they'll write emails and send emails to every other rabid RW on their list. They'll post it to Facebook and they'll twit it and reactionary blogs will pick it up. The wing nuts will post about here and others will demand links. Snopes will do a page proving its a lie and normal people will post the link.

Then fox will do a special in depth report on the darkened room and have a panel of "experts" talk about the that now-factual dark room and once again, some dumb lie will become fact.

Next thing we know, it will be printed in Texasss text books.

Don't forget these are the same idiots that went ballistic over Palin being criticized for teaching her tard to climb on dogs to fetch his bottle of Adderal.

Poor howdy doodle getting his panties in a wad.

You start threads worse than this, so if you can't take it don't dish it, what a whiner.

Tu Quoque fallacy. And doesn't alter the fact that this thread is horseshit, has no basis, no link, and can't even explain what the hell it's talking about. Whatever Howie (or anybody else) posted in the past doesn't change that one iota.

BTW, I have no doubt that the slut will get out of the whole mess, this is a tough case and if the slut was smart, he'd pay to get dropped out of the suit. The Democratic pedophile, that is another story, I hope she takes this guy for every penny, he is a disgrace.

"He" who? Who's "this guy"?

Who's the "slut"? What "mess" would she be getting out of?

The slut is Bill Clinton.

Not usually applied to males, but okay... who's the "Democratic pedophile", and who's "she"?
Shouldn't take a day to figure out what a post means...

 

[Carla_Danger]

It's a sexual action people do before sex.

ROFL

What a fucking retard.

THAT is what Slick Willie did to this nation. There are sixth graders going into the bathroom at the local school in my district giving the boys BJ's. You know why? Because today, it's not considered sex. It's only a little more risque' than kissing. We can all thank Clinton for that.

Carla REALLY believes that. It wouldn't surprise me if she is under 35 years of age. It wouldn't surprise me one bit.

Because, well, slick Willie didn't have sex with that woman, right? And Carla believes it. And the sixth graders giving head at that local school believe they are not having sex.

There are also little Christian girls who take abstinence pledges, now giving blow jobs and having anal sex....but hey, they're still virgins!

Virginity pledges don t mean much study says - CNN.com

 

[Carib Gyal]

It's a sexual action people do before sex.

ROFL

What a fucking retard.

THAT is what Slick Willie did to this nation. There are sixth graders going into the bathroom at the local school in my district giving the boys BJ's. You know why? Because today, it's not considered sex. It's only a little more risque' than kissing. We can all thank Clinton for that.

Carla REALLY believes that. It wouldn't surprise me if she is under 35 years of age. It wouldn't surprise me one bit.

Because, well, slick Willie didn't have sex with that woman, right? And Carla believes it. And the sixth graders giving head at that local school believe they are not having sex.

On little st james, 6th graders are taking clinton into the bathroom for bj's

 

[Uncensored2008]

Why do I get the feeling the National Enquirer reading rubes in this topic are actually hoping deep down inside that Clinton had sex with a kid? Actually wishing it is true that some kid was molested? Actually want to believe a former President of the United States of America stained our nation that badly?

Partisanship over country has reached a new low.

Party above all Comrade - we get it.

{Court documents show Mr Clinton was one of many high-profile friends of Epstein to visit his private island and fly on his jet, and that Epstein's phone directory showed he had 21 phone numbers for Mr Clinton or his aides.The documents suggest no wrong-doing on Mr Clinton's behalf, but they have set off speculation – particularly on the part of conservative online media – about the potential impact of the scandal on Hillary Clinton's presumed run for the White House."Bubba and the Palm Beach Pedophile" screams a headline on the Drudge Report, the conservative blog made famous by its Monica Lewinsky scandal revelations, in a headline today.}

Bill Clinton drawn into Prince Andrew sex scandal

 

[Pogo]

So much controversy and dispute and confusion about who's running for (D) President, I don't honestly know who will run, due to the conspiracy's that many Democrats will run. I just want a Republican to win.

Sorry, this logic makes about as much sense as the "RINO/DINO" concept. You're more interested in your team scoring points than your country? Fuck that.

 

[Papageorgio]

I wouldn't know, they nailed one story a few years back, but like I said earlier the source is suspect. I do know Clinton posed with a couple of hookers and I figured women rights group would hate the exploitation of women but since he is a Democrat, I'm sure you and others will give the slut a pass.

I promise I won't vote for him.

I wouldn't vote for him but the Democrats like to tie the spouse and kids to the candidate. I guess they will be different since Bill isn't going to have any influence in the WH if Hilly wins.

That's a big stretch since you've already admitted you have nothing on him. LOL!

continue on...

Carla, if this were a Palin, or another Republican you'd be all over it, if you tell me you would not, I'd say your were dishonest.

But people will try, right or wrong to tie this to Hillary, to assume it is all true, just like anything Walker in was accused of in Wisconsin, I'm still waiting for the indictments to be handed down, and have been for four years. Palin was said to be tied to illegal activity while governor of Alaska, waiting for those indictments to be handed down. Still waiting on a birth certificate on Obama, like that is ever going to happen, then you have Benghazi and I'm still waiting there. Proof that Bush fixed Ohio in 2004, or the illegal activity around the 2000 elections and it goes on and on, a lot of nothing yet each side claims the crazy ideas. Both sides play the game and you can bet if Hilly runs they will dig this crap up, do Bill and Hillary want to go through all that?
If I were them, I'd run away and live in peace.

They have nothing but neither side had anything against Bush, Palin, Walker, Obama and on and on, it doesn't stop the partisan crap.

Why are you lumping multiple issues/stories together? You do that a lot.

Lets try to remember why we're here. This is all over a tabloid article.

If this were about Sarah Palin, I would have nothing to say about it, just like when the National Enquirer put out this headline.

I completely ignored that headline. Nope, you won't fine one thread with me accusing Sarah Palin of having an affair.

I suggest you ignore tabloids. Yep, that is my suggestion.

Thank you for your suggestion and thank you for admitting you are a partisan hack.

Again, you are not comprehending, I don't think the story is true, I do think Bill is a slut, I don't think he had sex with a minor.

This is a story that goes with a bunch of silly issues, like the Benghazi which you first mentioned earlier in the thread, don't know why you would bring that up and then get upset with me bringing in other issues. IMHO, you are entitled to yours.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Wow. Looks like a new low for the Right Wing just when you thought they couldn't get any lower.

RIGHT - circle those wagons. Pedophilia is no big deal, Tea Baggers just want to criminalize a bit of fun..

Party above all Comrade..

 

[MisterBeale]

here's what I find funny and how republicans are so desperast to be correct... when you looked up sexual relations, Clintons wording, to the public it ment sexual intercourse ... then when you look up the term sexual intercourse it did not have the wording of oral sex in it any where... thats right it wasn't anywhere to be found under the term sexual intercourse or sexual relations....... about 6 months ago I was debating the issue of him lying under oath... that clinton never was convicted of lying under oath ... he was convicted of giving misleading testomoney, which isn't lying under oath ... my whole debate was bassed on the term sexual relation.... the people who change the meaning of words usually come from Texas when it comes to books and dictionaries ... there it was in print ... the republicans added to the diffiniton of sexual intercourse
oral sex ....

still Clinton convictions was giving misleading testomoney and not lying under oath
... it never fails when the want to be right they chand the meaning of what right is....

Maybe he'll shake his finger and scold us about not having sex with that underage girl. Because it depends what is is. lol.

23 years old isn't under age ... if you're going to debate a issue please look it up before opening mount and inserting foot ... MMM'kay!!!!

15 years old is considered underage. Ask that friend of Bill, a certain Mr. Epstein.

my bad again ... maybe you need to be a little more forth coming ... just becasue someone is a past friend doesn't mean that frendship remains ... again I don't know what his friendship with Mr Epsein is now ... I guess if you speak to the KKK and realize later in years thats a bad thing, doesn't make you a KKK supporter ... it make you look like you will do anything for money

Exactly -- how come this is an issue (for a politician already out of office), yet Scalise isn't an issue (for a politician currently IN office)?

Then there's Diaper David Vitter.... oh wait he's still in office too, never mind.

Having it both ways: Priceless

All megalomaniac elites should be kicked to the curb, regardless of party.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Why do I get the feeling the National Enquirer reading rubes in this topic are actually hoping deep down inside that Clinton had sex with a kid? Actually wishing it is true that some kid was molested? Actually want to believe a former President of the United States of America stained our nation that badly?

Partisanship over country has reached a new low.

Party above all Comrade - we get it.

{Court documents show Mr Clinton was one of many high-profile friends of Epstein to visit his private island and fly on his jet, and that Epstein's phone directory showed he had 21 phone numbers for Mr Clinton or his aides.The documents suggest no wrong-doing on Mr Clinton's behalf, but they have set off speculation – particularly on the part of conservative online media – about the potential impact of the scandal on Hillary Clinton's presumed run for the White House."Bubba and the Palm Beach Pedophile" screams a headline on the Drudge Report, the conservative blog made famous by its Monica Lewinsky scandal revelations, in a headline today.}

Bill Clinton drawn into Prince Andrew sex scandal

You let us know when a credible news source reports on this story, okay?

 

[Papageorgio]

The usual nutters will just say the room was dark.

Or some such blather as that.

AND - they will believe it because if its on the InterWebs and if it supports their idiot agenda, then its just got to be true. So, they'll write emails and send emails to every other rabid RW on their list. They'll post it to Facebook and they'll twit it and reactionary blogs will pick it up. The wing nuts will post about here and others will demand links. Snopes will do a page proving its a lie and normal people will post the link.

Then fox will do a special in depth report on the darkened room and have a panel of "experts" talk about the that now-factual dark room and once again, some dumb lie will become fact.

Next thing we know, it will be printed in Texasss text books.

Don't forget these are the same idiots that went ballistic over Palin being criticized for teaching her tard to climb on dogs to fetch his bottle of Adderal.

Poor howdy doodle getting his panties in a wad.

You start threads worse than this, so if you can't take it don't dish it, what a whiner.

Tu Quoque fallacy. And doesn't alter the fact that this thread is horseshit, has no basis, no link, and can't even explain what the hell it's talking about. Whatever Howie (or anybody else) posted in the past doesn't change that one iota.

BTW, I have no doubt that the slut will get out of the whole mess, this is a tough case and if the slut was smart, he'd pay to get dropped out of the suit. The Democratic pedophile, that is another story, I hope she takes this guy for every penny, he is a disgrace.

"He" who? Who's "this guy"?

Who's the "slut"? What "mess" would she be getting out of?

The slut is Bill Clinton.

Not usually applied to males, but okay... who's the "Democratic pedophile", and who's "she"?
Shouldn't take a day to figure out what a post means...

Slut is appropriate, why wouldn't it be? I apply the word to those that are.

 

[Uncensored2008]

OMG!! HE FLEW ON PLANES!?!!

That's bad, right?

I've flown on planes. Am I in trouble?

You flew on planes to private islands stocked with sex slaves?

You're such a partisan retard...

 

[Pogo]

Well, please let me know when a credible news source covers this story. The National Enquirer also said that Bigfoot held a lumberjack as a sex slave, Macaulay Culkin has months to live, Hillary Clinton adopts an alien baby, and of course there was news of Elvis sightings.

I wouldn't know, they nailed one story a few years back, but like I said earlier the source is suspect. I do know Clinton posed with a couple of hookers and I figured women rights group would hate the exploitation of women but since he is a Democrat, I'm sure you and others will give the slut a pass.

I promise I won't vote for him.

I wouldn't vote for him but the Democrats like to tie the spouse and kids to the candidate. I guess they will be different since Bill isn't going to have any influence in the WH if Hilly wins.

That's a big stretch since you've already admitted you have nothing on him. LOL!

continue on...

Carla, if this were a Palin, or another Republican you'd be all over it, if you tell me you would not, I'd say your were dishonest.

But people will try, right or wrong to tie this to Hillary, to assume it is all true, just like anything Walker in was accused of in Wisconsin, I'm still waiting for the indictments to be handed down, and have been for four years. Palin was said to be tied to illegal activity while governor of Alaska, waiting for those indictments to be handed down. Still waiting on a birth certificate on Obama, like that is ever going to happen, then you have Benghazi and I'm still waiting there. Proof that Bush fixed Ohio in 2004, or the illegal activity around the 2000 elections and it goes on and on, a lot of nothing yet each side claims the crazy ideas. Both sides play the game and you can bet if Hilly runs they will dig this crap up, do Bill and Hillary want to go through all that?
If I were them, I'd run away and live in peace.

They have nothing but neither side had anything against Bush, Palin, Walker, Obama and on and on, it doesn't stop the partisan crap.

And it didn't stop Bush, Palin, Walker, Obama on and on from running (and except for Palin, winning) either, did it?
Btw you already got two O'bama birth certificates, one long, one short. Going doesn't make 'em never have happened.

So ... wait, you're actually trying to suggest that, because her husband --- not Hillary, her husband -- is named in a suit -- which anyone can do and proves nothing --- and a suit where he's not even described as doing anything unsavory --- that that guilt-by-association fallacy on him, becomes a guilt-by-association fallacy on her????

How stupid do you think people are? Not counting the OP I mean.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[


You let us know when a credible news source reports on this story, okay?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

What a fucking retard.

 

[deaddogseye]

Hilary is running and this time she will be the nominee.

 

[Pogo]

Don't forget these are the same idiots that went ballistic over Palin being criticized for teaching her tard to climb on dogs to fetch his bottle of Adderal.

Poor howdy doodle getting his panties in a wad.

You start threads worse than this, so if you can't take it don't dish it, what a whiner.

Tu Quoque fallacy. And doesn't alter the fact that this thread is horseshit, has no basis, no link, and can't even explain what the hell it's talking about. Whatever Howie (or anybody else) posted in the past doesn't change that one iota.

BTW, I have no doubt that the slut will get out of the whole mess, this is a tough case and if the slut was smart, he'd pay to get dropped out of the suit. The Democratic pedophile, that is another story, I hope she takes this guy for every penny, he is a disgrace.

"He" who? Who's "this guy"?

Who's the "slut"? What "mess" would she be getting out of?

The slut is Bill Clinton.

Not usually applied to males, but okay... who's the "Democratic pedophile", and who's "she"?
Shouldn't take a day to figure out what a post means...

Slut is appropriate, why wouldn't it be? I apply the word to those that are.

Because the definition is:

slut
slət/
noun
derogatory
noun: slut; plural noun: sluts

1. 1.
   a woman who has many casual sexual partners.
   synonyms: promiscuous woman, prostitute, whore;More
   informalfloozy, tramp, hooker, hustler;
   datedtart, scarlet woman, loose woman, hussy, trollop;
   archaicharlot, strumpet, wanton
   "she dressed like a slut and didn't act much better"
2. 2.
   dated
   a woman with low standards of cleanliness.

Are you maybe new to English?

 

[Carla_Danger]

I promise I won't vote for him.

I wouldn't vote for him but the Democrats like to tie the spouse and kids to the candidate. I guess they will be different since Bill isn't going to have any influence in the WH if Hilly wins.

That's a big stretch since you've already admitted you have nothing on him. LOL!

continue on...

Carla, if this were a Palin, or another Republican you'd be all over it, if you tell me you would not, I'd say your were dishonest.

But people will try, right or wrong to tie this to Hillary, to assume it is all true, just like anything Walker in was accused of in Wisconsin, I'm still waiting for the indictments to be handed down, and have been for four years. Palin was said to be tied to illegal activity while governor of Alaska, waiting for those indictments to be handed down. Still waiting on a birth certificate on Obama, like that is ever going to happen, then you have Benghazi and I'm still waiting there. Proof that Bush fixed Ohio in 2004, or the illegal activity around the 2000 elections and it goes on and on, a lot of nothing yet each side claims the crazy ideas. Both sides play the game and you can bet if Hilly runs they will dig this crap up, do Bill and Hillary want to go through all that?
If I were them, I'd run away and live in peace.

They have nothing but neither side had anything against Bush, Palin, Walker, Obama and on and on, it doesn't stop the partisan crap.

Why are you lumping multiple issues/stories together? You do that a lot.

Lets try to remember why we're here. This is all over a tabloid article.

If this were about Sarah Palin, I would have nothing to say about it, just like when the National Enquirer put out this headline.

I completely ignored that headline. Nope, you won't fine one thread with me accusing Sarah Palin of having an affair.

I suggest you ignore tabloids. Yep, that is my suggestion.

Thank you for your suggestion and thank you for admitting you are a partisan hack.

Again, you are not comprehending, I don't think the story is true, I do think Bill is a slut, I don't think he had sex with a minor.

This is a story that goes with a bunch of silly issues, like the Benghazi which you first mentioned earlier in the thread, don't know why you would bring that up and then get upset with me bringing in other issues. IMHO, you are entitled to yours.

Then what the fuck are you bellowing about?

 

[Papageorgio]

So much controversy and dispute and confusion about who's running for (D) President, I don't honestly know who will run, due to the conspiracy's that many Democrats will run. I just want a Republican to win.

Sorry, this logic makes about as much sense as the "RINO/DINO" concept. You're more interested in your team scoring points than your country? Fuck that.

LOL! You are funny, you are honestly saying you would consider voting for a R over a D in a Presidential election? I find that very difficult to believe.

 

[Uncensored2008]

And it didn't stop Bush, Palin, Walker, Obama on and on from running (and except for Palin, winning) either, did it?
Btw you already got two O'bama birth certificates, one long, one short. Going doesn't make 'em never have happened.

So ... wait, you're actually trying to suggest that, because her husband --- not Hillary, her husband -- is named in a suit -- which anyone can do and proves nothing --- a suit where he's not even described as doing anything unsavory --- that that guilt-by-association fallacy on him, becomes a guilt-by-association fallacy on her????

How stupid do you think people are?

What you should do Huffer, is hold your breath until the meanies on the right stop bringing up things that hurt your precious party.

{The estate belonged to New York financier Jeffrey Epstein — a sex offenderonce linked with former president Bill Clinton, Nobel Prize-winning scientists, Kevin Spacey and British royalty. A stream of young girls allegedly flitted in and out of the house in the mid-aughts, attending naked pool parties and, police records showed, dispensing massages to Epstein and other guests.}

The prince and the sex offender Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein 8217 s mysterious relationship - The Washington Post

 

[g5000]

None of the girls has accused Clinton of having sex with them, much less accusing of being forced to have sex with Clinton.

They have accused many other leading political figures, but not Clinton. Clinton's name is not on the list of accused.

So I would strongly suggest you sick little retards stop your mental masturbations.