Don't know. Just looked it up. average +23 for Clinton. Nothing for Trump in Tn. Got the Clinton vs Trump....+11 for Trump.
Last edited:
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
How Brazen?
- Thread starter DarkFury
- Start date
JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,767
- 2,220
Trump gets things done.Word just out. Trump spent 1.78 million for his win.And I would say it WAS resolved, since the government kept the property the Clintons tried to steal!!!!!Lol, remember when Hillary took things from the White House when she and Bill left? They took china and all kinds of things that they had to return. Here they are multimillionaires, and they steal from the White House! Incredible!
Clintons take furniture and china from White House! - Saferbrowser Yahoo Search Results
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
WASHINGTON — President Clinton and his wife started shipping White House furniture to the Clintons' newly purchased home in New York more than a year ago, despite questions at the time by the White House chief usher about whether they were entitled to remove the items.
The day before the items were shipped out, chief usher Gary Walters said he questioned whether the Clintons should be taking the furnishings because he believed they were government property donated as part of a White House redecoration project in 1993, during Clinton's first year in office.
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
Not that facts matter to you RWNJ traitors and liars ...
Clintons Return White House Furniture
Former President Clinton and his wife, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, have sent $28,000 worth of household goods back to Washington after questions arose over whether the items were intended as personal gifts or donations to the White House.
“We have been informed that it is being shipped back, and the National Park Service is ready to receive it, take possession of it and take custody of it,” Jim McDaniel, the National Park Service’s liaison to the White House, said Wednesday.
“The property is being returned to government custody until such time that the issues can be resolved. It may well turn out that that property is rightly the personal property of the Clintons.”
Hillary spent 12 million to squeak by.
Donald Trump spent less then half FAR LESS then the Gov of that state {SC} did for theirs.
And since Hillary only won a little over 5,000 votes, while Trump won 240,000, I would say that exemplifies the effectiveness of a businessman who does construction vrs a life time politician in terms of bang/buck.
Arizona is pulling at the chain to ELECT Trump.
How's he doing where you live?
Here in Virginia Trump is at 28% according to latest poll. Rubio at 22%, Cruz at 19%
http://cnu.edu/cpp/pdf/feb 16 2016 report-_final.pdf
It is of 'certain' primary voters, but Trump has a lot of support among first time voters and mushy voters.
Viral image claims Clintons stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White HouseLol, remember when Hillary took things from the White House when she and Bill left? They took china and all kinds of things that they had to return. Here they are multimillionaires, and they steal from the White House! Incredible!
After they were criticized for taking $190,000 worth of china, flatware, rugs, televisions, sofas and other gifts with them when they left, the Clintons announced last week that they would pay for $86,000 worth of gifts, or nearly half the amount.
Their latest decision to send back $28,000 in gifts brings to $114,000 the value of items the Clintons have either decided to pay for or return.
McDaniel discussed the matter Wednesday with Betty Monkman, the White House curator, and Gary Walters, the chief usher, or executive manager of the White House.
They were reviewing the gifts the Clintons chose to keep after $28,000 worth of items were found on a list of donations the Park Service received for the 1993 White House redecoration project. The Washington Post this week quoted three people who said that they assumed the furnishings they donated for the project would stay in the White House.
“As a result of questions about the status of certain property donated to the White House during the Clinton administration, the National Park Service will accept the return of the property in question and act as a custodian of such property,” according to a statement released by the Park Service, which administers the White House as a unit of the national park system.
A person familiar with the Clintons’ move out of the White House, who spoke on condition of anonymity, would say only: “They’ve been returned.”
Furniture Movers
Clintons take furniture and china from White House! - Saferbrowser Yahoo Search Results
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
WASHINGTON — President Clinton and his wife started shipping White House furniture to the Clintons' newly purchased home in New York more than a year ago, despite questions at the time by the White House chief usher about whether they were entitled to remove the items.
The day before the items were shipped out, chief usher Gary Walters said he questioned whether the Clintons should be taking the furnishings because he believed they were government property donated as part of a White House redecoration project in 1993, during Clinton's first year in office.
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
Our ruling
A viral graphic said that Hillary Clinton was forced to return about $200,000 worth of furniture, artwork and china that she had stolen from the White House. The statement contains several inaccuracies.
The Clintons returned about $48,000 in furniture, and they paid the government about $86,000 for other items. Any way you count it, the $200,000 figure is too high.
According to top ethics lawyers, it’s at least debatable -- and at worst hyperbolic -- to say the Clintons "stole" the items. A congressional investigation found poor tracking of ownership and final disposition of gifts, which makes it hard to speak definitively of wrongdoing. In fact, two items the Clintons returned were ultimately sent back to them. Finally, it’s worth making clear that the "force" they responded to was political pressure, not legal jeopardy.
Accusations of stealing are serious and require a high threshold of evidence, unmet by the charges in this over-the-top graphic.
We rate the claim Mostly False.
Thank you for the information. But it remains that the Clinton's returned $134,000 of the gifts and money meant to stay in the White House. That's nothing to sneeze at.Viral image claims Clintons stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White HouseLol, remember when Hillary took things from the White House when she and Bill left? They took china and all kinds of things that they had to return. Here they are multimillionaires, and they steal from the White House! Incredible!
After they were criticized for taking $190,000 worth of china, flatware, rugs, televisions, sofas and other gifts with them when they left, the Clintons announced last week that they would pay for $86,000 worth of gifts, or nearly half the amount.
Their latest decision to send back $28,000 in gifts brings to $114,000 the value of items the Clintons have either decided to pay for or return.
McDaniel discussed the matter Wednesday with Betty Monkman, the White House curator, and Gary Walters, the chief usher, or executive manager of the White House.
They were reviewing the gifts the Clintons chose to keep after $28,000 worth of items were found on a list of donations the Park Service received for the 1993 White House redecoration project. The Washington Post this week quoted three people who said that they assumed the furnishings they donated for the project would stay in the White House.
“As a result of questions about the status of certain property donated to the White House during the Clinton administration, the National Park Service will accept the return of the property in question and act as a custodian of such property,” according to a statement released by the Park Service, which administers the White House as a unit of the national park system.
A person familiar with the Clintons’ move out of the White House, who spoke on condition of anonymity, would say only: “They’ve been returned.”
Furniture Movers
Clintons take furniture and china from White House! - Saferbrowser Yahoo Search Results
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
WASHINGTON — President Clinton and his wife started shipping White House furniture to the Clintons' newly purchased home in New York more than a year ago, despite questions at the time by the White House chief usher about whether they were entitled to remove the items.
The day before the items were shipped out, chief usher Gary Walters said he questioned whether the Clintons should be taking the furnishings because he believed they were government property donated as part of a White House redecoration project in 1993, during Clinton's first year in office.
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
Our ruling
A viral graphic said that Hillary Clinton was forced to return about $200,000 worth of furniture, artwork and china that she had stolen from the White House. The statement contains several inaccuracies.
The Clintons returned about $48,000 in furniture, and they paid the government about $86,000 for other items. Any way you count it, the $200,000 figure is too high.
According to top ethics lawyers, it’s at least debatable -- and at worst hyperbolic -- to say the Clintons "stole" the items. A congressional investigation found poor tracking of ownership and final disposition of gifts, which makes it hard to speak definitively of wrongdoing. In fact, two items the Clintons returned were ultimately sent back to them. Finally, it’s worth making clear that the "force" they responded to was political pressure, not legal jeopardy.
Accusations of stealing are serious and require a high threshold of evidence, unmet by the charges in this over-the-top graphic.
We rate the claim Mostly False.
DarkFury
Platinum Member
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #25
"Mostly False" that's like NOT ENTIRELY GUILTY.Viral image claims Clintons stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White HouseLol, remember when Hillary took things from the White House when she and Bill left? They took china and all kinds of things that they had to return. Here they are multimillionaires, and they steal from the White House! Incredible!
After they were criticized for taking $190,000 worth of china, flatware, rugs, televisions, sofas and other gifts with them when they left, the Clintons announced last week that they would pay for $86,000 worth of gifts, or nearly half the amount.
Their latest decision to send back $28,000 in gifts brings to $114,000 the value of items the Clintons have either decided to pay for or return.
McDaniel discussed the matter Wednesday with Betty Monkman, the White House curator, and Gary Walters, the chief usher, or executive manager of the White House.
They were reviewing the gifts the Clintons chose to keep after $28,000 worth of items were found on a list of donations the Park Service received for the 1993 White House redecoration project. The Washington Post this week quoted three people who said that they assumed the furnishings they donated for the project would stay in the White House.
“As a result of questions about the status of certain property donated to the White House during the Clinton administration, the National Park Service will accept the return of the property in question and act as a custodian of such property,” according to a statement released by the Park Service, which administers the White House as a unit of the national park system.
A person familiar with the Clintons’ move out of the White House, who spoke on condition of anonymity, would say only: “They’ve been returned.”
Furniture Movers
Clintons take furniture and china from White House! - Saferbrowser Yahoo Search Results
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
WASHINGTON — President Clinton and his wife started shipping White House furniture to the Clintons' newly purchased home in New York more than a year ago, despite questions at the time by the White House chief usher about whether they were entitled to remove the items.
The day before the items were shipped out, chief usher Gary Walters said he questioned whether the Clintons should be taking the furnishings because he believed they were government property donated as part of a White House redecoration project in 1993, during Clinton's first year in office.
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
Our ruling
A viral graphic said that Hillary Clinton was forced to return about $200,000 worth of furniture, artwork and china that she had stolen from the White House. The statement contains several inaccuracies.
The Clintons returned about $48,000 in furniture, and they paid the government about $86,000 for other items. Any way you count it, the $200,000 figure is too high.
According to top ethics lawyers, it’s at least debatable -- and at worst hyperbolic -- to say the Clintons "stole" the items. A congressional investigation found poor tracking of ownership and final disposition of gifts, which makes it hard to speak definitively of wrongdoing. In fact, two items the Clintons returned were ultimately sent back to them. Finally, it’s worth making clear that the "force" they responded to was political pressure, not legal jeopardy.
Accusations of stealing are serious and require a high threshold of evidence, unmet by the charges in this over-the-top graphic.
We rate the claim Mostly False.
Or a "Little Pregnant". See the hole in your argument idiot?
You ADMIT she STOLE but you argue the amount changes things.
A CRIME is committed WHEN something is STOLEN. I DON'T care if its a garbage can alright nitwit? YOU keeping up?
It IS the SAME idiot thinking that gave AWAY free loot zones in Baltimore.
It's the theft NOT the amount.
I believe the NUMBER is set in stone, but how they will vote is up to them...although in reality, these people are party member and usually vote according to the establishment's wishes if they have a choice.Super-delegates aren't set in stone. They weren't in 2008.
oreo
Gold Member
We all know about the theft in Iowa and well the outright BONING Bernie took in New Hampshire. But what about S.C.? How many will she STEAL there and how long before at least SOME of the Sanders supporters start yelling?
This IS a woman who has spent her entire life lying,cheating and stealing. With the WORLDS best and most coveted office before her why stop now? 53 to 47 is NOT a huge win, What's the delegate split going to be?
How long are just average Americans going to watch that party pull its crap so brazen? Hillary may have won the battle {S. Carolina} but IF she resorts to stealing AGAIN? She will have LOST the war.
Our "Elite" party member is now gone and it speaks to OUR honesty.
Yours is in the middle of STEALING. Guess what THAT speaks to?
Fury
Bernie Sanders was never a DEMOCRAT. In fact, he just changed his party status to Democrat to run on this ticket. He went from the Liberty Union party aka Socialist, then switched to Independent, until recently to Democrat.
IOW--Bernie Sanders has NO Democrats supporting him, whom are the Super Delegates. Of course they're going to stay with Hillary Clinton, she's been a Democrat for decades. She is well known and liked among party faithfuls, and they know she can win the White House, They also know Bernie Sanders would get slaughtered in a National Election.
If Bernie Sanders, by some remote miracle won the nomination, here is what to expect on election night.
Just move the blue over to New Hampshire and Vermont, and color the rest of this country RED. This country is center, it always has been, it always will be. It will not elect far left or far right candidates. Much less a candidate that is campaigning on increasing Federal Government spending by 40% and free college tuition, when we're already 19 trillion dollars in red ink.
Reagan v Mondale 1984
Last edited:
read the darn link I gave....it gives plenty of examples of how the process is total confusion, with 6 different agencies handling it..."Mostly False" that's like NOT ENTIRELY GUILTY.Viral image claims Clintons stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White HouseLol, remember when Hillary took things from the White House when she and Bill left? They took china and all kinds of things that they had to return. Here they are multimillionaires, and they steal from the White House! Incredible!
After they were criticized for taking $190,000 worth of china, flatware, rugs, televisions, sofas and other gifts with them when they left, the Clintons announced last week that they would pay for $86,000 worth of gifts, or nearly half the amount.
Their latest decision to send back $28,000 in gifts brings to $114,000 the value of items the Clintons have either decided to pay for or return.
McDaniel discussed the matter Wednesday with Betty Monkman, the White House curator, and Gary Walters, the chief usher, or executive manager of the White House.
They were reviewing the gifts the Clintons chose to keep after $28,000 worth of items were found on a list of donations the Park Service received for the 1993 White House redecoration project. The Washington Post this week quoted three people who said that they assumed the furnishings they donated for the project would stay in the White House.
“As a result of questions about the status of certain property donated to the White House during the Clinton administration, the National Park Service will accept the return of the property in question and act as a custodian of such property,” according to a statement released by the Park Service, which administers the White House as a unit of the national park system.
A person familiar with the Clintons’ move out of the White House, who spoke on condition of anonymity, would say only: “They’ve been returned.”
Furniture Movers
Clintons take furniture and china from White House! - Saferbrowser Yahoo Search Results
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
WASHINGTON — President Clinton and his wife started shipping White House furniture to the Clintons' newly purchased home in New York more than a year ago, despite questions at the time by the White House chief usher about whether they were entitled to remove the items.
The day before the items were shipped out, chief usher Gary Walters said he questioned whether the Clintons should be taking the furnishings because he believed they were government property donated as part of a White House redecoration project in 1993, during Clinton's first year in office.
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
Our ruling
A viral graphic said that Hillary Clinton was forced to return about $200,000 worth of furniture, artwork and china that she had stolen from the White House. The statement contains several inaccuracies.
The Clintons returned about $48,000 in furniture, and they paid the government about $86,000 for other items. Any way you count it, the $200,000 figure is too high.
According to top ethics lawyers, it’s at least debatable -- and at worst hyperbolic -- to say the Clintons "stole" the items. A congressional investigation found poor tracking of ownership and final disposition of gifts, which makes it hard to speak definitively of wrongdoing. In fact, two items the Clintons returned were ultimately sent back to them. Finally, it’s worth making clear that the "force" they responded to was political pressure, not legal jeopardy.
Accusations of stealing are serious and require a high threshold of evidence, unmet by the charges in this over-the-top graphic.
We rate the claim Mostly False.
Or a "Little Pregnant". See the hole in your argument idiot?
You ADMIT she STOLE but you argue the amount changes things.
A CRIME is committed WHEN something is STOLEN. I DON'T care if its a garbage can alright nitwit? YOU keeping up?
It IS the SAME idiot thinking that gave AWAY free loot zones in Baltimore.
It's the theft NOT the amount.
hard to swallow your claim of theft when they gave a list of everything they took and believed was gifted to them...
Federal rules strictly limit gifts for nearly every member of the executive branch, but the exceptions include the president and vice president. They may accept gifts, due to the needs of protocol and etiquette. There are some limits, but for the most part, if you want to show your appreciation for the occupant of the White House, you can. This courtesy extends to the entire first family -- and, importantly for this fact-check, if they want to keep those gifts when they leave, they can.
The Reagans had issues too
As an aside, we’ll note that the problem of gifts to the first family was not a new one.
For instance, the IRS investigated President Ronald Reagan and First Lady Nancy Reagan in 1989. At issue were gowns worth as much as $25,000 and diamond jewelry that had been loaned to Nancy Reagan. A year before, the White House Ethics Office found that the president could accept a $2.5 million home in Bel Air, Calif., purchased on his behalf by undisclosed friends. However, the Reagans ultimately repaid the donors.
DarkFury
Platinum Member
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #29
Oh I am WELL aware Sanders IS a socialist. Its what is going to split the DNC. YOUR party is going socialist win or lose. NOT a matter of "if" just how soon.We all know about the theft in Iowa and well the outright BONING Bernie took in New Hampshire. But what about S.C.? How many will she STEAL there and how long before at least SOME of the Sanders supporters start yelling?
This IS a woman who has spent her entire life lying,cheating and stealing. With the WORLDS best and most coveted office before her why stop now? 53 to 47 is NOT a huge win, What's the delegate split going to be?
How long are just average Americans going to watch that party pull its crap so brazen? Hillary may have won the battle {S. Carolina} but IF she resorts to stealing AGAIN? She will have LOST the war.
Our "Elite" party member is now gone and it speaks to OUR honesty.
Yours is in the middle of STEALING. Guess what THAT speaks to?
Fury
Bernie Sanders was never a DEMOCRAT. In fact, he just changed his party status to Democrat to run on this ticket. He went from the Liberty Union party aka Socialist, then switched to Independent, until recently to Democrat.
IOW--he has NO Democrats supporting him, who are the Super Delegates. Of course they're going to stay with Hillary Clinton, she's been a Democrat for decades. She is well known and liked among party faithfuls, and they know she can win the White House, They also know Bernie Sanders would get slaughtered in a National Election.
If Bernie Sanders, by some remote miracle won the nomination, here is what to expect on election night.
Just move the blue over to New Hampshire and Vermont, and color the rest of this country RED. This country is center, it always has been, it always will be. It will not elect far left or far right candidates. Much less a candidate that is campaigning on increasing Federal Government spending by 40% and free college tuition, when we are already 19 trillion dollars in red ink.
Reagan v Mondale 1984
DarkFury
Platinum Member
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #30
Hillary gave them a list of what she STOLE.read the darn link I gave....it gives plenty of examples of how the process is total confusion, with 6 different agencies handling it..."Mostly False" that's like NOT ENTIRELY GUILTY.Viral image claims Clintons stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White HouseLol, remember when Hillary took things from the White House when she and Bill left? They took china and all kinds of things that they had to return. Here they are multimillionaires, and they steal from the White House! Incredible!
After they were criticized for taking $190,000 worth of china, flatware, rugs, televisions, sofas and other gifts with them when they left, the Clintons announced last week that they would pay for $86,000 worth of gifts, or nearly half the amount.
Their latest decision to send back $28,000 in gifts brings to $114,000 the value of items the Clintons have either decided to pay for or return.
McDaniel discussed the matter Wednesday with Betty Monkman, the White House curator, and Gary Walters, the chief usher, or executive manager of the White House.
They were reviewing the gifts the Clintons chose to keep after $28,000 worth of items were found on a list of donations the Park Service received for the 1993 White House redecoration project. The Washington Post this week quoted three people who said that they assumed the furnishings they donated for the project would stay in the White House.
“As a result of questions about the status of certain property donated to the White House during the Clinton administration, the National Park Service will accept the return of the property in question and act as a custodian of such property,” according to a statement released by the Park Service, which administers the White House as a unit of the national park system.
A person familiar with the Clintons’ move out of the White House, who spoke on condition of anonymity, would say only: “They’ve been returned.”
Furniture Movers
Clintons take furniture and china from White House! - Saferbrowser Yahoo Search Results
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
WASHINGTON — President Clinton and his wife started shipping White House furniture to the Clintons' newly purchased home in New York more than a year ago, despite questions at the time by the White House chief usher about whether they were entitled to remove the items.
The day before the items were shipped out, chief usher Gary Walters said he questioned whether the Clintons should be taking the furnishings because he believed they were government property donated as part of a White House redecoration project in 1993, during Clinton's first year in office.
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
Our ruling
A viral graphic said that Hillary Clinton was forced to return about $200,000 worth of furniture, artwork and china that she had stolen from the White House. The statement contains several inaccuracies.
The Clintons returned about $48,000 in furniture, and they paid the government about $86,000 for other items. Any way you count it, the $200,000 figure is too high.
According to top ethics lawyers, it’s at least debatable -- and at worst hyperbolic -- to say the Clintons "stole" the items. A congressional investigation found poor tracking of ownership and final disposition of gifts, which makes it hard to speak definitively of wrongdoing. In fact, two items the Clintons returned were ultimately sent back to them. Finally, it’s worth making clear that the "force" they responded to was political pressure, not legal jeopardy.
Accusations of stealing are serious and require a high threshold of evidence, unmet by the charges in this over-the-top graphic.
We rate the claim Mostly False.
Or a "Little Pregnant". See the hole in your argument idiot?
You ADMIT she STOLE but you argue the amount changes things.
A CRIME is committed WHEN something is STOLEN. I DON'T care if its a garbage can alright nitwit? YOU keeping up?
It IS the SAME idiot thinking that gave AWAY free loot zones in Baltimore.
It's the theft NOT the amount.
hard to swallow your claim of theft when they gave a list of everything they took and believed was gifted to them...
Federal rules strictly limit gifts for nearly every member of the executive branch, but the exceptions include the president and vice president. They may accept gifts, due to the needs of protocol and etiquette. There are some limits, but for the most part, if you want to show your appreciation for the occupant of the White House, you can. This courtesy extends to the entire first family -- and, importantly for this fact-check, if they want to keep those gifts when they leave, they can.
The Reagans had issues too
As an aside, we’ll note that the problem of gifts to the first family was not a new one.
For instance, the IRS investigated President Ronald Reagan and First Lady Nancy Reagan in 1989. At issue were gowns worth as much as $25,000 and diamond jewelry that had been loaned to Nancy Reagan. A year before, the White House Ethics Office found that the president could accept a $2.5 million home in Bel Air, Calif., purchased on his behalf by undisclosed friends. However, the Reagans ultimately repaid the donors.
You remember the emails right? Who says she listed it all? Her?
The thief?
SmokeALib
Platinum Member
With a steamroller.She should be frisked everytime she leaves someones home or a store...You ever seen White House China?There was $190,000 worth of good taken from the White House. They did not return anything until the National Park Service came into the picture.Lol, remember when Hillary took things from the White House when she and Bill left? They took china and all kinds of things that they had to return. Here they are multimillionaires, and they steal from the White House! Incredible!
After they were criticized for taking $190,000 worth of china, flatware, rugs, televisions, sofas and other gifts with them when they left, the Clintons announced last week that they would pay for $86,000 worth of gifts, or nearly half the amount.
Their latest decision to send back $28,000 in gifts brings to $114,000 the value of items the Clintons have either decided to pay for or return.
McDaniel discussed the matter Wednesday with Betty Monkman, the White House curator, and Gary Walters, the chief usher, or executive manager of the White House.
They were reviewing the gifts the Clintons chose to keep after $28,000 worth of items were found on a list of donations the Park Service received for the 1993 White House redecoration project. The Washington Post this week quoted three people who said that they assumed the furnishings they donated for the project would stay in the White House.
“As a result of questions about the status of certain property donated to the White House during the Clinton administration, the National Park Service will accept the return of the property in question and act as a custodian of such property,” according to a statement released by the Park Service, which administers the White House as a unit of the national park system.
A person familiar with the Clintons’ move out of the White House, who spoke on condition of anonymity, would say only: “They’ve been returned.”
Furniture Movers
Clintons take furniture and china from White House! - Saferbrowser Yahoo Search Results
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
WASHINGTON — President Clinton and his wife started shipping White House furniture to the Clintons' newly purchased home in New York more than a year ago, despite questions at the time by the White House chief usher about whether they were entitled to remove the items.
The day before the items were shipped out, chief usher Gary Walters said he questioned whether the Clintons should be taking the furnishings because he believed they were government property donated as part of a White House redecoration project in 1993, during Clinton's first year in office.
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
Not that facts matter to you RWNJ traitors and liars ...
Clintons Return White House Furniture
Former President Clinton and his wife, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, have sent $28,000 worth of household goods back to Washington after questions arose over whether the items were intended as personal gifts or donations to the White House.
“We have been informed that it is being shipped back, and the National Park Service is ready to receive it, take possession of it and take custody of it,” Jim McDaniel, the National Park Service’s liaison to the White House, said Wednesday.
“The property is being returned to government custody until such time that the issues can be resolved. It may well turn out that that property is rightly the personal property of the Clintons.”
"A person familiar with the Clintons’ move out of the White House, who spoke on condition of anonymity, would say only: “They’ve been returned.”
Clintons take furniture and china from White House! - Saferbrowser Yahoo Search Results
"The Clintons came under strong criticism after disclosing that they were taking with them $190,000 in gifts received over the last eight years. GOP lawmakers and others criticized Hillary Rodham Clinton in particular for accepting many presents just before she joined the Senate and became covered by strict ethics rules that prohibit accepting gifts worth more than $50.
Bowing to such criticism, the Clintons decided Feb. 2 to pay for $86,000 worth of gifts given them in 2000. This week, they agreed to return another set of gifts, including the four items questioned by Walters, and $28,500 more in furnishings identified by the Washington Post this week as having been legally designated as White House property by the National Park Service."
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
How do you "mistake" that as personal property? The markings seem pretty clear to me Jackson. I bet she got her start in life STEALING towels from the motel 6.
Old Rocks
Diamond Member
About as well as his buddies did at the Refuge.Trump gets things done.Word just out. Trump spent 1.78 million for his win.And I would say it WAS resolved, since the government kept the property the Clintons tried to steal!!!!!Lol, remember when Hillary took things from the White House when she and Bill left? They took china and all kinds of things that they had to return. Here they are multimillionaires, and they steal from the White House! Incredible!
Clintons take furniture and china from White House! - Saferbrowser Yahoo Search Results
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
WASHINGTON — President Clinton and his wife started shipping White House furniture to the Clintons' newly purchased home in New York more than a year ago, despite questions at the time by the White House chief usher about whether they were entitled to remove the items.
The day before the items were shipped out, chief usher Gary Walters said he questioned whether the Clintons should be taking the furnishings because he believed they were government property donated as part of a White House redecoration project in 1993, during Clinton's first year in office.
Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
Not that facts matter to you RWNJ traitors and liars ...
Clintons Return White House Furniture
Former President Clinton and his wife, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, have sent $28,000 worth of household goods back to Washington after questions arose over whether the items were intended as personal gifts or donations to the White House.
“We have been informed that it is being shipped back, and the National Park Service is ready to receive it, take possession of it and take custody of it,” Jim McDaniel, the National Park Service’s liaison to the White House, said Wednesday.
“The property is being returned to government custody until such time that the issues can be resolved. It may well turn out that that property is rightly the personal property of the Clintons.”
Hillary spent 12 million to squeak by.
Donald Trump spent less then half FAR LESS then the Gov of that state {SC} did for theirs.
And since Hillary only won a little over 5,000 votes, while Trump won 240,000, I would say that exemplifies the effectiveness of a businessman who does construction vrs a life time politician in terms of bang/buck.
Arizona is pulling at the chain to ELECT Trump.
How's he doing where you live?
paulitician
Platinum Member
- Oct 7, 2011
- 38,401
- 4,162
- 1,130
The Party powers-that-be promised her the nomination this time around. She stuck it out and was loyal to Hussein. Her reward is the nomination. Sanders has no chance. The decision was made a long time ago. It's the way things really work.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 53
- Views
- 393
- Replies
- 146
- Views
- 883
- Replies
- 177
- Views
- 1K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 229
- Views
- 604
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 1
- Replies
- 114
- Views
- 446
- Replies
- 19
- Views
- 145
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8501
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 482
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-