Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
Then what the fuck are you bellowing about?
Are you on the ground pounding your fists and wailing?
![maxresdefault.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia1.annabrixthomsen.com%2F2014%2F01%2Fmaxresdefault.jpg&hash=16e68b3a0d8044035a65c48b63681c21)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then what the fuck are you bellowing about?
He denied Lewinsky, shook his finger at the entire world and flat out denied it. It was simply a case of what he said against what she said, and who could prove otherwise? Until the dress. The blue fucking dress. Who could foresee the stupid whore would save the dress?Exhibit A:
Bill Clinton's immorality and sexual abuse of underage girls.
This is exactly what Beale's masters want him to believe without actually saying such a thing directly. They have become very good at getting these tards to believe anything while avoiding making direct allegations so as to avoid a libel lawsuit.
So here's the tard's "evidence". Nothing more than a link. The tards never provide a quote from their links to support their manufactured bullshit:
Upon actually...you know...READING the link, we find:
Yet Virginia Roberts stresses that she was never ‘lent out’ to Mr Clinton.
That doesn't stop the tards from imagining exactly what their masters want them to imagine as real.
Nothing is manurfactured for those with intelligence. Those who judge the present extropolate from the past.
WHY would Mr. Clinton be hanging out with a 15 year old? For her brilliant views on politics?
Frankly, I don't care what the elite controlled press claims, nor do I care what Mr. Clinton or what Virginia Roberts actually claim went on. I don't need a stained dress to know what slick Willie was there for. I'm not obtuse. I know what the whole thing was set up for.
Do I think he had coitus with that girl? Of course I don't, that's how old Billy boy continues to set up plausible deniability. What I do know, is that whatever he did with her, I am sure you wouldn't want him doing with your 15 year old daughter/ grand daughter/ niece, etc.
The common defense started out as her being a liar, a young woman fantasizing about the virile stud. Then it turned into, so what, so he cheated on his wife.
With this new scandal, it's all a lie. Let's see what, if anything, develops.
I wouldn't vote for him but the Democrats like to tie the spouse and kids to the candidate. I guess they will be different since Bill isn't going to have any influence in the WH if Hilly wins.
That's a big stretch since you've already admitted you have nothing on him. LOL!
continue on...
Carla, if this were a Palin, or another Republican you'd be all over it, if you tell me you would not, I'd say your were dishonest.
But people will try, right or wrong to tie this to Hillary, to assume it is all true, just like anything Walker in was accused of in Wisconsin, I'm still waiting for the indictments to be handed down, and have been for four years. Palin was said to be tied to illegal activity while governor of Alaska, waiting for those indictments to be handed down. Still waiting on a birth certificate on Obama, like that is ever going to happen, then you have Benghazi and I'm still waiting there. Proof that Bush fixed Ohio in 2004, or the illegal activity around the 2000 elections and it goes on and on, a lot of nothing yet each side claims the crazy ideas. Both sides play the game and you can bet if Hilly runs they will dig this crap up, do Bill and Hillary want to go through all that?
If I were them, I'd run away and live in peace.
They have nothing but neither side had anything against Bush, Palin, Walker, Obama and on and on, it doesn't stop the partisan crap.
Why are you lumping multiple issues/stories together? You do that a lot.
Lets try to remember why we're here. This is all over a tabloid article.
If this were about Sarah Palin, I would have nothing to say about it, just like when the National Enquirer put out this headline.
![]()
I completely ignored that headline. Nope, you won't fine one thread with me accusing Sarah Palin of having an affair.
I suggest you ignore tabloids. Yep, that is my suggestion.
Thank you for your suggestion and thank you for admitting you are a partisan hack.
Again, you are not comprehending, I don't think the story is true, I do think Bill is a slut, I don't think he had sex with a minor.
This is a story that goes with a bunch of silly issues, like the Benghazi which you first mentioned earlier in the thread, don't know why you would bring that up and then get upset with me bringing in other issues. IMHO, you are entitled to yours.
Then what the fuck are you bellowing about?
None of the girls has accused Clinton of having sex with them, much less accusing of being forced to have sex with Clinton.
They have accused many other leading political figures, but not Clinton. Clinton's name is not on the list of accused.
So I would strongly suggest you sick little retards stop your mental masturbations.
Shoulda though of that before you put up a wank thread that can't even essplain itself, shouldn't you have?
He's a bigger dumbass than the one now.How great would Biden be
Wow. Looks like a new low for the Right Wing just when you thought they couldn't get any lower.
RIGHT - circle those wagons. Pedophilia is no big deal, Tea Baggers just want to criminalize a bit of fun..
Party above all Comrade..
THAT is what Slick Willie did to this nation. There are sixth graders going into the bathroom at the local school in my district giving the boys BJ's. You know why? Because today, it's not considered sex. It's only a little more risque' than kissing. We can all thank Clinton for that.It's a sexual action people do before sex.
ROFL
What a fucking retard.
Carla REALLY believes that. It wouldn't surprise me if she is under 35 years of age. It wouldn't surprise me one bit.
Because, well, slick Willie didn't have sex with that woman, right? And Carla believes it. And the sixth graders giving head at that local school believe they are not having sex.
There are also little Christian girls who take abstinence pledges, now giving blow jobs and having anal sex....but hey, they're still virgins!
Virginity pledges don t mean much study says - CNN.com
"If you talk to teens [about oral sex] they'll tell you it's not a big deal," Azam said. "In fact, they don't consider it sex. They don't consider a lot of things sex."
I did. That's why I already know what the common defense will be when the blue dress appears.He denied Lewinsky, shook his finger at the entire world and flat out denied it. It was simply a case of what he said against what she said, and who could prove otherwise? Until the dress. The blue fucking dress. Who could foresee the stupid whore would save the dress?Exhibit A:
Bill Clinton's immorality and sexual abuse of underage girls.
This is exactly what Beale's masters want him to believe without actually saying such a thing directly. They have become very good at getting these tards to believe anything while avoiding making direct allegations so as to avoid a libel lawsuit.
So here's the tard's "evidence". Nothing more than a link. The tards never provide a quote from their links to support their manufactured bullshit:
Upon actually...you know...READING the link, we find:
Yet Virginia Roberts stresses that she was never ‘lent out’ to Mr Clinton.
That doesn't stop the tards from imagining exactly what their masters want them to imagine as real.
Nothing is manurfactured for those with intelligence. Those who judge the present extropolate from the past.
WHY would Mr. Clinton be hanging out with a 15 year old? For her brilliant views on politics?
Frankly, I don't care what the elite controlled press claims, nor do I care what Mr. Clinton or what Virginia Roberts actually claim went on. I don't need a stained dress to know what slick Willie was there for. I'm not obtuse. I know what the whole thing was set up for.
Do I think he had coitus with that girl? Of course I don't, that's how old Billy boy continues to set up plausible deniability. What I do know, is that whatever he did with her, I am sure you wouldn't want him doing with your 15 year old daughter/ grand daughter/ niece, etc.
The common defense started out as her being a liar, a young woman fantasizing about the virile stud. Then it turned into, so what, so he cheated on his wife.
With this new scandal, it's all a lie. Let's see what, if anything, develops.
Shoulda though of that before you put up a wank thread that can't even essplain itself, shouldn't you have?
None of the girls has accused Clinton of having sex with them, much less accusing of being forced to have sex with Clinton.
They have accused many other leading political figures, but not Clinton. Clinton's name is not on the list of accused.
So I would strongly suggest you sick little retards stop your mental masturbations.
And it didn't stop Bush, Palin, Walker, Obama on and on from running (and except for Palin, winning) either, did it?
Btw you already got two O'bama birth certificates, one long, one short. Goingdoesn't make 'em never have happened.
So ... wait, you're actually trying to suggest that, because her husband --- not Hillary, her husband -- is named in a suit -- which anyone can do and proves nothing --- a suit where he's not even described as doing anything unsavory --- that that guilt-by-association fallacy on him, becomes a guilt-by-association fallacy on her????
How stupid do you think people are?
What you should do Huffer, is hold your breath until the meanies on the right stop bringing up things that hurt your precious party.
{The estate belonged to New York financier Jeffrey Epstein — a sex offenderonce linked with former president Bill Clinton, Nobel Prize-winning scientists, Kevin Spacey and British royalty. A stream of young girls allegedly flitted in and out of the house in the mid-aughts, attending naked pool parties and, police records showed, dispensing massages to Epstein and other guests.}
The prince and the sex offender Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein 8217 s mysterious relationship - The Washington Post
I did. That's why I already know what the common defense will be when the blue dress appears.He denied Lewinsky, shook his finger at the entire world and flat out denied it. It was simply a case of what he said against what she said, and who could prove otherwise? Until the dress. The blue fucking dress. Who could foresee the stupid whore would save the dress?Exhibit A:
Bill Clinton's immorality and sexual abuse of underage girls.
This is exactly what Beale's masters want him to believe without actually saying such a thing directly. They have become very good at getting these tards to believe anything while avoiding making direct allegations so as to avoid a libel lawsuit.
So here's the tard's "evidence". Nothing more than a link. The tards never provide a quote from their links to support their manufactured bullshit:
Upon actually...you know...READING the link, we find:
Yet Virginia Roberts stresses that she was never ‘lent out’ to Mr Clinton.
That doesn't stop the tards from imagining exactly what their masters want them to imagine as real.
Nothing is manurfactured for those with intelligence. Those who judge the present extropolate from the past.
WHY would Mr. Clinton be hanging out with a 15 year old? For her brilliant views on politics?
Frankly, I don't care what the elite controlled press claims, nor do I care what Mr. Clinton or what Virginia Roberts actually claim went on. I don't need a stained dress to know what slick Willie was there for. I'm not obtuse. I know what the whole thing was set up for.
Do I think he had coitus with that girl? Of course I don't, that's how old Billy boy continues to set up plausible deniability. What I do know, is that whatever he did with her, I am sure you wouldn't want him doing with your 15 year old daughter/ grand daughter/ niece, etc.
The common defense started out as her being a liar, a young woman fantasizing about the virile stud. Then it turned into, so what, so he cheated on his wife.
With this new scandal, it's all a lie. Let's see what, if anything, develops.
Shoulda though of that before you put up a wank thread that can't even essplain itself, shouldn't you have?![]()
The prince and the sex offender Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein 8217 s mysterious relationship - The Washington Post
The estate belonged to New York financier Jeffrey Epstein — a sex offender once linked with former president Bill Clinton, Nobel Prize-winning scientists, Kevin Spacey and British royalty. A stream of young girls allegedly flitted in and out of the house in the mid-aughts, attending naked pool parties and, police records showed, dispensing massages to Epstein and other guests.
Jeffrey Epstein from high school teacher to billionaire money man of mystery
a little background on the lead of this story
Prince Andrew claims lurid account from alleged sex slave
Prince Andrews apparent involvement
Bill Clinton drawn into Prince Andrew sex scandal
And Bill Clinton's involvement with this pedophile, and also Alan Dershowitz
smh...
From your Washington Post link I learned that he flew on planes with Spacey and Clinton in 2002.
Thank you, that was enlightening.
OMG!! HE FLEW ON PLANES!?!!
![]()
That's bad, right?
I've flown on planes. Am I in trouble?
You might be in trouble. Did you fly on a plane in 2002? Hummm?
And it didn't stop Bush, Palin, Walker, Obama on and on from running (and except for Palin, winning) either, did it?
Btw you already got two O'bama birth certificates, one long, one short. Goingdoesn't make 'em never have happened.
So ... wait, you're actually trying to suggest that, because her husband --- not Hillary, her husband -- is named in a suit -- which anyone can do and proves nothing --- a suit where he's not even described as doing anything unsavory --- that that guilt-by-association fallacy on him, becomes a guilt-by-association fallacy on her????
How stupid do you think people are?
What you should do Huffer, is hold your breath until the meanies on the right stop bringing up things that hurt your precious party.
{The estate belonged to New York financier Jeffrey Epstein — a sex offenderonce linked with former president Bill Clinton, Nobel Prize-winning scientists, Kevin Spacey and British royalty. A stream of young girls allegedly flitted in and out of the house in the mid-aughts, attending naked pool parties and, police records showed, dispensing massages to Epstein and other guests.}
The prince and the sex offender Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein 8217 s mysterious relationship - The Washington Post
The prince and the sex offender Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein 8217 s mysterious relationship - The Washington Post
The estate belonged to New York financier Jeffrey Epstein — a sex offender once linked with former president Bill Clinton, Nobel Prize-winning scientists, Kevin Spacey and British royalty. A stream of young girls allegedly flitted in and out of the house in the mid-aughts, attending naked pool parties and, police records showed, dispensing massages to Epstein and other guests.
smh...
From your Washington Post link I learned that he flew on planes with Spacey and Clinton in 2002.
Thank you, that was enlightening.
OMG!! HE FLEW ON PLANES!?!!
![]()
That's bad, right?
I've flown on planes. Am I in trouble?
You might be in trouble. Did you fly on a plane in 2002? Hummm?
Oh shit oh shit oh shit!!![]()
I did, and if that plane had a flight attendant who lived in Arkansas during the Clinton governor years, that means my grand niece's babysitter's co-worker is forever tainted and can never run for office!!
I really fucked up huh.![]()
It was the proof that got a married man impeached. Not that you would know what it is to be married.I did. That's why I already know what the common defense will be when the blue dress appears.He denied Lewinsky, shook his finger at the entire world and flat out denied it. It was simply a case of what he said against what she said, and who could prove otherwise? Until the dress. The blue fucking dress. Who could foresee the stupid whore would save the dress?Exhibit A:
This is exactly what Beale's masters want him to believe without actually saying such a thing directly. They have become very good at getting these tards to believe anything while avoiding making direct allegations so as to avoid a libel lawsuit.
So here's the tard's "evidence". Nothing more than a link. The tards never provide a quote from their links to support their manufactured bullshit:
Upon actually...you know...READING the link, we find:
That doesn't stop the tards from imagining exactly what their masters want them to imagine as real.
Nothing is manurfactured for those with intelligence. Those who judge the present extropolate from the past.
WHY would Mr. Clinton be hanging out with a 15 year old? For her brilliant views on politics?
Frankly, I don't care what the elite controlled press claims, nor do I care what Mr. Clinton or what Virginia Roberts actually claim went on. I don't need a stained dress to know what slick Willie was there for. I'm not obtuse. I know what the whole thing was set up for.
Do I think he had coitus with that girl? Of course I don't, that's how old Billy boy continues to set up plausible deniability. What I do know, is that whatever he did with her, I am sure you wouldn't want him doing with your 15 year old daughter/ grand daughter/ niece, etc.
The common defense started out as her being a liar, a young woman fantasizing about the virile stud. Then it turned into, so what, so he cheated on his wife.
With this new scandal, it's all a lie. Let's see what, if anything, develops.
Shoulda though of that before you put up a wank thread that can't even essplain itself, shouldn't you have?![]()
You must be an old hag. The younger generation doesn't give two shits about the blue dress.
You let us know when a credible news source reports on this story, okay?
And it didn't stop Bush, Palin, Walker, Obama on and on from running (and except for Palin, winning) either, did it?
Btw you already got two O'bama birth certificates, one long, one short. Goingdoesn't make 'em never have happened.
So ... wait, you're actually trying to suggest that, because her husband --- not Hillary, her husband -- is named in a suit -- which anyone can do and proves nothing --- a suit where he's not even described as doing anything unsavory --- that that guilt-by-association fallacy on him, becomes a guilt-by-association fallacy on her????
How stupid do you think people are?
What you should do Huffer, is hold your breath until the meanies on the right stop bringing up things that hurt your precious party.
{The estate belonged to New York financier Jeffrey Epstein — a sex offenderonce linked with former president Bill Clinton, Nobel Prize-winning scientists, Kevin Spacey and British royalty. A stream of young girls allegedly flitted in and out of the house in the mid-aughts, attending naked pool parties and, police records showed, dispensing massages to Epstein and other guests.}
The prince and the sex offender Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein 8217 s mysterious relationship - The Washington Post
From your link...
Donald Trump was Epstein’s pal at that time. “He’s a lot of fun to be with,” Trump said. “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”
All it says about Clinton was that they rode on a plane in 2002.
Your link is very enlightening! It says he flew on planes with Spacey and Clinton in 2002. Hold the phone!
Wow. Looks like a new low for the Right Wing just when you thought they couldn't get any lower.
RIGHT - circle those wagons. Pedophilia is no big deal, Tea Baggers just want to criminalize a bit of fun..
Party above all Comrade..
From your link...
Donald Trump was Epstein’s pal at that time. “He’s a lot of fun to be with,” Trump said. “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”
All it says about Clinton was that they rode on a plane in 2002.