Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Public medication plans are starting to happen more and more in the Western world. But here we're talking about employers who already have health plans who don't want to include birth control because they think their invisible friend will disapprove, as though that's the only strike they'd have against them for getting into a non-existant invisible paradise.A lot of people take medications that keep them alive. Where are their advocates to force everyone else to pay for that?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A lot of people take medications that keep them alive. Where are their advocates to force everyone else to pay for that?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why should we pay for a 21 month old preemie who has to spend a year in neonatal ICU and ends up being mentally retarded.
Because the Republicans want it.
Public medication plans are starting to happen more and more in the Western world. But here we're talking about employers who already have health plans who don't want to include birth control because they think their invisible friend will disapprove, as though that's the only strike they'd have against them for getting into a non-existant invisible paradise.A lot of people take medications that keep them alive. Where are their advocates to force everyone else to pay for that?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I hope they have lots of pg women who get paid lots of time off.
A case in point. Some screech that Trump is Hitler. Some of the same also screech that the government should have all the guns. What is wrong with this picture?
It isn't what you are portraying it as.
Hey, guess what, in Nazi Germany, regular folks had SHITLOADS of guns. If you weren't a Jew, you could have all the fucking guns you wanted.
Guns don't stop dictators. Because the dictators have tanks and bombers and lots more guys with guns.
So the argument that we need to have Crazy Steve up there with his bumpstock shooting into a crowd because that might save us from a dictator some day is sort of retarded.
The Jews were the ones who needed the guns. I thought that was obvious.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can you show anywhere that private gun owners were successful against the Nazis?
France, Holland, Belgium, Norway, Poland, USSR, Greece?
Any private gun owner who used them against the Nazis was executed....along with his family and neighbors
A case in point. Some screech that Trump is Hitler. Some of the same also screech that the government should have all the guns. What is wrong with this picture?
It isn't what you are portraying it as.
Hey, guess what, in Nazi Germany, regular folks had SHITLOADS of guns. If you weren't a Jew, you could have all the fucking guns you wanted.
Guns don't stop dictators. Because the dictators have tanks and bombers and lots more guys with guns.
So the argument that we need to have Crazy Steve up there with his bumpstock shooting into a crowd because that might save us from a dictator some day is sort of retarded.
The Jews were the ones who needed the guns. I thought that was obvious.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can you show anywhere that private gun owners were successful against the Nazis?
France, Holland, Belgium, Norway, Poland, USSR, Greece?
Any private gun owner who used them against the Nazis was executed....along with his family and neighbors
Better to simply walk quietly into the gas chambers and ovens?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Because people are refusing things for stupid reasons, like believing in an invisible being who they think disapproves. Employees need to be protected from the whims of retards.Public medication plans are starting to happen more and more in the Western world. But here we're talking about employers who already have health plans who don't want to include birth control because they think their invisible friend will disapprove, as though that's the only strike they'd have against them for getting into a non-existant invisible paradise.A lot of people take medications that keep them alive. Where are their advocates to force everyone else to pay for that?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why should the government have the power to force employers to provide anything at all for their employees? It would be more honest for the government to create a new welfare program and supply it directly. This way just interferes with private contracts.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When our population became 353 million. When it hits 400 maybe birth control will become a requirementThe Trump administration is rolling back the Obama-era requirement that employer-provided health insurance policies cover birth control methods at no cost to women.
According to senior officials with the Department of Health and Human Services, the goal of the new rule is to allow any company or nonprofit group to exclude the coverage for contraception if it has a religious or moral objection.
The change fulfills a promise President Trump made in May to the Catholic religious order The Little Sisters of the Poor in a ceremony in the White House Rose Garden. The nuns had sued the Obama administration over the birth control requirement.
It also sets up a fight between advocates of religious freedom and those of equal rights for women. The American Civil Liberties Union sued the Trump Administration within hours of the rule being published, claiming it violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, which ensures that all people receive equal protection under the law.
Longer-acting contraception, like an intrauterine device, can cost more than $1,000, says Sarah Lipton-Lubet, a vice president at the National Partnership for Women and Families. She says the new rule is a tool for discrimination against women.
"Women shouldn't be denied access to basic health care based on their employers' religious beliefs," she says. "We all have the right to our religious beliefs. But the way that this rule treats religion is really an excuse to discriminate."
In addition to the ACLU, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, and California Attorney General Javier Becerra announced they too plan to file suit opposing the new rule.
Trump Guts Requirement That Employer Health Plans Pay For Birth Control
Maybe some of you leftists can help me out here. How in the world can you say not forcing employers to provide birth control is a violation of equal protection? What's not equal about it? And how is not paying for it "denying access" to birth control? Is there some law that states you can't buy birth control for yourself, and that only your employer can buy it for you?
Who here believes that when the founders wrote the Constitution, that they had forcing employers to provide things for their employees in mind?
No they will kill off the seniors. They want young and healthy to work for them. Aged and disable are no good to them.
/----/ And why is that anyone else's responsibility to pay for her BC pills? What about the guy who is porking her? Where is his responsibility? Libtards don't like to talk about that.But they don't and become single mothers supported by welfare for years... Great job GOP. Who cares about reality, right, dupe?/----/ They can buy BC pills from Walmart RX for about $9 a month.The Trump administration is rolling back the Obama-era requirement that employer-provided health insurance policies cover birth control methods at no cost to women.
According to senior officials with the Department of Health and Human Services, the goal of the new rule is to allow any company or nonprofit group to exclude the coverage for contraception if it has a religious or moral objection.
The change fulfills a promise President Trump made in May to the Catholic religious order The Little Sisters of the Poor in a ceremony in the White House Rose Garden. The nuns had sued the Obama administration over the birth control requirement.
It also sets up a fight between advocates of religious freedom and those of equal rights for women. The American Civil Liberties Union sued the Trump Administration within hours of the rule being published, claiming it violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, which ensures that all people receive equal protection under the law.
Longer-acting contraception, like an intrauterine device, can cost more than $1,000, says Sarah Lipton-Lubet, a vice president at the National Partnership for Women and Families. She says the new rule is a tool for discrimination against women.
"Women shouldn't be denied access to basic health care based on their employers' religious beliefs," she says. "We all have the right to our religious beliefs. But the way that this rule treats religion is really an excuse to discriminate."
In addition to the ACLU, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, and California Attorney General Javier Becerra announced they too plan to file suit opposing the new rule.
Trump Guts Requirement That Employer Health Plans Pay For Birth Control
Maybe some of you leftists can help me out here. How in the world can you say not forcing employers to provide birth control is a violation of equal protection? What's not equal about it? And how is not paying for it "denying access" to birth control? Is there some law that states you can't buy birth control for yourself, and that only your employer can buy it for you?
Who here believes that when the founders wrote the Constitution, that they had forcing employers to provide things for their employees in mind?
Anything to save the greedy idiot brainwashing GOP billionaires from paying their fair share... Welcome to the 21st century...
FDR is who established the salary cap ... Not the GOP.
The business owners are the ones who thought of more ways to compensate employees.
So ... Your comment would be the exact opposite of what happened ...
.
... A person should not have to work at a company just to get health ins.
the laws of humankind that when an egg is fertilized by a sperm a life begins. if it didn't, then women wouldn't be pregnant right? What is a pregnancy?By passing legislation in the liberal media that's how. Its called propaganda, can't muster the support of the American people, can't get actual laws passed, then use propaganda in the schools and media to faux pass it.
I get that. What I don't get is how anybody can file a lawsuit over it. Employers provide (or should be allowed to provide) whatever benefits they desire. No government should force any industry to provide anything but a safe workplace and reasonable demands of an employee.
What's even more disturbing is that some liberal court will actually rule employees have the right to free birth control by their employers.
Who gave the white men in the house, (the GOP) the right to decide when human life begins?
Who gave you the right to murder that life?
Answer the question, who gave white GOP men in the House the right to decide when a life is viable??
No. They can buy their own policy.... A person should not have to work at a company just to get health ins.
They don't have to ...
.
... A person should not have to work at a company just to get health ins.
They don't have to ...
.
The gov did that is who. Sure beats having abortions. I don't want to pay for prostate checks but we do.
when they wrote the constitution , we had single shot muzzle loaders, who said everyone should carry a semi auto pistol.
Want to go back to the writing of the constitution , lets do it.
the laws of humankind that when an egg is fertilized by a sperm a life begins. if it didn't, then women wouldn't be pregnant right? What is a pregnancy?By passing legislation in the liberal media that's how. Its called propaganda, can't muster the support of the American people, can't get actual laws passed, then use propaganda in the schools and media to faux pass it.
I get that. What I don't get is how anybody can file a lawsuit over it. Employers provide (or should be allowed to provide) whatever benefits they desire. No government should force any industry to provide anything but a safe workplace and reasonable demands of an employee.
What's even more disturbing is that some liberal court will actually rule employees have the right to free birth control by their employers.
Who gave the white men in the house, (the GOP) the right to decide when human life begins?
Who gave you the right to murder that life?
Answer the question, who gave white GOP men in the House the right to decide when a life is viable??
No. They can buy their own policy.... A person should not have to work at a company just to get health ins.
They don't have to ...
.
Ask the guys who take viagra. They know.The Trump administration is rolling back the Obama-era requirement that employer-provided health insurance policies cover birth control methods at no cost to women.
According to senior officials with the Department of Health and Human Services, the goal of the new rule is to allow any company or nonprofit group to exclude the coverage for contraception if it has a religious or moral objection.
The change fulfills a promise President Trump made in May to the Catholic religious order The Little Sisters of the Poor in a ceremony in the White House Rose Garden. The nuns had sued the Obama administration over the birth control requirement.
It also sets up a fight between advocates of religious freedom and those of equal rights for women. The American Civil Liberties Union sued the Trump Administration within hours of the rule being published, claiming it violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, which ensures that all people receive equal protection under the law.
Longer-acting contraception, like an intrauterine device, can cost more than $1,000, says Sarah Lipton-Lubet, a vice president at the National Partnership for Women and Families. She says the new rule is a tool for discrimination against women.
"Women shouldn't be denied access to basic health care based on their employers' religious beliefs," she says. "We all have the right to our religious beliefs. But the way that this rule treats religion is really an excuse to discriminate."
In addition to the ACLU, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, and California Attorney General Javier Becerra announced they too plan to file suit opposing the new rule.
Trump Guts Requirement That Employer Health Plans Pay For Birth Control
Maybe some of you leftists can help me out here. How in the world can you say not forcing employers to provide birth control is a violation of equal protection? What's not equal about it? And how is not paying for it "denying access" to birth control? Is there some law that states you can't buy birth control for yourself, and that only your employer can buy it for you?
Who here believes that when the founders wrote the Constitution, that they had forcing employers to provide things for their employees in mind?
/----/ And why is that anyone else's responsibility to pay for her BC pills? What about the guy who is porking her? Where is his responsibility? Libtards don't like to talk about that.But they don't and become single mothers supported by welfare for years... Great job GOP. Who cares about reality, right, dupe?/----/ They can buy BC pills from Walmart RX for about $9 a month.The Trump administration is rolling back the Obama-era requirement that employer-provided health insurance policies cover birth control methods at no cost to women.
According to senior officials with the Department of Health and Human Services, the goal of the new rule is to allow any company or nonprofit group to exclude the coverage for contraception if it has a religious or moral objection.
The change fulfills a promise President Trump made in May to the Catholic religious order The Little Sisters of the Poor in a ceremony in the White House Rose Garden. The nuns had sued the Obama administration over the birth control requirement.
It also sets up a fight between advocates of religious freedom and those of equal rights for women. The American Civil Liberties Union sued the Trump Administration within hours of the rule being published, claiming it violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, which ensures that all people receive equal protection under the law.
Longer-acting contraception, like an intrauterine device, can cost more than $1,000, says Sarah Lipton-Lubet, a vice president at the National Partnership for Women and Families. She says the new rule is a tool for discrimination against women.
"Women shouldn't be denied access to basic health care based on their employers' religious beliefs," she says. "We all have the right to our religious beliefs. But the way that this rule treats religion is really an excuse to discriminate."
In addition to the ACLU, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, and California Attorney General Javier Becerra announced they too plan to file suit opposing the new rule.
Trump Guts Requirement That Employer Health Plans Pay For Birth Control
Maybe some of you leftists can help me out here. How in the world can you say not forcing employers to provide birth control is a violation of equal protection? What's not equal about it? And how is not paying for it "denying access" to birth control? Is there some law that states you can't buy birth control for yourself, and that only your employer can buy it for you?
Who here believes that when the founders wrote the Constitution, that they had forcing employers to provide things for their employees in mind?
It's amazing to me that the same people who complain about the abortion rate, would also deny women access to birth control.
Birth control is a basic health need for women of child bearing age, unless they want a dozen children. If my health insurance is part of my salary package, it damn well better have birth control as part of that package, because my employer has no right to tell me what I do with my body.
This is discrimination against female workers. Especially when you consider that men are having their Viagara covered.
