danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #261
that is all you did.You did no such thing. You merely insisted it is. A contract requires consent from all parties to it. I never consented to it.With what? I just "proved it is."I just proved that the Constitution is not a contract.Right wingers don't know what they are talking about.I can't see any posts from danielpalos, because he is an idiot, so I ignored him. But, this is a funny discussion.
When a child is born with an obligation to work for the benefit of other people, we call that child a slave. The Marxists try to sugar coat it and make it sound like a noble responsibility, but the result is the same.
The proponents of communism and its resulting socialist state (yes, it works just the opposite of the way Marx described it) misuse and bastardize the "social contract" theory. Social contract is simply the agreement of individuals (implicitly) to surrender some of their natural freedoms to a government in exchange for that government's protection of their remaining freedoms. That's it.
The Marxists claim that we have surrendered our all of our rights to property to their State, in exchange for (I presume) protection from economic failure. Assuming (but never conceding) that is true, a serious question remains. In the minds of Marxists (or Socialists) have we surrendered our right to revoke our consent?
The so-called "social contract" is bullshit. It's how statists justify their desire to plunder and enslave you.
Our social contract is our federal Constitution for the Union.
You have to abdicate your citizenship and move to an AnCap to avoid paying any taxes. That Power is delegated via the People to our federal Congress by the authority of the social Contract known as our federal Constitution.